The dominant ideology in the western nations is built around multi-racialism or anti-racism and is a variant of Nazism. The motive is to push “whites” out of their communities and it is done by deceit and against democratic principles or rule of law.
the western reaction to Nazi thinking was meant to be a return to Enlightenment values but in his paper to the UNESCO 1951 conference in London Claude Levi-Strauss claimed the differences between races were because of "accidents of hstory, geography
More than 50 million African workers are being brought to Europe in a secret immigration agreement. This is the most evil plan against humanity hatched in Europe since the Nazis herded Jewish people into the gas chambers and the Soviets starved 5 million Kulaks and is likewise meant to destroy a people: the whole of western Europe and her people and has been implemented by the evil E.U.
This ideology is totalitarian with only one viewpoint allowed. It is very intolerant of any complaint about the cruelty and injustice of it and brands dissidents as “haters”, “bigots, “fascists” or “Nazis.” It is implemented by deceit and often in secret.
A “job centre” funded by money confiscated from tax-payers has been opened in Mali and was the beginning of “free movement of people in Africa and the EU”. The report is from the EU statistical agency Eurostat. It rationalises that vast numbers of migrants could be needed to meet the shortfall in two years if Europe is to have a hope of funding the pension and health needs of its growing elderly population.
EU economists is Britain and other EU states will “need” 56 million immigrant workers between them by 2050 to make up for the “demographic decline” due to falling birth rates and rising death rates across Europe. That is a lie!
If the Civil Service Pensions and in particular parliamentary pensions were scaled down to sensible levels more in line with every other pensioner receiving a pension from HM Government there would be greater equality after retirement.
People are paid for doing a job while they are doing it. But I don’t see why the taxpayer should be required to fund a pension which equates to a job when they have left. I know the private sector do that but that is private and driven by profits. It is entirely different.
Moreover, If we were not transferring billions of pounds in Aid to elites in the Third World, and billions as UK subscriptions to the UN and the EU, we might well be able to give our people a better pension.
The report for the EU, is by Moroccan-born French MEP Francoise Castex, who wants immigrants to be given legal rights and access to social welfare provision such as benefits. “Having sufficient people of working age is vital for the economy and for tax revenue.”
What they really mean is they want to destroy Europe and the people. Ms Castex said: “It is urgent that member states have a calm approach to immigration. To say ‘yes’, we need immigration … it is not a new development, we must accept it.” To ensure cheap labour for the elites.
The Portugal declaration urges the EU to assist African governments in setting up migration information centres “to better manage labour mobility between Africa and the EU”.The first job centre was opened in Bamako, capital of Mali, on Monday the 6th of October. More centres are to open soon in other west African states then in north Africa.
The media provide the justification by blaming us and people start to blame themselves. We are ruled by being made to feel ashamed of ourselves. The photograph illustrating this report shows a cue of Africans in western dress presumably waiting to come here.(1)
These immigrant African people are prepared for immigration with clothes and language lessons by The British Council. African lawyer Dele Oguntimojou wrote: ”(you) do not know how the youth in the poor African village is being seduced by lush advertising to shed his native dress for blue jeans; to retune his ears from the traditional hi-life to the drum and bass of hip-hop and Brit pop. Even now the British Council is busy across Africa training the next generation of immigrants in the language of the destination country.”(2)
There was an expose in November 2006 that the Government were advertising for immigrants in a Foreign Office pamphlet distributed from Embassies around the world. 'Multicultural Britain - A Land Of Immigrants' encourages immigrants to come here because of the Human Rights Act which gives them privileges over natives and well-paid jobs. Illustrated with photos of smiling non-whites, it is an invitation to people to immigrate here. (3)
Home Office minister Beverley Hughes was found to be approving visa claims from eastern Europe despite warnings they were using forged documents. She only resigned when she found a letter sent to her on 4 March last year by a junior Home Office minister, Mr Ainsworth, alerting her to potential immigration frauds.
There were also allegations about abuse of the European Community Association Agreement (ECAA) which had already been raised by James Cameron, the British consul in Romania who blew the gaff. Ms Hughes told BBC Two's Newsnight that Mr Cameron's claims were the first she knew of the alleged "scam". But it is now clear she sent letters in March and April 2003 in reply to Mr Ainsworth's concerns.
Here is an insight. Lin Homer was chief executive of Birmingham city council and presided over what investigator, Judge Mawrey, called "massive, systematic and organised fraud" in an election campaign. It made a mockery of the election and he ruled that not less than 1,500 votes had been cast fraudulently in the city. He the comments after he upheld allegations of postal fraud relating to six seats won by Labour in the June 2004 ballot. For this she was promoted to chief of the Immigration and Nationality Directorate.(4)
An excuse is "The Home Office is a shambles." Why so? How come politicians do well in other jobs but fail as Home Secretaries? The Home Office is brilliantly succesful: it has been infiltrating immigrants into the country without people realising for years! But as usual the ideologues have no practical grasp and think only of the utopia of a multi racial world and cheap labour for themselves and the corporations.
Hitler changed the concept of Lebensraum from colonisation to enlargement within Europe. “For it is not in colonial acquisitions that we must see the solution of this problem, but exclusively in the acquisition of a territory for settlement, which will enhance the area of the mother country, and hence not only keep the new settlers in the most intimate community with the land of their origin, but secure for the total area those advantages which lie in its unified magnitude.” (5) He added a racial bias to Lebensraum and claimed that the Soviet Union was run by Jews so Germany had a right to take Russian land in search of a unity between the German Volk and the land, Blood and Soil.
In a speech and interview with The Brussells Journal, Vladimir Bukovsky, the Russian dissident, who spent twelve years in Soviet psychiatric units, told of documents from secret Soviet files which he was allowed to study in 1992 as a reward for helping leader Boris Yeltsin. These documents confirm a “conspiracy” to turn the European Union into a socialist state and those who oppose further European integration will be regarded as xenophobes. I think Patricia Hewitt said this publicly” (6)
I would add to his otherwise accurate analysis, that when it comes to race, the dominant western ideology is a variant of Nazism. The importation of immigrants to enrich us, make us more vibrant etc is a form of Lebensraum. It began as an understandable reaction to the barbarity of Hitler’s Nazis but has now itself become a cruel, tyranny.
The Nuremberg Trials exposed genocidal practices and prompted official policies of medical ethics and the 1950 UNESCO statement on race. Scientific societies made similar statements on "race " and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, was a response to abuses during the Second World War. It was adopted by the United Nations in 1948. It proclaimed: "Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family." This was extended in the 1978 UNESCO declaration on race and racial prejudice - the fundamental equality of all human beings is the ideal toward which ethics and science should converge but in practice racial theories are still used to justify improving the racial stock. In his three-part television series ”Mongrel nation” in June 2003, the Lebanese-born comedian Edie Izzard, claimed that Mongrel dogs are cleverer than pedigree dogs. This metaphor suggested that mongrel people are as a master race, genetically superior to the rest!
The definition of racism in the Macpherson report: “Racism in general terms consists of conduct, words or practices which disadvantage or advantage people because of their colour, culture or ethnic origin.”(Para, 6.4) Our rulers are discriminating against us because we are white! Where Hitler had proposed a “thousand –year Reich” inhabited by a “Master Race” of Pure Aryans, the inverted Multi-Racial idea is a perfect world made up of a new type of person: the Coffee-Coloured person.
Totalitarianism and oppression into the British legal system with the Commission for Racial Equality, in the 1976 Race Relations Act, of Home Secretary Roy Jenkins. His biographer, John Campbell (Weidenfield & Nicolson.1983) revealed, he believed: “That immigration was good for Britain and if people resisted they should be socially engineered into accepting it". Commonwealth immigrants like previous waves of immigrants from the Norman Conquest, to the refugees of the 30’s, could help overcome “our natural Island lethargy”. Roy Jenkins is probably the most evil British politician who ever lived.
This was the first time that Race had been used in British law and is similar to the Nazi race laws which compelled Jewish people to register their property and "Aryanized" Jewish businesses which replaced Jewish employees and ownership was taken by by Germans who bought them cheap.. Jewish doctors were forbidden to treat non-Jews, and Jewish lawyers were not permitted to practice law.
A similar law is being introduced by Harriet Harman, the Minister for Women. This so-called “Equality Law” is to stop white men getting jobs and to allow employers to give ethnic minority and female candidates preferential treatment. The “doublespeak” is “positive action" and prevents applicants with better job credentials getting the job if they are the wrong sex or race.(7)
People in Nazi Germany had to carry an identity cards, but Jews had special identifying marks: a red "J" stamped on them and new middle names for those who did not have obviously "Jewish" first names: "Israel" for males, "Sara" for females. The cards allowed the police to identify Jews easily.
The Daily Mail of 26th September reported on our new EU I.D.Cards. The Home Secretary claims “the cards would protect against identity fraud, illegal working, and help people prove their identity easily” but like the Nazi I.D.Cards foreigners will not have to show them to get a job or use the NHS and schools. The cards are covered in EU lettering and an EU symbol of a bull.
We have racial lists kept to ensure preferential treatment for other ethnic groups cynically known as equal Opportunities monitoring forms which help people give priority to other ethnic groups.
The term “Racist” is not descriptive but inhibitive. It is to cow us while our society is transformed from a natural society to a Multi-Racial state. After the Second World War Nazi and Fascist were more coercive, but as the war receded Racist became more effective as it was universally pejorative and not restricted to old-fashioned ideologies. It is corporate elites who want cheap labour imported as well as outsourcing and they operate within the “tender idealism” pushed by politicians.
Racial theories on improving the racial stock are used to justify immigration. In the second reading of the Commonwealth immigrants Bill (16/11/1961, Lord Royle said, “wouldn’t we be better off with a dash of darker blood?” The multi-racialist Fenner Brockway(later Lord) wrote glowingly of mixed race people which is similar reverence as Nazis had for pure Aryans, “Fifty years ago I read a book by Sir Sidney Olivier, who had been Governer of Jamaica, recording what splendid human specimens, physically and mentally, were the progeny of mixed marriages on that island. Many of us who know the sons and daughters of mixed marriages will bear out this judgement.” (8)
The group Hitler valued us, is the pariah, whereas the groups he persecuted are privileged. It is social engineering to give power to ethnics and displace whites. The Independent 21 April 2004 reported that “British school-leavers could be denied places leading universities for overseas students. Oxford University is to increase the number of overseas undergraduates, who pay higher fees, while freezing the total number of undergraduate places, thus cutting the number of places available to UK school-leavers.”
The large corporations expect their “diverse” work force to be loyal not to country but the company. This goes well with free markets, which have always been Utopian and supra national.
Racial Awareness Training is a method of brainwashing that local councils send their employers, employees and decision makers on to be conditioned in correct thinking: “to challenge individual prejudices and values and change them”. It stemmed from the ideas of the American Judith Katz who held that “racism is inherent in whites”.
There were examples in the USA of blonde haired people, usually women, being racially abused until they broke down and sobbed. The fact that it was done to blondes shows that we are victims of racism in the guise of anti-racism.
The “Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain’s”(Runnymede Trust 2002) Parekh Report We are told the way forward is for the ”United Kingdom to formally declare itself to be a multi-cultural society” page xxi. (9)
We are inducted into our culture, community and our history and traditions, quite naturally, as we grow up. The abstract method though, requires a sort of schoolbook learning process as in the republican “Citizenship classes” which are supposed to make all foreigners British.
This process only acts on the surface, on the conscious minds of the pupils, whereas our natural traditional way imbues the very nature of the person as it is slowly internalised into the deep unconscious mind as a uniting bond. The totalitarian method advocated by Parekh has to be
forced by brainwashing and politicised police. At the same time the immigrants are allowed to perpetuate the divisions by inducting their own children into their own traditions. They are exempt from Multi-Racialism!
The police are being turned into a race-gestapo. Judge Mapherson began his investigation into the murder of Stephen Lawrence prejudiced against the police. With his mind already made up he used British law as social engineering to mould the police into an anti-racist thought force.
They know what we should think, from the start and the idea is not for fair and open enquiry to ascertain the facts of a case but to reach the right conclusion. This added more totalitarianism to law: Recommendation 12 states,” A racist incident is any incident, which is perceived to be racist by the victim, or any other person. Recommendation 13 adds, “That the term “racist incident” must be understood to include crimes and non-crimes in policing terms. Both must be investigated with equal commitment”. Now we can be investigated for committing non-crimes.
There are purges on the police as former chief of the Metropolitan police, Sir John Stevens introduced planted informers into police training classes to spy for and report on “racist” officers. An interim report into police handling of their own racism, which was established in 2004 after a television documentary, The Secret Policeman, showed racism at a police training centre in Warrington.
The report was produced by a panel led by Sir David Calvert-Smith, a former director of public prosecutions who, like Macpherson began from prejudice not an open mind.
The “enquiry” apparently looked at internal police attitudes to race, including monitoring of race policies and training, recruitment and grievance procedures, rather than operational policing. Like Macpherson this panel had decided the outcome before they started.
Smith admitted that his team had decided before they started that police racism was a "major" problem. It was "commonly accepted", he said, and reinforced by The Secret Policeman, that "racism is still a major problem within the service. We have not set out to prove that it exists. We have taken it as a given".(10) This is discrimination against “white” police officers.
The labelling of innocent people as “racists”, “bigots”, “haters” etc is dehumanisation setting us up for persecution for not conforming to establishment diktats. It is pure totalitarian thinking straight from Nazi Germany if any speak out against being dispossessed they are persecuted by the state.
No man survives when freedom fails,
The best men rot in filthy jails,
And those who cry 'appease, appease'
Are hanged by those they tried to please.
(1) http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/6562....workers-into-EU
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fabric/maliprof.htm; http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/6532....o-more-migrants http://appablog.wordpress.com/2008/09/15/inauguration-of-the-
migration-information-and-management-centre-cigem-in-bamako-mali-monday-6-october-2008/
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/thi....-uk-472164.html
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23385319-details/Bosses+choosing+committed+foreign+workers+over+'lazy+British',+says+CBI/article.do
(2)Salisbury Review. Spring 2003. Vol 21. No3. (www.salisbury-review.co.uk)
http://www.britishcouncil.org/new/
(3) http://ukinnl.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/pdf/3190535/insight-uk-ethnic-diversity
(4)http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3589131.stm; http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/2006/09/the_great_immigration_scandal.html;
The Great Immigration Scandal by Steve Moxon
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4613997.stm
(5) Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1971)pp 646, 655
(6) http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/865/print
(7) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7474801.stm
http://www.lg-em.gov.uk/pp/gold/viewGold.asp?IDType=Page&ID=18233
(8) Immigration: what is the answer? (RKP.1965) pp83,84 Fenner Brockway and Norman Pannell
(9) http://www.hrmguide.co.uk/diversity/parekh_report.htm ; http://erc21.blogspot.com/2005/10/parekh-report-2.html
http://www.aml.org.uk/_islamophobia.php
(10) http://news.bbc.co.uk/vote2001/hi/englis....000/1190971.stm
http://83.137.212.42/sitearchive/cre/downloads/PoliceFI_interim.pdf
Monday, 5 January 2009
Friday, 26 December 2008
Book Review
English Witness to their darkest hour
by P Scrivener
Athelney £10.94. pp174
ISBN9781903313046
http://www.athelney.org/
English witness to their darkest hour is a compendium of experiences and insights from ordinary people and some honourable commentators in the media who speak for them.
It is not so much controversial as shocking: but not shocking in the conventional sense of, say, porn on TV, but the revelation of a situation that is not officially recognised - the move to an oppressive, totalitarian state and what that means to people in practice.
Many innocent readers will be moved to sadness and despair by the impact of so many examples of injustice and official cruelty. The oppressors, the elites, are based not on birth, blood or land but expressing the correct ideological thoughts and any who say the wrong thing have their career publicly destroyed like genome scientist James Watson or the unsophisticated media creation Jade Goody in a media show trial as they are driven out of the elite and publicly to keep others in line. Their attitude grows out of prejudice against the English and in favour of ethnic minorities.
The English are usually accused of perpetrating evils like colonialism, racism, imperialism on other people but author Pat Scrivener shows with examples that that is what the authorities are doing to the English. The book is permeated with a sense of anxiety for the future, of not being allowed to speak against the abuses by the authorities. This book has to speak for itself as no mere description would give the real sense of it. There is no appropriate genre for contemporary revelation.
From the Author’s note the pervading sense of fear in the country is revealed. Her daughter, ”then ten, begged me not to write this book. She did not want to lose me to Labour’s racist regime” and this sets the tone for an Orwellian journey. How did it start?
The late Lord Deramore writes in the foreword that in 1945 with the election of Atlee we got our first statist government: “...in 1911, we were ruled by a democratic Government elected by a smaller franchise, today we have an autocratic government elected by a much larger franchise.”
Leading newspaper columnists like Richard Littlejohn: ”From day one - or Year Zero as I christened it in the Mail back in 1997 - Labour has set out to destroy England as we knew it.
While the Welsh and the Scots have been given their own parliaments and the IRA encouraged to take over Northern Ireland, the English have been subjugated, abused and ignored.
Mass immigration - legal and illegal - has transformed parts of England into foreign countries. State control as often is accompanied by lawlessness. In the chapter on Violent Crime Theodore Dalrymple tells how “surgeons” at the hospital he worked at “grow experienced in the treatment of gunshot wounds, when a few years ago they had no experience at all” and Peter Hitchins : “How much longer are the British going to put up with the way they are being ignored by those who claim to be in charge of the country? ...crime and disorder are out of control. But the safe, wealthy elite scornfully dismiss people such as me as alarmists”. He has had letters from people all over the country who are “baffled, afraid, dispirited and angry.” This book is part of ceasing to put up with it.
Labour MP Frank Field compares it with Stalin's forced migration in the Ukraine. Entire neighborhoods are being ethnically cleansed - and it's the English who are getting out of town.”
There are quotes from English people who are so broken down by the ruling elites that they guiltily explain they are not racist even when they are the victims of assault.
They have learnt from experience how dishonest are the media who promote the ideology that English people are racist while ethnic minorities are victims: a Daily Telegraph report of a woman who had been assaulted by Black schoolgirls on a bus and had a bone knocked through the skin of an arm. The paper commented: ”She maintains she is not a racist.” An anonymous remark from a TV documentary on “hate crime” from March 2001: “It portrayed racism as a purely White on Black activity. The subtle way the camera kept panning to a flag of St.George - which could have been in any innocent setting or one set up for the programme - forced a connection between racism and the flag.”
On oppression we hear from “Steve” “I find myself waiting in long queues in the post office to watch with amazement as asylum seekers and immigrants get their own counter. I see discrimination justified by liberals and lefties who believe special interest groups for ethnics are not divisive but also necessary, but if one suggests a special interest for whites its classed as racist or imperialist.”
This highlights the underlying difficulty. The elites are prejudiced against us and in favour of the ”ethnics” and this is how it translates into practice.
A dangerous side to this is highlighted in “National Security.” Phillip Johnston wrote in the Daily Telegraph after 9/11" Britain not only lets in people who supports terrorists but also often thwarted efforts to extradite suspected terrorists. More than half a dozen governments had filed protests with the Foreign Office about their presence...Egypt denounced Britain for” protecting killers.”
Former Conservative transport Minister with responsibility for the Channel Tunnel, Sir David Mitchell:” I’m at a loss to understand why the government doesn’t take effective action to stop illegal immigrants using the chunnel”.
The UK frontier is effectively at Calais he explained ...It’s a dereliction of duty to exercise immigration controls at the front door of the tunnel but and turn a blind eye to those who walk in by the side door.” They don’t want to. They are surrendering us to Eurabia.
Under Conquest and Imperialism Phillip Seddon writes” There can be few worse punishments for the young than to be taught to despise their own heritage, or at best that it is only one of many equal options. Herein also lies the poor performance of Luton as a whole in nation-wide school league tables...” This was from “The Popular Press” as many are from internet groups so this recognition of the real situation is spreading. It is easy to see why they want to get the internet under their control.
An exemplar of the chapter on Oppression is Jim of an internet newsgroup: “A man in Portsmouth was fined for remonstrating with Muslims who were openly celebrating the anniversary of 9/22. If he had not changed his plea to guilty to race hatred he was told he could got to jail. This man could not speak the truth.”
The editor adds an infamous example from Liverpool in 1999 when a 78 year-old was arrested and charged with criminal damage for posting UKIP posters and writing “Don’t forget the 1945 war” and “Free speech for England.” Because he had referred to England it was classed as “racially aggravated.”
These are the shocking cases reported in the media and so devoid of common sense they are described as “Political Correctness gone mad.” What P. Scrivener has done is take what whites are accused of doing to ethnic minorities and show that in reality the authorities are doing it to the English. This book heralds a re-learning curve.
A big shock is the penultimate chapter that deals with, wait for it, the genocide of the English! Dr. Anthony Daniels:”One obvious explanation (of the increase in TB in the Western world) makes officials uneasy that there has been a virtual conspiracy of silence about it.
The explanation is the vast population movement from areas of high prevalence of the disease such as Africa and Asia, to areas of much lower prevalence , such as Western Europe and North America.” An explanation from a TB in March 2003. “...includes the deliberate importation of diseases by refusing to screen incomers, which kill members of the British Community, such as AIDS/HIV, hepatitus, TB, etc. It also includes the deliberate importation of individuals from communities which have a higher violent crime rate than the British Community, thus increasing the death rate among the British.”
Mog states: "Just look at the abortion business. Killing English babies and then complaining we are under-populated and need to import immigrants. I really see something sinister.”
The sense of injustice people feel is here. Gayle Hall had a letter in the Sunday Telegraph "I was deeply upset to read about asylum seekers receiving fertility treatment on the NHS. As a British citizen and taxpayer , I was refused treatment as my local authority refused to pay".
The final chapter brings us back down with who is to blame. Like most reasonable people she finds culpability with the dominant ideological elites who act against the interests of the English not the immigrants who are behaving naturally in looking after their own interests.
But this eclectic and electric book details the reality. The Utopian project requires everything to be used as propaganda, social engineering and legal coercion as people have to be moulded or coerced into the future state - the basis of the totalitarian regimes of the last century as seen in Soviet Russia, Mao's China, Nazi Germany and Cambodia under Pol Pot.
This entails discrimination in favouror ethnics and discrimination against the English in their own country by their elected representatives. This will shock many who are not aware of what is happening because media propaganda has confused them.
by P Scrivener
Athelney £10.94. pp174
ISBN9781903313046
http://www.athelney.org/
English witness to their darkest hour is a compendium of experiences and insights from ordinary people and some honourable commentators in the media who speak for them.
It is not so much controversial as shocking: but not shocking in the conventional sense of, say, porn on TV, but the revelation of a situation that is not officially recognised - the move to an oppressive, totalitarian state and what that means to people in practice.
Many innocent readers will be moved to sadness and despair by the impact of so many examples of injustice and official cruelty. The oppressors, the elites, are based not on birth, blood or land but expressing the correct ideological thoughts and any who say the wrong thing have their career publicly destroyed like genome scientist James Watson or the unsophisticated media creation Jade Goody in a media show trial as they are driven out of the elite and publicly to keep others in line. Their attitude grows out of prejudice against the English and in favour of ethnic minorities.
The English are usually accused of perpetrating evils like colonialism, racism, imperialism on other people but author Pat Scrivener shows with examples that that is what the authorities are doing to the English. The book is permeated with a sense of anxiety for the future, of not being allowed to speak against the abuses by the authorities. This book has to speak for itself as no mere description would give the real sense of it. There is no appropriate genre for contemporary revelation.
From the Author’s note the pervading sense of fear in the country is revealed. Her daughter, ”then ten, begged me not to write this book. She did not want to lose me to Labour’s racist regime” and this sets the tone for an Orwellian journey. How did it start?
The late Lord Deramore writes in the foreword that in 1945 with the election of Atlee we got our first statist government: “...in 1911, we were ruled by a democratic Government elected by a smaller franchise, today we have an autocratic government elected by a much larger franchise.”
Leading newspaper columnists like Richard Littlejohn: ”From day one - or Year Zero as I christened it in the Mail back in 1997 - Labour has set out to destroy England as we knew it.
While the Welsh and the Scots have been given their own parliaments and the IRA encouraged to take over Northern Ireland, the English have been subjugated, abused and ignored.
Mass immigration - legal and illegal - has transformed parts of England into foreign countries. State control as often is accompanied by lawlessness. In the chapter on Violent Crime Theodore Dalrymple tells how “surgeons” at the hospital he worked at “grow experienced in the treatment of gunshot wounds, when a few years ago they had no experience at all” and Peter Hitchins : “How much longer are the British going to put up with the way they are being ignored by those who claim to be in charge of the country? ...crime and disorder are out of control. But the safe, wealthy elite scornfully dismiss people such as me as alarmists”. He has had letters from people all over the country who are “baffled, afraid, dispirited and angry.” This book is part of ceasing to put up with it.
Labour MP Frank Field compares it with Stalin's forced migration in the Ukraine. Entire neighborhoods are being ethnically cleansed - and it's the English who are getting out of town.”
There are quotes from English people who are so broken down by the ruling elites that they guiltily explain they are not racist even when they are the victims of assault.
They have learnt from experience how dishonest are the media who promote the ideology that English people are racist while ethnic minorities are victims: a Daily Telegraph report of a woman who had been assaulted by Black schoolgirls on a bus and had a bone knocked through the skin of an arm. The paper commented: ”She maintains she is not a racist.” An anonymous remark from a TV documentary on “hate crime” from March 2001: “It portrayed racism as a purely White on Black activity. The subtle way the camera kept panning to a flag of St.George - which could have been in any innocent setting or one set up for the programme - forced a connection between racism and the flag.”
On oppression we hear from “Steve” “I find myself waiting in long queues in the post office to watch with amazement as asylum seekers and immigrants get their own counter. I see discrimination justified by liberals and lefties who believe special interest groups for ethnics are not divisive but also necessary, but if one suggests a special interest for whites its classed as racist or imperialist.”
This highlights the underlying difficulty. The elites are prejudiced against us and in favour of the ”ethnics” and this is how it translates into practice.
A dangerous side to this is highlighted in “National Security.” Phillip Johnston wrote in the Daily Telegraph after 9/11" Britain not only lets in people who supports terrorists but also often thwarted efforts to extradite suspected terrorists. More than half a dozen governments had filed protests with the Foreign Office about their presence...Egypt denounced Britain for” protecting killers.”
Former Conservative transport Minister with responsibility for the Channel Tunnel, Sir David Mitchell:” I’m at a loss to understand why the government doesn’t take effective action to stop illegal immigrants using the chunnel”.
The UK frontier is effectively at Calais he explained ...It’s a dereliction of duty to exercise immigration controls at the front door of the tunnel but and turn a blind eye to those who walk in by the side door.” They don’t want to. They are surrendering us to Eurabia.
Under Conquest and Imperialism Phillip Seddon writes” There can be few worse punishments for the young than to be taught to despise their own heritage, or at best that it is only one of many equal options. Herein also lies the poor performance of Luton as a whole in nation-wide school league tables...” This was from “The Popular Press” as many are from internet groups so this recognition of the real situation is spreading. It is easy to see why they want to get the internet under their control.
An exemplar of the chapter on Oppression is Jim of an internet newsgroup: “A man in Portsmouth was fined for remonstrating with Muslims who were openly celebrating the anniversary of 9/22. If he had not changed his plea to guilty to race hatred he was told he could got to jail. This man could not speak the truth.”
The editor adds an infamous example from Liverpool in 1999 when a 78 year-old was arrested and charged with criminal damage for posting UKIP posters and writing “Don’t forget the 1945 war” and “Free speech for England.” Because he had referred to England it was classed as “racially aggravated.”
These are the shocking cases reported in the media and so devoid of common sense they are described as “Political Correctness gone mad.” What P. Scrivener has done is take what whites are accused of doing to ethnic minorities and show that in reality the authorities are doing it to the English. This book heralds a re-learning curve.
A big shock is the penultimate chapter that deals with, wait for it, the genocide of the English! Dr. Anthony Daniels:”One obvious explanation (of the increase in TB in the Western world) makes officials uneasy that there has been a virtual conspiracy of silence about it.
The explanation is the vast population movement from areas of high prevalence of the disease such as Africa and Asia, to areas of much lower prevalence , such as Western Europe and North America.” An explanation from a TB in March 2003. “...includes the deliberate importation of diseases by refusing to screen incomers, which kill members of the British Community, such as AIDS/HIV, hepatitus, TB, etc. It also includes the deliberate importation of individuals from communities which have a higher violent crime rate than the British Community, thus increasing the death rate among the British.”
Mog states: "Just look at the abortion business. Killing English babies and then complaining we are under-populated and need to import immigrants. I really see something sinister.”
The sense of injustice people feel is here. Gayle Hall had a letter in the Sunday Telegraph "I was deeply upset to read about asylum seekers receiving fertility treatment on the NHS. As a British citizen and taxpayer , I was refused treatment as my local authority refused to pay".
The final chapter brings us back down with who is to blame. Like most reasonable people she finds culpability with the dominant ideological elites who act against the interests of the English not the immigrants who are behaving naturally in looking after their own interests.
But this eclectic and electric book details the reality. The Utopian project requires everything to be used as propaganda, social engineering and legal coercion as people have to be moulded or coerced into the future state - the basis of the totalitarian regimes of the last century as seen in Soviet Russia, Mao's China, Nazi Germany and Cambodia under Pol Pot.
This entails discrimination in favouror ethnics and discrimination against the English in their own country by their elected representatives. This will shock many who are not aware of what is happening because media propaganda has confused them.
Monday, 8 December 2008
Police Torture a Political Prisoner
On 18 November 2008 a copy of a BNP members list was published on the internet, and thus began a train of events that is destined to be one of history’s turning points. It revealed to a trusting public what the authorities are really like. These decent people who are supposed to be looking after our interests now stand exposed as totalitarians who will do anything, however oppressive and tyrannical, to silence dissent.
Innocent members of the public will be surprised at how oppressed the British people are unless they remain quiescent and only do permitted activities like watch telly, support sports teams and go to bars. If they dare speak out or campaign against certain injustices they will be persecuted and even brutalised.
There are many in this country who sincerely believe in freedom and democracy. They frequently gravitate towards the easily-occupied “moral high ground” of condemning racism by whites. But they rarely comprehend that a totalitarian, undemocratic structure has been created to oppress whites. Do they ever stop to think that in the home of the Mother of Parliaments, the Rule of Law and representative democracy the police would torture a political prisoner?
There was even a thinly-veiled incitement to violence from the established media. On 20/11/2008 Mirror columnist Brian Reade wrote, under a picture of Nick Griffin, and in mock-worried tones:-
I’m worried about the 12,000 BNP members whose names and addresses have been leaked on the internet. I pray their details don’t fall into the hands of any of those black radical groups known to take a very dim view of white neo-Nazis. It would be truly awful if anything nasty happened to these nice people wouldn’t it?
In part his wish was realised. In Cheltenham, widow Natalia Colthurst received six threatening calls in which she was asked her name and why she supports the BNP. The caller warned, “We know where you live”. The 72-year-old, who lives in Whaddon Road, was advised by bereavement councillors to join social groups when her husband died in 2006. The former language teacher said after two BNP meetings early last year, she and her elderly friend realised it wasn’t for them and broke with the party.
The house of George and June Papps on Lysons Avenue, Gloucester, was vandalised, with graffiti saying “BNP Scum”, scrawled on a wall. The couple, aged 79 and 77, are both recovering from cancer and said they were singled-out because their son, who has moved away, is a member.
Another eye-opener for trusting members of the public is British bobbies torturing a political prisoner, BNP member Andrew Tierney. He was one of thirteen BNP activists arrested by Merseyside police, from whom fingerprints and DNA were taken to be added to the National Database. The media have not covered this but from the BNP‘s own website and from personal interviews I discovered the reality of what happened.
The victim related: “They then somehow applied a tremendous pressure behind my ears, inflicting great pain. They then pulled my head back so far that my windpipe was restricted, and while I was gasping for air, applied pressure to the front of my neck as well,” he said. Nearly collapsing from the pain and lack of oxygen, he was then unable to prevent the policemen from taking his fingerprints. They put a deep gash in his forehead in the process.
“Next they grabbed hold of my nose, and once again somehow applied the most penetrating pressure to the back of my neck, forcing my mouth open to take a DNA swab,” he continued.
The episode lasted at least a quarter of an hour, and the victim was left shaken and in pain. Photographs taken shortly afterwards clearly showed bleeding from wounds sustained behind both his ears. They applied some kind of pressure to his arms and his side, once again leaving considerable bruising, evidenced again by photographs taken shortly after his release.
This is similar to how the Americans torture political prisoners at Guantanamo Bay:-
“The military police inflicted so much pain, Mr Aamer said he thought he was going to die. The MPs pressed on pressure points all over his body: his temples, just under his jawline, in the hollow beneath his ears. They choked him. They bent his nose so hard he thought it would break.”
Here is a technical analysis of what they did to the political prisoner in Liverpool: they were applying pressure to the transverse processes of the first cervical vertebra. It’s taught as a pressure point in both Karate and Ju-jitsu, either to strike at, or press, to break a grip or grapple.
You may cause the atlanto-occipital joint to cavitate by doing this which is like cracking the knuckles, except that as this done at the base of the skull it will probably frighten anyone who doesn’t understand what is going on. They might think their neck has been broken!
“They then pulled my head back so far that my windpipe was restricted, and while I was gasping for air, applied pressure to the front of my neck as well,” he said. Nearly collapsing from the pain and lack of oxygen. He was then unable to prevent the policemen from taking his fingerprints.
Pulling the head back forcefully can and will break the neck. You will either die very quickly or become paraplegic and confined to a wheelchair for life or tetraplegic like Christopher Reeve, depending on the location of the fracture and how far any bone fragments from the vertical lamina enter the spinal cord itself. Attacking the trachea in the manner described can also be fatal, but a fatality is more likely to occur from a violent blow rather than pressure. It’s not so much the collapse of the trachea but disruption to the baro receptors located at the bifurcation of the carotid artery. These control blood pressure to the brain and, if sufficiently traumatised, can shut off blood supply to the brain permanently.
“Next they grabbed hold of my nose, and once again somehow applied the most penetrating pressure to the back of my neck, forcing my mouth open to take a DNA swab.”
Again, very dangerous. It depends exactly where the pressure is applied, but a broken neck or avulsion of the dens could occur. The dens is a little bit of bone about the size of the last phalange of your little finger that acts as a pivot for the heads rotation. It is sometimes avulsed or pulled off in whiplash victims. It sits just posterior to the brain stem, in the area where breathing is regulated, so you don’t want a broken dens shoved through that particular area!”
This action from a Police Officer can only be justified in a desperate one-on-one struggle with a bigger and stronger opponent, but is not appropriate for a custody suite. Either the Police have a lack of understanding of the potential dangers of their action, in which case their training needs to be revised, or they were deliberately reckless. It is easy to see how people can be killed in police custody.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversial_Deaths_in_UK_Police_Custody
In addition a 70 year-old man, Arnold Briddle, was refused his prescribed medication for third-stage renal failure. Merseyside Police could have murdered two people quite easily that night!
This all started on Saturday the 22nd of November when Liverpool’s political police arrested the thirteen BNP members for distributing Racism Cuts Both Ways (PDF) leaflets, which is, of course, not illegal! They also ransacked their homes. Police refused to tell friends and relatives when they would be released. The men were interviewed under caution under section 19 of the Public Order Act.
There is more to this than meets the eye. It is the start of a coordinated policy of harassment across the country.
There were a lot more out leafleting than thirteen but the police only arrested the people who had the “Racism cuts both ways leaflet” at that precise moment. Those at St. Annes Street police station were released between one and two in the morning. As their colleagues had not been released from other stations they went in Convoy to Wavertree Police station the area which is akin to Pakistanistan.
Outside Wavertree police station there was one of those caught-on-camera yellow police vans watching them, whilst cars full of Asians raced up and down Wavertree Road at speed beeping their horns and shouting obscenities at us while the police did nothing. It is illegal to beep a horn after 11pm at night.
Furthermore, Police at the Wavertree Road Police station have asked that all British National Party activists refrain from displaying British Flags as it is likely to cause “offence” to the ethnics in the area. They have advised that the display of the St. George cross and Welsh flags Cross of St. David & Welsh Dragon, in particular would give offence!
A victim related: “I was arrested, first time ever (I never even ever had a detention in school). The police were awful to us, they did nothing but lie and treat us like rubbish. They made a 64 year old sleep on a wood bench, denied an elderly chap with medical problems his medication saying “You will be alright till tomorrow”. Supporters from around the country arrived and demonstrated outside the stations, but as they left the city they were stopped and harassed by the police. If you want to know how low the police have sunk one of those arrested was wearing his regimental blazer and medals! They intend to take Merseyside police to law for unlawful imprisonment.
Less than two weeks after Merseyside Police had tortured Andy Tierney they raided the home and business premises of his brother, the famous Liverpool entrepreneur Peter “Quiggens” Tierney. “They said they were looking for guns,” Mr Tierney, who was also one of the original thirteen, said. “I knew that it was rubbish, because we have never had anything like that. It was obviously just an attempt at intimidation and revenge harassment after their political agenda blew up in their faces last week.” The police officers used sniffer dogs to search Mr Tierney’s house, garden and shop. When he asked if they had any justification for their actions they threatened to arrest him if he did not “shut up.”
A few months earlier, Peter and a couple of colleagues had been harassed by armed police while leafletting in Liverpool city centre:-
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=kpMoG2la77c
An apposite comparison for the BNP is with the Tolpuddle Martyrs and the oppression they were subjected to by the Regime of the time - it bears close comparison with the tyrannical behavior of Merseyside police. The Tolpuddle Martyrs “crime” was to try to start an organisation to represent their interests against a class bent on their ruin.
This applies to the BNP. The leaflet the “elites” want to suppress argues for parity in the consideration of racist attacks on innocent people. There are manifold explicitly racist crimes committed by ethnics on the indigenous population, encouraged by the victim complex which has been instilled in them by the state which stirs them up by relentlessly blaming whites for the slave trade, the Empire and even portrays “racism” as an exclusively white phenomenon.
The most evil example was Kriss Donald which was kept quiet by the media for years. It was an attack of which there is no white-on-black equivalent and which was far more brutal than the murder of Steven Lawrence (which has never been proved to have been a racist attack).
Unprovoked racist attacks by ethnic minorities on indigenous Britons are commonplace and the urban indigenous population know this as a simple fact. The bias in law (PDF) is perverse and unjust. The sovereignty of Parliament rests on its own resistance to laws it considered immoral during the Civil War, from this precedent not only are all Britons entitled to resist laws which are unjust but they are duty bound to do so in the defence of liberty, freedom and the sovereignty of the British people. Even to the extent of armed resistance in the last resort.
The common perception among dissident groups is that the Establishment is knowingly evil and corrupt. The kind explanation is that the core beliefs of the Establishment lend their actions an internal logic and, by their standards, virtue. For example if you accept that racism is the supreme evil as the Establishment does, then is not persecuting racists a noble and necessary activity?
Well no, because those who are negatively labelled “racists,” to dehumanise them so they can be brutalised and not worry anyone's conscience, are not harming anyone but, on the contrary, are being harmed - pushed out of their communities and denied employment as cheap labour is imported. They are trying to defend themselves, their children, their communities and that cannot be wrong.
The Establishment’s descent into tyranny and persecution is a symptom of an ideology in its death throes, where it exponentially multiplies internal contradictions and fossilises into a simplistic and irrational dogma. We saw similar phenomenon in the final stages of fascism and communism. Of course we have to allow for our own pre-conceptions and the distorting effect of our own beliefs when assessing the morality of the Establishment’s actions. But even then it is clear that they are becoming increasingly aggressive and totalitarian as their values are been shown to be false. And as they are persecuting people, they are culpable, not misguided.
Our authorities are in league with Muslims against us. There are even members of al-Qaeda serving in the police. Yet BNP members are persecuted for distributing leaflets that are lawful, as later attested by the Attorney General. The BNP may well have intolerant and unattractive elements, but it is far preferable to a government which is undoubtedly both and also genocidal and incompetent. People are, generally, encouraged by the media to believe that members of the Establishment are partisan but fundamentally decent people. I think they are thoroughly evil. The “fundamental goodness” is a pretence … pure media propaganda. They are far more evil than any BNP leader who, in his most unguarded and unwise moments, has shown more naivety than wickedness.
Post Script: later the Chief Constable of Merseyside Police admitted Liability and Merseyside Police agreed to pay each person arrested the sum of about £2200!
(1) http://m.mirror.co.uk/ms/p/tmg/mirror/view.m?id=153596&tid=27708
(2) http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/news/Anti-BNP-activists-mistakenly-target-Gloucestershire-pensioners/article-495221-detail/article.html
(3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp
(4) http://www.bnp.org.uk/thumbs/Racism_Cuts_Both_Ways.pdf
(5) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tolpuddle_Martyrs
(6) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Kriss_Donald
Groups concerned with liberties and rights
Statewatch : http://www.statewatch.org/
Civitas: http://www.civitas.org.uk/
Innocent members of the public will be surprised at how oppressed the British people are unless they remain quiescent and only do permitted activities like watch telly, support sports teams and go to bars. If they dare speak out or campaign against certain injustices they will be persecuted and even brutalised.
There are many in this country who sincerely believe in freedom and democracy. They frequently gravitate towards the easily-occupied “moral high ground” of condemning racism by whites. But they rarely comprehend that a totalitarian, undemocratic structure has been created to oppress whites. Do they ever stop to think that in the home of the Mother of Parliaments, the Rule of Law and representative democracy the police would torture a political prisoner?
There was even a thinly-veiled incitement to violence from the established media. On 20/11/2008 Mirror columnist Brian Reade wrote, under a picture of Nick Griffin, and in mock-worried tones:-
I’m worried about the 12,000 BNP members whose names and addresses have been leaked on the internet. I pray their details don’t fall into the hands of any of those black radical groups known to take a very dim view of white neo-Nazis. It would be truly awful if anything nasty happened to these nice people wouldn’t it?
In part his wish was realised. In Cheltenham, widow Natalia Colthurst received six threatening calls in which she was asked her name and why she supports the BNP. The caller warned, “We know where you live”. The 72-year-old, who lives in Whaddon Road, was advised by bereavement councillors to join social groups when her husband died in 2006. The former language teacher said after two BNP meetings early last year, she and her elderly friend realised it wasn’t for them and broke with the party.
The house of George and June Papps on Lysons Avenue, Gloucester, was vandalised, with graffiti saying “BNP Scum”, scrawled on a wall. The couple, aged 79 and 77, are both recovering from cancer and said they were singled-out because their son, who has moved away, is a member.
Another eye-opener for trusting members of the public is British bobbies torturing a political prisoner, BNP member Andrew Tierney. He was one of thirteen BNP activists arrested by Merseyside police, from whom fingerprints and DNA were taken to be added to the National Database. The media have not covered this but from the BNP‘s own website and from personal interviews I discovered the reality of what happened.
The victim related: “They then somehow applied a tremendous pressure behind my ears, inflicting great pain. They then pulled my head back so far that my windpipe was restricted, and while I was gasping for air, applied pressure to the front of my neck as well,” he said. Nearly collapsing from the pain and lack of oxygen, he was then unable to prevent the policemen from taking his fingerprints. They put a deep gash in his forehead in the process.
“Next they grabbed hold of my nose, and once again somehow applied the most penetrating pressure to the back of my neck, forcing my mouth open to take a DNA swab,” he continued.
The episode lasted at least a quarter of an hour, and the victim was left shaken and in pain. Photographs taken shortly afterwards clearly showed bleeding from wounds sustained behind both his ears. They applied some kind of pressure to his arms and his side, once again leaving considerable bruising, evidenced again by photographs taken shortly after his release.
This is similar to how the Americans torture political prisoners at Guantanamo Bay:-
“The military police inflicted so much pain, Mr Aamer said he thought he was going to die. The MPs pressed on pressure points all over his body: his temples, just under his jawline, in the hollow beneath his ears. They choked him. They bent his nose so hard he thought it would break.”
Here is a technical analysis of what they did to the political prisoner in Liverpool: they were applying pressure to the transverse processes of the first cervical vertebra. It’s taught as a pressure point in both Karate and Ju-jitsu, either to strike at, or press, to break a grip or grapple.
You may cause the atlanto-occipital joint to cavitate by doing this which is like cracking the knuckles, except that as this done at the base of the skull it will probably frighten anyone who doesn’t understand what is going on. They might think their neck has been broken!
“They then pulled my head back so far that my windpipe was restricted, and while I was gasping for air, applied pressure to the front of my neck as well,” he said. Nearly collapsing from the pain and lack of oxygen. He was then unable to prevent the policemen from taking his fingerprints.
Pulling the head back forcefully can and will break the neck. You will either die very quickly or become paraplegic and confined to a wheelchair for life or tetraplegic like Christopher Reeve, depending on the location of the fracture and how far any bone fragments from the vertical lamina enter the spinal cord itself. Attacking the trachea in the manner described can also be fatal, but a fatality is more likely to occur from a violent blow rather than pressure. It’s not so much the collapse of the trachea but disruption to the baro receptors located at the bifurcation of the carotid artery. These control blood pressure to the brain and, if sufficiently traumatised, can shut off blood supply to the brain permanently.
“Next they grabbed hold of my nose, and once again somehow applied the most penetrating pressure to the back of my neck, forcing my mouth open to take a DNA swab.”
Again, very dangerous. It depends exactly where the pressure is applied, but a broken neck or avulsion of the dens could occur. The dens is a little bit of bone about the size of the last phalange of your little finger that acts as a pivot for the heads rotation. It is sometimes avulsed or pulled off in whiplash victims. It sits just posterior to the brain stem, in the area where breathing is regulated, so you don’t want a broken dens shoved through that particular area!”
This action from a Police Officer can only be justified in a desperate one-on-one struggle with a bigger and stronger opponent, but is not appropriate for a custody suite. Either the Police have a lack of understanding of the potential dangers of their action, in which case their training needs to be revised, or they were deliberately reckless. It is easy to see how people can be killed in police custody.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversial_Deaths_in_UK_Police_Custody
In addition a 70 year-old man, Arnold Briddle, was refused his prescribed medication for third-stage renal failure. Merseyside Police could have murdered two people quite easily that night!
This all started on Saturday the 22nd of November when Liverpool’s political police arrested the thirteen BNP members for distributing Racism Cuts Both Ways (PDF) leaflets, which is, of course, not illegal! They also ransacked their homes. Police refused to tell friends and relatives when they would be released. The men were interviewed under caution under section 19 of the Public Order Act.
There is more to this than meets the eye. It is the start of a coordinated policy of harassment across the country.
There were a lot more out leafleting than thirteen but the police only arrested the people who had the “Racism cuts both ways leaflet” at that precise moment. Those at St. Annes Street police station were released between one and two in the morning. As their colleagues had not been released from other stations they went in Convoy to Wavertree Police station the area which is akin to Pakistanistan.
Outside Wavertree police station there was one of those caught-on-camera yellow police vans watching them, whilst cars full of Asians raced up and down Wavertree Road at speed beeping their horns and shouting obscenities at us while the police did nothing. It is illegal to beep a horn after 11pm at night.
Furthermore, Police at the Wavertree Road Police station have asked that all British National Party activists refrain from displaying British Flags as it is likely to cause “offence” to the ethnics in the area. They have advised that the display of the St. George cross and Welsh flags Cross of St. David & Welsh Dragon, in particular would give offence!
A victim related: “I was arrested, first time ever (I never even ever had a detention in school). The police were awful to us, they did nothing but lie and treat us like rubbish. They made a 64 year old sleep on a wood bench, denied an elderly chap with medical problems his medication saying “You will be alright till tomorrow”. Supporters from around the country arrived and demonstrated outside the stations, but as they left the city they were stopped and harassed by the police. If you want to know how low the police have sunk one of those arrested was wearing his regimental blazer and medals! They intend to take Merseyside police to law for unlawful imprisonment.
Less than two weeks after Merseyside Police had tortured Andy Tierney they raided the home and business premises of his brother, the famous Liverpool entrepreneur Peter “Quiggens” Tierney. “They said they were looking for guns,” Mr Tierney, who was also one of the original thirteen, said. “I knew that it was rubbish, because we have never had anything like that. It was obviously just an attempt at intimidation and revenge harassment after their political agenda blew up in their faces last week.” The police officers used sniffer dogs to search Mr Tierney’s house, garden and shop. When he asked if they had any justification for their actions they threatened to arrest him if he did not “shut up.”
A few months earlier, Peter and a couple of colleagues had been harassed by armed police while leafletting in Liverpool city centre:-
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=kpMoG2la77c
An apposite comparison for the BNP is with the Tolpuddle Martyrs and the oppression they were subjected to by the Regime of the time - it bears close comparison with the tyrannical behavior of Merseyside police. The Tolpuddle Martyrs “crime” was to try to start an organisation to represent their interests against a class bent on their ruin.
This applies to the BNP. The leaflet the “elites” want to suppress argues for parity in the consideration of racist attacks on innocent people. There are manifold explicitly racist crimes committed by ethnics on the indigenous population, encouraged by the victim complex which has been instilled in them by the state which stirs them up by relentlessly blaming whites for the slave trade, the Empire and even portrays “racism” as an exclusively white phenomenon.
The most evil example was Kriss Donald which was kept quiet by the media for years. It was an attack of which there is no white-on-black equivalent and which was far more brutal than the murder of Steven Lawrence (which has never been proved to have been a racist attack).
Unprovoked racist attacks by ethnic minorities on indigenous Britons are commonplace and the urban indigenous population know this as a simple fact. The bias in law (PDF) is perverse and unjust. The sovereignty of Parliament rests on its own resistance to laws it considered immoral during the Civil War, from this precedent not only are all Britons entitled to resist laws which are unjust but they are duty bound to do so in the defence of liberty, freedom and the sovereignty of the British people. Even to the extent of armed resistance in the last resort.
The common perception among dissident groups is that the Establishment is knowingly evil and corrupt. The kind explanation is that the core beliefs of the Establishment lend their actions an internal logic and, by their standards, virtue. For example if you accept that racism is the supreme evil as the Establishment does, then is not persecuting racists a noble and necessary activity?
Well no, because those who are negatively labelled “racists,” to dehumanise them so they can be brutalised and not worry anyone's conscience, are not harming anyone but, on the contrary, are being harmed - pushed out of their communities and denied employment as cheap labour is imported. They are trying to defend themselves, their children, their communities and that cannot be wrong.
The Establishment’s descent into tyranny and persecution is a symptom of an ideology in its death throes, where it exponentially multiplies internal contradictions and fossilises into a simplistic and irrational dogma. We saw similar phenomenon in the final stages of fascism and communism. Of course we have to allow for our own pre-conceptions and the distorting effect of our own beliefs when assessing the morality of the Establishment’s actions. But even then it is clear that they are becoming increasingly aggressive and totalitarian as their values are been shown to be false. And as they are persecuting people, they are culpable, not misguided.
Our authorities are in league with Muslims against us. There are even members of al-Qaeda serving in the police. Yet BNP members are persecuted for distributing leaflets that are lawful, as later attested by the Attorney General. The BNP may well have intolerant and unattractive elements, but it is far preferable to a government which is undoubtedly both and also genocidal and incompetent. People are, generally, encouraged by the media to believe that members of the Establishment are partisan but fundamentally decent people. I think they are thoroughly evil. The “fundamental goodness” is a pretence … pure media propaganda. They are far more evil than any BNP leader who, in his most unguarded and unwise moments, has shown more naivety than wickedness.
Post Script: later the Chief Constable of Merseyside Police admitted Liability and Merseyside Police agreed to pay each person arrested the sum of about £2200!
(1) http://m.mirror.co.uk/ms/p/tmg/mirror/view.m?id=153596&tid=27708
(2) http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/news/Anti-BNP-activists-mistakenly-target-Gloucestershire-pensioners/article-495221-detail/article.html
(3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp
(4) http://www.bnp.org.uk/thumbs/Racism_Cuts_Both_Ways.pdf
(5) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tolpuddle_Martyrs
(6) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Kriss_Donald
Groups concerned with liberties and rights
Statewatch : http://www.statewatch.org/
Civitas: http://www.civitas.org.uk/
Wednesday, 3 December 2008
British Government Colludes with Muslim Terrorists
British Government Colludes with Muslim Terrorists
Gordon Brown and Business Secretary Lord Mandelson went to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states in the first week of November 2008 to ask them to fund our faltering economies by putting billions into the International Monetary Fund.
In return they offered them some control over Britain and the West. The Saudi regime is the motor behind Islamisation of the West. It is Saudi’s Wahhabi form of Islam which, together with the Shi’ites in Iran, aims to make Islam dominant in the world. Saudi money has financed the spread of Wahhabi mosques, preachers and educational institutions in this country promoting holy war and converting thousands of British Muslims.
Saudi Wahhabism seeks to conquer the West through a pincer movement comprising violence on the one hand and cultural infiltration on the other and our Prime Minister is colluding with them. Lord Mandelson admitted that the Saudis and other Gulf states would get more influence in global institutions in return.
Islamic influence is spreading into our cultural life as they buy Western institutions. Manchester City F C was is now owned by the ruling family of Abu Dhabi; Barclays Bank, has had almost £6 billion invested from Abu Dhabi and Qatar.
Islamist ideas are also spread through Islamic study centres attached to our universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed eight universities — including Oxford and Cambridge — have accepted more than £233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995, spreading radicalism and creating two separate identities and sets of allegiance.
Our traditional elites are colluding with them against us. The Saudi monarchy are building The Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), founded in 1985, Prince Charles is its honorary patron. It is the biggest Muslim educational centre in the United Kingdom and built as a traditional Oxford college around a central cloistered quadrangle. The 10,230 sq m four-storey building will feature study and research facilities, a lecture theatre, a large library and an environmentally controlled archive for rare documents; a prayer hall with traditional dome and minaret tower. The centre includes a 108-foot-high minaret and a 75-foot-high dome. It is estimated at £65 million. We remember that this traitorous university is pushing British students of in favour of overseas students.
The elites submission to Saudi was clear when they suspend rule of law as they did by abandoning the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems because of an explicit threat made by the Saudi authorities that, if the case continued, ‘British lives on British streets’ would be at risk, as explained by Britain’s former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles. These are the controllers of terror groups in the West that Brown and oher politicians are colluding with against the general public!
Muslims have influence over us through the combination of the threat of violence and wealth,
yet, Brown is to make London the global centre of Islamic banking. Britain’s major banks are accepting Sharia finance, on the basis that it is a source of vast wealth but Sharia is a project for Islamising society that prohibits interest.
It was founded in mid-20th century by Islamist ideologues to further global Islamic rule by creating separate administrative systems. Muslims have to donate some of their income to charity, and that goes through the sharia banking system. Usually, the clerics who decide where this ‘charity’ money should go are advocates of terror like Sheik Yusuf Qaradawi, who supports suicide bombing in Iraq and Israel; and Sheik Muhammed Taqi Usmani, who ran a madrassa that supported the Taliban, yet sits on the sharia supervisory board of the Dow Jones Islamic Index Fund.
Many charitable donations are directed to terrorist organisations like Hamas and Hezbollah. This influence was clear when the banks refused the BNP, a legal political party, banking facilities.
Brown is giving Muslims more influence over our lives yet knows that terrorists are organising to go to war with us because he is regularly briefed by the Secret Services. The growth of terror cells was revealed in a leaked Government intelligence report states that secret al-Qaeda cells in London, Birmingham and Luton are planning mass-casualty attacks, reported the Telegraph of 9 Nov 2008.
The document was compiled by the intelligence branch of the Ministry of Defence, MI5 and Special Branch. It reveals that "some thousands" of extremists are active in the UK. They are mainly born here and aged between 18 and 30. Many are thought to have been trained abroad in terrorist camps.
The report "International Terrorism", states: "For the foreseeable future the UK will continue to be a high-priority target for international terrorists aligned with al-Qaeda. We are under threat from “British nationals”, including Muslim converts, foreign terrorists based here and terrorists planning attacks from abroad." It notes that the threat from the Islamist terrorists in the UK is "diverse and widely distributed" and that the numbers of terrorist in Britain is "difficult to judge". The document does state, that the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre, which is based in MI5's headquarters at Thames House in London, estimates "some thousands of extremists in the UK committed to supporting Jihadi activities, either here or abroad".
Jonathan Evans, the director general of MI5, said last year they had identified at least 2,000 men and women who were a risk to national security and public safety.
Home Office figures record that since 2001, over 1,200 terrorist suspects have been arrested, over 140 charged and more than 45 convicted of terrorism offences. It is also estimated that there are 200 terrorist networks functioning in Britain today who are involved in at least 30 plots.
This shows the number of terrorists threatening the UK is growing. The majority of extremists are British nationals of south Asian, mainly Pakistanistanistani origin but there are also extremists from north and east Africa, Iraq and the Middle East, and a number of converts.
Knowing this, in November 2006, the Government were advertising for immigrants by placing an Home Office pamphlet 'Multicultural Britain - A Land Of Immigrants' encouraging immigrants to come here because of the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs, in embassies across the world including those were terrorist come here from. The advert was first discovered in the Embassy in Pakistanistanistan!
The overwhelming majority of Muslims at war with us are of active service age - 18-30. "The main concentrations are in London, Birmingham, with significant terrorist networks in the South East, notably Luton. These enemy networks are spreading their propaganda, training more terrorists, fund raising from local council grants, lottery; and, procuring non-lethal military equipment to support Jihads in Pakistanistanistan, Afghanistan and Iraq, against our soldiers and sending recruits to the conflicts.
MI5 believe that the risk of terror attacks by Islamist is widespread. To combat this, MI5 has nine regional offices and has nearly doubled its staff from 1,800 in 2001 to 3,500 today. But is recruiting from Muslim communities and allowing itself to be subverted. The elites play down the number of Muslims in Britain but we know it is many more than 1.5million. At least a million live in London. There are c150,000 Muslims in Birmingham and a further c27,000 in Luton. There are an estimated 10,000 Afro-Caribbean Muslims or white converts.
Luton has a growing Muslim population and has been a hot-bed of radical activity. The extremist group al-Muhajiroun is active in the town but the police ignore them. The 7/7 bombers gathered in Luton, to travel to London to kill people. Yet the Government still encourage them to pour into the country!
The ethnic cleansing of non-Muslims in Luton shows police complicity. The Muslims are attacking people from all races and are trying to ethnically clear a West Indians in Luton by throwing bricks through their windows. The police have been ignoring it, but TV showed a residents meeting with episcopalian Bishop Blake asking the police what they were going to do about it. (1)The police have “Hate Crime officers” to harry and persecute any who try to expose what Muslims are doing!
Some of the terrorists involved in the plot to bring down airliners using liquid bombs came from London, where a bomb factory had been established. In Birmingham, a bulkhead of Muslim territorialism is where the kidnaping of a Muslim in the British army was planned.
The leader Parviz Khan, who was financed by state benefits, formed a terrorist cell intended to video the execution and release the film on the internet.
It is senior Government ministers who encourage terrorists to come here. Yahoo news of 11 November 2008 reported that a Hizbollah radical was allowed to enter the UK after ministers announced a crackdown on extremists. Ibrahim Mousawi spoke at a conference at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London. Mr Mousawi, a former editor of Hizbollah's television channel, is a "well-known extremist", The armed wing of the Middle Eastern Islamic group is on a Home Office list of proscribed terror organisations. Yet, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, had announced that extremists would have to prove their innocence under new rules and promised to publish a list of banned individuals!
Our elites act in consort with Muslims in changing our ways to be more suitable for their children. Rowan Williamse, Archbishop of Canterbury, was quoted in the Daily Mail of 5th July 2008 as saying Christian doctrine is offensive to Muslims, and criticising Christianity's history for its violence, its use of harsh punishments and its betrayal of its peaceful principles. His sent a conciliatory letter to Islamic leaders calling for an alliance between the two faiths for 'the common good'. What a traitorous, evil man!
Our rulers are also allowing Muslims to take over our legal system. The Sunday Times September 14th 2008 reported Islamic law has been officially adopted in Britain. The government has secretly sanctioned the powers for Sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence. Rulings issued by a network of five Sharia courts are enforceable by the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court. Before this rulings of Sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and required voluntary compliance among Muslims. It has now come out that Sharia courts with these powers have been set up in London, Birmingham, Bradford and Manchester with the network’s headquarters in Nuneaton, Warwickshire. Two more courts are being planned for Glasgow and Edinburgh.
The authorities are also encouraging anti-Semitic attacks in Britain which has reached its second-highest level ever(17 May 2008. The Independent). Figures show 547 such incidents were recorded last year, of which a record 114 were violent assaults. The Community Security Trust (CST), which protects the Jewish community, counted every recorded anti-Semitic assault, threat, act of abuse and damage or desecration of Jewish property across the country. Mark Gardner, a spokesman for CST, said:” the usual allies of British Jews fear showing support would further the Zionist cause. In the 1990s, when Jews faced attacks from the far right there was a lot of sympathy from the liberal left establishments, but today the same voices simply see anti-Semitism as something useful to Zionists.”
The Miami Herald (October 10, 2004) had an article, "French Jews Escape to United States," giving copious examples of French Jews who moved to southern Florida because of their fears of the militant Muslim minority in France.
At the same time the Government and other authorities persecute opponents of this collusion. “Chris Keates, the general secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women teachers, said: “Those who declare their affiliation to the BNP should not be allowed to work in the teaching profession or in public services.” The Royal Institute of British Architects is persecuting BNP members. Any candidate for election to RIBA’s council has to declare whether or not they are BNP. members. Compare this to anti-Jewish legislation in pre-war Germany. (5)
The police not only ignore Muslims grooming our young girls but also the selling of heroin and crack. They collude with Muslim extremists and persecute those who try to warn about the dangers - police raided Blackburn BNP organiser Robin Evans and Pendle councillor Brian Parker at dawn on suspicion of distributing a leaflet showing that Mulim gangs distribute heroin. The police told Mr. Parker’s wife that it is over the heroin leaflet, but a Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson told the Muslim News in October 2008, “We looked at the evidence and concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to advice the police to prosecute on ground of racial hatred.” The leaflet reveals to the public that Muslim gangs are “almost exclusively responsible” for the heroin trade, of which 95% comes from Afghanistan and Pakistanistanistan.
At the same time up to eight serving police officers and civilian staff are suspected of having links to Al Qaeda. Some are thought to have attended terrorist training camps in Pakistanistanistan and Afghanistan. The names of these officers were featured on a dossier, drawn up with the help of MI5, that was instigated because of fears that Muslim terrorists were taking advantage of the “positive discrimination” schemes used by the police to attract more ethnic staff. (3)
It is clear that by their own logic the British police can not be trusted to uphold the law fairly and impartially as they are witchunting certain types of people from the force and giving preferment to Muslims terrorists! The real intention is shown because al-Queda officers were not sacked, because the police said that they lacked the “legal power” to dismiss them.
They claim Classified intelligence reports raising concerns about police officers affiliations with Muslim terrorist cells can not be used to justify their dismissal, but a detective inspector serving in the professional standards department of a Midlands force is checking the leaked BNP members list against his force personnel records. He said: "Even people on the list who are lapsed members of the BNP, or who have just approached the party expressing an interest in joining, will be of interest to us."
This a clear insight into the fact that the practice of police work is governed by institutional prejudice against “whites”. Officers are banned from joining or promoting the BNP because they would not uphold the law in a multri-racial society impartially. By their own logic employing al-Queda members or supporters suggests the police do are not really fighting terrorism but the British people who oppose it. In fact Prime Minister Gordon Brown who collaborates with the Saudis appointed John Cruddas MP to spearhead a campaign against “the far right”.
(1)http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....king-police-don’t-dare-sack-them.html
(2)
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ilKIeag1HUc&feature=related
http://www.bedsonsunday.com/bedsonsunday-news/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=248045
http://www.lutononsunday.com/lutononsunday/DisplayArticle.asp?id=248100
http://www.cogichq.co.uk/Text/bishop_a.htm
http://www.yoel.info/demographicjihad.htm
(3) http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/pol....rs-1026311.html
(4) - http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/nov/19/thefarright-freedomofinformation
(5) http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?ModuleId=10005681
Gordon Brown and Business Secretary Lord Mandelson went to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states in the first week of November 2008 to ask them to fund our faltering economies by putting billions into the International Monetary Fund.
In return they offered them some control over Britain and the West. The Saudi regime is the motor behind Islamisation of the West. It is Saudi’s Wahhabi form of Islam which, together with the Shi’ites in Iran, aims to make Islam dominant in the world. Saudi money has financed the spread of Wahhabi mosques, preachers and educational institutions in this country promoting holy war and converting thousands of British Muslims.
Saudi Wahhabism seeks to conquer the West through a pincer movement comprising violence on the one hand and cultural infiltration on the other and our Prime Minister is colluding with them. Lord Mandelson admitted that the Saudis and other Gulf states would get more influence in global institutions in return.
Islamic influence is spreading into our cultural life as they buy Western institutions. Manchester City F C was is now owned by the ruling family of Abu Dhabi; Barclays Bank, has had almost £6 billion invested from Abu Dhabi and Qatar.
Islamist ideas are also spread through Islamic study centres attached to our universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed eight universities — including Oxford and Cambridge — have accepted more than £233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995, spreading radicalism and creating two separate identities and sets of allegiance.
Our traditional elites are colluding with them against us. The Saudi monarchy are building The Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), founded in 1985, Prince Charles is its honorary patron. It is the biggest Muslim educational centre in the United Kingdom and built as a traditional Oxford college around a central cloistered quadrangle. The 10,230 sq m four-storey building will feature study and research facilities, a lecture theatre, a large library and an environmentally controlled archive for rare documents; a prayer hall with traditional dome and minaret tower. The centre includes a 108-foot-high minaret and a 75-foot-high dome. It is estimated at £65 million. We remember that this traitorous university is pushing British students of in favour of overseas students.
The elites submission to Saudi was clear when they suspend rule of law as they did by abandoning the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems because of an explicit threat made by the Saudi authorities that, if the case continued, ‘British lives on British streets’ would be at risk, as explained by Britain’s former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles. These are the controllers of terror groups in the West that Brown and oher politicians are colluding with against the general public!
Muslims have influence over us through the combination of the threat of violence and wealth,
yet, Brown is to make London the global centre of Islamic banking. Britain’s major banks are accepting Sharia finance, on the basis that it is a source of vast wealth but Sharia is a project for Islamising society that prohibits interest.
It was founded in mid-20th century by Islamist ideologues to further global Islamic rule by creating separate administrative systems. Muslims have to donate some of their income to charity, and that goes through the sharia banking system. Usually, the clerics who decide where this ‘charity’ money should go are advocates of terror like Sheik Yusuf Qaradawi, who supports suicide bombing in Iraq and Israel; and Sheik Muhammed Taqi Usmani, who ran a madrassa that supported the Taliban, yet sits on the sharia supervisory board of the Dow Jones Islamic Index Fund.
Many charitable donations are directed to terrorist organisations like Hamas and Hezbollah. This influence was clear when the banks refused the BNP, a legal political party, banking facilities.
Brown is giving Muslims more influence over our lives yet knows that terrorists are organising to go to war with us because he is regularly briefed by the Secret Services. The growth of terror cells was revealed in a leaked Government intelligence report states that secret al-Qaeda cells in London, Birmingham and Luton are planning mass-casualty attacks, reported the Telegraph of 9 Nov 2008.
The document was compiled by the intelligence branch of the Ministry of Defence, MI5 and Special Branch. It reveals that "some thousands" of extremists are active in the UK. They are mainly born here and aged between 18 and 30. Many are thought to have been trained abroad in terrorist camps.
The report "International Terrorism", states: "For the foreseeable future the UK will continue to be a high-priority target for international terrorists aligned with al-Qaeda. We are under threat from “British nationals”, including Muslim converts, foreign terrorists based here and terrorists planning attacks from abroad." It notes that the threat from the Islamist terrorists in the UK is "diverse and widely distributed" and that the numbers of terrorist in Britain is "difficult to judge". The document does state, that the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre, which is based in MI5's headquarters at Thames House in London, estimates "some thousands of extremists in the UK committed to supporting Jihadi activities, either here or abroad".
Jonathan Evans, the director general of MI5, said last year they had identified at least 2,000 men and women who were a risk to national security and public safety.
Home Office figures record that since 2001, over 1,200 terrorist suspects have been arrested, over 140 charged and more than 45 convicted of terrorism offences. It is also estimated that there are 200 terrorist networks functioning in Britain today who are involved in at least 30 plots.
This shows the number of terrorists threatening the UK is growing. The majority of extremists are British nationals of south Asian, mainly Pakistanistanistani origin but there are also extremists from north and east Africa, Iraq and the Middle East, and a number of converts.
Knowing this, in November 2006, the Government were advertising for immigrants by placing an Home Office pamphlet 'Multicultural Britain - A Land Of Immigrants' encouraging immigrants to come here because of the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs, in embassies across the world including those were terrorist come here from. The advert was first discovered in the Embassy in Pakistanistanistan!
The overwhelming majority of Muslims at war with us are of active service age - 18-30. "The main concentrations are in London, Birmingham, with significant terrorist networks in the South East, notably Luton. These enemy networks are spreading their propaganda, training more terrorists, fund raising from local council grants, lottery; and, procuring non-lethal military equipment to support Jihads in Pakistanistanistan, Afghanistan and Iraq, against our soldiers and sending recruits to the conflicts.
MI5 believe that the risk of terror attacks by Islamist is widespread. To combat this, MI5 has nine regional offices and has nearly doubled its staff from 1,800 in 2001 to 3,500 today. But is recruiting from Muslim communities and allowing itself to be subverted. The elites play down the number of Muslims in Britain but we know it is many more than 1.5million. At least a million live in London. There are c150,000 Muslims in Birmingham and a further c27,000 in Luton. There are an estimated 10,000 Afro-Caribbean Muslims or white converts.
Luton has a growing Muslim population and has been a hot-bed of radical activity. The extremist group al-Muhajiroun is active in the town but the police ignore them. The 7/7 bombers gathered in Luton, to travel to London to kill people. Yet the Government still encourage them to pour into the country!
The ethnic cleansing of non-Muslims in Luton shows police complicity. The Muslims are attacking people from all races and are trying to ethnically clear a West Indians in Luton by throwing bricks through their windows. The police have been ignoring it, but TV showed a residents meeting with episcopalian Bishop Blake asking the police what they were going to do about it. (1)The police have “Hate Crime officers” to harry and persecute any who try to expose what Muslims are doing!
Some of the terrorists involved in the plot to bring down airliners using liquid bombs came from London, where a bomb factory had been established. In Birmingham, a bulkhead of Muslim territorialism is where the kidnaping of a Muslim in the British army was planned.
The leader Parviz Khan, who was financed by state benefits, formed a terrorist cell intended to video the execution and release the film on the internet.
It is senior Government ministers who encourage terrorists to come here. Yahoo news of 11 November 2008 reported that a Hizbollah radical was allowed to enter the UK after ministers announced a crackdown on extremists. Ibrahim Mousawi spoke at a conference at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London. Mr Mousawi, a former editor of Hizbollah's television channel, is a "well-known extremist", The armed wing of the Middle Eastern Islamic group is on a Home Office list of proscribed terror organisations. Yet, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, had announced that extremists would have to prove their innocence under new rules and promised to publish a list of banned individuals!
Our elites act in consort with Muslims in changing our ways to be more suitable for their children. Rowan Williamse, Archbishop of Canterbury, was quoted in the Daily Mail of 5th July 2008 as saying Christian doctrine is offensive to Muslims, and criticising Christianity's history for its violence, its use of harsh punishments and its betrayal of its peaceful principles. His sent a conciliatory letter to Islamic leaders calling for an alliance between the two faiths for 'the common good'. What a traitorous, evil man!
Our rulers are also allowing Muslims to take over our legal system. The Sunday Times September 14th 2008 reported Islamic law has been officially adopted in Britain. The government has secretly sanctioned the powers for Sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence. Rulings issued by a network of five Sharia courts are enforceable by the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court. Before this rulings of Sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and required voluntary compliance among Muslims. It has now come out that Sharia courts with these powers have been set up in London, Birmingham, Bradford and Manchester with the network’s headquarters in Nuneaton, Warwickshire. Two more courts are being planned for Glasgow and Edinburgh.
The authorities are also encouraging anti-Semitic attacks in Britain which has reached its second-highest level ever(17 May 2008. The Independent). Figures show 547 such incidents were recorded last year, of which a record 114 were violent assaults. The Community Security Trust (CST), which protects the Jewish community, counted every recorded anti-Semitic assault, threat, act of abuse and damage or desecration of Jewish property across the country. Mark Gardner, a spokesman for CST, said:” the usual allies of British Jews fear showing support would further the Zionist cause. In the 1990s, when Jews faced attacks from the far right there was a lot of sympathy from the liberal left establishments, but today the same voices simply see anti-Semitism as something useful to Zionists.”
The Miami Herald (October 10, 2004) had an article, "French Jews Escape to United States," giving copious examples of French Jews who moved to southern Florida because of their fears of the militant Muslim minority in France.
At the same time the Government and other authorities persecute opponents of this collusion. “Chris Keates, the general secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women teachers, said: “Those who declare their affiliation to the BNP should not be allowed to work in the teaching profession or in public services.” The Royal Institute of British Architects is persecuting BNP members. Any candidate for election to RIBA’s council has to declare whether or not they are BNP. members. Compare this to anti-Jewish legislation in pre-war Germany. (5)
The police not only ignore Muslims grooming our young girls but also the selling of heroin and crack. They collude with Muslim extremists and persecute those who try to warn about the dangers - police raided Blackburn BNP organiser Robin Evans and Pendle councillor Brian Parker at dawn on suspicion of distributing a leaflet showing that Mulim gangs distribute heroin. The police told Mr. Parker’s wife that it is over the heroin leaflet, but a Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson told the Muslim News in October 2008, “We looked at the evidence and concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to advice the police to prosecute on ground of racial hatred.” The leaflet reveals to the public that Muslim gangs are “almost exclusively responsible” for the heroin trade, of which 95% comes from Afghanistan and Pakistanistanistan.
At the same time up to eight serving police officers and civilian staff are suspected of having links to Al Qaeda. Some are thought to have attended terrorist training camps in Pakistanistanistan and Afghanistan. The names of these officers were featured on a dossier, drawn up with the help of MI5, that was instigated because of fears that Muslim terrorists were taking advantage of the “positive discrimination” schemes used by the police to attract more ethnic staff. (3)
It is clear that by their own logic the British police can not be trusted to uphold the law fairly and impartially as they are witchunting certain types of people from the force and giving preferment to Muslims terrorists! The real intention is shown because al-Queda officers were not sacked, because the police said that they lacked the “legal power” to dismiss them.
They claim Classified intelligence reports raising concerns about police officers affiliations with Muslim terrorist cells can not be used to justify their dismissal, but a detective inspector serving in the professional standards department of a Midlands force is checking the leaked BNP members list against his force personnel records. He said: "Even people on the list who are lapsed members of the BNP, or who have just approached the party expressing an interest in joining, will be of interest to us."
This a clear insight into the fact that the practice of police work is governed by institutional prejudice against “whites”. Officers are banned from joining or promoting the BNP because they would not uphold the law in a multri-racial society impartially. By their own logic employing al-Queda members or supporters suggests the police do are not really fighting terrorism but the British people who oppose it. In fact Prime Minister Gordon Brown who collaborates with the Saudis appointed John Cruddas MP to spearhead a campaign against “the far right”.
(1)http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....king-police-don’t-dare-sack-them.html
(2)
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ilKIeag1HUc&feature=related
http://www.bedsonsunday.com/bedsonsunday-news/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=248045
http://www.lutononsunday.com/lutononsunday/DisplayArticle.asp?id=248100
http://www.cogichq.co.uk/Text/bishop_a.htm
http://www.yoel.info/demographicjihad.htm
(3) http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/pol....rs-1026311.html
(4) - http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/nov/19/thefarright-freedomofinformation
(5) http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?ModuleId=10005681
Monday, 1 December 2008
Great British Tradition of Conserving Homogeneity
To insinuate those of us who follow a traditional Conservative way and who lost thousands fighting Nazism to be maliciously called Nazis or Fascists is disrespectful and offensive. A racial world view is a traditional world view and goes back to our Anglo Saxon tribal days.
Hitler jumped on the bandwagon and took it to extremes. Instead of being something that held people together he made it into a form of aggression and hatred. But he was an exception and not part of our tradition anyway.
In fact many aspects of wanting to conserve or recreate our homogeneity can be traced back deep into our history. We have a great and noble tradition of Conserving out homogeneity and until after the war had a better and more pleasant lives for being homogenous.
There is concern that following lessons from history that large groups of people with not only little in common but also historical grudges will spoil civic life and possibly cause bloodshed.
Queen Elizabeth was in the Great Tradition and in 1596, sent an "open letter" to the Lord Mayor of London, stating "there are of late divers blackmoores brought into this realme, of which kinde of people there are allready here to manie," ordering that they be deported.
A week later, she repeated: "good pleasure to have those kinde of people sent out of the lande" and commissioned the merchant Casper van Senden to "take up" certain "blackamoores here in this realme and to transport them into Spaine and Portugall." In 1601, she again complained about the "great numbers of Negars and Blackamoors which (as she is informed) are crept into this realm," "infidels, having no understanding of Christ or his Gospel," and had them repatriated.
Edmund Burke, offered a definition of a nation which involves a shared identity, history and ancestory, and continuity: “As the ends of such a partner-ship cannot be obtained in many generations, it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living and those who are dead, but between those who are living and those who are dead, and those who are to be born.”
A passage in Edward Gibbon’s masterpiece “The Decline and Fall of Rome” is prophetic. He pondered what would have befallen us had Muslims won the battle of Poitiers in France in 733. He saw that battle as a major turning point in European history: “the Arabian fleet might have sailed without a naval combat into the mouth of the Thames. Perhaps the interpretation of the Koran would now be taught in the schools of Oxford, and her pulpits might demonstrate to a circumcised people the sanctity and truth of the revelation of Mahomet."
There is concern that the immigrants will come to dominate us. We read repeated reports that we are becoming a minority in our own towns and cities.
The immigrants are human and like us, are subject to the same failings and are likely to treat us badly as we did them.
Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli wrote in Chapter 24 of “Lord George Bentinck: A Political Biography”(1852), “The Jews...are a living and the most striking evidence of the falsity of that pernicious doctrine of modern times, the natural equality of man. The particular equality of a particular race is a matter of municipal arrangement, and depends entirely on political considerations and circumstances; but the natural equality of man now in vogue, and taking the form of cosmopolitan fraternity, is a principle which, were it possible to act on it, would deteriorate the great races and destroy all the genius of the world. What would be the consequences on the great Anglo-Saxon republic, for example, were its citizens to secede from their sound principle of reserve, and mingle with their negro and coloured populations? In the course of time they would become so deteriorated that their states would probably be reconquered and regained by the aborigines whom they have expelled, and who would then be their superiors.”
Sir Winston Churchill followed the noble tradition but unfortunately had failing health. Yet he still tried to heal the rupture in our national continuity in 1955 by having a bill to control immigration drawn up which was not ready until June, two months after he stepped down because of his health. He wanted the Conservative party to adopt the slogan "Keep England White." (1)
A hero against mass immigration in the early 1950s was the fifth Marquess of Salisbury, grand son of the great Conservative Prime Minister and descendant of Lord Burleigh adviser to Queen Elizabeth.
He fought his battles in Cabinet. A letter preserved at the National Archive written to Viscount Swinton in 1954, shows his standpoint. Swinton like others only wanted the powers to deport criminals, sick immigrants and charges on the state but Salisbury was deeper and wiser than that and foretold: “I should not be satisfied with the legislation which you suggest. I feel that it would only be tinkering with what is really becoming a fundamental problem for us all, though it is only beginning to push its ugly head above the surface of politics. The figures which we have been given make it clear that we are faced with a problem which, though at at present it may be only a cloud the size of a man’s hand, may easily come to fill the whole political horizon … Indeed, if something is not done to check it now, I should not be at all surprised if the problem became quite unmanageable in twenty or thirty years time. We might well be faced with very much the same type of appalling issue that is now causing such great difficulties for the United States. The main causes of this sudden inflow of blacks is of course the Welfare State. So long as the antiquated rule obtains that any British subject can come into this country without any limitation at all, these people will pour in to take advantage of our social services and other amenities and we shall have no protection at all.”
Oliver Lyttletton (later Lord Chandos) wanted to introduce deposits of £500 to be put down by immigrants: “ if there is to be means of controlling the increasing flow of coloured people who come here largely to enjoy the benefits of the Welfare State.”
He had a list of all restrictions imposed on Britons by other Commonwealth countries who refused to accept “persons who are likely to become a public charge,” illiterates”, those deemed “undesirable” had “unsuitable standards or habits of life” many had quota systems and even dictation tests. Jamaica prohibited those likely “to become a charge on public funds by reason of infirmity of body or mind or ill-health or who is not in possession of sufficient means to support himself or such of his dependents as he shall bring with him to the island”.
Thirty–nine territories had entry permit systems or required prospective residents to first obtain permission. Lyttleton letter to Swinton 31/3/1954. We alone allowed anyone in.
Conservative Cyril Osborne (Louth) first tried in 1954 to introduce a bill to control immigration under the 10 minute rule. Before it got to Parliament the Commonwealth Affairs committee had 17 present when 14 spoke and only one supported the bill.
In May 1958, 3 months before the racial battles of Notting Hill and Nottingham Osborne had written to Labour leader Hugh Gaitskill who handed it to his secretary to reply, “The Labour Party is opposed to restriction of immigration as every Commonwealth citizen has the right as a British subject to enter this country.” Then 3 months after He instigated a Commons debate on the 5th of December 1958 when Labour spokesman Arthur Bottomley stated, “We are categorically against it (restrictions).” Supporting Osborne Labour’s Frank Tomney, remarked on elected representatives ignoring their constituents. “We have been sent here by the electorate to give expression to issues which concern them.”
His sincerity was clear. After vainly pleading with the Conservative backbench 1922 committee to consider the consequences of uncontrolled immigration, he broke down and wept. At the second reading of the Commonwealth Immigration bill (1961) he stated, “The world’s poor would swarm to Britain’s welfare honey pot. We have neither the room nor the resources to take all who would like to come.”
Norman Pannell Conservative member for Liverpool (Kirkdale) served in the Nigerian Legislature and lived in Africa for over 10 years. He proposed a motion at the 1958 Tory conference for reciprocal rights of entry with other Commonwealth countries, for the U.K. had an open door policy and let anyone in. “When I visited Nigeria two years ago as a member of Parliament without ultimate responsibility for the affairs of the that country, I was given an entry permit valid for 14 days and renewable subject to good behaviour.” He also addressed the 1961 conference on the perils of admitting criminals and the sick. The debate was stage-managed to stop Cyril Osborne speaking who stood outside in the rain handing out off-prints of a letter of his from the morning’s Telegraph. Pannell stated that though Butler had disagreed with limiting numbers, had agreed with his suggestion of deporting immigrants who commit crimes but nothing had been done.
There is the importation of diseases which puts the population at risk. In a letter to the Times of 13th December 1960, Harold Gurden wrote, “On the health question we find the middle ring of the city(Birmingham), where immigrants are mainly concentrated, heavily peppered with dots of tuberculosis incidence. It is the opinion of medical officers that at least some immigrants are suffering with this disease before entering the country...We have a duty to our constituents.”
In 2007 it has been revealed that we have a record number of cases of TB. This has been imported by our authorities.
When we were homogeneous we trusted one another and the police did not need to be armed; now they regularly have to shoot people in the street, we are in a surveillance state and have totalitarian race laws to oppress us.
At a Society For Individual freedom meeting at Birmingham Town Hall, on 18 4 1968, 2 days before Enoch’s famous Rivers of Blood speech, Sir Ronald Bell warned of the forthcoming Race Relations Act, "I am profoundly convinced that if this immediate threat is not sharply challenged and then fought with as great a persistence as has been shown over recent years by those who have worked for this engine of oppression, then many further uses of law and of the power of the state for shaping men’s minds will follow.”
To control thought totalitarians redefine words and change the meaning of legal terms.
K. Harvey Proctor addressed the 1983 Conservative party conference ,but no senior party member sat on the platform apart from a glum looking John Biffen who only clapped sparely.
Mrs Thatcher was not present.
In 1981 Proctor had announced a plan by the Monday club Immigration and Repatriation Committee to repatriate 50,000 immigrants a year. The forward to the document was by Sir Ronald Bell.
At a Monday Club dinner in early 1984 guest of honour Enoch Powell revealed that the Conservative party had threatened to not speak to Proctor for his belief in repatriation which would have been the first time in their history they had sent one of their MP’s to Coventry!
In his outstanding book “The Unarmed Invasion”(1965) Lord Elton wrote,” We seem to be re-enacting the story of the Roman Empire, which in its decadence imported subject races to do the menial tasks.” In his autobiography the great Rock guitarist Eric Clapton tells of adverts he saw while touring Jamaica for immigrants to come here and how clear it was that they were being brought here as cheap labour.
They are there now because our rulers are on their side against us. The Saudi monarchy are building The Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), founded in 1985, Prince Charles is its honorary patron. It is the biggest Muslim educational centre in the United Kingdom and built as a traditional Oxford college around a central cloistered quadrangle. The 10,230 sq m four-storey building will feature study and research facilities, a lecture theatre, a large library and an environmentally controlled archive for rare documents; a prayer hall with traditional dome and minaret tower. The centre includes a 108-foot-high minaret and a 75-foot-high dome. It is estimated at £65 million. We remember that this traitorous university is pushing us out of there in favour of overseas students. As reported in the Independent 21 April 2004.
A TV poll marking 40 years since Enoch’s 'Rivers of Blood' speech found most people anticipate racial conflict over the years to come. The unprecedented level of prosperity Europe has enjoyed for years that has prevented the civil unrest but we are now heading into recession. In an echo of Enoch’s warnings on “racial civil war” The Sunday Times of June 11, 2006 reported that Rear Admiral Chris Parry, one of Britain’s most senior military strategists warned that western civilisation faces a threat on a par with the barbarian invasions that destroyed the Roman empire.
He said future migrations would be comparable to the Goths and Vandals while north African “barbary” pirates could be attacking yachts and beaches in the Mediterranean within 10 years.
Europe, including Britain, could be undermined by large immigrant groups with little allegiance to their host countries—a “reverse colonisation” as Parry described it. These groups would stay connected to their homelands by the internet and cheap flight.
We never asked if we wanted, this invasion, not by proud conquering warlords, but by cringing Third World masses with whom we have nothing in common but the elites wanted for cheap labour and to expiate their historic guilt, while they lived peacefully in fine areas.
The words of these heroes became reality on 7 July 2005 when 52 victims of Third World immigration were blown up in of London. Enoch had told the Southall Chamber of Commerce on 4th November 1971, “Yet it is more truly when he looks into the eyes of Asia that the Englishman comes face to face with those who will dispute with him possession of his native land.”
As Stanley Baldwin, three times Prime Minister, said On May 24 1929:“Let us keep this thought ever in our mind: “that each one of us, so far as in him lies, will strive to keep these islands a fit nursery for Our Race”.
(1) Peter Hennessy, 'Having It So Good - Britain in the Fifties' (Allen Lane, 2006) p 224
Hennessy's reference is: Peter Catterall (ed.), 'The Macmillan Diaries: The Cabinet Years, 1950-1957' (Macmillan, 2003) p 382.
Hitler jumped on the bandwagon and took it to extremes. Instead of being something that held people together he made it into a form of aggression and hatred. But he was an exception and not part of our tradition anyway.
In fact many aspects of wanting to conserve or recreate our homogeneity can be traced back deep into our history. We have a great and noble tradition of Conserving out homogeneity and until after the war had a better and more pleasant lives for being homogenous.
There is concern that following lessons from history that large groups of people with not only little in common but also historical grudges will spoil civic life and possibly cause bloodshed.
Queen Elizabeth was in the Great Tradition and in 1596, sent an "open letter" to the Lord Mayor of London, stating "there are of late divers blackmoores brought into this realme, of which kinde of people there are allready here to manie," ordering that they be deported.
A week later, she repeated: "good pleasure to have those kinde of people sent out of the lande" and commissioned the merchant Casper van Senden to "take up" certain "blackamoores here in this realme and to transport them into Spaine and Portugall." In 1601, she again complained about the "great numbers of Negars and Blackamoors which (as she is informed) are crept into this realm," "infidels, having no understanding of Christ or his Gospel," and had them repatriated.
Edmund Burke, offered a definition of a nation which involves a shared identity, history and ancestory, and continuity: “As the ends of such a partner-ship cannot be obtained in many generations, it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living and those who are dead, but between those who are living and those who are dead, and those who are to be born.”
A passage in Edward Gibbon’s masterpiece “The Decline and Fall of Rome” is prophetic. He pondered what would have befallen us had Muslims won the battle of Poitiers in France in 733. He saw that battle as a major turning point in European history: “the Arabian fleet might have sailed without a naval combat into the mouth of the Thames. Perhaps the interpretation of the Koran would now be taught in the schools of Oxford, and her pulpits might demonstrate to a circumcised people the sanctity and truth of the revelation of Mahomet."
There is concern that the immigrants will come to dominate us. We read repeated reports that we are becoming a minority in our own towns and cities.
The immigrants are human and like us, are subject to the same failings and are likely to treat us badly as we did them.
Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli wrote in Chapter 24 of “Lord George Bentinck: A Political Biography”(1852), “The Jews...are a living and the most striking evidence of the falsity of that pernicious doctrine of modern times, the natural equality of man. The particular equality of a particular race is a matter of municipal arrangement, and depends entirely on political considerations and circumstances; but the natural equality of man now in vogue, and taking the form of cosmopolitan fraternity, is a principle which, were it possible to act on it, would deteriorate the great races and destroy all the genius of the world. What would be the consequences on the great Anglo-Saxon republic, for example, were its citizens to secede from their sound principle of reserve, and mingle with their negro and coloured populations? In the course of time they would become so deteriorated that their states would probably be reconquered and regained by the aborigines whom they have expelled, and who would then be their superiors.”
Sir Winston Churchill followed the noble tradition but unfortunately had failing health. Yet he still tried to heal the rupture in our national continuity in 1955 by having a bill to control immigration drawn up which was not ready until June, two months after he stepped down because of his health. He wanted the Conservative party to adopt the slogan "Keep England White." (1)
A hero against mass immigration in the early 1950s was the fifth Marquess of Salisbury, grand son of the great Conservative Prime Minister and descendant of Lord Burleigh adviser to Queen Elizabeth.
He fought his battles in Cabinet. A letter preserved at the National Archive written to Viscount Swinton in 1954, shows his standpoint. Swinton like others only wanted the powers to deport criminals, sick immigrants and charges on the state but Salisbury was deeper and wiser than that and foretold: “I should not be satisfied with the legislation which you suggest. I feel that it would only be tinkering with what is really becoming a fundamental problem for us all, though it is only beginning to push its ugly head above the surface of politics. The figures which we have been given make it clear that we are faced with a problem which, though at at present it may be only a cloud the size of a man’s hand, may easily come to fill the whole political horizon … Indeed, if something is not done to check it now, I should not be at all surprised if the problem became quite unmanageable in twenty or thirty years time. We might well be faced with very much the same type of appalling issue that is now causing such great difficulties for the United States. The main causes of this sudden inflow of blacks is of course the Welfare State. So long as the antiquated rule obtains that any British subject can come into this country without any limitation at all, these people will pour in to take advantage of our social services and other amenities and we shall have no protection at all.”
Oliver Lyttletton (later Lord Chandos) wanted to introduce deposits of £500 to be put down by immigrants: “ if there is to be means of controlling the increasing flow of coloured people who come here largely to enjoy the benefits of the Welfare State.”
He had a list of all restrictions imposed on Britons by other Commonwealth countries who refused to accept “persons who are likely to become a public charge,” illiterates”, those deemed “undesirable” had “unsuitable standards or habits of life” many had quota systems and even dictation tests. Jamaica prohibited those likely “to become a charge on public funds by reason of infirmity of body or mind or ill-health or who is not in possession of sufficient means to support himself or such of his dependents as he shall bring with him to the island”.
Thirty–nine territories had entry permit systems or required prospective residents to first obtain permission. Lyttleton letter to Swinton 31/3/1954. We alone allowed anyone in.
Conservative Cyril Osborne (Louth) first tried in 1954 to introduce a bill to control immigration under the 10 minute rule. Before it got to Parliament the Commonwealth Affairs committee had 17 present when 14 spoke and only one supported the bill.
In May 1958, 3 months before the racial battles of Notting Hill and Nottingham Osborne had written to Labour leader Hugh Gaitskill who handed it to his secretary to reply, “The Labour Party is opposed to restriction of immigration as every Commonwealth citizen has the right as a British subject to enter this country.” Then 3 months after He instigated a Commons debate on the 5th of December 1958 when Labour spokesman Arthur Bottomley stated, “We are categorically against it (restrictions).” Supporting Osborne Labour’s Frank Tomney, remarked on elected representatives ignoring their constituents. “We have been sent here by the electorate to give expression to issues which concern them.”
His sincerity was clear. After vainly pleading with the Conservative backbench 1922 committee to consider the consequences of uncontrolled immigration, he broke down and wept. At the second reading of the Commonwealth Immigration bill (1961) he stated, “The world’s poor would swarm to Britain’s welfare honey pot. We have neither the room nor the resources to take all who would like to come.”
Norman Pannell Conservative member for Liverpool (Kirkdale) served in the Nigerian Legislature and lived in Africa for over 10 years. He proposed a motion at the 1958 Tory conference for reciprocal rights of entry with other Commonwealth countries, for the U.K. had an open door policy and let anyone in. “When I visited Nigeria two years ago as a member of Parliament without ultimate responsibility for the affairs of the that country, I was given an entry permit valid for 14 days and renewable subject to good behaviour.” He also addressed the 1961 conference on the perils of admitting criminals and the sick. The debate was stage-managed to stop Cyril Osborne speaking who stood outside in the rain handing out off-prints of a letter of his from the morning’s Telegraph. Pannell stated that though Butler had disagreed with limiting numbers, had agreed with his suggestion of deporting immigrants who commit crimes but nothing had been done.
There is the importation of diseases which puts the population at risk. In a letter to the Times of 13th December 1960, Harold Gurden wrote, “On the health question we find the middle ring of the city(Birmingham), where immigrants are mainly concentrated, heavily peppered with dots of tuberculosis incidence. It is the opinion of medical officers that at least some immigrants are suffering with this disease before entering the country...We have a duty to our constituents.”
In 2007 it has been revealed that we have a record number of cases of TB. This has been imported by our authorities.
When we were homogeneous we trusted one another and the police did not need to be armed; now they regularly have to shoot people in the street, we are in a surveillance state and have totalitarian race laws to oppress us.
At a Society For Individual freedom meeting at Birmingham Town Hall, on 18 4 1968, 2 days before Enoch’s famous Rivers of Blood speech, Sir Ronald Bell warned of the forthcoming Race Relations Act, "I am profoundly convinced that if this immediate threat is not sharply challenged and then fought with as great a persistence as has been shown over recent years by those who have worked for this engine of oppression, then many further uses of law and of the power of the state for shaping men’s minds will follow.”
To control thought totalitarians redefine words and change the meaning of legal terms.
K. Harvey Proctor addressed the 1983 Conservative party conference ,but no senior party member sat on the platform apart from a glum looking John Biffen who only clapped sparely.
Mrs Thatcher was not present.
In 1981 Proctor had announced a plan by the Monday club Immigration and Repatriation Committee to repatriate 50,000 immigrants a year. The forward to the document was by Sir Ronald Bell.
At a Monday Club dinner in early 1984 guest of honour Enoch Powell revealed that the Conservative party had threatened to not speak to Proctor for his belief in repatriation which would have been the first time in their history they had sent one of their MP’s to Coventry!
In his outstanding book “The Unarmed Invasion”(1965) Lord Elton wrote,” We seem to be re-enacting the story of the Roman Empire, which in its decadence imported subject races to do the menial tasks.” In his autobiography the great Rock guitarist Eric Clapton tells of adverts he saw while touring Jamaica for immigrants to come here and how clear it was that they were being brought here as cheap labour.
They are there now because our rulers are on their side against us. The Saudi monarchy are building The Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), founded in 1985, Prince Charles is its honorary patron. It is the biggest Muslim educational centre in the United Kingdom and built as a traditional Oxford college around a central cloistered quadrangle. The 10,230 sq m four-storey building will feature study and research facilities, a lecture theatre, a large library and an environmentally controlled archive for rare documents; a prayer hall with traditional dome and minaret tower. The centre includes a 108-foot-high minaret and a 75-foot-high dome. It is estimated at £65 million. We remember that this traitorous university is pushing us out of there in favour of overseas students. As reported in the Independent 21 April 2004.
A TV poll marking 40 years since Enoch’s 'Rivers of Blood' speech found most people anticipate racial conflict over the years to come. The unprecedented level of prosperity Europe has enjoyed for years that has prevented the civil unrest but we are now heading into recession. In an echo of Enoch’s warnings on “racial civil war” The Sunday Times of June 11, 2006 reported that Rear Admiral Chris Parry, one of Britain’s most senior military strategists warned that western civilisation faces a threat on a par with the barbarian invasions that destroyed the Roman empire.
He said future migrations would be comparable to the Goths and Vandals while north African “barbary” pirates could be attacking yachts and beaches in the Mediterranean within 10 years.
Europe, including Britain, could be undermined by large immigrant groups with little allegiance to their host countries—a “reverse colonisation” as Parry described it. These groups would stay connected to their homelands by the internet and cheap flight.
We never asked if we wanted, this invasion, not by proud conquering warlords, but by cringing Third World masses with whom we have nothing in common but the elites wanted for cheap labour and to expiate their historic guilt, while they lived peacefully in fine areas.
The words of these heroes became reality on 7 July 2005 when 52 victims of Third World immigration were blown up in of London. Enoch had told the Southall Chamber of Commerce on 4th November 1971, “Yet it is more truly when he looks into the eyes of Asia that the Englishman comes face to face with those who will dispute with him possession of his native land.”
As Stanley Baldwin, three times Prime Minister, said On May 24 1929:“Let us keep this thought ever in our mind: “that each one of us, so far as in him lies, will strive to keep these islands a fit nursery for Our Race”.
(1) Peter Hennessy, 'Having It So Good - Britain in the Fifties' (Allen Lane, 2006) p 224
Hennessy's reference is: Peter Catterall (ed.), 'The Macmillan Diaries: The Cabinet Years, 1950-1957' (Macmillan, 2003) p 382.
Saturday, 15 November 2008
Out of the Ashes of Rock
Out of the Ashes of Rock
Rock music smashed into public awareness in 1955. The record that started the movement was Rock Around the Clock by Bill Haley and the Comets and used on the soundtrack of the American film “Blackboard Jungle” which was about juvenile delinquents and teenage gangs in a New York school. Where the film was shown or Haley played the cinemas were wrecked and seats slashed with knives. This established the wild, rebellious posture that young people began to imitate and gave them a manufactured identity and rebellion against their families and local traditions.
It was an amalgam of various forms but principally Country and Western and the black form Rhythm and Blues. It came in a package with a style of dress and ways of walking and behaving. Haley was suceeded by Elvis Presley who defined the style and look for the next decade and has a religious devotion 29 years after his death. His home Gracelands attracts worshippers on the scale of Lourdes or Mecca. If any found one of his toenails fans would likely be cured of Scrofula!
The style changed in 1962 with the Beatles. It is an American form that dominated our culture in England. The Beatles appearances produced mass hysteria and in 1964 had an audience of 58, 000 at the Shea stadium in New York, which was unique. Their records sold millions even before release and at one time they had the top 5 hits in the American Billboard chart. John Lennon made his famous remark that “We are more popular than Jesus,” that appalled many but was objectively true.
The talented artists were subsumed into the global enterprise making millions in advertising and book sales and weakened the culture and traditions of independent nations. Rock and its sanitized form pop is mass, universal entertainment.
Most Rock music was produced and listened to through drugs. The type of music went with the type of drug. Some classics are “White Rabbit” by Jefferson Airplane, “I Had Too Much to Dream last night” by The Electric Prunes, and “My Friend Jack eats Sugar Lumps” by the Smoke – all glorified LSD. This caused much psychiatric harm to gullible youngsters and in our own time the varieties of hypnotic dance music require “Ecstasy” which has killed many users.
There was required reading: Timothy Leary, Aldous Huxley, Carlos Casteneda for those who thought they were on a spiritual path; or, for those who wanted political revolution, “The Greening of America” by Charles Reich and the Marxist who inspired the Woodstock festival, and the Hippy movement, Herbert Marcuse. People who did not show full devotion were sneered at as psueds.
Rock stars were promoted as Gurus. The one most feted was John Lennon. But how deep does the thinking go? Lennon was interviewed for Marxist magazine, 'Red Mole' by rich editor Tariq Ali who wrote,” A limo pulled up outside our office, to the astonishment of bystanders. My colleague Robin Blackburn and I piled in and were driven to Tittenhurst, his Surrey mansion. We spoke for most of the day, saw one of Yoko's avant-garde films (which Robin adored) and were driven back to London. The interview had gone extremely well. Both John and Yoko had been disarmingly frank. The very next morning John rang. He had been so inspired by our interview that he had written a new song. Could he sing it down the phone? He could. That was how I first heard "Power to the People".
Tittenhurst Park a massive, white ,200 yr-old Georgian mansion in Ascot, Surrey had an eight-track studio, 7 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, 3 reception rooms and stood in 70 acres of Parkland. Not only did he record "Working Class Hero" and describe it as a song for the revolution. Here he wrote in his best known song, “Imagine” no possessions” but died leaving $275 million. He donated money to the Ira and Black Panthers.
The groups of the first beat boom looked back but for inspiration not to imitate. The Beatles based their early songs on those of Buddy Holly and used his format for a band of 3 guitarists and drummer. The Rolling Stones were part of a white blues movement in London and adopted instruments such as the maracas from black blues singers in the states and the Sitar from India. These influences aided their own productions and helped developed their own song writing. For the young musicians in the early 60’s the influx of American blues records was inspiration.
A fundamental feature of rock is excitement and the power to put people into frenzy. That is all gone, now. The current artists are looking back to previous bands. There has been a shift from copying the 1960’s groups to the 80’s, but it is still looking back to more exciting and creative times but with no development. Although it was once the young, the main buyers of rock music now are in their 40’s and 50’s. The young have no music of their own and look back to eras before they were born. Rock or pop does not grow out of the natural interactions of the community, or as an expression of some deep care or aspect of life. It is parcelled off into types and eras and the quest of the multi-national corporations for a new sounds, a new look, a new star promoted beyond their talent.
The difficulty has always been matching the words to a tune. Pop is manufactured specially for an audience to make money by titillating them with boy or girl bands with the right look. There is no cultural development and the more popular acts sound indistinguishable. Rock and Pop comes in waves and fashions and because it operates on the surface of life, puts down no roots and parcells people into an era. -“When was your era”, as if all of life comes to an end when a new fad begins!
Young people no longer have an original music of their own and look back to a time before they were born. One 23 yr-old woman tells me her favourite band is the Doors and her hero Jim Morrison. Morrison died 12 years before she was born. This would not be pathetic if she had said her heroes were say Wagner or Beethoven, as they were part of a deep tradition of music which can move people everywhere and by their genius transcend their era.
The image of rebellion is used to corrupt the fans while making millions. A young woman told me she likes the Sex Pistols and the Clash, “They are anti-establishment”. What! Most pretend to be, but have made millions and live in mansions with countless bank accounts. Looking at the Charts is like looking at the stock exchange index and buying a CD like shopping for processed food in a supermarket. Everything is packaged, the images on the front are designed to appeal to usually base instincts. There is neither spontaneous talent nor inspiration. Mass produced Rock and Pop is dying, its energy gone, or, as T.S.Eliot put it in “The Hollow Men”, fading away, “Not with a bang, But a wimper. What will fill this gap?
The time is right to begin replacing this artificial music by re- linking to our own traditions and re-developing them for our current time and experiences. We can not go back into the past and must use the instruments that modern musicians have done so much with. Many would prefer a guitar solo from Clapton, Jimmi Hendrix or Gary Moore than an Aria from an opera. It is also futile to pick up the old instruments and try to make authentic music a thousand years late - we would be a choir of caterwaulers screeching on catgut.
I mentioned Blues music. This is a genuine culture and grows out of the real experiences of poor, black singers who tramped the southern states articulating a deep need and a plaint for improvement. This is an immediate expression of the sufferings of a community grown out of experience not manufactured.
Our natural culture is being destroyed and we re-culturalised for the global culture. We should seek to introduce an understanding of our spiritual and social malaise into traditional forms. We are being oppressed by our elected representatives who have hoodwinked us into trusting them as looking after our interests is a subject for community songs. There is precedent in our Ballads of Robin Hood.
The early songs of Bob Dylan give an idea of how to articulate our modern oppressions. He wrote protest songs with a contemporary theme within traditional structures. His anthem for the new era “The Times They are A Changing” was expressed musically by using the tune of “An Irish Rover”.
“Come mothers and fathers
Throughout the land
And don't criticize
What you can't understand
Your sons and your daughters
Are beyond your command
Your old road is Rapidly agein”
This was a hymn to the Adversary culture but it suggests the way. A Hard Rains A-Gonna fall” contains imaginative poetic imagery. With Dylan the whole is greater than the parts and the images are built up until one has the feel of mans’ destructive potential.
It is developed from our traditional Border Ballad, Lord Randall:
"O where ha you been, Lord Randal, my son?
And where ha you been, my handsome young man?"
"I ha been at the greenwood; mother, make my bed soon,
For I'm wearied wi hunting, and fain wad lie down."
In Dylan,
“Oh, were have you been, my blue-eyed son?
Oh, were have you been my darling young one?
I’ve stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains,
I’ve walked and I’ve crawled on six crooked highways,
I’ve stepped in the middle of seven sad forests
I’ve been out in front of a dozen dead oceans,
And it’s a hard, it’s a hard, etc…
In the original Lord Randall has been poisoned by his lover, in Dylan the world has been poisoned by humanity. It was the time of the Cuban missile crisis and Dylan uses traditional forms to carry the contemporary thoughts and emotions felt by people across the world. The Dylan piece is more sophisticated than its model and the language poetic but it suggests a way of re-linking with our musical origins and but being topical for our current time.
TV and radio no longer have such powerful control over what we watch and hear as the internet has opened up new ways of broadcasting music. There are local shows and festivals to begin a renewal of musical culture, like the return of spring after the cold and blasts of winter. There are local and back street pubs that need custom and many who want to escape trendy bars with their excessively loud dance music which destroys customers’ ears.
Development is in the practice, not rationally planned beforehand. Natural music grows out of the community whereas artificial pop and rock are manufactured and “consumers” manipulated into buying it. Development within a tradition gives continuity and acts as a spine to hold communities together. Now that rock is dead, and pop puerile it is time to begin re-linking with our cultural origins.
Rock music smashed into public awareness in 1955. The record that started the movement was Rock Around the Clock by Bill Haley and the Comets and used on the soundtrack of the American film “Blackboard Jungle” which was about juvenile delinquents and teenage gangs in a New York school. Where the film was shown or Haley played the cinemas were wrecked and seats slashed with knives. This established the wild, rebellious posture that young people began to imitate and gave them a manufactured identity and rebellion against their families and local traditions.
It was an amalgam of various forms but principally Country and Western and the black form Rhythm and Blues. It came in a package with a style of dress and ways of walking and behaving. Haley was suceeded by Elvis Presley who defined the style and look for the next decade and has a religious devotion 29 years after his death. His home Gracelands attracts worshippers on the scale of Lourdes or Mecca. If any found one of his toenails fans would likely be cured of Scrofula!
The style changed in 1962 with the Beatles. It is an American form that dominated our culture in England. The Beatles appearances produced mass hysteria and in 1964 had an audience of 58, 000 at the Shea stadium in New York, which was unique. Their records sold millions even before release and at one time they had the top 5 hits in the American Billboard chart. John Lennon made his famous remark that “We are more popular than Jesus,” that appalled many but was objectively true.
The talented artists were subsumed into the global enterprise making millions in advertising and book sales and weakened the culture and traditions of independent nations. Rock and its sanitized form pop is mass, universal entertainment.
Most Rock music was produced and listened to through drugs. The type of music went with the type of drug. Some classics are “White Rabbit” by Jefferson Airplane, “I Had Too Much to Dream last night” by The Electric Prunes, and “My Friend Jack eats Sugar Lumps” by the Smoke – all glorified LSD. This caused much psychiatric harm to gullible youngsters and in our own time the varieties of hypnotic dance music require “Ecstasy” which has killed many users.
There was required reading: Timothy Leary, Aldous Huxley, Carlos Casteneda for those who thought they were on a spiritual path; or, for those who wanted political revolution, “The Greening of America” by Charles Reich and the Marxist who inspired the Woodstock festival, and the Hippy movement, Herbert Marcuse. People who did not show full devotion were sneered at as psueds.
Rock stars were promoted as Gurus. The one most feted was John Lennon. But how deep does the thinking go? Lennon was interviewed for Marxist magazine, 'Red Mole' by rich editor Tariq Ali who wrote,” A limo pulled up outside our office, to the astonishment of bystanders. My colleague Robin Blackburn and I piled in and were driven to Tittenhurst, his Surrey mansion. We spoke for most of the day, saw one of Yoko's avant-garde films (which Robin adored) and were driven back to London. The interview had gone extremely well. Both John and Yoko had been disarmingly frank. The very next morning John rang. He had been so inspired by our interview that he had written a new song. Could he sing it down the phone? He could. That was how I first heard "Power to the People".
Tittenhurst Park a massive, white ,200 yr-old Georgian mansion in Ascot, Surrey had an eight-track studio, 7 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, 3 reception rooms and stood in 70 acres of Parkland. Not only did he record "Working Class Hero" and describe it as a song for the revolution. Here he wrote in his best known song, “Imagine” no possessions” but died leaving $275 million. He donated money to the Ira and Black Panthers.
The groups of the first beat boom looked back but for inspiration not to imitate. The Beatles based their early songs on those of Buddy Holly and used his format for a band of 3 guitarists and drummer. The Rolling Stones were part of a white blues movement in London and adopted instruments such as the maracas from black blues singers in the states and the Sitar from India. These influences aided their own productions and helped developed their own song writing. For the young musicians in the early 60’s the influx of American blues records was inspiration.
A fundamental feature of rock is excitement and the power to put people into frenzy. That is all gone, now. The current artists are looking back to previous bands. There has been a shift from copying the 1960’s groups to the 80’s, but it is still looking back to more exciting and creative times but with no development. Although it was once the young, the main buyers of rock music now are in their 40’s and 50’s. The young have no music of their own and look back to eras before they were born. Rock or pop does not grow out of the natural interactions of the community, or as an expression of some deep care or aspect of life. It is parcelled off into types and eras and the quest of the multi-national corporations for a new sounds, a new look, a new star promoted beyond their talent.
The difficulty has always been matching the words to a tune. Pop is manufactured specially for an audience to make money by titillating them with boy or girl bands with the right look. There is no cultural development and the more popular acts sound indistinguishable. Rock and Pop comes in waves and fashions and because it operates on the surface of life, puts down no roots and parcells people into an era. -“When was your era”, as if all of life comes to an end when a new fad begins!
Young people no longer have an original music of their own and look back to a time before they were born. One 23 yr-old woman tells me her favourite band is the Doors and her hero Jim Morrison. Morrison died 12 years before she was born. This would not be pathetic if she had said her heroes were say Wagner or Beethoven, as they were part of a deep tradition of music which can move people everywhere and by their genius transcend their era.
The image of rebellion is used to corrupt the fans while making millions. A young woman told me she likes the Sex Pistols and the Clash, “They are anti-establishment”. What! Most pretend to be, but have made millions and live in mansions with countless bank accounts. Looking at the Charts is like looking at the stock exchange index and buying a CD like shopping for processed food in a supermarket. Everything is packaged, the images on the front are designed to appeal to usually base instincts. There is neither spontaneous talent nor inspiration. Mass produced Rock and Pop is dying, its energy gone, or, as T.S.Eliot put it in “The Hollow Men”, fading away, “Not with a bang, But a wimper. What will fill this gap?
The time is right to begin replacing this artificial music by re- linking to our own traditions and re-developing them for our current time and experiences. We can not go back into the past and must use the instruments that modern musicians have done so much with. Many would prefer a guitar solo from Clapton, Jimmi Hendrix or Gary Moore than an Aria from an opera. It is also futile to pick up the old instruments and try to make authentic music a thousand years late - we would be a choir of caterwaulers screeching on catgut.
I mentioned Blues music. This is a genuine culture and grows out of the real experiences of poor, black singers who tramped the southern states articulating a deep need and a plaint for improvement. This is an immediate expression of the sufferings of a community grown out of experience not manufactured.
Our natural culture is being destroyed and we re-culturalised for the global culture. We should seek to introduce an understanding of our spiritual and social malaise into traditional forms. We are being oppressed by our elected representatives who have hoodwinked us into trusting them as looking after our interests is a subject for community songs. There is precedent in our Ballads of Robin Hood.
The early songs of Bob Dylan give an idea of how to articulate our modern oppressions. He wrote protest songs with a contemporary theme within traditional structures. His anthem for the new era “The Times They are A Changing” was expressed musically by using the tune of “An Irish Rover”.
“Come mothers and fathers
Throughout the land
And don't criticize
What you can't understand
Your sons and your daughters
Are beyond your command
Your old road is Rapidly agein”
This was a hymn to the Adversary culture but it suggests the way. A Hard Rains A-Gonna fall” contains imaginative poetic imagery. With Dylan the whole is greater than the parts and the images are built up until one has the feel of mans’ destructive potential.
It is developed from our traditional Border Ballad, Lord Randall:
"O where ha you been, Lord Randal, my son?
And where ha you been, my handsome young man?"
"I ha been at the greenwood; mother, make my bed soon,
For I'm wearied wi hunting, and fain wad lie down."
In Dylan,
“Oh, were have you been, my blue-eyed son?
Oh, were have you been my darling young one?
I’ve stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains,
I’ve walked and I’ve crawled on six crooked highways,
I’ve stepped in the middle of seven sad forests
I’ve been out in front of a dozen dead oceans,
And it’s a hard, it’s a hard, etc…
In the original Lord Randall has been poisoned by his lover, in Dylan the world has been poisoned by humanity. It was the time of the Cuban missile crisis and Dylan uses traditional forms to carry the contemporary thoughts and emotions felt by people across the world. The Dylan piece is more sophisticated than its model and the language poetic but it suggests a way of re-linking with our musical origins and but being topical for our current time.
TV and radio no longer have such powerful control over what we watch and hear as the internet has opened up new ways of broadcasting music. There are local shows and festivals to begin a renewal of musical culture, like the return of spring after the cold and blasts of winter. There are local and back street pubs that need custom and many who want to escape trendy bars with their excessively loud dance music which destroys customers’ ears.
Development is in the practice, not rationally planned beforehand. Natural music grows out of the community whereas artificial pop and rock are manufactured and “consumers” manipulated into buying it. Development within a tradition gives continuity and acts as a spine to hold communities together. Now that rock is dead, and pop puerile it is time to begin re-linking with our cultural origins.
Tuesday, 21 October 2008
The Elites are surrending us
Western Elites are Surrending Their People.
The rulers try to build a multi-racial society from mixed motives: some, high-minded ideals, others exploit this to import cheap labour. They invite immigrants and make us share everything with them while the global elites who live here and multi national corporations pay little tax and politicians pay none and claim vast expenses.
If they want immigrants they should put them up at their houses; invite them into their communities. It is not as if the imports are all needy or in danger, though we pretend they are because it makes us feel wanted and righteous for offering aid.
The message conveyed to them is that we are weak and scared and this makes them despise us for not standing up for ourselves. When immigrants arrive they are welcomed by hordes of do-gooders - they can tell any lie and it is accepted.
The elites hope there is no threat from them and pretend they are essentially good and appeal to their good will by being nice to them,. hoping they will reciprocate by being nice back. This mentality was expressed neatly by Jens Orback, Sweden’s Minister of Democracy, “We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.”
The Government are feeble and allow things to happen but also cunning and manipulative. They are not really in control but inadequate for their positions. They should be strengthening our people’s characters but do the opposite - constantly blaming and using us as scapegoats (racists) if anything goes wrong in the Utopian plan. It affects our everyday lives because social relations now have to be regulated and restrictive anti-terrorist laws are imposed on everyone not just the likely suspects, Muslims.
We used to be homogeneous and trusted one another. In general it was peaceful, we queued, were relaxed with each other and tried to get on by using good manners and showing consideration. Is immigration an accident? No, it is importing cheap labour and votes without understanding the consequences.
In November 2006 the Government were advertising for immigrants and doing it by deceit. A Foreign Office pamphlet 'Multicultural Britain - A Land Of Immigrants' encouraged immigrants to come here because of the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs. It was placed in embassies across the world. Cherie Blair, the former Prime Minister’s wife, is a human rights lawyer. No wonder immigration increased so much under Blair!
In June 2004 while Conservative leader Michael Howard was campaigning against immigration to win the General Election, he was an investor in communications firm Incepta. A subsidiary company Citigate Lloyd Northover won two Home Office contracts to develop Websites and communications technology to speed up applications from immigrants to enter the UK.
The company also profited from the Immigration and Nationality Directorate website for the Government which eases the entrance and settling of asylum seekers. The Sunday Mirror of May 1, 2005 revealed that as Home Secretary he gave nearly 15,000 failed asylum seekers the right to stay in Britain for life when he was Home Secretary. He tried to conceal this.
How do ethnics perceive us? “You can chase their women and the men look the other way, even their fathers and brothers don’t mind! There is nothing they can do because their government and media are against them.”
This applies to communities already here who think of our women as only good for one thing, which is at the heart of the widespread grooming of our young girls.
One example was in the Times of August 11th 2007 which reported a 42 year-old Muslim man from Burnley. He gave one 14 year-old white girl the first of five Ecstasy tablets at a motorway service station before having sex with her on the back seat of the car while a group drove back to Lancashire. The court was told that the two men later took the girls to an address in Blackburn where Hussain,from Blackburn aged 42 had sex with the second 14 year-old white girl and gave her ten Ecstasy tablets. Judge Andrew Gilbart, QC, jailed them under new laws to protect young girls being groomed for sex.
Parents complain that white girls as young as 12 are being screwed by older Muslim men but Police and groups with responsibility to protect children pretend it is not happening or that this grooming our youngsters is not racial. Parents know that there are networks to use our young girls while the authorities are frightened to do anything. The issue is not that they are having sex with under-age girls but that they are using our women for gratification when they have their own women.
The elite present white women as only worth one thing. In early August 2007 on a Big Brother programme, within 5 minutes of arriving in the house, the role model for young white women was announcing that she loved to "swallow" and performing a lap dance for two people she'd only just met. Around the same time I accidentally turned on Hollyoaks at 5.15 and was greeted with two blokes snogging, tongues and all.
How is our culture transmitted now? David Beckham: "I definitely want Brooklyn to be Christened but I don't know into which religion yet".
There is a predatory element among the newcomers and they see us differently from the way they look at their own people, so they do not feel guilty about exploiting us. They view us in a similar way to how we viewed them when we went into their countries: as pushovers and a source of advantage.
They are doing what comes naturally while we are being surrendered by our elites. It is encouraged by TV which sells its programmes to foreign countries and this acts as incitement to come here. For years traditional liberals would argue,”We did it to them now they can do it to us.”
It was of course us who had to do their suffering for them. They live in good areas!
The elites are softening us up for immigrants to take over! An editorial in the Birmingham Post of 18th march 2006 asked: ”Is there anything intrinsically wrong with whites becoming a minority in Birmingham?” Well, then, why not look at what is happening in practice? Take the “Pride of Spitalfields” in Heneage Street off Brick Lane. This beautiful, traditional East End pub was fire-bombed by an Asian gang in 2003 and some staff were injured. Two weeks later the landlady was threatened with a replica gun in Brick Lane by Asians and warned: 'You don't belong round here'. She stood her ground and told them to shoot if they were going to. The Bangla gang ran off.
The same courage has enabled her to continue - and it's still a great pub. The Exmouth Estate was a completely white estate but because of Labour's plan to enrich the entire East End with Bangladeshis.
The Hollands was one of the loveliest pubs in London and prized by the Victorian Society, and poet John Betjeman. It was full of Victorian artifacts and sitting in the back bar was like sitting in a small Victorian drawing room.
How did the immigrant feel about this quaint Victorian bit of our culture? They continually tried to burn it down. The 1997 attempt didn't quite succeed but they persevered and finally achieved the desired result. Within the year the Spanish landlady decided she'd had enough. Young's Brewery, who owned the place, decided it had become a liability. Burning a pub down is against the law.
The police are paid to do uphold the law and detect crime but not, where Muslims are concerned - they can do what they like to our society, our country - they are protected because the police are afraid to interfere in issues of 'cultural sensitivity'. Police who do so risk not being promoted - inevitable in a politicised police force. The chiefs of the police are in league with the immigrants against us. Lord Stevens introduced spies in police training colleges to report on and weed out “racist” trainees.
In Tower Hamlets recently it was revealed that police raids on suspected terrorists would have to be cleared with local Muslim religious leaders to prevent civil disturbance. Get permission from the local Imam before raiding a terrorist suspect's flat!
At one level they are constantly pushing for more political power and the local council is now nearly all Muslim and changing our ways to their own. In the council chamber recently a memo was sent round exhorting non-Muslims to observe fasting practices during council meetings.
Two years ago, a traditional Guy Fawkes Night usually subsidised by the council was abandoned for a public enactment of Bangladeshi folk tales which were funded by local council taxes.
There was a proposal to alter the name of Aldgate East underground station near Brick Lane to Banglatown. Last year, because of a shortage of cemetery space for Muslims it was proposed by one Muslim councillor to relocate the graves in Tower Hamlets Cemetery elsewhere in order to construct a ‘multi-faith burial site’ – a Muslim burial site.
Why did the graves need to be dug up? Because dead Muslims cannot be buried alongside Christians and other infidels. There are some relatives of those buried in that cemetery still living. The dead include victims of the famous Bethnal Green tube disaster of 1943.
On the streets, the other part of the pincer move to power operates - the lawlessness of Bangladeshi youths, whose parents appear to have abandoned any attempt to control their behaviour.
The Ousley report published after the Bradford riots in 2001 showed that Muslim fathers, by and large, were only interested in their sons adopting Islam. If they did, the parents turned a blind eye to any anti-social behaviour. All white people, even the elderly, are targets. Tribal gang wars have seen in the last few years - between the Brick Lane Boys, the Shadwell Posse and the Poplar Boys, for example. These gangs also fight gangs from other Asian turfs in London, such as the Drummond Street Boys from Euston.
At other times, Muslim youths have kidnapped animals from one of the local farms on the Isle of Dogs. Small goats and pigs have been driven around for about a mile then taken out of the car and stoned to death – they have also been tortured in other ways.
The Muslim cruelty to animals, particularly dogs, is disgusting. There are educated Muslims who would never behave in this sort of way – attacking white people, gays or torturing animals and I doubt that this behaviour is directly inspired by the Koran, yet there is a wholly unnecessary sense of fear which is felt by those who live there - not only working class people.
There is a parallel in India, but the Indian Government are direct and ours manipulative and deceitful. West Bengal is in the hands of Communists - the ruling party is the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and they have been destroying what was good among the Bengalis.
From 1977 the CPI(M) has been destroying the last traces of Bengali culture - the Viswabharati, the university of Rabindra Nath Tagore, the Asiatic Society of Sir William Jones, the works of 19th Century Bengali writers.
In the 1980's and 1990's, the Communists in West Bengal took control of the properties of the Anglo-Indians, the Bengali Nationalists and Conservatives of British Period. Thousands of Bengalis have been displaced from West Bengal to settle in other countries, UK , USA, and Canada.
In Kolkata on 10th September 2008 Activists of Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) staged a protest against Bangladeshi immigrants. They chanted slogans about their resentment of the large numbers of illegal Bangladeshi immigrants flooding in. They carried placards and banners and marched down the streets demanding deportation. They want Bangladeshi immigrants to be stripped of the benefits that they get in India and repatriated.
There are 30 million Bangladeshi immigrants in India: ” ... we are staging an agitation against them. We demand that these immigrants should be identified and they should be deported from this country. Detect, delete, and deport, these are our three demands”, said Sunil Kumar, an activist.
A warning of what EU elites would do with I.D. cards - These illegal immigrants work in low-paid jobs - maids, servants, labourers etc. They are usually naturalised after being issued with ration cards and identity cards.
On September the 27th 2008 Former Union law minister Subramanian Swamy told the two-day Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) of infiltration by Bangladeshi as a national issue and said that either Bangladesh should hand over one third of its land to India or take back illegal immigrants.
British elites cannot face that immigrants might want to take revenge on us. Our pretense that they are harmless undervalues their humanity and leads our rulers into dangerous absurdities like police chiefs alerting community leaders before they raid for terrorists or explosives!
Implicit in our conduct is we have no fight in us, are easy. The crimes committed by ethnics are not the same as those committed by our people, they are how people invade by demography - raping, stealing and assaulting us – they are here to take. Their body language shows it as they swagger through our streets.
As soon as we wake we put on the TV, or sit at our PC.s, to prevent thinking about what is going on around us. We accept broadcasts from our elites telling us what to think and how to interpret news events without question. We are encouraged to be tolerant which is to be passive and allow others to take everything off us.
The media treated the Muslim bombings as if it were natural disasters and no one was to blame to excuse it which encourages others. There is no questioning of their cultural background but blame the ”preachers of hate,” their visits to the middle east: but these have learned all about us, decided they do not like us and our ways and rejected us. This is a blow to the rulers because they pretend that these middle-class lads of the third generation, behave just like us while at the same time they promote tolerance for different cultures.
It is fearsome to look at where we did it to others like Ireland, Ghana, Sri Lanka, Ceylon. Rubber came from South America not Malaya but we planted it there and because the Singhalese were not cut out for the work imported Tamils with a different language and religion and caused mayhem and misery which is still going on.
The elites think it is normal to mingle but people have deeper loyalties as in Sarajevo where superficially it seemed that everyone was uniting. On independence the divided populations of India collapsed into civil war, as Nigeria, Rwanda, Iraq and Iran, as in Sarajevo, it happens regularly and is happening here. Everyone needs somewhere to belong.
Is it guilt that motivates the elites? Guilt is remorse and you make amends, but the elites are not making amends themselves they use us for that by bringing immigrants into our communities not their own.
They live in lovely areas or safely in gated communities and this shows their real motive - loathing of their own people and fear of offending other ethnic groups. The profession of guilt is egotistical and makes them feel virtuous.
The political, intellectual and corporate elites think only of themselves. One gets cheap labour, the other looks magnanimous and great. They do not care how much we suffer as long as they feel good.
Many illegals work unlawfully long hours for almost nothing and have their liberty restricted by their masters. If anything makes me want to vomit it is the sickening hypocrisy of western elites who publicly apologise for historic slavery while importing wage slaves from the third world and now Eastern Europe!
Although, the elites allow Muslims to what they like to us and our communities they exploit them in their own countries. There have been reports of our elites using sweated labour in Bangladesh.
Recommended Reading
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7184166.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7183465.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2005/11/08/do0802.xml
http://awarforeurabia.blogspot.com/2005/07/mark-steyn-wake-up-folks-its-war.html
The rulers try to build a multi-racial society from mixed motives: some, high-minded ideals, others exploit this to import cheap labour. They invite immigrants and make us share everything with them while the global elites who live here and multi national corporations pay little tax and politicians pay none and claim vast expenses.
If they want immigrants they should put them up at their houses; invite them into their communities. It is not as if the imports are all needy or in danger, though we pretend they are because it makes us feel wanted and righteous for offering aid.
The message conveyed to them is that we are weak and scared and this makes them despise us for not standing up for ourselves. When immigrants arrive they are welcomed by hordes of do-gooders - they can tell any lie and it is accepted.
The elites hope there is no threat from them and pretend they are essentially good and appeal to their good will by being nice to them,. hoping they will reciprocate by being nice back. This mentality was expressed neatly by Jens Orback, Sweden’s Minister of Democracy, “We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.”
The Government are feeble and allow things to happen but also cunning and manipulative. They are not really in control but inadequate for their positions. They should be strengthening our people’s characters but do the opposite - constantly blaming and using us as scapegoats (racists) if anything goes wrong in the Utopian plan. It affects our everyday lives because social relations now have to be regulated and restrictive anti-terrorist laws are imposed on everyone not just the likely suspects, Muslims.
We used to be homogeneous and trusted one another. In general it was peaceful, we queued, were relaxed with each other and tried to get on by using good manners and showing consideration. Is immigration an accident? No, it is importing cheap labour and votes without understanding the consequences.
In November 2006 the Government were advertising for immigrants and doing it by deceit. A Foreign Office pamphlet 'Multicultural Britain - A Land Of Immigrants' encouraged immigrants to come here because of the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs. It was placed in embassies across the world. Cherie Blair, the former Prime Minister’s wife, is a human rights lawyer. No wonder immigration increased so much under Blair!
In June 2004 while Conservative leader Michael Howard was campaigning against immigration to win the General Election, he was an investor in communications firm Incepta. A subsidiary company Citigate Lloyd Northover won two Home Office contracts to develop Websites and communications technology to speed up applications from immigrants to enter the UK.
The company also profited from the Immigration and Nationality Directorate website for the Government which eases the entrance and settling of asylum seekers. The Sunday Mirror of May 1, 2005 revealed that as Home Secretary he gave nearly 15,000 failed asylum seekers the right to stay in Britain for life when he was Home Secretary. He tried to conceal this.
How do ethnics perceive us? “You can chase their women and the men look the other way, even their fathers and brothers don’t mind! There is nothing they can do because their government and media are against them.”
This applies to communities already here who think of our women as only good for one thing, which is at the heart of the widespread grooming of our young girls.
One example was in the Times of August 11th 2007 which reported a 42 year-old Muslim man from Burnley. He gave one 14 year-old white girl the first of five Ecstasy tablets at a motorway service station before having sex with her on the back seat of the car while a group drove back to Lancashire. The court was told that the two men later took the girls to an address in Blackburn where Hussain,from Blackburn aged 42 had sex with the second 14 year-old white girl and gave her ten Ecstasy tablets. Judge Andrew Gilbart, QC, jailed them under new laws to protect young girls being groomed for sex.
Parents complain that white girls as young as 12 are being screwed by older Muslim men but Police and groups with responsibility to protect children pretend it is not happening or that this grooming our youngsters is not racial. Parents know that there are networks to use our young girls while the authorities are frightened to do anything. The issue is not that they are having sex with under-age girls but that they are using our women for gratification when they have their own women.
The elite present white women as only worth one thing. In early August 2007 on a Big Brother programme, within 5 minutes of arriving in the house, the role model for young white women was announcing that she loved to "swallow" and performing a lap dance for two people she'd only just met. Around the same time I accidentally turned on Hollyoaks at 5.15 and was greeted with two blokes snogging, tongues and all.
How is our culture transmitted now? David Beckham: "I definitely want Brooklyn to be Christened but I don't know into which religion yet".
There is a predatory element among the newcomers and they see us differently from the way they look at their own people, so they do not feel guilty about exploiting us. They view us in a similar way to how we viewed them when we went into their countries: as pushovers and a source of advantage.
They are doing what comes naturally while we are being surrendered by our elites. It is encouraged by TV which sells its programmes to foreign countries and this acts as incitement to come here. For years traditional liberals would argue,”We did it to them now they can do it to us.”
It was of course us who had to do their suffering for them. They live in good areas!
The elites are softening us up for immigrants to take over! An editorial in the Birmingham Post of 18th march 2006 asked: ”Is there anything intrinsically wrong with whites becoming a minority in Birmingham?” Well, then, why not look at what is happening in practice? Take the “Pride of Spitalfields” in Heneage Street off Brick Lane. This beautiful, traditional East End pub was fire-bombed by an Asian gang in 2003 and some staff were injured. Two weeks later the landlady was threatened with a replica gun in Brick Lane by Asians and warned: 'You don't belong round here'. She stood her ground and told them to shoot if they were going to. The Bangla gang ran off.
The same courage has enabled her to continue - and it's still a great pub. The Exmouth Estate was a completely white estate but because of Labour's plan to enrich the entire East End with Bangladeshis.
The Hollands was one of the loveliest pubs in London and prized by the Victorian Society, and poet John Betjeman. It was full of Victorian artifacts and sitting in the back bar was like sitting in a small Victorian drawing room.
How did the immigrant feel about this quaint Victorian bit of our culture? They continually tried to burn it down. The 1997 attempt didn't quite succeed but they persevered and finally achieved the desired result. Within the year the Spanish landlady decided she'd had enough. Young's Brewery, who owned the place, decided it had become a liability. Burning a pub down is against the law.
The police are paid to do uphold the law and detect crime but not, where Muslims are concerned - they can do what they like to our society, our country - they are protected because the police are afraid to interfere in issues of 'cultural sensitivity'. Police who do so risk not being promoted - inevitable in a politicised police force. The chiefs of the police are in league with the immigrants against us. Lord Stevens introduced spies in police training colleges to report on and weed out “racist” trainees.
In Tower Hamlets recently it was revealed that police raids on suspected terrorists would have to be cleared with local Muslim religious leaders to prevent civil disturbance. Get permission from the local Imam before raiding a terrorist suspect's flat!
At one level they are constantly pushing for more political power and the local council is now nearly all Muslim and changing our ways to their own. In the council chamber recently a memo was sent round exhorting non-Muslims to observe fasting practices during council meetings.
Two years ago, a traditional Guy Fawkes Night usually subsidised by the council was abandoned for a public enactment of Bangladeshi folk tales which were funded by local council taxes.
There was a proposal to alter the name of Aldgate East underground station near Brick Lane to Banglatown. Last year, because of a shortage of cemetery space for Muslims it was proposed by one Muslim councillor to relocate the graves in Tower Hamlets Cemetery elsewhere in order to construct a ‘multi-faith burial site’ – a Muslim burial site.
Why did the graves need to be dug up? Because dead Muslims cannot be buried alongside Christians and other infidels. There are some relatives of those buried in that cemetery still living. The dead include victims of the famous Bethnal Green tube disaster of 1943.
On the streets, the other part of the pincer move to power operates - the lawlessness of Bangladeshi youths, whose parents appear to have abandoned any attempt to control their behaviour.
The Ousley report published after the Bradford riots in 2001 showed that Muslim fathers, by and large, were only interested in their sons adopting Islam. If they did, the parents turned a blind eye to any anti-social behaviour. All white people, even the elderly, are targets. Tribal gang wars have seen in the last few years - between the Brick Lane Boys, the Shadwell Posse and the Poplar Boys, for example. These gangs also fight gangs from other Asian turfs in London, such as the Drummond Street Boys from Euston.
At other times, Muslim youths have kidnapped animals from one of the local farms on the Isle of Dogs. Small goats and pigs have been driven around for about a mile then taken out of the car and stoned to death – they have also been tortured in other ways.
The Muslim cruelty to animals, particularly dogs, is disgusting. There are educated Muslims who would never behave in this sort of way – attacking white people, gays or torturing animals and I doubt that this behaviour is directly inspired by the Koran, yet there is a wholly unnecessary sense of fear which is felt by those who live there - not only working class people.
There is a parallel in India, but the Indian Government are direct and ours manipulative and deceitful. West Bengal is in the hands of Communists - the ruling party is the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and they have been destroying what was good among the Bengalis.
From 1977 the CPI(M) has been destroying the last traces of Bengali culture - the Viswabharati, the university of Rabindra Nath Tagore, the Asiatic Society of Sir William Jones, the works of 19th Century Bengali writers.
In the 1980's and 1990's, the Communists in West Bengal took control of the properties of the Anglo-Indians, the Bengali Nationalists and Conservatives of British Period. Thousands of Bengalis have been displaced from West Bengal to settle in other countries, UK , USA, and Canada.
In Kolkata on 10th September 2008 Activists of Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) staged a protest against Bangladeshi immigrants. They chanted slogans about their resentment of the large numbers of illegal Bangladeshi immigrants flooding in. They carried placards and banners and marched down the streets demanding deportation. They want Bangladeshi immigrants to be stripped of the benefits that they get in India and repatriated.
There are 30 million Bangladeshi immigrants in India: ” ... we are staging an agitation against them. We demand that these immigrants should be identified and they should be deported from this country. Detect, delete, and deport, these are our three demands”, said Sunil Kumar, an activist.
A warning of what EU elites would do with I.D. cards - These illegal immigrants work in low-paid jobs - maids, servants, labourers etc. They are usually naturalised after being issued with ration cards and identity cards.
On September the 27th 2008 Former Union law minister Subramanian Swamy told the two-day Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) of infiltration by Bangladeshi as a national issue and said that either Bangladesh should hand over one third of its land to India or take back illegal immigrants.
British elites cannot face that immigrants might want to take revenge on us. Our pretense that they are harmless undervalues their humanity and leads our rulers into dangerous absurdities like police chiefs alerting community leaders before they raid for terrorists or explosives!
Implicit in our conduct is we have no fight in us, are easy. The crimes committed by ethnics are not the same as those committed by our people, they are how people invade by demography - raping, stealing and assaulting us – they are here to take. Their body language shows it as they swagger through our streets.
As soon as we wake we put on the TV, or sit at our PC.s, to prevent thinking about what is going on around us. We accept broadcasts from our elites telling us what to think and how to interpret news events without question. We are encouraged to be tolerant which is to be passive and allow others to take everything off us.
The media treated the Muslim bombings as if it were natural disasters and no one was to blame to excuse it which encourages others. There is no questioning of their cultural background but blame the ”preachers of hate,” their visits to the middle east: but these have learned all about us, decided they do not like us and our ways and rejected us. This is a blow to the rulers because they pretend that these middle-class lads of the third generation, behave just like us while at the same time they promote tolerance for different cultures.
It is fearsome to look at where we did it to others like Ireland, Ghana, Sri Lanka, Ceylon. Rubber came from South America not Malaya but we planted it there and because the Singhalese were not cut out for the work imported Tamils with a different language and religion and caused mayhem and misery which is still going on.
The elites think it is normal to mingle but people have deeper loyalties as in Sarajevo where superficially it seemed that everyone was uniting. On independence the divided populations of India collapsed into civil war, as Nigeria, Rwanda, Iraq and Iran, as in Sarajevo, it happens regularly and is happening here. Everyone needs somewhere to belong.
Is it guilt that motivates the elites? Guilt is remorse and you make amends, but the elites are not making amends themselves they use us for that by bringing immigrants into our communities not their own.
They live in lovely areas or safely in gated communities and this shows their real motive - loathing of their own people and fear of offending other ethnic groups. The profession of guilt is egotistical and makes them feel virtuous.
The political, intellectual and corporate elites think only of themselves. One gets cheap labour, the other looks magnanimous and great. They do not care how much we suffer as long as they feel good.
Many illegals work unlawfully long hours for almost nothing and have their liberty restricted by their masters. If anything makes me want to vomit it is the sickening hypocrisy of western elites who publicly apologise for historic slavery while importing wage slaves from the third world and now Eastern Europe!
Although, the elites allow Muslims to what they like to us and our communities they exploit them in their own countries. There have been reports of our elites using sweated labour in Bangladesh.
Recommended Reading
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7184166.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7183465.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2005/11/08/do0802.xml
http://awarforeurabia.blogspot.com/2005/07/mark-steyn-wake-up-folks-its-war.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
