Often, in researching for an article like this, I find it is almost impossible to believe what I am reading. I am reminded that we are fortunate. We have attained a perceptive grasp and know how to read between the lines. But if you talk to the average punter in the pub, in the shops or on the bus, you will find that they are still not free from propagandists deceit. They believe much of what they have been told by the media.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_P3tAP38GuxI/Sh....h/Scan10074.jpg
The UK is ruled by an ideological caste which is a self-selecting elite that requires total acceptance of the belief-system to advance in life; the practical aspect is a Kleptocracy as they rob the population by deceit and theft from public funds. If you meet that criteria you can fiddle yourself a fortune. Blair’s expenses records have now been accidentally shredded! Opening the door to immigration is a nice, little earner if your wife is a Human Rights lawyer.
They transfer other peoples’ taxes to fellow Kleptocrats in the Third World with whom they are in alliance under the guise of giving to the starving or poor but make little effort to ensure that starving people actually get the aid. These are their two main activities and both utilise a talent for deceit, deception, dissembling and good old-fashioned lying and stealing. They have a common way of thinking and make allowances for themselves.
There is an awakening going on, but the media are still dictating opinion for the mass of people in the soggy centre. Everyone talks of the gutter press, and of their lies and deceit. (1)
(2) http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/maguire/2007/10/bnps-king-harold-claim-is-bonk.html
But people still form their opinions on what the press tells them. The propagandist nature of that is apparent in the dumbing-down that we see in the coverage of politics and areas that the elites want to control, while the analysis on the sports pages of, say, football tactics, or analysis of football managers and their styles, is thoughtful, informative stuff. (2)
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/2....15875-21341228/
It assumes a great deal of both the intelligence and knowledge of the reader. The political coverage, however, treats him as an empty vessel to be filled with filled with foreign thoughts.
How do the establishment and their media deal with people who form their own conclusions from life, and see through the lies told by the media? They ignore our perceptions and argue to the man. They insult the speaker. Why don’t they calmly and reasonably explain why we are wrong? Because our views are natural and traditional and instinctive. They cannot face what they also think deep down, so they project on to us. Those in charge, the “caste”, are the same as us deep down but don’t have to express it because they have good lives in nice areas and exclusive jobs; underneath, they have the same instincts as us and, though cushioned, feel the same shocks. What they do when they feel unease sneaking in is to repress the doubt, and when dark thoughts bubble to the surface they force them to the back of their minds. This tension is barely perceived as it is projected on to us. They see what they cannot face in us, and that is why they never give a reasoned explanation to us. All the press hate the BNP with a passion. When I read their hate I look for sensible points in case there is a real expose, but it is always lies.
The BNP are a genuinely popular movement that recalls Huey Long in the States and Poujade in France, have an opportunity at grassroots level and an enormous opportunity now they have two MEPs.
Griffin has made some inroads into gaining the vote from middle-class voters which should make a lot of difference in the long run. There are a several BNP councillors who own businesses and who, through networking, will probably help to increase the popularity of the party. Maybe that explains part of why the media went to war with them!
What else is it about the BNP that the media hate so much? Is it that its policy is completely different from the norm, thus they attack people who are not like “us”? General dislike of the leaders? Revenge, then? It was the BNP’s Michael Barnbrook who exposed Conservative MP Derek Conway and started the expenses scams ball rolling. Or are the media, like the politicians, scared the BNP will expose them too? The press are, as an institution, liberal-Socialist. Individually they want to keep their jobs so they toe the line. The media put a great deal of money and effort into their Anti-BNP campaign, with every single newspaper and even The Publican, Accountancy Age and Caterer & Housekeeper joining the biased fray!
If not for the internet, the BNP website, blogs etc and the activists on the ground, the party would have been hammered at the ballot box. I can honestly say that I have never seen such a campaign of hatred towards any party, which destroys the media pretence of being fair and unbisased and leads me to suspect that the NUJ is probably still the closed shop that it was back in the 80’s. And I only hope that the claims of vote-rigging aren’t true (though I’m not as naive as to believe that there won’t have been some discussions of vote-rigging going on). It is of profound importance to tackle this bias.
It is built into people like animals to defend our territories, and when they have uncomfortable thoughts or feelings they often project them onto other people, assigning the thoughts or feelings that they cannot face in themselves to an alternative target. Neurotic projection is seeing in others what they find objectionable in themselves and unwanted thoughts, and emotions are ascribed onto another person or people. According to Wade, Tavris (2000) projection occurs when a person’s unacceptable or threatening feelings are repressed and then attributed to someone else.
When the Establishment attacks its rivals it generalises, but even when corruption is widespread amongst the Establishment parties, as with the expenses scandals, it is presented as an individual matter. Although it is clear that the expenses scandal is a matter of the party as a whole, the media, being corrupt, focus on individuals. Party politicians, for their part, try hard not to focus at all. (3)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY3YNW0TFV8
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/articl....in g-No-10.html
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment....icle6445961.ece
http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.co....0-expenses.html
David Cameron acknowledged that many people will be angry at the main parties over the MPs’ expenses, but he urged them not to react by voting for the BNP. Cameron is a civilised and polished man. But he became very angry with a member of the audience at the Bath and West Show in Shepton Mallet, Somerset - and this was an example of when what cannot be faced is projected. The member of the audience argued that the BNP “have a point when it comes to immigration” and Cameron retorted: “If you vote for the BNP you are voting for a bunch of fascists who want to divide this country over the issues of race and the colour of skin.” Cameron told him: “Go and have a look at what the BNP have said. Do not be naive about what these people stand for. “They dress up in a suit and knock on your door in a nice way but they are still Nazi thugs”. Yes, look at what they really stand for and do not trust the media. (4)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....ths- later.html
He told the audience:
“There is a proper national debate that we should have about immigration. I want us to limit the number of people coming to Britain, but do not believe that the way to beat the BNP is to half agree with them.”
He knows full well that debate and honest expression of fears have been suppressed by the Ideological Caste who cannot bear to hear the truth! But what is his hidden agenda?
Cameron revealed the establishment agenda to de-culture as well as dispossess us:
“Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.” (5)
http://www.movinghere.org.uk/galleries/histories/asian/origins/origins.htm
To accelerate the socially-engineering of our society Cameron set up the Conservative Muslim Forum, a sort of Tory equivalent of the National Black Police Association, which ‘advises’ the Conservative Party on how best to assimilate us to Muslims. The CMF wants the compulsory history curriculum in schools changed to give full recognition of the “massive contribution (sic) that Islam has made to the development of Western civilisation”.
His totalitarian response to comments by Patrick Mercer and Nigel Hastilow show what this “freedom” means - persecution of dissidents. But what does he stand for, in his lovely suits?
“There is no domestic or foreign any more. In this world today, we are all in it together.”
He abandoned his constituency in Whitney during severe flooding to visit Rwanda. His view that immigration has benefited Britain “immeasurably”, and we are they “free” and not frightened of being persecuted by the state, would not find an echo in the hearts of the masses. What Cameron really means is that he wants people to be free to say what the Caste wants them to say, and to have control over their lives so that the Caste can manage them in the way they want to.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew....-on-floods.html
Nick Clegg, another member of the Ideological Caste, saw himself staring straight back at him when he looked at the BNP:
“They peddle hate and they don’t actually provide people with hope.”
Hope? If you are hopeful for the future for women in an increasingly Islamicised West, just look at the Despatches programme that was filmed inside Mosques. If you are hopeful for a just life for the native British, just look at how immigrants enter our country without question and officials say nothing. But if we speak we are shut up with the usual insults of “racism”, “xenophobia” and “hate”. In normal, non-Marxised times there are rules of etiquette that govern how we approach others and are approached. The idea that the present vile censorship constitutes hospitality and openness to strangers is utterly false, and just a cover because the Caste are too weak to acknowledge the enormity of what they have done to us.
"Police are investigating money laundering allegations over the Liberal Democrats' acceptance of £2.4m from a donor later convicted of fraud.
Michael Brown's donation hugely boosted the party's 2005 election campaign, the BBC's Newsnight programme said.
Mr Brown was convicted of fraud in 2008 but vanished before being sentenced to seven years in jail last month.
The party said its auditors were "satisfied that we do not need to make provision for repayment".
Mr Brown's victims say the Liberal Democrats were using their stolen money.
Now one of them, Robert Mann, who is already suing the party to get it back, has instructed his lawyers to ask police to investigate whether the party breached the 2002 Proceeds of Crime Act"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8110452.stm
Sir Ian Blair, who as commissioner of the Metropolitan Police was in charge at the time of the London bombings, was paid £580,000 during his final eight months in office, more than double his annual salary, and a pension of £3.5 million. No wonder he was compliant!
Complementary Projection is the act of assuming that others do, think and feel in the same way as you. The Archbishop of Canterbury says the adoption of certain aspects of Sharia law in the UK “seems unavoidable”. He told Radio 4’s World at One on 7th February 2008 that the UK has to “face up to the fact” that some of its citizens do not relate to the British legal system. Dr Williams argues that adopting parts of Islamic Sharia law would help maintain social cohesion. Williams also tried to cover up the exposures of MPs’ expenses. (6)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment....icle6345624.ece
Another who wants to destroy Britain and her people is the Bishop of Hulme, the Rt Rev Stephen Lowe. He said recently that anyone who votes BNP is not a Christian!. (7)
http://www.manchester.anglican.org/news/209/faith-leaders-sign-antibnp-pledge
Lowe also took it upon himself to ban I vow to thee my country from his services for being too nationalistic:
“Honestly, nobody can really, if they read that hymn, sing it in any seriousness anymore.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/3557750.stm
He added that he was raising the issue in the wider context of the “vilification” of foreigners in the media and had noticed it was being sung at “various national occasions”. He was seeing villification of the indigenous population who are vilified in the media IF they stand up for themselves but projecting it.
The Bishops talk as if the BNP operates in a vacuum where no changes and no events ever impel political consequences. They seem to think that their faux-holy response has no foundation in culturally Marxist ideology. But it does: it is all part of their ideology. And what do they really think? Archbishop Murphy-O’Connor tolerated child abuse by priests.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/840594.stm
In reality, hospitality implies that someone needs refuge ... you welcome them ... but after a time they leave. They do not move in or push your own children out. That is not hospitality. That is dispossession.
Certainly the most comic but also the best example of repressed racism was the classic bloomer by famous football manager Ron Atkinson in what is known as a Freudian Slip. On 21 April 2004, he said, “… he (Desailly) is what is known in some schools as a lazy thick nigger”. Transmission in the UK had finished - his comment was broadcast to the Middle East. He also gave up his column for The Guardian “by mutual agreement”. He has no idea why he said it. He believes it was an aberration and that he is not racist, stating that his West Brom side was the first high-profile British club to have a significant number of black players.
Last November, Brown and Mandelson went to Saudi to ask for funding for the IMF and Western economies, and offered them some influence over our affairs. Darling has introduced Sharia banking and the EU have signed “The Barcelona Deal” which gives open immigration into Europe. The consequences are very ugly. Last January thousands of Muslims marched through London and other European cities chanting “Jews to the gas”.
It is important that intelligent young people start looking into what is actually happening - not what we are told is happening. Don’t take my word for it. Look into it.
The quote in that article of Cameron saying we should adapt to Muslims is only different in degree, but not kind, from the submission of Simon Hughes to Muslims. (9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHZYXOm898Q
The traditional elites such as the Archbishop of Canterbury, Judge Butler-Sloss and Stephan Hickman QC are calling for the introduction of Sharia Law. Consider how we are told that Islam is a “Religion of Peace”. Both Tony Blair and Boris Johnson have stated as much. Well, if that’s true, wouldn’t you expect such a force for “goodness” to be evident in culture, and society? But is that the truth of Islamic societies?
Saudi Arabia (Muslim) has a legal system that uses savage penalties. How does a ‘Religion of Peace’ feel about criminals getting their hands chopped off? The protesters who called for death to a cartoonist who drew Mohammed in a way that they saw as offensive. Did Muslims across the world declare that this was in no conceivable way an appropriate response? Were the Muslim “extremists” who in their hundreds called for death to Gillian Gibbons, the teacher working in the Sudan who made the cultural error of permitting a pupil to name a teddy bear “Mohammed”, mere ‘freaks’, totally insane, totally unrepresentative of any version of Islam? In our own country we saw what they really think when they burnt Salman Rushdie’s books.
The Caste behave with studied generosity towards immigrants, and pretend they are harmless. If you cannot face some danger you may well pretend it is harmless, or even not real. If there is a gangster in the area terrorising others you wish it away. Oh, he’s a good bloke ... he doesn’t bother me. It’s a way of putting off catastrophe. And perhaps they will get to like us. Perhaps they will realise that we are nice people. It’s like being so frightened you pretend something is not happening. It is too painful for the elites to acknowledge and would lead to sufficient anguish for them to strike out, blaming us.
The timid rulers have capitulated to everyone from Communists in South Africa and Zimbabwe to Muslims throughout Europe. They can not assert themselves over anyone but their own compliant people. There is a great deal of emasculated masochism bound up with the shame and lack of moral courage of our rulers.
They give overseas aid to countries who don’t need it and pass oppressive laws against their own people. An early example of the state oppressing its own people and privileging foreigners was the the race battles in Notting Hill of 1958. Evil Judge Salmon gave excessive sentences of around 4 years to the young working-class local lad but let the Black youths off.
The 1961 race battles in Dudley were similar. Young men were fearful of losing their jobs to immigrants but even worse, the immigrants were pulling their women while many young locals were away serving their country on national service. The police arrested them and the magistrates punished them just for acting naturally. The state was breaking down the primary instincts of its own menfolk to keep their women and territory!
In his excellent book “The Deculturalisation of the English People”, John Lovejoy told of how, on his return from Australia where he had worked closely with Aborigines, he was horrified to see that his own people were being decultured in the same way (and by the same Globalist forces). The most important factor in a people’s decline is when the men lose their women, and that is what the Caste are doing to us by constantly promoting ethnics. How often in a normal day do we encounter advertisements and other representations of the typical family unit as a Black with a white woman. I urge people to look for themselves and not trust the Caste who are trying to destroy their own people for no better reason than their own underlying fear of other races!
(10)
In the most noble speech ever made in the House of commons Labour MP Frank Tomney explained how his young constituents were persecuted by the elites. Speaking in Cyril Osborne's Immigration (Control) debate HC Deb 05 December 1958 vol 596 cc1552-97
"I do not want to take up too much time, but I have a special consideration to put to the Under-Secretary of State arising out of the race riots in my constituency. Nine young men were arrested. There is no one in the constituency who takes the view that what they did was not wrong, severely wrong, but the sentence they received, boys of 17 years of age, was four years' imprisonment, and there has been considerable feeling in Notting Hill and that neighbourhood against these sentences, and it is still there today, so that even coloured people are going round organising petitions on behalf of those boys.
I wrote a letter on behalf of the parents of those boys to the Home Secretary, asking him to see me about this matter. He replied that it was sub judice and he could not do so. The case was subject to appeal a week ago and the Appeal Bench confirmed the sentences. So far as I know—and I made sure—none of those boys had a previous conviction. Not one of them. It may be that there will be a change of attitude towards this case on the part of the Home Office after time has elapsed. I mention this case only to demonstrate that, despite the fact that there may have been some unsavoury people, some people out looking for trouble, some people out to spread trouble in these areas, there were people who were genuinely concerned about their own position.
I want to refer to an issue which has been put to me. It concerns the Manchester Guardian and some of my constituents. We all know that frequently there is landlord and tenant trouble. We know about the problems that arise between white landlords and coloured tenants, between coloured landlords and white tenants, between coloured landlords and coloured tenants, between English landlords and English tenants, between Irish landlords and English tenants, and between English landlords and tenants from Commonwealth countries.
These are things which are spread by gossip and otherwise through our constituencies. The case I have in mind was a classic one in so far as the Manchester Guardian treated it in a special article. Some of my constituents did not agree with the contents of the article. They sent me a petition on the matter and upon the issue which gave rise to the article. That was all right. I investigated the case personally. I interviewed the coloured family concerned. I interviewed their white tenant, the police, and the neighbours, and I came to the conclusion that the Manchester Guardian article was not right either in fact or in presentation. The tenants in the area wrote to the Manchester Guardian protesting that this was not a true summary of the position and asking the editor to publish their letter. This great Liberal newspaper refused to do it.
These are the things underneath which give rise to feeling. It is not colour, it is not race, it is utter and complete frustration. The Daily Herald first drew attention to this matter when they took up the case and published a leading article headed "Cut it out", which made direct reference to the position in that area. These are responsible people. The tenants have lived in the house for 21 years, but it is understandable that when people from the Commonwealth take a lease they are charged high prices and they must get their money back somehow before the lease runs out.
The result is that we have these cases of crowding more and more people into the available accommodation. Cannot something be done? Surely it is not beyond the guile of a Government Department to frame regulations which provide that where there is a change of tenancy of this character protection can be given to both parties. These are the human things, which have not been mentioned hitherto in this debate, that give rise to these troubles.
To return to the case of the four boys, there are no more loyal people than the Cockneys. They are loyal to our institutions and to the nation, but they are also informed. They read the newspapers and look at television. When they read about comparable cases and find variations in the sentences imposed by the courts they come to think that our law does not provide justice. In one case of alleged rioting which concerned coloured people, one man was sentenced to prison for a year and others were fined. The man who was sentenced to a year's imprisonment had a former conviction in 1948 for shooting a policeman—I will not give his name—and if I know the Public Prosecutor that is a crime with intent to kill. Yet these boys, with no previous convictions, got four years. I do not want to take up too much time, but I have a special consideration to put to the Under-Secretary of State arising out of the race riots in my constituency. Nine young men were arrested. There is no one in the constituency who takes the view that what they did was not wrong, severely wrong, but the sentence they received, boys of 17 years of age, was four years' imprisonment, and there has been considerable feeling in Notting Hill and that neighbourhood against these sentences, and it is still there today, so that even coloured people are going round organising petitions on behalf of those boys.
I wrote a letter on behalf of the parents of those boys to the Home Secretary, asking him to see me about this matter. He replied that it was sub judice and he could not do so. The case was subject to appeal a week ago and the Appeal Bench confirmed the sentences. So far 1594 as I know—and I made sure—none of those boys had a previous conviction. Not one of them. It may be that there will be a change of attitude towards this case on the part of the Home Office after time has elapsed. I mention this case only to demonstrate that, despite the fact that there may have been some unsavoury people, some people out looking for trouble, some people out to spread trouble in these areas, there were people who were genuinely concerned about their own position.
I want to refer to an issue which has been put to me. It concerns the Manchester Guardian and some of my constituents. We all know that frequently there is landlord and tenant trouble. We know about the problems that arise between white landlords and coloured tenants, between coloured landlords and white tenants, between coloured landlords and coloured tenants, between English landlords and English tenants, between Irish landlords and English tenants, and between English landlords and tenants from Commonwealth countries.
These are things which are spread by gossip and otherwise through our constituencies. The case I have in mind was a classic one in so far as the Manchester Guardian treated it in a special article. Some of my constituents did not agree with the contents of the article. They sent me a petition on the matter and upon the issue which gave rise to the article. That was all right. I investigated the case personally. I interviewed the coloured family concerned. I interviewed their white tenant, the police, and the neighbours, and I came to the conclusion that the Manchester Guardian article was not right either in fact or in presentation. The tenants in the area wrote to the Manchester Guardian protesting that this was not a true summary of the position and asking the editor to publish their letter. This great Liberal newspaper refused to do it.
These are the things underneath which give rise to feeling. It is not colour, it is not race, it is utter and complete frustration. The Daily Herald first drew attention to this matter when they took up the case and published a leading article headed "Cut it out", which made direct reference to the position in that area. These are responsible people. The tenants have lived in the house for 21 years, but it is understandable that when people from the Commonwealth take a lease they are charged high prices and they must get their money back somehow before the lease runs out.
The result is that we have these cases of crowding more and more people into the available accommodation. Cannot something be done? Surely it is not beyond the guile of a Government Department to frame regulations which provide that where there is a change of tenancy of this character protection can be given to both parties. These are the human things, which have not been mentioned hitherto in this debate, that give rise to these troubles.
To return to the case of the four boys, there are no more loyal people than the Cockneys. They are loyal to our institutions and to the nation, but they are also informed. They read the newspapers and look at television. When they read about comparable cases and find variations in the sentences imposed by the courts they come to think that our law does not provide justice. In one case of alleged rioting which concerned coloured people, one man was sentenced to prison for a year and others were fined. The man who was sentenced to a year's imprisonment had a former conviction in 1948 for shooting a policeman—I will not give his name—and if I know the Public Prosecutor that is a crime with intent to kill. Yet these boys, with no previous convictions, got four years. I do not want to take up too much time, but I have a special consideration to put to the Under-Secretary of State arising out of the race riots in my constituency. Nine young men were arrested. There is no one in the constituency who takes the view that what they did was not wrong, severely wrong, but the sentence they received, boys of 17 years of age, was four years' imprisonment, and there has been considerable feeling in Notting Hill and that neighbourhood against these sentences, and it is still there today, so that even coloured people are going round organising petitions on behalf of those boys.
I wrote a letter on behalf of the parents of those boys to the Home Secretary, asking him to see me about this matter. He replied that it was sub judice and he could not do so. The case was subject to appeal a week ago and the Appeal Bench confirmed the sentences. So far as I know—and I made sure—none of those boys had a previous conviction. Not one of them. It may be that there will be a change of attitude towards this case on the part of the Home Office after time has elapsed. I mention this case only to demonstrate that, despite the fact that there may have been some unsavoury people, some people out looking for trouble, some people out to spread trouble in these areas, there were people who were genuinely concerned about their own position.
I want to refer to an issue which has been put to me. It concerns the Manchester Guardian and some of my constituents. We all know that frequently there is landlord and tenant trouble. We know about the problems that arise between white landlords and coloured tenants, between coloured landlords and white tenants, between coloured landlords and coloured tenants, between English landlords and English tenants, between Irish landlords and English tenants, and between English landlords and tenants from Commonwealth countries.
These are things which are spread by gossip and otherwise through our constituencies. The case I have in mind was a classic one in so far as the Manchester Guardian treated it in a special article. Some of my constituents did not agree with the contents of the article. They sent me a petition on the matter and upon the issue which gave rise to the article. That was all right. I investigated the case personally. I interviewed the coloured family concerned. I interviewed their white tenant, the police, and the neighbours, and I came to the conclusion that the Manchester Guardian article was not right either in fact or in presentation. The tenants in the area wrote to the Manchester Guardian protesting that this was not a true summary of the position and asking the editor to publish their letter. This great Liberal newspaper refused to do it.
These are the things underneath which give rise to feeling. It is not colour, it is not race, it is utter and complete frustration. The Daily Herald first drew attention to this matter when they took up the case and published a leading article headed "Cut it out", which made direct reference to the position in that area. These are responsible people. The tenants have lived in the house for 21 years, but it is understandable that when people from the Commonwealth take a lease they are charged high prices and they must get their money back somehow before the lease runs out.
The result is that we have these cases of crowding more and more people into the available accommodation. Cannot something be done? Surely it is not beyond the guile of a Government Department to frame regulations which provide that where there is a change of tenancy of this character protection can be given to both parties. These are the human things, which have not been mentioned hitherto in this debate, that give rise to these troubles.
To return to the case of the four boys, there are no more loyal people than the Cockneys. They are loyal to our institutions and to the nation, but they are also informed. They read the newspapers and look at television. When they read about comparable cases and find variations in the sentences imposed by the courts they come to think that our law does not provide justice. In one case of alleged rioting which concerned coloured people, one man was sentenced to prison for a year and others were fined. The man who was sentenced to a year's imprisonment had a former conviction in 1948 for shooting a policeman—I will not give his name—and if I know the Public Prosecutor that is a crime with intent to kill. Yet these boys, with no previous convictions, got four years."
Thursday, 30 July 2009
Thursday, 18 June 2009
Conservative Architecture and Planning
Since the end of World War Two, Britain’s towns and cities have been transformed for the benefit of local councils and commerce. Grievous damage was done by Luftwaffe bombs, but the Nazis were outdone in gratuitous destruction by postwar urban planners.
After the war, a sense of shame at our past and achievements became widespread amongst the intelligentsia, and led to an ineluctable weakening of our national identity. Our elites began wittingly and unwittingly to dismantle the very idea of England. Social engineering started to be used in architecture and planning as much as in education and entertainment. Its aim was to change the physical and mental environment, and thereby change people, who were seen as plastic and malleable. The theory was that planned council estates could change people for the better.
Marxism was fashionable and in 1938, Leeds City Council built Quarry Hill Flats to commemorate the Marxist insurrection against the government in Karl Mark Hof, Vienna in 1934. It was the largest housing scheme in the country and used the latest ideas and techniques. The flats had solid fuel ranges, electric lighting, the latest refuse disposal system and communal facilities. (The steel frame and concrete clad construction was faulty, and the flats had to be demolished in 1978.)
Park Hill in Sheffield was another Marxist utopian development. These flats were opened in 1962 and are now listed. They are representative of the “Streets in the Sky” fad. The idea was that of artificial “streets” built outside the front doors of tower block flats. It was envisaged that milk floats would go up in service lifts and on to the ‘streets’, make their deliveries and go back into the service lift and on up to the next floor. (Deliveries were stopped when a child was knocked over and killed by a float.)
In most of these schemes, there was great emphasis on pedestrian movement, as envisaged in Corbusier’s theoretic “Radiant City”or his “Unite” development in Marseilles.
The new town of Skelmersdale was designed to separate vehicles from pedestrians with a system of courtyard layouts and cul-de-sacs emerging off spine streets, which led to disproportionate costs in street cleaning, refuse collection, ground and street furniture maintenance and, particularly, policing. It was built on an old coalfield and around a series of deep clefts in the moor side that go down into the middle of the town, which means that extensive ground remediation and stabilisation was and is required for any construction.
It was built using innovative and experimental techniques – but these were deeply flawed, requiring expensive remedies. Many houses had central heating outlets in the ceiling. The fact that heat rises was ignored, so the bedrooms were heated moderately well but not the downstairs rooms. And it is possible to punch a hand through walls because the houses’ metal frames are corroded and the concrete slabs have collapsed.
Local communities were dispossessed for such gimcrack schemes. The theory was from the Corbusian model of “uniformity in the part, variety in the whole,” which was necessary to produce the “house machine” or “A machine for living in”? This phrase says it all: treating people as machines.
As well as the vague but generic desire to change society, there were more direct motives for such grandiose developments. For example, trade unionists on Sheffield council wanted to create municipal socialism and get back into power (1), by creating a new class of grateful client voters. Businesses also usually preferred to build anew rather than rebuild or restore, as re-development usually offers higher returns than conservation. There were often baser motives. In The History of Halesowen (2004), Julian Hunt relates how in the late 1950s and early ‘60s when the historic town centre was demolished for a concrete shopping centre, three of the local councillors were builders, and a fourth a demolition contractor.
For all these reasons, a plethora of radical new municipal building swept across the country from the 1950s onwards – schools, hospitals, offices, civic centres, entertainment and sports venues, shopping parades, shopping malls, new road schemes and street furniture, apartment tower blocks to house tenants whose ‘slums’ had been bombed or condemned as unfit for habitation. Whole new towns were created, like Stevenage, Corby and Cumbernauld, and historic towns such as Peterborough altered radically by vast, bland and often jerry-built new housing estates for ex-slum-dwellers. These schemes looked exciting in the plans but in practice turned out usually to be ugly, expensive and inefficient. At least some of the ‘slum clearance’ may not have even have necessary. Norman Dennis, told me in private correspondence, that In 1970, “Four out of every ten families living in the 1965-70 clearance areas were very satisfied with their present living conditions, in some areas the proportion was as high as six out of every ten. Two out of three owner-occupiers were not in favour of demolition.” But it went ahead anyway. The ruling mentality was well expressed in 1950 by the Labour minister for Town and Country Planning, Lewis Silkin: “It is necessary to lead the citizen – guide him. The citizen does not always know exactly what is best”.
Hackins Hey, for example, was a quaint by-way in Liverpool with small shops dating from the 18th century. But to planners and councillors it was only history and so it was destroyed overtime for a railway station that was not built. What little remains of Liverpool’s unique character and community spirit is still under threat. In 2005, the government issued a directive to destroy 20,000 habitable homes in Liverpool (and thousands more elsewhere), to be replaced by largely executive-style homes beyond the economic reach of dispossessed locals. Whole Liverpool neighbourhoods are still being flattened and their often unwilling communities compulsorily dispersed.
To see a ruined city, go to Coventry. The bus station is cold, drab, dirty and unwelcoming and just outside there is a piece of modern art to commemorate Frank Mitchell, inventor of the jet engine, that looks like four waste disposal chutes poking up into the air then coming down again. It suffered some of the worst German bombing of the war, as a result of which the word “Coventration” passed into the German language. But after the war, it was still an English medieval town - then the council got to work on it. There are still some outstanding buildings but they are lost in a welter of ugly concrete buildings.
Two plans for redevelopment were submitted: one proposed by the city engineer, E H Ford, would have re-created the old city centre using the existing street lines; the other, the plan of city architect Donald Gibson, was the one adopted. Based on completely new street lines with pedestrian shopping precincts, it was seen as a great opportunity to create an ultra-modern city centre based on entirely new thinking and almost erasing the past. The centre of Coventry had had congestion before the war in its narrow medieval streets and the bombing gave the council an excuse to sweep it all away. The development soon dated and it is now generally regretted that most of the city’s history has been erased, as it is now recognised that history attracts tourists. They could have rebuilt it as it was, as in cities like Budapest.
Exeter was recently voted the most “Cloned” town in England, but before the war it was beautiful, and though wartime bombing hit some excellent buildings they could have been rebuilt on the old plans - but the council had them replaced in the modern style. In 1940 German radio announced, “Exeter was a jewel. We have destroyed it.” They had not. It could easily have been rebuilt.
The City Council commissioned a town-planning consultant, Thomas Sharp, to prepare a redevelopment plan for the reconstruction of the city. The plan was published as “Exeter Phoenix”. Bedford Circus, was damaged, it had been one of the most impressive examples of unified urban 18th century architecture in England but the council destroyed it and Princesshay turned into a pedestrian shopping precinct which was redeveloped again in 2005 into shopping and leisure complex which manages our time. Sharp believed buildings that “will best stand the test of time will be those which show no stylistic tricks at all but which depend for their effect on being clean, well proportioned and honest”. He had it the wrong way round.
Pictures of old Birmingham(England) show a fine Victorian city with buildings like Snow Hill station, which was like a cathedral in its design and detail, The Woodman, a glorious Victorian pub, and the old library to see the wanton destruction so often perpetrated by local authorities. The Bull Ring shopping area was redeveloped in the 1960s, and was so ugly, so unpopular and so badly constructed that it has all just been redeveloped again (not entirely successfully, although it is an improvement). In 1971, Liverpudlian sculptor Arthur Dooley presented a statue of a town planner to Birmingham Council - a little man in pinstriped trousers and a bowler hat with a key in his back. The council no loger have it!
In the 1960s, one Shrewsbury councillor wanted the entire historic town centre dismantled and rebuilt outside the town so a shopping centre could be built in its stead. Thankfully, he was overruled. Yet the council has wasted many fine buildings, such as the beautiful String of Horses pub, which was removed in 1969 to make way for a traffic roundabout. (It was reconstructed at the Avoncroft Museum of Historic Buildings in Bromsgrove.)
In 1968, the 140 year old London Bridge had started to sink into the Thames. Instead of trying to rescue it, the Corporation of London sold it for US$2.5m. American entrepreneur Robert P McCulloch had the bridge dismantled and sent by barge to California, where it was rebuilt at Lake Havasu. Near the bridge is an “English Village” which pays homage to our culture, while here our authorities are destroying it. It has Tudor-style architecture, and the shops and restaurants create the atmosphere of ‘Olde England’, with tree-lined walkways and local breweries for hand-brewed ale.
An example of what our towns and cities could and should be like is Cambridge. It is a human-scale city, where Roman roads and walls can still be seen, along with the Saxon church of St Bene’t’s, the Romanesque Church of the Holy Sepulchre, university buildings from the early 13th century, the awe-inspiring 15/16th century King’s College Chapel and many characterful later houses and cottages, which do not imitate American models or make people feel insignificant. The beautiful, historic buildings give residents not just civic pride, but also a sense of being part of something that transcends themselves, uniting them with something deeper and bigger than the present moment. This respect for architectural tradition, be it noted, runs in parallel with an international reputation not just for academic excellence, but also the cutting-edge technology of Cambridge’s so-called “Silicon Fen”.
In much modern architecture, everything is streamlined - flat surfaces and geometric shapes without the ornamentation that lends character and beauty to so many older buildings. So-called ‘rational’ architecture eschews tradition and local and national vernacular styles and materials, leading to conformity and an artificialism that make people feel out of place. It is impossible to love tower blocks or office buildings built along these lines, or places dominated by such buildings.
This is not just a matter of aesthetics; it is about our very identity, which is the reciprocal relationship between people and the places in which they live. Building on what we have in a similar scale and style maintains continuity and helps to focus culture and identity. National and local governments alike are destroying places that are sanctioned by time and use, where communities have grown up and grown together instinctively.
People’s natural bonding instincts are increasingly thwarted by buildings that separate them from one another and are not physically conducive to developing community spirit - the sense of belonging and of knowing with whom you belong.
Canadian Plains Indians, the Innu, were moved by government into specially built estates. The Innu were effectively forcibly transformed into Canadians, just as Britons are being forcibly transformed into ‘citizens of the world’. Like us, the Innu are having their past erased and are being offered nothing for the future – despair has set in, as it is setting in on Britain’s sink estates. One important difference is that the Innu have been dispossessed by a different ethnic group(Canadian Globalists), whereas we are being dispossessed by our own elected representatives(British Globalists). In many young Innu, their deculturation manifests in drug and alcohol abuse and petty crime. More and more of Britain’s young people are similarly aimless, lacking in self-respect, without tradition or a sense of being part of something. Many of them have likewise started to prey on their own people. There have always been people at the bottom of the pile, but they used to develop within a cultural tradition to which they belonged, albeit peripherally. Most Young people do not misbehave out of endemic wickedness, but because they have been decultured. Thanks to a combination of social, cultural, political and now environmental pressures, many young people in this country have been effectively estranged from Englishness, severed from civilizing structures that their ancestors could take for granted. Buildings need to develop from traditions and renew those traditions with the sense of familiarity to helping civilise young people and minimise the viscious crimes we now have.
Local councillors are only elected by a minority of voters and are not therefore fully representative of the public. We need an office appointed by the Crown like a lord lieutenant with responsibility for protecting communities not factions of it. The Office of the Lord-Lieutenant dates from the 16th Century and has the force of tradition behind it at a time when we are victims of unrestrained change for profit at our communities’ expense.
The Lord Lieutenant is apart from local politics in the County and is interested in all aspects of life - voluntary and business, statutory and social and cultural. This office could be expanded into a Royal representative to appoint local authorities with responsibility for maintaining the continuity of local areas and communities.
DAVID HAMILTON
(2381)
NOTES
1. Farewell to Yorkshire, Roy Hattersley.
See
People and Planning: The Sociology of Housing in Sunderland, Norman Dennis, Faber & Faber, 1970
Planning and Urban Change, S V Ward, Paul Chapman, 1994
After the war, a sense of shame at our past and achievements became widespread amongst the intelligentsia, and led to an ineluctable weakening of our national identity. Our elites began wittingly and unwittingly to dismantle the very idea of England. Social engineering started to be used in architecture and planning as much as in education and entertainment. Its aim was to change the physical and mental environment, and thereby change people, who were seen as plastic and malleable. The theory was that planned council estates could change people for the better.
Marxism was fashionable and in 1938, Leeds City Council built Quarry Hill Flats to commemorate the Marxist insurrection against the government in Karl Mark Hof, Vienna in 1934. It was the largest housing scheme in the country and used the latest ideas and techniques. The flats had solid fuel ranges, electric lighting, the latest refuse disposal system and communal facilities. (The steel frame and concrete clad construction was faulty, and the flats had to be demolished in 1978.)
Park Hill in Sheffield was another Marxist utopian development. These flats were opened in 1962 and are now listed. They are representative of the “Streets in the Sky” fad. The idea was that of artificial “streets” built outside the front doors of tower block flats. It was envisaged that milk floats would go up in service lifts and on to the ‘streets’, make their deliveries and go back into the service lift and on up to the next floor. (Deliveries were stopped when a child was knocked over and killed by a float.)
In most of these schemes, there was great emphasis on pedestrian movement, as envisaged in Corbusier’s theoretic “Radiant City”or his “Unite” development in Marseilles.
The new town of Skelmersdale was designed to separate vehicles from pedestrians with a system of courtyard layouts and cul-de-sacs emerging off spine streets, which led to disproportionate costs in street cleaning, refuse collection, ground and street furniture maintenance and, particularly, policing. It was built on an old coalfield and around a series of deep clefts in the moor side that go down into the middle of the town, which means that extensive ground remediation and stabilisation was and is required for any construction.
It was built using innovative and experimental techniques – but these were deeply flawed, requiring expensive remedies. Many houses had central heating outlets in the ceiling. The fact that heat rises was ignored, so the bedrooms were heated moderately well but not the downstairs rooms. And it is possible to punch a hand through walls because the houses’ metal frames are corroded and the concrete slabs have collapsed.
Local communities were dispossessed for such gimcrack schemes. The theory was from the Corbusian model of “uniformity in the part, variety in the whole,” which was necessary to produce the “house machine” or “A machine for living in”? This phrase says it all: treating people as machines.
As well as the vague but generic desire to change society, there were more direct motives for such grandiose developments. For example, trade unionists on Sheffield council wanted to create municipal socialism and get back into power (1), by creating a new class of grateful client voters. Businesses also usually preferred to build anew rather than rebuild or restore, as re-development usually offers higher returns than conservation. There were often baser motives. In The History of Halesowen (2004), Julian Hunt relates how in the late 1950s and early ‘60s when the historic town centre was demolished for a concrete shopping centre, three of the local councillors were builders, and a fourth a demolition contractor.
For all these reasons, a plethora of radical new municipal building swept across the country from the 1950s onwards – schools, hospitals, offices, civic centres, entertainment and sports venues, shopping parades, shopping malls, new road schemes and street furniture, apartment tower blocks to house tenants whose ‘slums’ had been bombed or condemned as unfit for habitation. Whole new towns were created, like Stevenage, Corby and Cumbernauld, and historic towns such as Peterborough altered radically by vast, bland and often jerry-built new housing estates for ex-slum-dwellers. These schemes looked exciting in the plans but in practice turned out usually to be ugly, expensive and inefficient. At least some of the ‘slum clearance’ may not have even have necessary. Norman Dennis, told me in private correspondence, that In 1970, “Four out of every ten families living in the 1965-70 clearance areas were very satisfied with their present living conditions, in some areas the proportion was as high as six out of every ten. Two out of three owner-occupiers were not in favour of demolition.” But it went ahead anyway. The ruling mentality was well expressed in 1950 by the Labour minister for Town and Country Planning, Lewis Silkin: “It is necessary to lead the citizen – guide him. The citizen does not always know exactly what is best”.
Hackins Hey, for example, was a quaint by-way in Liverpool with small shops dating from the 18th century. But to planners and councillors it was only history and so it was destroyed overtime for a railway station that was not built. What little remains of Liverpool’s unique character and community spirit is still under threat. In 2005, the government issued a directive to destroy 20,000 habitable homes in Liverpool (and thousands more elsewhere), to be replaced by largely executive-style homes beyond the economic reach of dispossessed locals. Whole Liverpool neighbourhoods are still being flattened and their often unwilling communities compulsorily dispersed.
To see a ruined city, go to Coventry. The bus station is cold, drab, dirty and unwelcoming and just outside there is a piece of modern art to commemorate Frank Mitchell, inventor of the jet engine, that looks like four waste disposal chutes poking up into the air then coming down again. It suffered some of the worst German bombing of the war, as a result of which the word “Coventration” passed into the German language. But after the war, it was still an English medieval town - then the council got to work on it. There are still some outstanding buildings but they are lost in a welter of ugly concrete buildings.
Two plans for redevelopment were submitted: one proposed by the city engineer, E H Ford, would have re-created the old city centre using the existing street lines; the other, the plan of city architect Donald Gibson, was the one adopted. Based on completely new street lines with pedestrian shopping precincts, it was seen as a great opportunity to create an ultra-modern city centre based on entirely new thinking and almost erasing the past. The centre of Coventry had had congestion before the war in its narrow medieval streets and the bombing gave the council an excuse to sweep it all away. The development soon dated and it is now generally regretted that most of the city’s history has been erased, as it is now recognised that history attracts tourists. They could have rebuilt it as it was, as in cities like Budapest.
Exeter was recently voted the most “Cloned” town in England, but before the war it was beautiful, and though wartime bombing hit some excellent buildings they could have been rebuilt on the old plans - but the council had them replaced in the modern style. In 1940 German radio announced, “Exeter was a jewel. We have destroyed it.” They had not. It could easily have been rebuilt.
The City Council commissioned a town-planning consultant, Thomas Sharp, to prepare a redevelopment plan for the reconstruction of the city. The plan was published as “Exeter Phoenix”. Bedford Circus, was damaged, it had been one of the most impressive examples of unified urban 18th century architecture in England but the council destroyed it and Princesshay turned into a pedestrian shopping precinct which was redeveloped again in 2005 into shopping and leisure complex which manages our time. Sharp believed buildings that “will best stand the test of time will be those which show no stylistic tricks at all but which depend for their effect on being clean, well proportioned and honest”. He had it the wrong way round.
Pictures of old Birmingham(England) show a fine Victorian city with buildings like Snow Hill station, which was like a cathedral in its design and detail, The Woodman, a glorious Victorian pub, and the old library to see the wanton destruction so often perpetrated by local authorities. The Bull Ring shopping area was redeveloped in the 1960s, and was so ugly, so unpopular and so badly constructed that it has all just been redeveloped again (not entirely successfully, although it is an improvement). In 1971, Liverpudlian sculptor Arthur Dooley presented a statue of a town planner to Birmingham Council - a little man in pinstriped trousers and a bowler hat with a key in his back. The council no loger have it!
In the 1960s, one Shrewsbury councillor wanted the entire historic town centre dismantled and rebuilt outside the town so a shopping centre could be built in its stead. Thankfully, he was overruled. Yet the council has wasted many fine buildings, such as the beautiful String of Horses pub, which was removed in 1969 to make way for a traffic roundabout. (It was reconstructed at the Avoncroft Museum of Historic Buildings in Bromsgrove.)
In 1968, the 140 year old London Bridge had started to sink into the Thames. Instead of trying to rescue it, the Corporation of London sold it for US$2.5m. American entrepreneur Robert P McCulloch had the bridge dismantled and sent by barge to California, where it was rebuilt at Lake Havasu. Near the bridge is an “English Village” which pays homage to our culture, while here our authorities are destroying it. It has Tudor-style architecture, and the shops and restaurants create the atmosphere of ‘Olde England’, with tree-lined walkways and local breweries for hand-brewed ale.
An example of what our towns and cities could and should be like is Cambridge. It is a human-scale city, where Roman roads and walls can still be seen, along with the Saxon church of St Bene’t’s, the Romanesque Church of the Holy Sepulchre, university buildings from the early 13th century, the awe-inspiring 15/16th century King’s College Chapel and many characterful later houses and cottages, which do not imitate American models or make people feel insignificant. The beautiful, historic buildings give residents not just civic pride, but also a sense of being part of something that transcends themselves, uniting them with something deeper and bigger than the present moment. This respect for architectural tradition, be it noted, runs in parallel with an international reputation not just for academic excellence, but also the cutting-edge technology of Cambridge’s so-called “Silicon Fen”.
In much modern architecture, everything is streamlined - flat surfaces and geometric shapes without the ornamentation that lends character and beauty to so many older buildings. So-called ‘rational’ architecture eschews tradition and local and national vernacular styles and materials, leading to conformity and an artificialism that make people feel out of place. It is impossible to love tower blocks or office buildings built along these lines, or places dominated by such buildings.
This is not just a matter of aesthetics; it is about our very identity, which is the reciprocal relationship between people and the places in which they live. Building on what we have in a similar scale and style maintains continuity and helps to focus culture and identity. National and local governments alike are destroying places that are sanctioned by time and use, where communities have grown up and grown together instinctively.
People’s natural bonding instincts are increasingly thwarted by buildings that separate them from one another and are not physically conducive to developing community spirit - the sense of belonging and of knowing with whom you belong.
Canadian Plains Indians, the Innu, were moved by government into specially built estates. The Innu were effectively forcibly transformed into Canadians, just as Britons are being forcibly transformed into ‘citizens of the world’. Like us, the Innu are having their past erased and are being offered nothing for the future – despair has set in, as it is setting in on Britain’s sink estates. One important difference is that the Innu have been dispossessed by a different ethnic group(Canadian Globalists), whereas we are being dispossessed by our own elected representatives(British Globalists). In many young Innu, their deculturation manifests in drug and alcohol abuse and petty crime. More and more of Britain’s young people are similarly aimless, lacking in self-respect, without tradition or a sense of being part of something. Many of them have likewise started to prey on their own people. There have always been people at the bottom of the pile, but they used to develop within a cultural tradition to which they belonged, albeit peripherally. Most Young people do not misbehave out of endemic wickedness, but because they have been decultured. Thanks to a combination of social, cultural, political and now environmental pressures, many young people in this country have been effectively estranged from Englishness, severed from civilizing structures that their ancestors could take for granted. Buildings need to develop from traditions and renew those traditions with the sense of familiarity to helping civilise young people and minimise the viscious crimes we now have.
Local councillors are only elected by a minority of voters and are not therefore fully representative of the public. We need an office appointed by the Crown like a lord lieutenant with responsibility for protecting communities not factions of it. The Office of the Lord-Lieutenant dates from the 16th Century and has the force of tradition behind it at a time when we are victims of unrestrained change for profit at our communities’ expense.
The Lord Lieutenant is apart from local politics in the County and is interested in all aspects of life - voluntary and business, statutory and social and cultural. This office could be expanded into a Royal representative to appoint local authorities with responsibility for maintaining the continuity of local areas and communities.
DAVID HAMILTON
(2381)
NOTES
1. Farewell to Yorkshire, Roy Hattersley.
See
People and Planning: The Sociology of Housing in Sunderland, Norman Dennis, Faber & Faber, 1970
Planning and Urban Change, S V Ward, Paul Chapman, 1994
Tuesday, 2 June 2009
Facing Reality and Making Tough Decisions
The British ruling class changed after the Second World War, becoming obsessed with an ideology of sensitivity towards the Third World and their posture of white man on top was discarded. The humiliation over Suez put the lid on it as the debacle showed us as weak and no longer a top nation. We need to understand how our foolish “Caste” think and to ask ourselves if we are betraying young people.
The events that led to the tragedy facing us now were dictated by - weakness, sentimentality and surrender which were presented as moral superiority, dressed up in high-mindedness. The tougher ones used it as a screen for the exploitation of cheap imported labour to make profits by keeping costs down. At the same time they think that when immigrants take over our culture will continue!
The old British ruling class had introduced minorities into several countries for commercial reasons and if contemporary elites had anything about them thy would see from history that immigration leads to racial war. They introduced Tamils into Ceylon (Sri Lanka) for rubber and saddled the Singalese with a race war. They spoke a different language and had a different religion from the natives. It was similar in Malaya were the ruling class introduced Chinese, then Tamils, while in Guyana they introduced Indians. It happened too in Fiji when the ruling class imported Indians to cut sugar cane.
Around 50 years ago little more than half of the population was Malay and the racial differences showed themselves in the Malays being pushed out as the Chinese were more successful at commerce and gravitated to the cities while the Malays lived in the country. There had to be laws introduced to protect the Malays.
Henry “Chips” Channon, wrote in his diary for 12th May 1948 “... I fear that England is on the decline, and that we shall dwindle for a generation or so. We are a tired race and our genius seems dead.” There was appeasement of the Nazis in the 30s and appeasement of immigrants since the 50s.
The elites became frightened of the world and needed to join larger bodies for protection The League of Nations was seen as a vehicle for morality rather than power and the national -interest. They renounced the Balance of Power for the moral superiority of the League. The began disarming while there was a potential threat from Nazi Germany and we were the most powerful nation. Since the second War its been the Commonwealth, the EU and ultimately World Government and for Socialists, even the Soviet Union.
There was racial conflict from the beginning of mass immigration and the rulers avoided facing it by making scapegoats of the British people. This blaming their own people is part of the multi-racialist outlook and endures still.
In 1948 between 31 July and 2 August in Liverpool, in Deptford on the 18th July; and Birmingham between the 6th and 8th of August 1949 but the idealists ignored them as they had in 1919 when after the racial battles in Liverpool and Cardiff Lord Milner wrote in a Memorandum of June 23rd, On the Repatriation of Coloured Men: ”I have every reason to fear, that when we get these men back to their own colonies they might be tempted to revenge themselves on the white minorities there…” (1) Milner’s high-minded comment on Britain ruling Egypt is telling:” It is a force making for the triumph of the simplest ideas of honesty, humanity, and justice...If Egyptian prosperity is a British interest so is Egyptian independence...”
They failed to keep power by being the centre of the Commonwealth and adopted a fawning attitude to them. It is thought that immigration was caused by the 1948 British Nationality Act. In fact there had never been restrictions because Commonwealth citizens were legally British subjects. However, it was one-sided as we could not just immigrate into their countries.
Oliver Lyttleton (later Lord Chandos), Secretary of State for the Colonies, 1951-53, made a list of the restrictions Commonwealth countries imposed on Britons. They refused “persons who are likely to become a public charge,” “illiterates”, those deemed “undesirable” had “unsuitable standards or habits of life;” many had quota systems and dictation tests. Jamaica prohibited those likely “to become a charge on public funds by reason of infirmity of body or mind or ill-health or who is not in possession of sufficient means to support himself or such of his dependants as he shall bring with him to the island”. Thirty–nine territories had entry permit systems or required prospective residents to first obtain permission.
In Eminent Churchillians Andrew Roberts reports that Commonwealth Secretary Lord Home (later PM), worried that they should not give the impression that Commonwealth citizens from India, Pakistan and Ceylon would be less favourably treated than those from the Dominions otherwise there could be retaliation. Robert’s interviews show the decadence of the rulers in the 1950s: “A Minister closely involved in the decision-making process, ‘ In fact…we were just stalling and hoping for the best’… One of Mr. Churchill’s private secretaries, ‘at that time it seemed a very good idea to get bus conductors and stuff’ … a junior minister, ‘it was becoming hard to find somebody to carry your bags at the station’
In 1955 Conservative MP Cyril Osborne tried to introduce a Bill to control immigration but was not successful. The Spectator of 4th February commented: “This will save the Government the duty of facing the facts.”
The government gave no practical support, leaving it to local councils and voluntary organizations. There were many representations from local councils to the Government; slum clearance was held back; immigration was under constant and secret discussion at Cabinet level but apart from Churchill’s attempt in 1955 to have a Bill for controls drawn up but having to retire because of his health, no other could take decisive action.
In August 1958 senior police officers dismissed the Notting Hill race battle as “...ruffians, both coloured and white, out for hooliganism.” However, the files show that there were mobs of 300-400 shouting “Keep Britain White” who fought large mobs of “youths of colour.” Coincidentally, “Keep England White” is the slogan Churchill wanted the Conservative party to use for the 1955 general election.
People are realising that the main parties, the media, academics and corporations are enemies promoting policies that are destroying them; that, far from representing us, they are against us. They and those who still follow them effect moral superiority, while we are lectured on our wickedness because we object to our communities being destroyed by being used as dumping ground for immigrants when the Ideological Caste themselves have 2 homes in posh areas or beautiful village and the recent revelations of their expenses scams has disgusted the whole nation.
The young are given no sense of cultural legacy, but taught what races we wronged and who to apologise to. As long as the state controls education and the parents abdicate their responsibilities the decline will continue. We have to face up to the fact that we are letting them do this to us. Would asylum seekers take the risks to get here if they were not so privileged?
Rulers are paralysed by fear of immigrants but tell themselves it is virtue - tolerance, absence of prejudice, we are all coming together in the brotherhood of man! They pretend the immigrants are assimilating. Its as if they boarded an airplane and left their ways behind like shedding a skin and arrived here waiting to be moulded into Brits!
Those who express, or are suspected of holding, unauthorized opinions never get a job in an Establishment position because they are "racists" or "haters." The result is an “Ideological caste” purged of independent thought and consisting solely of drones, and followers. They talk like mindless robots - sexism, homophobia, racism, hate speech. The education system filters dissidents, preventing them getting qualified. Malcolm Bradbury made it clear in “The History Man” that those labelled “right-wing” are marked down.
Everyone with a public profile is a hundred percent on message because of the "aspirational" adoption of elite orthodoxy by the middle class. "To be a progressive is to be elite". This is why it is an “Ideological Caste” - you can only belong if you submit, and you have no career if you think for yourself.
Nature abhors a vacuum and others take control: In August 2008 David Cameron had private talks with Murdoch as did Blair before becoming PM. I recall Mathew Paris stating on TV that Murdoch closed the Today newspaper to change The Sun from promoting the Tories to promoting Blair's Labour.
In one of his Talk Sport programmes, historian David Starkey criticised journalists and asked why none had the guts to tell us what Blair and Murdoch discussed at their private meeting. Murdoch should never have been allowed to take over The Times because of the Monopolies Commission but it was got through Parliament by Tory John Biffen. I assume at that time Murdoch supported the Tories!
If ever you wonder why Lord Archer was grassed up years after the event, remember his novel based on the lives of Murdoch and Maxwell. Maxwell was not exposed by intrepid journalists until he had died and stories of corruption were coming out. Journalists know about these things but keep them quiet until they need to control or destroy someone. They will have known about the expenses for ages but are bringing it out now for reasons that are not yet clear,possibly to present Cameron as a moral force to clean up.
The elites are afraid to listen to other opinions and face the harsh reality and this is leading to anti-Semitism as they grovel for oil and finance for Western banking.
Sin is no longer wrong behaviour but wrong thinking - those who err are persecuted and subject to public humiliation. Churchill was pushed into “the wilderness” by the establishment during a national crisis and Enoch was sacked from the Shadow Cabinet. For writing that “Enoch was right” prospective Halesowen Conservative candidate Nigel Hastilow had to stand down and local councillor Ken Turner claimed he was rejected because he is not Black!
Frank Ellis, was persecuted by the University of Leeds, for calling for “Humane repatriation of immigrants”, Talk Sport presenter Ian Collins shouted at him, “Your’e mad!” A couple of years earlier Collins screamed abuse at an elderly lady on his programme but Ofcom would not investigate. Adverts for his programme were later broadcast joking about him insulting elderly ladies! It's now alright to scream abuse at our elderly, but if you say anything about immigrants you must be mad!
Comedians have been dropped to stop them influencing the public - Hughie Greene, Jim Davidson and the massively popular Benny Hill. had his TV series cancelled. While the right sort of people like Ben Elton and Lenny Henry are promoted.
When it comes to different ethnic groups otherwise rational people become sentimental and weak. Its like a woman on seeing a baby or a child talking to its pet. When immigrants are presented they go to pieces in a girly sentimentality that has caused us to pretend invaders are coming to improve our culture and look after the sick and elderly!
It is like a family writ large. Sometimes one is despised and does not get the care that makes one feel worthy. I knew of an elder girl who was not favoured but the young one and son were. Her mother criticised her appearance which made her depressive. With fostering there is a danger that the parents will pay them attention leaving their own out and making them feel less worthy. This is what is causing immoral behaviour and a giving up amongst our working classes who are neglected for immigrants.
I listened to the debate at the Radio Academy of Nick Griffin and Abu Hamza. One particularly pompous journo asked Griffin:”Don’t you think people should be treated equally?". They don’t treat us equally! The positions of the “caste” are assumptions - they never justify their views while we are effectively put on media trial. I suppose they convince themselves they are righting wrongs, and redressing the balance, by showing us in a bad light and the ethnics as always competent and worthy. They habitually describe them as intelligent. We don’t talk about white people like this: “Charles Murray the intelligent social scientist,” but they do of ethnics and people start to wonder why it has to be emphasised.
Meanwhile television is telling us to feel sympathy for immigrants and how ill-used they have been. They boost others up but put us down. The neglect is psychological and subliminal. We are left out of adverts as the typical unit is portrayed as a black with a white woman.
Things come out in bits and we have to put them together as bits are usually in a little report tucked away in a newspaper.
The rulers have thrown in the towel and accepted that they can not stop immigrants taking over our homeland apart from keep us oppressed. It was stated by a former television employee in the Birmingham Post that we must be prepared for when immigrants become a majority.
Former Swedish PM Jens Orback stated Swedes must be nice to Muslims so they will be nice to us when they take over! To see where fawning on immigrants gets, the Muslim terrorists are the grandchildren of people our elites praised. If they slipped up in their restaurants like serving Kit E Kat in the curry it was assumed that they didn’t know any better but we would bring them up and they would become like us but instead they are making constant threats of violence and domination against us. Like a conquered people we are broken down by the elites so that immigrants can take over.
But why assume dominant immigrants would treat our children well? They are human like us and likely to treat us badly as they were treated under the Empire. In fact many quotations from preachers in mosques make it clear what they intend to do to our children. For elites to leave our children to be bullied and persecuted by new Muslim rulers shows what evil people they are.
Paradoxically, the elites think our culture is so powerful that the newcomers will imitate us. The unrecognised implication is that they are inferior. When they apply to open a Mosque the authorities think it is something harmless, like a local church. They hide in the comforting illusion that Islam is “a religion of peace.” But underneath the rulers are capitulating, betraying us to an enemy who will visit vengeance on our next generations for wrongs committed by these same rulers who invaded their homelands in Iraq and Afghanistan in an unjustified invasion and bombed their women and children! They see to imagine that they can make these countries Western and bring everyone here!
There is a pretence that the British Muslims against us are a tiny minority but its not a half-a-dozen chaps who happen to bump into each other fortuitously and think “Oh, lets plant some bombs!” They all share the goal of Muslim domination if not the methods.
The authorities can not face it when they plant a bomb so ask their neighbours leading questions then pretend how much they had integrated and how he loved fish and chips. They gather endless statistics on the widespread support for terrorism but can’t face them.
When the “Ideological Caste” discuss the multi-racial society they never give examples of the results but name someone they know or sports personalities; when we cite examples like Luton, (3) they do not prove us wrong with debate but slander us because they are afraid of facing things and our exposing reality frightens them. There is no attempt to be honest - they have closed minds.
We are given semi-psychiatric labels for our recalcitrance – prejudice, paranoia, living in the past, irrational. We have been labelled and do not need explaining. We are having a false identities imposed on us and internalising the negativity. For example, what is “racist” about wanting our own communities? What is racist about keeping jobs and homes for our own children?
The orthodoxy is dissolving and we face chaos or totalitarian holding measures, in this time of great change. We must ask ourselves some important questions. What future are we leaving for our next generations? In twenty years what will our children and grandchildren have?
We have a duty to our children and their children as they in turn will have to theirs and we owe a debt to our ancestors who bequeath our nation and culture to us and must honour that. The honouring is in maintaining what they left to us and the duty is in passing it on to our descendents. In the wise words of general George S.Patton:” "All men are afraid in battle. The coward is the one who lets his fear overcome his sense of duty. Duty is the essence of manhood.”
The elites have caused a human tragedy. We have terrible choices and must make tough decisions. Most people have friends, colleagues and relations from other ethnic groups but now have to ask ourselves: “can we allow our future generations to whom we owe a duty to be pushed out of jobs, homes, and college places in their own country?” Look at statistics from ONS which don’t take into account the births to mothers born here and then look at your children and ask” am I betraying them? Where will they live and work?” We have tough decisions to make. (4)
(1) For the weakening of the old ruling class see Correlli Barnett's "Collapse of British Power". I can't recommend it enough.
On behind the scenes machinations see Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley, who was praised by Bill Clinton in his inaugural speech.
http://radiobergen.org/powergame/tragedy.html
(2)Panikos Paranyi (ed) “Racial Violence in Britain in the Nineteenth Century.” (Leicester University.1996).
(3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJDs0F1Cn8A
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/mar/10/two-arrested-army-protest-luton
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/mar/11/muslim-group-anti-war-protests
http://keeptonyblairforpm.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/anjem-choudary-on-protest-at-luton-troopsshould-hate-speech-be-banned/
(4)
Mark Steyn on demographic domination - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlkEYoKC-kA
http://www.panos.org.uk/?lid=27193
The events that led to the tragedy facing us now were dictated by - weakness, sentimentality and surrender which were presented as moral superiority, dressed up in high-mindedness. The tougher ones used it as a screen for the exploitation of cheap imported labour to make profits by keeping costs down. At the same time they think that when immigrants take over our culture will continue!
The old British ruling class had introduced minorities into several countries for commercial reasons and if contemporary elites had anything about them thy would see from history that immigration leads to racial war. They introduced Tamils into Ceylon (Sri Lanka) for rubber and saddled the Singalese with a race war. They spoke a different language and had a different religion from the natives. It was similar in Malaya were the ruling class introduced Chinese, then Tamils, while in Guyana they introduced Indians. It happened too in Fiji when the ruling class imported Indians to cut sugar cane.
Around 50 years ago little more than half of the population was Malay and the racial differences showed themselves in the Malays being pushed out as the Chinese were more successful at commerce and gravitated to the cities while the Malays lived in the country. There had to be laws introduced to protect the Malays.
Henry “Chips” Channon, wrote in his diary for 12th May 1948 “... I fear that England is on the decline, and that we shall dwindle for a generation or so. We are a tired race and our genius seems dead.” There was appeasement of the Nazis in the 30s and appeasement of immigrants since the 50s.
The elites became frightened of the world and needed to join larger bodies for protection The League of Nations was seen as a vehicle for morality rather than power and the national -interest. They renounced the Balance of Power for the moral superiority of the League. The began disarming while there was a potential threat from Nazi Germany and we were the most powerful nation. Since the second War its been the Commonwealth, the EU and ultimately World Government and for Socialists, even the Soviet Union.
There was racial conflict from the beginning of mass immigration and the rulers avoided facing it by making scapegoats of the British people. This blaming their own people is part of the multi-racialist outlook and endures still.
In 1948 between 31 July and 2 August in Liverpool, in Deptford on the 18th July; and Birmingham between the 6th and 8th of August 1949 but the idealists ignored them as they had in 1919 when after the racial battles in Liverpool and Cardiff Lord Milner wrote in a Memorandum of June 23rd, On the Repatriation of Coloured Men: ”I have every reason to fear, that when we get these men back to their own colonies they might be tempted to revenge themselves on the white minorities there…” (1) Milner’s high-minded comment on Britain ruling Egypt is telling:” It is a force making for the triumph of the simplest ideas of honesty, humanity, and justice...If Egyptian prosperity is a British interest so is Egyptian independence...”
They failed to keep power by being the centre of the Commonwealth and adopted a fawning attitude to them. It is thought that immigration was caused by the 1948 British Nationality Act. In fact there had never been restrictions because Commonwealth citizens were legally British subjects. However, it was one-sided as we could not just immigrate into their countries.
Oliver Lyttleton (later Lord Chandos), Secretary of State for the Colonies, 1951-53, made a list of the restrictions Commonwealth countries imposed on Britons. They refused “persons who are likely to become a public charge,” “illiterates”, those deemed “undesirable” had “unsuitable standards or habits of life;” many had quota systems and dictation tests. Jamaica prohibited those likely “to become a charge on public funds by reason of infirmity of body or mind or ill-health or who is not in possession of sufficient means to support himself or such of his dependants as he shall bring with him to the island”. Thirty–nine territories had entry permit systems or required prospective residents to first obtain permission.
In Eminent Churchillians Andrew Roberts reports that Commonwealth Secretary Lord Home (later PM), worried that they should not give the impression that Commonwealth citizens from India, Pakistan and Ceylon would be less favourably treated than those from the Dominions otherwise there could be retaliation. Robert’s interviews show the decadence of the rulers in the 1950s: “A Minister closely involved in the decision-making process, ‘ In fact…we were just stalling and hoping for the best’… One of Mr. Churchill’s private secretaries, ‘at that time it seemed a very good idea to get bus conductors and stuff’ … a junior minister, ‘it was becoming hard to find somebody to carry your bags at the station’
In 1955 Conservative MP Cyril Osborne tried to introduce a Bill to control immigration but was not successful. The Spectator of 4th February commented: “This will save the Government the duty of facing the facts.”
The government gave no practical support, leaving it to local councils and voluntary organizations. There were many representations from local councils to the Government; slum clearance was held back; immigration was under constant and secret discussion at Cabinet level but apart from Churchill’s attempt in 1955 to have a Bill for controls drawn up but having to retire because of his health, no other could take decisive action.
In August 1958 senior police officers dismissed the Notting Hill race battle as “...ruffians, both coloured and white, out for hooliganism.” However, the files show that there were mobs of 300-400 shouting “Keep Britain White” who fought large mobs of “youths of colour.” Coincidentally, “Keep England White” is the slogan Churchill wanted the Conservative party to use for the 1955 general election.
People are realising that the main parties, the media, academics and corporations are enemies promoting policies that are destroying them; that, far from representing us, they are against us. They and those who still follow them effect moral superiority, while we are lectured on our wickedness because we object to our communities being destroyed by being used as dumping ground for immigrants when the Ideological Caste themselves have 2 homes in posh areas or beautiful village and the recent revelations of their expenses scams has disgusted the whole nation.
The young are given no sense of cultural legacy, but taught what races we wronged and who to apologise to. As long as the state controls education and the parents abdicate their responsibilities the decline will continue. We have to face up to the fact that we are letting them do this to us. Would asylum seekers take the risks to get here if they were not so privileged?
Rulers are paralysed by fear of immigrants but tell themselves it is virtue - tolerance, absence of prejudice, we are all coming together in the brotherhood of man! They pretend the immigrants are assimilating. Its as if they boarded an airplane and left their ways behind like shedding a skin and arrived here waiting to be moulded into Brits!
Those who express, or are suspected of holding, unauthorized opinions never get a job in an Establishment position because they are "racists" or "haters." The result is an “Ideological caste” purged of independent thought and consisting solely of drones, and followers. They talk like mindless robots - sexism, homophobia, racism, hate speech. The education system filters dissidents, preventing them getting qualified. Malcolm Bradbury made it clear in “The History Man” that those labelled “right-wing” are marked down.
Everyone with a public profile is a hundred percent on message because of the "aspirational" adoption of elite orthodoxy by the middle class. "To be a progressive is to be elite". This is why it is an “Ideological Caste” - you can only belong if you submit, and you have no career if you think for yourself.
Nature abhors a vacuum and others take control: In August 2008 David Cameron had private talks with Murdoch as did Blair before becoming PM. I recall Mathew Paris stating on TV that Murdoch closed the Today newspaper to change The Sun from promoting the Tories to promoting Blair's Labour.
In one of his Talk Sport programmes, historian David Starkey criticised journalists and asked why none had the guts to tell us what Blair and Murdoch discussed at their private meeting. Murdoch should never have been allowed to take over The Times because of the Monopolies Commission but it was got through Parliament by Tory John Biffen. I assume at that time Murdoch supported the Tories!
If ever you wonder why Lord Archer was grassed up years after the event, remember his novel based on the lives of Murdoch and Maxwell. Maxwell was not exposed by intrepid journalists until he had died and stories of corruption were coming out. Journalists know about these things but keep them quiet until they need to control or destroy someone. They will have known about the expenses for ages but are bringing it out now for reasons that are not yet clear,possibly to present Cameron as a moral force to clean up.
The elites are afraid to listen to other opinions and face the harsh reality and this is leading to anti-Semitism as they grovel for oil and finance for Western banking.
Sin is no longer wrong behaviour but wrong thinking - those who err are persecuted and subject to public humiliation. Churchill was pushed into “the wilderness” by the establishment during a national crisis and Enoch was sacked from the Shadow Cabinet. For writing that “Enoch was right” prospective Halesowen Conservative candidate Nigel Hastilow had to stand down and local councillor Ken Turner claimed he was rejected because he is not Black!
Frank Ellis, was persecuted by the University of Leeds, for calling for “Humane repatriation of immigrants”, Talk Sport presenter Ian Collins shouted at him, “Your’e mad!” A couple of years earlier Collins screamed abuse at an elderly lady on his programme but Ofcom would not investigate. Adverts for his programme were later broadcast joking about him insulting elderly ladies! It's now alright to scream abuse at our elderly, but if you say anything about immigrants you must be mad!
Comedians have been dropped to stop them influencing the public - Hughie Greene, Jim Davidson and the massively popular Benny Hill. had his TV series cancelled. While the right sort of people like Ben Elton and Lenny Henry are promoted.
When it comes to different ethnic groups otherwise rational people become sentimental and weak. Its like a woman on seeing a baby or a child talking to its pet. When immigrants are presented they go to pieces in a girly sentimentality that has caused us to pretend invaders are coming to improve our culture and look after the sick and elderly!
It is like a family writ large. Sometimes one is despised and does not get the care that makes one feel worthy. I knew of an elder girl who was not favoured but the young one and son were. Her mother criticised her appearance which made her depressive. With fostering there is a danger that the parents will pay them attention leaving their own out and making them feel less worthy. This is what is causing immoral behaviour and a giving up amongst our working classes who are neglected for immigrants.
I listened to the debate at the Radio Academy of Nick Griffin and Abu Hamza. One particularly pompous journo asked Griffin:”Don’t you think people should be treated equally?". They don’t treat us equally! The positions of the “caste” are assumptions - they never justify their views while we are effectively put on media trial. I suppose they convince themselves they are righting wrongs, and redressing the balance, by showing us in a bad light and the ethnics as always competent and worthy. They habitually describe them as intelligent. We don’t talk about white people like this: “Charles Murray the intelligent social scientist,” but they do of ethnics and people start to wonder why it has to be emphasised.
Meanwhile television is telling us to feel sympathy for immigrants and how ill-used they have been. They boost others up but put us down. The neglect is psychological and subliminal. We are left out of adverts as the typical unit is portrayed as a black with a white woman.
Things come out in bits and we have to put them together as bits are usually in a little report tucked away in a newspaper.
The rulers have thrown in the towel and accepted that they can not stop immigrants taking over our homeland apart from keep us oppressed. It was stated by a former television employee in the Birmingham Post that we must be prepared for when immigrants become a majority.
Former Swedish PM Jens Orback stated Swedes must be nice to Muslims so they will be nice to us when they take over! To see where fawning on immigrants gets, the Muslim terrorists are the grandchildren of people our elites praised. If they slipped up in their restaurants like serving Kit E Kat in the curry it was assumed that they didn’t know any better but we would bring them up and they would become like us but instead they are making constant threats of violence and domination against us. Like a conquered people we are broken down by the elites so that immigrants can take over.
But why assume dominant immigrants would treat our children well? They are human like us and likely to treat us badly as they were treated under the Empire. In fact many quotations from preachers in mosques make it clear what they intend to do to our children. For elites to leave our children to be bullied and persecuted by new Muslim rulers shows what evil people they are.
Paradoxically, the elites think our culture is so powerful that the newcomers will imitate us. The unrecognised implication is that they are inferior. When they apply to open a Mosque the authorities think it is something harmless, like a local church. They hide in the comforting illusion that Islam is “a religion of peace.” But underneath the rulers are capitulating, betraying us to an enemy who will visit vengeance on our next generations for wrongs committed by these same rulers who invaded their homelands in Iraq and Afghanistan in an unjustified invasion and bombed their women and children! They see to imagine that they can make these countries Western and bring everyone here!
There is a pretence that the British Muslims against us are a tiny minority but its not a half-a-dozen chaps who happen to bump into each other fortuitously and think “Oh, lets plant some bombs!” They all share the goal of Muslim domination if not the methods.
The authorities can not face it when they plant a bomb so ask their neighbours leading questions then pretend how much they had integrated and how he loved fish and chips. They gather endless statistics on the widespread support for terrorism but can’t face them.
When the “Ideological Caste” discuss the multi-racial society they never give examples of the results but name someone they know or sports personalities; when we cite examples like Luton, (3) they do not prove us wrong with debate but slander us because they are afraid of facing things and our exposing reality frightens them. There is no attempt to be honest - they have closed minds.
We are given semi-psychiatric labels for our recalcitrance – prejudice, paranoia, living in the past, irrational. We have been labelled and do not need explaining. We are having a false identities imposed on us and internalising the negativity. For example, what is “racist” about wanting our own communities? What is racist about keeping jobs and homes for our own children?
The orthodoxy is dissolving and we face chaos or totalitarian holding measures, in this time of great change. We must ask ourselves some important questions. What future are we leaving for our next generations? In twenty years what will our children and grandchildren have?
We have a duty to our children and their children as they in turn will have to theirs and we owe a debt to our ancestors who bequeath our nation and culture to us and must honour that. The honouring is in maintaining what they left to us and the duty is in passing it on to our descendents. In the wise words of general George S.Patton:” "All men are afraid in battle. The coward is the one who lets his fear overcome his sense of duty. Duty is the essence of manhood.”
The elites have caused a human tragedy. We have terrible choices and must make tough decisions. Most people have friends, colleagues and relations from other ethnic groups but now have to ask ourselves: “can we allow our future generations to whom we owe a duty to be pushed out of jobs, homes, and college places in their own country?” Look at statistics from ONS which don’t take into account the births to mothers born here and then look at your children and ask” am I betraying them? Where will they live and work?” We have tough decisions to make. (4)
(1) For the weakening of the old ruling class see Correlli Barnett's "Collapse of British Power". I can't recommend it enough.
On behind the scenes machinations see Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley, who was praised by Bill Clinton in his inaugural speech.
http://radiobergen.org/powergame/tragedy.html
(2)Panikos Paranyi (ed) “Racial Violence in Britain in the Nineteenth Century.” (Leicester University.1996).
(3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJDs0F1Cn8A
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/mar/10/two-arrested-army-protest-luton
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/mar/11/muslim-group-anti-war-protests
http://keeptonyblairforpm.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/anjem-choudary-on-protest-at-luton-troopsshould-hate-speech-be-banned/
(4)
Mark Steyn on demographic domination - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlkEYoKC-kA
http://www.panos.org.uk/?lid=27193
Friday, 8 May 2009
The Wind of Changing Consciousness
American commentator Brenda Walker wrote: "If there is anything that should make Americans' blood run cold about immigration, it is the sight of Europe—and Britain, the home of Western civilization—being buried by millions of Muslim colonists. Europe is just hoping against hope that Islam isn't going to explode into massive rioting (or worse), or impose total cultural Islamification. Major Jihadist terror occurred in London July 7, 2005, killing 52 and injuring 700 and in Madrid March 11, 2004, killing 191 and injuring 1841. Yet cowardly politicians continue policies of appeasement, which hostile Muslims correctly apprise as the fatal weakness of a culture too pacified to defend itself. " (1)
What she does not know is that there is a change of consciousness spreading through Britain as we realise that we are being discriminated against by our elected representatives. People can find no work, and one reason they have now understood is that foreigners are brought in as cheap labour to undercut wages. (2)
People are realising that the main parties, the media, academics and corporations are promoting an agenda which is destroying them. Politicians are effectively at war with them, and slowly the realisation is dawning. People hear them degrading white children as “chavs” and “yobs” while praising ethnics. They see their communities turned from safe areas into places of fear and uncertainty. They see politician’s children sent to the best schools while theirs have to risk knife gangs from imported ethnic communities.
With a change of consciousness comes a revival of spirit which the elites have been trying to stifle in Brits. But the Three Lions roared in Luton against the Muslims who insulted our brave soldiers!
They roared against our land being taken in the Cambridge village of Cottenham. An an unlikely place for an old-fashioned revolt against authority. But earlier this year, some 1,000 residents declared they would withhold their council tax until something was done about the travellers on the outskirts.
For decades there have been Gypsy communities living legally on two sites for 30 or so families near the village. Then, at Easter 2003, the site grew as a number of Irish Traveller families arrived in the area.
Local tensions rose, as villagers believed their way of life under threat. Angry residents demanded answers and established a campaigning website, Middle England in Revolt." (3)
But now politicians are beginning to lose confidence:
Hazel Blears panicked: "The British National Party has made advances because mainstream political parties, including Labour, have abandoned sections of the white working class, ignoring people’s needs while taking their votes for granted." Blears argues “Shouting ‘Nazi’ is not the answer.” (4)
The media, who are still shouting Nazi, are part of the same “ideological caste”. They give a false view of reality, employing words that become part of habitual thinking. The term “odious” is so often applied to the BNP that people probably think its part of their name!
They, and those who still believe them, affect moral superiority, confident that they are following the Orthodoxy, while we are lectured on our wickedness.
Aggressive TV interviewers like Jeremy Paxman hold media Inquisitions of dissenters in what are effectively show trials as they cross-examine in a bid to make them submit. Those who err are publicly persecuted and subject to public humiliation.
It works whether or not the persecuted are definitively native Britons. It’s about opinions which can be presented as axiomatic examples of “white racism”. So, Jade Goody, who was one-quarter black, was clamorously persecuted by the media for her on-screen faux-pas, and so was the half-Iranian from “The Apprentice” TV program. This sort of thing serves to keep the rest of us obedient. After all, multi-racial society is fragile. It is always ready to explode. It only seems to work through oppression, persecution, totalitarian laws, a politicised police and the media covering up race-crimes against whites.
All this the people are beginning to see.
Education is being “dumbed down”, and this, too, is becoming too obvious to hide. It isn’t done just so everyone passes. In certain subjects only some aspects are taught, as with the concentration upon Hitler and the Holocaust in the teaching of World War II.
The main thing, apparently, is to develop the correct attitudes. White children are indoctrinated to reject their identity, to be ashamed of their history and, if at all possible, to slander themselves and internalise racial guilt. Meanwhile, the children of immigrants imported for cheap labour and to replace us learn how “racist” and “evil” our ancestors were. They learn to silence protest with a word only applied to us - racist. That demonstrates perfectly where the discrimination really lies. It prevents us objecting to the cheap labour that is destroying children’s futures. The entrance figures for law and medical schools show that Asian are pushing indigenous students out.
The rulers don’t know where they are going and are confused. All that saves them from public obloquy is that the media are part of the same “Ideological caste” and, as long as they don’t say the wrong thing, cover up for them. The government have the means to protect our borders because they police Iraq and Afghanistan. But they don’t want to. The media covers by telling us that the politicians have lost control of the orders. No, they have not. They want immigrants to flood in, which is why they advertise for them to come here in our overseas embassies. It is why the British Council trains young Africans in our ways and uproots them from their own villages and communities.
Our politicians are effeminate and rule by deceit. They even deceive themselves because they are not manly enough to face things. This is why they become hysterical when the BNP expose what is really going on. They are still fighting the last war. The pejoratives they use to cow people paint a nightmare vision of what will happen if we cease to follow them. It is as out of date as they are - “Nazism”, “white supremacy”, “fascism”.
All this is, though, is becoming obvious to people.
Politicians and TV are constantly being nice to ethnics because they have lost power and know they will not be obeyed. If any ethnic is involved in a cultural activity or a sport there is always an adjective of praise in front of the name. They start from that point. Wishful thinking overrides analysis.
They don’t have to face the consequences of their inadequacy if they build up a bogey world of what will ensue if we try to deal with their bias against us and also think our culture is so wonderful the whole world will be swayed by it but at the same time want to bring everyone here through advertising in our embassies abroad and through the British Council.
Those granted asylum seekers get priority over British people. When they arrive they are homeless. So Brits on the waiting list may live in overcrowded conditions or in squalor, or may have a health priority such as spores from black mould in the house getting on their childrens’ lungs. But they will be classed as having a home and so are abandoned.
Asylum getters have their houses fitted out with every thing they need: brand new and with a guarantee. There is a free car because its cheaper than paying for taxis for them. Indigenous people are advised to use public transport, but not asylum seekers.
A young women I know was given a temporary, emergency house, called a “dispersal property” and reserved for asylum seekers. She was told that not to use one of the rooms, because there was damaged furniture in it - she checked. The room was full of things that are used to entice asylum seekers to come, including, phone, large flat screen television, pots and pans, blankets, recordable DVD player, X box, play station and a Wi, a box full of various game and music DVD’s in various languages.
Think what you would have to buy for your self and children if you were moving into a empty house to make a home? They also get free phone calls from land-line and mobile to anywhere around the world. They even have to have to be provided with an empty room as a childrens’ play room. Don’t believe me? Go to any council estate and talk to a local. When the asylum van rolls up, locals say, “ It’s Christmas come early - as long as your not British!"
Two telling examples of the new spirit presented themselves when Daily Mail columnists Melannie Phillips and Peter Hitchins respectively attacked the BNP. Each had over two hundred comments, of which the great majority criticised them. Even at the Guardian, it is interesting to see how articles attacking the BNP are themselves attacked by some CiF commenters, and even more interesting that the reader “commend clicks” for these commenters far outnumber those for the anti-BNP misery bags.
Our view of reality is largely created for an ulterior purpose by the media. We are trained to think that defending our communities is “white supremacy.” I don’t think I was born when that was in any sense real! They are thinking of the Ku Klux Klan, of course. But what have unemployed Brits to do with the KKK?
Its’ simply one more cruel, spiteful insult for the victims of multi-racialism. For years the evil elites stopped criticism of importing cheap labour by labelling those who had fought in WWII or lost family in that fight as Nazis. What vile, evil people our rulers are to do that to people who only want to preserve their jobs and communities! But this is not going unseen.
Decades of toxic social, economic and educational policy have made white people less able to compete against migrant groups with strong ideologies like Islam. A moral relativist culture of tolerance could never stand up against people who are organised, protected by family values, with a coherent and radicalising religion. But the desire to redeem our declining civilisation exists. No matter that the elites makes so much effort to destroy our organic culture and re-culture us for globalism. No matter that historicists hold our collapse to be inevitable, the will to survive is reviving from the bottom.
The role of a healthy art now, would be to introduce an understanding of our spiritual and social oppression into traditional forms. Our culture, our civilisation grows from us and we grown in it in reciprocal relation. One thing that is essential in a community is musical performances. I am not a Soviet Marxist-Leninist offering blueprints that lead to people being forced to conform to politicheskaya pravil’nost, but here are some suggestions to consider.(5)
We should form local folk groups and book rooms in local pubs, put on local festivals and feasts. Since the totalitarian ban on smoking in pubs many have been forced to close and those remaining need trade.
That we are being oppressed by our rulers is a subject for community songs. There is precedent in our Ballads of Robin Hood, and even in some of the early and, obviously, commercial work by Bob Dylan. For example, his “A Hard Rains A-Gonna fall” is developed from the traditional Border Ballad, “Lord Randall”, and gives an idea of how to express contemporary evils at the hands of the authorities:-
“O where ha you been, Lord Randal, my son?
And where ha you been, my handsome young man?”
“I ha been at the greenwood; mother, make my bed soon,
For I’m wearied wi hunting, and fain wad lie down.”
In Dylan:-
“Oh, were have you been, my blue-eyed son?
Oh, were have you been my darling young one?
I’ve stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains,
I’ve walked and I’ve crawled on six crooked highways,
I’ve stepped in the middle of seven sad forests
I’ve been out in front of a dozen dead oceans,
And it’s a hard, it’s a hard, etc …
Dylan used traditional forms to carry the contemporary thoughts and emotions felt by people across the world. The Dylan piece suggests how we can re-link with our musical origins and they express contemporary evils visited upon us by the corrupt politicians who hoodwink us into voting for them by pretending they are looking after our interests.
When we were homogenous we had a mutual trust that allowed us to be civil to one another but now civic society is quashed by state controls. This civility took centuries to grow but the progressives have destroyed that and it takes a totalitarian structure and political police to keep things together and we are reverting to a more primitive type.
The new spirit is hopeful not moaning - people do not want to associate with people they perceive as losers who cannot compete and cope.
The relationship of the populace to political representatives is one of trust. Politicians are not educated to it like professional people nor is it inherited as with monarchs and aristocrats but they offer us something and ask us to trust them but now know they have broken it.
The country we have inherited is being taken off us bit by bit and by subterfuge of the rulers. The ethnics are not passive objects but flesh and blood people like us. The con-trick is that the rulers have entered a compact with ethics but lie to us by saying what we know is happening is not happening and those who are coming to take our children’s inheritance are merely improving our lives. Our elected representatives are traitors to rank beside any in British history. We have to take responsibility for ourselves and break our child-like dependence on them. What can we do for ourselves?
A young couple I know bought a lump of ground to create a vegetable garden to help free them from the tyranny of supermarkets, others take on allotments. These things could be organised by local branches but require proper legal arrangements to avoid conflict over people trying to take things for themselves.
Gypsies are taking charge of their own destinies and buying our land. They buy it from farmers cash down, then they pile in. but the authorities are faced with a fait accompli. They stand up for themselves and are self-reliant. We must develop a variant on these and take proper advice. here is an idea:
In The Spectator of 17th December 2005, Conservative philosopher, Roger Scruton told of how he and his community were buying land and letting to local farmers:-
“Rural residents must therefore take power into their own hands, and it is encouraging that they have already done this in the matter of the Hunting Act, holding this law to ridicule by showing that it cannot be enforced. It is now time for them to exercise their power in other and more demanding ways… Neighbours should club together to buy small parcels of land from any desperate farming neighbour, thereafter renting it back to him at a peppercorn rent. This we have done in our neighbourhood, so saving ourselves both from travellers and agribusiness, by injecting needed capital into a family farm.”
(1) Dead Culture Walking: Muslim Colonization Of Europe Should Frighten America, Brenda Walker 26/03/09 - vdare.com,
(2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZnH4wihoKo
(3) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3635872.stm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpDrgrxrR3c
The next March Bank Holiday Sunday the 24th May 5pm St Georges Square, Luton. The whole country witnessed the hate hurled at the soldiers’ homecoming! Two of their regiment died in Iraq and they were met with what the other side in both that war and the war on our streets think of them.
(4) http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/nov/22/bnp-far-right-hazel-blears
http://www.lgcplus.com/News/2009/03/hodge_urges_rethink_on_bnp.html
(5) http://www.reversespins.com/pcmarx.html
What she does not know is that there is a change of consciousness spreading through Britain as we realise that we are being discriminated against by our elected representatives. People can find no work, and one reason they have now understood is that foreigners are brought in as cheap labour to undercut wages. (2)
People are realising that the main parties, the media, academics and corporations are promoting an agenda which is destroying them. Politicians are effectively at war with them, and slowly the realisation is dawning. People hear them degrading white children as “chavs” and “yobs” while praising ethnics. They see their communities turned from safe areas into places of fear and uncertainty. They see politician’s children sent to the best schools while theirs have to risk knife gangs from imported ethnic communities.
With a change of consciousness comes a revival of spirit which the elites have been trying to stifle in Brits. But the Three Lions roared in Luton against the Muslims who insulted our brave soldiers!
They roared against our land being taken in the Cambridge village of Cottenham. An an unlikely place for an old-fashioned revolt against authority. But earlier this year, some 1,000 residents declared they would withhold their council tax until something was done about the travellers on the outskirts.
For decades there have been Gypsy communities living legally on two sites for 30 or so families near the village. Then, at Easter 2003, the site grew as a number of Irish Traveller families arrived in the area.
Local tensions rose, as villagers believed their way of life under threat. Angry residents demanded answers and established a campaigning website, Middle England in Revolt." (3)
But now politicians are beginning to lose confidence:
Hazel Blears panicked: "The British National Party has made advances because mainstream political parties, including Labour, have abandoned sections of the white working class, ignoring people’s needs while taking their votes for granted." Blears argues “Shouting ‘Nazi’ is not the answer.” (4)
The media, who are still shouting Nazi, are part of the same “ideological caste”. They give a false view of reality, employing words that become part of habitual thinking. The term “odious” is so often applied to the BNP that people probably think its part of their name!
They, and those who still believe them, affect moral superiority, confident that they are following the Orthodoxy, while we are lectured on our wickedness.
Aggressive TV interviewers like Jeremy Paxman hold media Inquisitions of dissenters in what are effectively show trials as they cross-examine in a bid to make them submit. Those who err are publicly persecuted and subject to public humiliation.
It works whether or not the persecuted are definitively native Britons. It’s about opinions which can be presented as axiomatic examples of “white racism”. So, Jade Goody, who was one-quarter black, was clamorously persecuted by the media for her on-screen faux-pas, and so was the half-Iranian from “The Apprentice” TV program. This sort of thing serves to keep the rest of us obedient. After all, multi-racial society is fragile. It is always ready to explode. It only seems to work through oppression, persecution, totalitarian laws, a politicised police and the media covering up race-crimes against whites.
All this the people are beginning to see.
Education is being “dumbed down”, and this, too, is becoming too obvious to hide. It isn’t done just so everyone passes. In certain subjects only some aspects are taught, as with the concentration upon Hitler and the Holocaust in the teaching of World War II.
The main thing, apparently, is to develop the correct attitudes. White children are indoctrinated to reject their identity, to be ashamed of their history and, if at all possible, to slander themselves and internalise racial guilt. Meanwhile, the children of immigrants imported for cheap labour and to replace us learn how “racist” and “evil” our ancestors were. They learn to silence protest with a word only applied to us - racist. That demonstrates perfectly where the discrimination really lies. It prevents us objecting to the cheap labour that is destroying children’s futures. The entrance figures for law and medical schools show that Asian are pushing indigenous students out.
The rulers don’t know where they are going and are confused. All that saves them from public obloquy is that the media are part of the same “Ideological caste” and, as long as they don’t say the wrong thing, cover up for them. The government have the means to protect our borders because they police Iraq and Afghanistan. But they don’t want to. The media covers by telling us that the politicians have lost control of the orders. No, they have not. They want immigrants to flood in, which is why they advertise for them to come here in our overseas embassies. It is why the British Council trains young Africans in our ways and uproots them from their own villages and communities.
Our politicians are effeminate and rule by deceit. They even deceive themselves because they are not manly enough to face things. This is why they become hysterical when the BNP expose what is really going on. They are still fighting the last war. The pejoratives they use to cow people paint a nightmare vision of what will happen if we cease to follow them. It is as out of date as they are - “Nazism”, “white supremacy”, “fascism”.
All this is, though, is becoming obvious to people.
Politicians and TV are constantly being nice to ethnics because they have lost power and know they will not be obeyed. If any ethnic is involved in a cultural activity or a sport there is always an adjective of praise in front of the name. They start from that point. Wishful thinking overrides analysis.
They don’t have to face the consequences of their inadequacy if they build up a bogey world of what will ensue if we try to deal with their bias against us and also think our culture is so wonderful the whole world will be swayed by it but at the same time want to bring everyone here through advertising in our embassies abroad and through the British Council.
Those granted asylum seekers get priority over British people. When they arrive they are homeless. So Brits on the waiting list may live in overcrowded conditions or in squalor, or may have a health priority such as spores from black mould in the house getting on their childrens’ lungs. But they will be classed as having a home and so are abandoned.
Asylum getters have their houses fitted out with every thing they need: brand new and with a guarantee. There is a free car because its cheaper than paying for taxis for them. Indigenous people are advised to use public transport, but not asylum seekers.
A young women I know was given a temporary, emergency house, called a “dispersal property” and reserved for asylum seekers. She was told that not to use one of the rooms, because there was damaged furniture in it - she checked. The room was full of things that are used to entice asylum seekers to come, including, phone, large flat screen television, pots and pans, blankets, recordable DVD player, X box, play station and a Wi, a box full of various game and music DVD’s in various languages.
Think what you would have to buy for your self and children if you were moving into a empty house to make a home? They also get free phone calls from land-line and mobile to anywhere around the world. They even have to have to be provided with an empty room as a childrens’ play room. Don’t believe me? Go to any council estate and talk to a local. When the asylum van rolls up, locals say, “ It’s Christmas come early - as long as your not British!"
Two telling examples of the new spirit presented themselves when Daily Mail columnists Melannie Phillips and Peter Hitchins respectively attacked the BNP. Each had over two hundred comments, of which the great majority criticised them. Even at the Guardian, it is interesting to see how articles attacking the BNP are themselves attacked by some CiF commenters, and even more interesting that the reader “commend clicks” for these commenters far outnumber those for the anti-BNP misery bags.
Our view of reality is largely created for an ulterior purpose by the media. We are trained to think that defending our communities is “white supremacy.” I don’t think I was born when that was in any sense real! They are thinking of the Ku Klux Klan, of course. But what have unemployed Brits to do with the KKK?
Its’ simply one more cruel, spiteful insult for the victims of multi-racialism. For years the evil elites stopped criticism of importing cheap labour by labelling those who had fought in WWII or lost family in that fight as Nazis. What vile, evil people our rulers are to do that to people who only want to preserve their jobs and communities! But this is not going unseen.
Decades of toxic social, economic and educational policy have made white people less able to compete against migrant groups with strong ideologies like Islam. A moral relativist culture of tolerance could never stand up against people who are organised, protected by family values, with a coherent and radicalising religion. But the desire to redeem our declining civilisation exists. No matter that the elites makes so much effort to destroy our organic culture and re-culture us for globalism. No matter that historicists hold our collapse to be inevitable, the will to survive is reviving from the bottom.
The role of a healthy art now, would be to introduce an understanding of our spiritual and social oppression into traditional forms. Our culture, our civilisation grows from us and we grown in it in reciprocal relation. One thing that is essential in a community is musical performances. I am not a Soviet Marxist-Leninist offering blueprints that lead to people being forced to conform to politicheskaya pravil’nost, but here are some suggestions to consider.(5)
We should form local folk groups and book rooms in local pubs, put on local festivals and feasts. Since the totalitarian ban on smoking in pubs many have been forced to close and those remaining need trade.
That we are being oppressed by our rulers is a subject for community songs. There is precedent in our Ballads of Robin Hood, and even in some of the early and, obviously, commercial work by Bob Dylan. For example, his “A Hard Rains A-Gonna fall” is developed from the traditional Border Ballad, “Lord Randall”, and gives an idea of how to express contemporary evils at the hands of the authorities:-
“O where ha you been, Lord Randal, my son?
And where ha you been, my handsome young man?”
“I ha been at the greenwood; mother, make my bed soon,
For I’m wearied wi hunting, and fain wad lie down.”
In Dylan:-
“Oh, were have you been, my blue-eyed son?
Oh, were have you been my darling young one?
I’ve stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains,
I’ve walked and I’ve crawled on six crooked highways,
I’ve stepped in the middle of seven sad forests
I’ve been out in front of a dozen dead oceans,
And it’s a hard, it’s a hard, etc …
Dylan used traditional forms to carry the contemporary thoughts and emotions felt by people across the world. The Dylan piece suggests how we can re-link with our musical origins and they express contemporary evils visited upon us by the corrupt politicians who hoodwink us into voting for them by pretending they are looking after our interests.
When we were homogenous we had a mutual trust that allowed us to be civil to one another but now civic society is quashed by state controls. This civility took centuries to grow but the progressives have destroyed that and it takes a totalitarian structure and political police to keep things together and we are reverting to a more primitive type.
The new spirit is hopeful not moaning - people do not want to associate with people they perceive as losers who cannot compete and cope.
The relationship of the populace to political representatives is one of trust. Politicians are not educated to it like professional people nor is it inherited as with monarchs and aristocrats but they offer us something and ask us to trust them but now know they have broken it.
The country we have inherited is being taken off us bit by bit and by subterfuge of the rulers. The ethnics are not passive objects but flesh and blood people like us. The con-trick is that the rulers have entered a compact with ethics but lie to us by saying what we know is happening is not happening and those who are coming to take our children’s inheritance are merely improving our lives. Our elected representatives are traitors to rank beside any in British history. We have to take responsibility for ourselves and break our child-like dependence on them. What can we do for ourselves?
A young couple I know bought a lump of ground to create a vegetable garden to help free them from the tyranny of supermarkets, others take on allotments. These things could be organised by local branches but require proper legal arrangements to avoid conflict over people trying to take things for themselves.
Gypsies are taking charge of their own destinies and buying our land. They buy it from farmers cash down, then they pile in. but the authorities are faced with a fait accompli. They stand up for themselves and are self-reliant. We must develop a variant on these and take proper advice. here is an idea:
In The Spectator of 17th December 2005, Conservative philosopher, Roger Scruton told of how he and his community were buying land and letting to local farmers:-
“Rural residents must therefore take power into their own hands, and it is encouraging that they have already done this in the matter of the Hunting Act, holding this law to ridicule by showing that it cannot be enforced. It is now time for them to exercise their power in other and more demanding ways… Neighbours should club together to buy small parcels of land from any desperate farming neighbour, thereafter renting it back to him at a peppercorn rent. This we have done in our neighbourhood, so saving ourselves both from travellers and agribusiness, by injecting needed capital into a family farm.”
(1) Dead Culture Walking: Muslim Colonization Of Europe Should Frighten America, Brenda Walker 26/03/09 - vdare.com,
(2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZnH4wihoKo
(3) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3635872.stm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpDrgrxrR3c
The next March Bank Holiday Sunday the 24th May 5pm St Georges Square, Luton. The whole country witnessed the hate hurled at the soldiers’ homecoming! Two of their regiment died in Iraq and they were met with what the other side in both that war and the war on our streets think of them.
(4) http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/nov/22/bnp-far-right-hazel-blears
http://www.lgcplus.com/News/2009/03/hodge_urges_rethink_on_bnp.html
(5) http://www.reversespins.com/pcmarx.html
Thursday, 7 May 2009
Child Rape - The Spoils of War
In his greatest speech made in response to calls for him to be prosecuted under the 1976 Race Relations Act, “The Uniform of Colour”, Enoch Powell gave an insight into how human nature operates:
“In understanding this matter, the beginning of wisdom is to grasp the law that in human societies power is never left unclaimed and unused. It does not blow about, like wastepaper on the streets, ownerless and inert. Men’s nature is not only, as Thucydides long ago asserted, to exert power where they have it; men cannot help themselves from exerting power where they have it, whether they want to or not. The coloured population of over two million in England, a population which grows at the rate of nearly 100,000 a year while the remainder diminishes, a population which is predominantly concentrated in the central areas of the metropolis and other key urban and industrial centers of England, does possess—simply by reason of segregation and differentiation—a power which would not accrue to a mere random sample of two million persons similarly located but not perceived or perceiving themselves as distinct from the rest”.
The Sun of 10 November 2006 quoted Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller quoted as predicting waves of terrorist bombings, with possibly chemical and biological devices.
“At this moment, at least 30 attacks are being actively planned and 1,600 suicidal young terrorists are under surveillance. Round-the-clock vigilance by security services has thwarted five major conspiracies and saved countless lives. There are plenty more outrages being planned.”
There have been warnings from the Home Secretary and her predecessor John Reid. The US classes London as a centre of terrorism! There are so many Muslims militantly opposed to us that it is attempting to live in a fantasy of multi-racial harmony to pretend that we are in anything but an early stage of undeclared war.
But there is another aspect of the war being waged against us in our own country by people the elites who are bringing here which is not admitted by our complicit authorities.
In an expose` of public interest the Daily Mail of 6 April 2009 reported: “Migrant workers and illegal immigrants (asylum seekers) were responsible for up to a third of all sex attacks in some areas". Greater London was worst affected, with foreigners charged in connection with a third of rapes. To get the figures the Express had to make a Freedom of Information request.
Most sex attacks were committed by foreigners in areas with large immigrant communities, like Cambridgeshire, Merseyside, Hertfordshire, Avon and Somerset. Police say it is difficult to bring foreign rapists to justice due to the large number of migrant workers and illegal immigrants in the country and there is no record of them entering the country.
On March 27, 2009 six Muslim men were arrested for the sexual exploitation and rape of young English girls: "A police spokesman said that it was important to maintain a low profile in order to keep the impact and disturbance caused to surrounding communities to a minimum. He added: "Uniformed officers from the Safer Neighbourhood Teams will be issuing leaflets to residents following the raid to reassure them and explain some details of the operation."
Why don’t the police just beg Muslims to stop raping young white children, to save the police having a race war on our streets?
Our children that they raped were as young as 11 years old. The Rotherham Advertiser reported it but left out the ethnic identities to fool locals into thinking anyone might be doing it when it is Muslim communities. The Advertiser also minimised the seriousness of the attacks by describing them as “exploitation and rape” when it is child molesting and child rape - our children, who are being raped by invaders plundering booty; during invasions, the conquerors rape the women of the conquered, but these are with the complicity of the political police and government.
The rapes in the Rwanda War are notorious. In 1998, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda held that "sexual assault formed an integral part of the process of destroying the Tutsi ethnic group and that the rape was systematic and had been perpetrated against Tutsi women only, manifesting the specific intent required for those acts to constitute genocide." Presiding judge Navanethem Pillay said in a statement after the verdict: "From time immemorial, rape has been regarded as spoils of war. Now it will be considered a war crime. We want to send out a strong message that rape is no longer a trophy of war."
But the rapes on our children are “spoils of war.” Although on a smaller scale than the above examples, the rapes of British children have the same basic motives; the hatred of one ethnic group for another. They are perpetrated on one people (our children) by a different group of people(older Muslim men).
The orthodox assumption is that Muslims rapists are like British rapists - acting as individuals (or a couple), but this is a whole community based on extended families raping the children of a different community. This is where treating each case an as individual case breaks down. It is guerilla warfare: fighting by unconventional means within areas occupied by the enemy(us).
The brave Grandfather of a 12 year old who was child-raped, and passed around to other's to rape, reported it to Rotherham Police but they told him there was nothing they could do about it so he went to Marlene Guest, a Rotherham BNP councillor, and explained that the police had refused to uphold the law against the rapists. Councillor Guest drove straight to the Rotherham Main Street police station and warned them, that if they continued to shield child-rapists the BNP would publicise it as they had in Huddersfield. That is the only reason Rotherham police acted.
In Huddersfield, Muslim men were telephoning young girls and threatening to burn down their homes if they did not meet them. The Mother of one of the raped children, said that she there many case's of child rape by Muslims in Huddersfield and took reporters to meet some of the Mothers, all had the same experiences - multiple offences, and the police allowing Muslims to get away with it. These child- rapes by Muslim communities are only exposed after heroic relations fight the police who fear a race-war starting so they cover it up.(2)
We have evidence of the community nature of the child-rapes in these reports but the establishment pretend it is something else. It is being waged against us by extended families.
British National Party Councillor Sharon Wilkinson listened to the story of a lady living in the war zone in a Northern Mill Town. Hundreds of white girls, many as young as 12, are being lured into group sex and prostitution by gangs of British born Pakistani men from West and South Yorkshire. The girls are introduced to their ‘pimps’ by classmates, often brothers and cousins of the older Muslim rapists. It is their community against ours.(3)
The Daily Mail of 27 March 2008 prompted by that evening’s Panorama expose reported some case studies which show that it is the Muslim community as a whole attacking our people. “Jane: "It happened every night. There were loads of men involved.. You couldn't keep count. It was like a conveyor belt.” she relates. “A conveyor belt of men all expecting sex. She was only 14. Jane clearly remembers the sheer, terrifying numbers of men who would be brought to her bed at night ... As she puts it: "I was just this innocent little girl who went from playing with her dolls to having sex with lots of different men."
And unpalatable though it may be to confront, there are, even now, many other innocent little girls at risk of being forced into the same sickening transition. (4)
She relates the pattern: Victims are wooed by gangs of older men and made dependent by expensive gifts and constant compliments. A sexual relationship ensues before the abusers begin to exert control through threats, brutality and drugs before selling the girls to other men for sex. ... The numbers involved in setting the girls up and raping them from the Muslim community and the fact that it is relations acting together, demonstrates the community nature of this attack on our community.
"The grooming starts where you meet them and they're nice to you and take you to McDonald's and buy you cigarettes," she tells Panorama. "I was flattered that older boys were interested in me, which at 13 is nice. "And then you start to meet the cousins and the brothers, and then you realise that you've been passed on because suddenly you're hanging around with older people." It was not long either, before the "hanging around" took on a more sinister tone. "They start to touch you and say sexual things to you," she told Panorama. "And then the abuse starts. I was pinned down by two men while a third man raped me. "And there were other men watching." There are threats of violence: "They'd say things like they'd bomb my house and gang-rape my mum," she says. "I had to perform sexual acts on different men. One would come in, do whatever he wanted, go out and another would come in," she recalls.
"One day I was picked up by an older man who took me to a park. He pulled a gun out from under the car seat and put it to my head and told me that I was going to die in three seconds," she remembers. "Then he counted down and pulled the trigger, but it wasn't loaded. He found that amusing." These vile abuses of our young girls by the Muslim community is an Act of War.
“Eventually, terrified for her life, Jane confided the truth to her parents, who reported it to the police. What ensued is subject to dispute: while the force concerned say they couldn't find enough evidence for a prosecution, Jane insists she felt forced to withdraw her allegations because officers couldn't guarantee her safety.
Lindsay and Fiona had similar Stories. They were both troubled youngsters who had problems at home, they were manipulated by predatory older Muslims. "We met Zulfi and Qais in a take-away in Blackburn," Lindsay, now 16, recalls today. "We were just mates. They'd give us cans of lager, bottles of Jack Daniels and sometimes ecstasy, cocaine and cannabis. We knew at some point they'd expect sex with us. But we didn't think there was really anything wrong with that."... “
Persistent complaints to the authorities, Megan says, were ignored until local MP, Jack Straw, intervened. Within weeks, both girls were taken into care in a bid to remove them from the source of the abuse. But Naveed and Hussain abducted them from care and took them back to prostitution. This time the violence was too much and they gatherd courage to report the child rapists to the police. They relate the evil being done to our girls by whole communities of Muslims: “The time Zulfi attacked Fiona was the worst," Lindsay says. "I remember hearing her screaming because he was whacking her across the back with a metal bar when she refused to have sex with him. "I guess she had sex with him in the end just to keep him quiet."
The Panorama programme involved eight months of investigation and found that about 5,000 young English girls are being prostituted by Muslims and black gangs. We are victims of racial guerilla war and the police are protecting the pimps and rapists.
Muslims call us “infidels” which dehumanises us, making us less than human in their eyes so they think they can do what they like because we are beneath compassion, yet our evil rulers continue to import them.
Sara Swann, a former government adviser on child protection: "Many girls are terrified and with reason. We had a case in the West Midlands where a girl had her tongue nailed to the table when she threatened to tell.” Another had her head pulled back, and a kettle of boiling water held over her open mouth." These are our people Muslims are attacking. British men have a duty to protect them.
In 2004, Channel 4 pulled a programme about Muslim pimps operating in Bradford at the request of the Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, who felt the timing of the programme could contribute to community unrest. In other words we are on the verge of a race war with Muslims and the police are trying to cover it up.
The documentary, examined the work of Bradford social services, and claims that "charismatic, wealthier" Asian men are targeting white girls as young as 11 for sex and drug abuse. The use of “Asian” is a slur on Hindus because it is Muslims who are doing this to or young girls. The programme was after attempts by two mothers to trace the men who took control of their daughters through drugs and intimidation.
West Yorkshire police asked Channel 4 to withdraw the programme after seeing a preview. Colin Cramphorn, the chief constable, feared race riots which erupted in Bradford three years earlier. In a letter to Mark Thompson, Channel 4's chief executive, he said the documentary could lead to "community disorder". (5)
Mr.Cramphorn knew what Muslims are up to. They use the threat of street war to manipulate the authorities. His obituary in the Guardian of 4 December 2006 told: “ Cramphorn's wider role came in the aftermath of the London bombings of July 7 2005, when it was revealed that the suicide team came from Leeds and Dewsbury, part of his patch. He rose to the challenge both operationally and, perhaps more significantly, in the way he led the reassurance of frightened and potentially angry communities, both ethnic minority and white, which avoided any serious backlash. In this, he built on the work of many other agencies, particularly in Leeds and Bradford, where many channels of communication between different groups swung into action at once.
But the chief constable reached out to others beyond this partly because he had given earlier, clear and outspoken warnings about what he called "Jihadists", and had met initial mockery when he revealed that extremist cells had organised training camps in national parks, such as the Yorkshire Dales. But he knew what he was talking about.”
It's like the American frontier when the Native Americans were being pushed off their land: everything is a negotiation between two hostile communities through Pow Wows and peace offerings.
The Times of August 11 2007 reported on “growing concern" at the attitudes of some Muslim men towards white girls which campaigners claim few will address.
“Parents have complained that in parts of the country with large Asian communities white girls as young as 12 are being targeted for sex by older Asian men yet the authorities are unwilling to act because of fears of being labeled racist.”
The police unbelievably, have a legal duty of care to the public!!! Has anyone ever known them follow this? They have members of al-Queda serving in the police and torture a BNP political activist in Liverpool; they kill an innocent white man going about his lawful business while anarchists protested against the G20 conference on 1st April in London; they ignore Muslims known as the Luton Taliban insulting our troops on their return from Iraq in Luton but arrest a young Englishman who was upset by this.
We are on the verge of an ethnic war with Muslims and the police are trying to cover it up. Even worse the ideological rulers of our country try to stop BNP getting into senior positions positions on police authorities because they will force the police to protect our young girls Muslim rapists instead of covering it up!
The government is even picking serving soldiers who are prepared to shoot their own people. Our rulers are at war with us and in alliance with Muslims. For years we have had it drummed into us that we are governed by high morals and venerable principles - equality, tolerance, fair-play, but as things start to come out we see that in reality we are ruled by some of the vilest, most evil people ever to have power and influence in any country. (7)
(1) http://www.actioninengland.gb.com/Enoch%20Powell%27s%20Speech.htm
(2) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl....ex- slaves.html
http://www.rotherhamadvertiser.com/News.aspx?id=8694
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/article-....hite-girls.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/02/2007_34_thu.shtml
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article2237940.ece
http://www.red-alerts.com/islamic-expans....olest-children/
(3) http://youtube.com/watch?v=F9ngzY4SSH8
http://youtube.com/watch?v=w5dHhzSDOcY
(4) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7935679.stm
(5) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....-testimony.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....e-preacher.html
(6) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1....x-grooming.html
(7) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1462628.stm
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/police-code-consultation
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....ters-warn.htm l
http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog/_archives
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/....el-788559.html.
“In understanding this matter, the beginning of wisdom is to grasp the law that in human societies power is never left unclaimed and unused. It does not blow about, like wastepaper on the streets, ownerless and inert. Men’s nature is not only, as Thucydides long ago asserted, to exert power where they have it; men cannot help themselves from exerting power where they have it, whether they want to or not. The coloured population of over two million in England, a population which grows at the rate of nearly 100,000 a year while the remainder diminishes, a population which is predominantly concentrated in the central areas of the metropolis and other key urban and industrial centers of England, does possess—simply by reason of segregation and differentiation—a power which would not accrue to a mere random sample of two million persons similarly located but not perceived or perceiving themselves as distinct from the rest”.
The Sun of 10 November 2006 quoted Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller quoted as predicting waves of terrorist bombings, with possibly chemical and biological devices.
“At this moment, at least 30 attacks are being actively planned and 1,600 suicidal young terrorists are under surveillance. Round-the-clock vigilance by security services has thwarted five major conspiracies and saved countless lives. There are plenty more outrages being planned.”
There have been warnings from the Home Secretary and her predecessor John Reid. The US classes London as a centre of terrorism! There are so many Muslims militantly opposed to us that it is attempting to live in a fantasy of multi-racial harmony to pretend that we are in anything but an early stage of undeclared war.
But there is another aspect of the war being waged against us in our own country by people the elites who are bringing here which is not admitted by our complicit authorities.
In an expose` of public interest the Daily Mail of 6 April 2009 reported: “Migrant workers and illegal immigrants (asylum seekers) were responsible for up to a third of all sex attacks in some areas". Greater London was worst affected, with foreigners charged in connection with a third of rapes. To get the figures the Express had to make a Freedom of Information request.
Most sex attacks were committed by foreigners in areas with large immigrant communities, like Cambridgeshire, Merseyside, Hertfordshire, Avon and Somerset. Police say it is difficult to bring foreign rapists to justice due to the large number of migrant workers and illegal immigrants in the country and there is no record of them entering the country.
On March 27, 2009 six Muslim men were arrested for the sexual exploitation and rape of young English girls: "A police spokesman said that it was important to maintain a low profile in order to keep the impact and disturbance caused to surrounding communities to a minimum. He added: "Uniformed officers from the Safer Neighbourhood Teams will be issuing leaflets to residents following the raid to reassure them and explain some details of the operation."
Why don’t the police just beg Muslims to stop raping young white children, to save the police having a race war on our streets?
Our children that they raped were as young as 11 years old. The Rotherham Advertiser reported it but left out the ethnic identities to fool locals into thinking anyone might be doing it when it is Muslim communities. The Advertiser also minimised the seriousness of the attacks by describing them as “exploitation and rape” when it is child molesting and child rape - our children, who are being raped by invaders plundering booty; during invasions, the conquerors rape the women of the conquered, but these are with the complicity of the political police and government.
The rapes in the Rwanda War are notorious. In 1998, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda held that "sexual assault formed an integral part of the process of destroying the Tutsi ethnic group and that the rape was systematic and had been perpetrated against Tutsi women only, manifesting the specific intent required for those acts to constitute genocide." Presiding judge Navanethem Pillay said in a statement after the verdict: "From time immemorial, rape has been regarded as spoils of war. Now it will be considered a war crime. We want to send out a strong message that rape is no longer a trophy of war."
But the rapes on our children are “spoils of war.” Although on a smaller scale than the above examples, the rapes of British children have the same basic motives; the hatred of one ethnic group for another. They are perpetrated on one people (our children) by a different group of people(older Muslim men).
The orthodox assumption is that Muslims rapists are like British rapists - acting as individuals (or a couple), but this is a whole community based on extended families raping the children of a different community. This is where treating each case an as individual case breaks down. It is guerilla warfare: fighting by unconventional means within areas occupied by the enemy(us).
The brave Grandfather of a 12 year old who was child-raped, and passed around to other's to rape, reported it to Rotherham Police but they told him there was nothing they could do about it so he went to Marlene Guest, a Rotherham BNP councillor, and explained that the police had refused to uphold the law against the rapists. Councillor Guest drove straight to the Rotherham Main Street police station and warned them, that if they continued to shield child-rapists the BNP would publicise it as they had in Huddersfield. That is the only reason Rotherham police acted.
In Huddersfield, Muslim men were telephoning young girls and threatening to burn down their homes if they did not meet them. The Mother of one of the raped children, said that she there many case's of child rape by Muslims in Huddersfield and took reporters to meet some of the Mothers, all had the same experiences - multiple offences, and the police allowing Muslims to get away with it. These child- rapes by Muslim communities are only exposed after heroic relations fight the police who fear a race-war starting so they cover it up.(2)
We have evidence of the community nature of the child-rapes in these reports but the establishment pretend it is something else. It is being waged against us by extended families.
British National Party Councillor Sharon Wilkinson listened to the story of a lady living in the war zone in a Northern Mill Town. Hundreds of white girls, many as young as 12, are being lured into group sex and prostitution by gangs of British born Pakistani men from West and South Yorkshire. The girls are introduced to their ‘pimps’ by classmates, often brothers and cousins of the older Muslim rapists. It is their community against ours.(3)
The Daily Mail of 27 March 2008 prompted by that evening’s Panorama expose reported some case studies which show that it is the Muslim community as a whole attacking our people. “Jane: "It happened every night. There were loads of men involved.. You couldn't keep count. It was like a conveyor belt.” she relates. “A conveyor belt of men all expecting sex. She was only 14. Jane clearly remembers the sheer, terrifying numbers of men who would be brought to her bed at night ... As she puts it: "I was just this innocent little girl who went from playing with her dolls to having sex with lots of different men."
And unpalatable though it may be to confront, there are, even now, many other innocent little girls at risk of being forced into the same sickening transition. (4)
She relates the pattern: Victims are wooed by gangs of older men and made dependent by expensive gifts and constant compliments. A sexual relationship ensues before the abusers begin to exert control through threats, brutality and drugs before selling the girls to other men for sex. ... The numbers involved in setting the girls up and raping them from the Muslim community and the fact that it is relations acting together, demonstrates the community nature of this attack on our community.
"The grooming starts where you meet them and they're nice to you and take you to McDonald's and buy you cigarettes," she tells Panorama. "I was flattered that older boys were interested in me, which at 13 is nice. "And then you start to meet the cousins and the brothers, and then you realise that you've been passed on because suddenly you're hanging around with older people." It was not long either, before the "hanging around" took on a more sinister tone. "They start to touch you and say sexual things to you," she told Panorama. "And then the abuse starts. I was pinned down by two men while a third man raped me. "And there were other men watching." There are threats of violence: "They'd say things like they'd bomb my house and gang-rape my mum," she says. "I had to perform sexual acts on different men. One would come in, do whatever he wanted, go out and another would come in," she recalls.
"One day I was picked up by an older man who took me to a park. He pulled a gun out from under the car seat and put it to my head and told me that I was going to die in three seconds," she remembers. "Then he counted down and pulled the trigger, but it wasn't loaded. He found that amusing." These vile abuses of our young girls by the Muslim community is an Act of War.
“Eventually, terrified for her life, Jane confided the truth to her parents, who reported it to the police. What ensued is subject to dispute: while the force concerned say they couldn't find enough evidence for a prosecution, Jane insists she felt forced to withdraw her allegations because officers couldn't guarantee her safety.
Lindsay and Fiona had similar Stories. They were both troubled youngsters who had problems at home, they were manipulated by predatory older Muslims. "We met Zulfi and Qais in a take-away in Blackburn," Lindsay, now 16, recalls today. "We were just mates. They'd give us cans of lager, bottles of Jack Daniels and sometimes ecstasy, cocaine and cannabis. We knew at some point they'd expect sex with us. But we didn't think there was really anything wrong with that."... “
Persistent complaints to the authorities, Megan says, were ignored until local MP, Jack Straw, intervened. Within weeks, both girls were taken into care in a bid to remove them from the source of the abuse. But Naveed and Hussain abducted them from care and took them back to prostitution. This time the violence was too much and they gatherd courage to report the child rapists to the police. They relate the evil being done to our girls by whole communities of Muslims: “The time Zulfi attacked Fiona was the worst," Lindsay says. "I remember hearing her screaming because he was whacking her across the back with a metal bar when she refused to have sex with him. "I guess she had sex with him in the end just to keep him quiet."
The Panorama programme involved eight months of investigation and found that about 5,000 young English girls are being prostituted by Muslims and black gangs. We are victims of racial guerilla war and the police are protecting the pimps and rapists.
Muslims call us “infidels” which dehumanises us, making us less than human in their eyes so they think they can do what they like because we are beneath compassion, yet our evil rulers continue to import them.
Sara Swann, a former government adviser on child protection: "Many girls are terrified and with reason. We had a case in the West Midlands where a girl had her tongue nailed to the table when she threatened to tell.” Another had her head pulled back, and a kettle of boiling water held over her open mouth." These are our people Muslims are attacking. British men have a duty to protect them.
In 2004, Channel 4 pulled a programme about Muslim pimps operating in Bradford at the request of the Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, who felt the timing of the programme could contribute to community unrest. In other words we are on the verge of a race war with Muslims and the police are trying to cover it up.
The documentary, examined the work of Bradford social services, and claims that "charismatic, wealthier" Asian men are targeting white girls as young as 11 for sex and drug abuse. The use of “Asian” is a slur on Hindus because it is Muslims who are doing this to or young girls. The programme was after attempts by two mothers to trace the men who took control of their daughters through drugs and intimidation.
West Yorkshire police asked Channel 4 to withdraw the programme after seeing a preview. Colin Cramphorn, the chief constable, feared race riots which erupted in Bradford three years earlier. In a letter to Mark Thompson, Channel 4's chief executive, he said the documentary could lead to "community disorder". (5)
Mr.Cramphorn knew what Muslims are up to. They use the threat of street war to manipulate the authorities. His obituary in the Guardian of 4 December 2006 told: “ Cramphorn's wider role came in the aftermath of the London bombings of July 7 2005, when it was revealed that the suicide team came from Leeds and Dewsbury, part of his patch. He rose to the challenge both operationally and, perhaps more significantly, in the way he led the reassurance of frightened and potentially angry communities, both ethnic minority and white, which avoided any serious backlash. In this, he built on the work of many other agencies, particularly in Leeds and Bradford, where many channels of communication between different groups swung into action at once.
But the chief constable reached out to others beyond this partly because he had given earlier, clear and outspoken warnings about what he called "Jihadists", and had met initial mockery when he revealed that extremist cells had organised training camps in national parks, such as the Yorkshire Dales. But he knew what he was talking about.”
It's like the American frontier when the Native Americans were being pushed off their land: everything is a negotiation between two hostile communities through Pow Wows and peace offerings.
The Times of August 11 2007 reported on “growing concern" at the attitudes of some Muslim men towards white girls which campaigners claim few will address.
“Parents have complained that in parts of the country with large Asian communities white girls as young as 12 are being targeted for sex by older Asian men yet the authorities are unwilling to act because of fears of being labeled racist.”
The police unbelievably, have a legal duty of care to the public!!! Has anyone ever known them follow this? They have members of al-Queda serving in the police and torture a BNP political activist in Liverpool; they kill an innocent white man going about his lawful business while anarchists protested against the G20 conference on 1st April in London; they ignore Muslims known as the Luton Taliban insulting our troops on their return from Iraq in Luton but arrest a young Englishman who was upset by this.
We are on the verge of an ethnic war with Muslims and the police are trying to cover it up. Even worse the ideological rulers of our country try to stop BNP getting into senior positions positions on police authorities because they will force the police to protect our young girls Muslim rapists instead of covering it up!
The government is even picking serving soldiers who are prepared to shoot their own people. Our rulers are at war with us and in alliance with Muslims. For years we have had it drummed into us that we are governed by high morals and venerable principles - equality, tolerance, fair-play, but as things start to come out we see that in reality we are ruled by some of the vilest, most evil people ever to have power and influence in any country. (7)
(1) http://www.actioninengland.gb.com/Enoch%20Powell%27s%20Speech.htm
(2) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl....ex- slaves.html
http://www.rotherhamadvertiser.com/News.aspx?id=8694
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/article-....hite-girls.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/02/2007_34_thu.shtml
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article2237940.ece
http://www.red-alerts.com/islamic-expans....olest-children/
(3) http://youtube.com/watch?v=F9ngzY4SSH8
http://youtube.com/watch?v=w5dHhzSDOcY
(4) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7935679.stm
(5) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....-testimony.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....e-preacher.html
(6) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1....x-grooming.html
(7) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1462628.stm
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/police-code-consultation
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....ters-warn.htm l
http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog/_archives
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/....el-788559.html.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
