Save our Children from State Social Engineering

Saving our Children from State Social Engineering

Since the rise to power of the New Left, in the 1960.s - 70.s, education has been to instill the correct attitudes rather than developing the child’s abilities. The authorities brainwash our children and only certain selected topics can be taught in history with the Second World war dominant because Nazism is used to frighten children away from Nationalist sentiments.
I mentioned history being reduced to acceptable propaganda: a Government funded study in April 2007 found that Schools are stopping teaching the Holocaust in history lessons to avoid offending Muslim pupils. It found some teachers are reluctant teach this for fear of upsetting Muslim students whose beliefs include Holocaust denial. There is fear of teaching children about the 11th century Crusades when Christians armies fought Muslim armies for control of Jerusalem because a different version is taught in mosques."
Sexually transmitted diseases are increasing among youngsters and being imported from Africa by immigrants. But rather than face this a group of MPs led by Chris Bryant, parliamentary aide to Harriet Harman, says that the solution is to educate children more about sex education from a much earlier age. They want children to have relationship advice 'in context' if they are to make informed decisions about when to have sex.
Chris Bryant - Captain Underpants It should be remembered that Bryant is openly homosexual as BBC News reported on 2nd December 2003, when he apologised for e-mailing a picture of himself (must read) in his underpants via a gay website. From 1994 to 1996 he was London manager of Common Purpose the controversial charity."Many Muslims will opt out of this as it will be teaching homosexuality as equal to heterosexual relations. Children could be taught sex education from the age of four, under plans by Mps.
They could also be taught a version of the development of slavery, colonisation and how it links to the British empire and the industrial revolution according to BBC News on 27th August 2008The Daily Mail of 27th August revealed. They want the Government to make advice on relationships, contraception and sexually transmitted diseases compulsory in all primary and secondary schools. It is the latest campaign aimed at cutting Britain's teenage pregnancy rate, which remains among the highest in Europe despite repeated attempts by ministers to reduce it.
Even worse the The Daily Mail of 22 August 2008, reported that almost a quarter of all babies in Britain are now born to immigrant mothers. In London the figure is 54 per cent, rising to 75 per cent in some boroughs....A report revealed that one in eight pupils speaks English as a second language...MPs and unions have called for urgent action to prevent schools being overwhelmed by the pressure but we can not trust them and must do this ourselves. Migrant children take longer to understand lessons and divert the teacher's energies from other pupils. In 1965 Peter Griffiths MP for Smethwich, a headmaster, called for special classes to teach immigrants English and was accused of wanting to start apartheid in schools.
It is much worse now so we must do it ourselves. Home education is not an alternative lifestyle choice it is now an imperative. Children used to be withdrawn for, say, bullying, unhappiness, failure to cater for SEN, or problems with teaching style and the curriculum but now we must save our children from Government manipulation.
Cultural Marxism is a total ideological system, imposing or manipulating opinions for all aspects of life - "Everything is Political." It is a subtle but less brutal version of Stalin's Russia. This process begins with children at school and operates on different levels. There is the physical level.
The State has DNA records of nearly a million children, some as young as five, and has been secretly taking their fingerprints since 2001. Each week 20 schools introduce fingerprinting. Ostensibly this helps them develop a love of books and reading. It replaces library cards by the child's fingerprint and placing the print on a scanner opens their computer file with records of the books they have borrowed.Minister for Schools and Learning, Jim Knight, revealed that when working on a crime police have access to the children’s fingerprints but parents are not told. To remove the prints takes professional cleansing. The schools, education authorities and the Government say it is difficult to convert this code back though not impossible and a computer whizz-kid could re- create the original fingerprints for identity theft. To save our children we must set up Home Schooling networks and when the authorities try to impose restrictions, refuse them.
In July 2006 The Observer reported that British children, possibly as young as six, will be subjected to compulsory fingerprinting under European Union rules being drawn up in secret. The prints will be stored on a database which could be shared with countries around the world. Under proposed laws being drawn up secretly by the European Commission’s ‘Article Six’ committee, which is composed of representatives of the European Union’s 25 member states, all children will have to attend a finger-printing centre to obtain an EU passport by June 2009 at the latest. The Home Office wants to include children in its biometric passport scheme in two years' and automatically transfer their details and fingerprints to the new national identity database when they are 16. The Government is underhandedly building a genetic database. Data has been used for genetic research without consent, including attempts to predict "ethnic appearance" from DNA profiles.
Sport too has been jettisoned as the new elites detest competition and advocate co-operation to suppress male aggression. Commenting on our Olympic achievements in the Daily Mail of 20 August 2008, Leo McKinstry wrote: "Over the past weekend, our sailors, cyclists, swimmers and rowers won an unprecedented eight gold medals, by far the greatest haul by Britons in two days in a century of Olympic competition...Of the 14 heroes pictured on the front page of yesterday's Mail, six were educated at independent schools… Nor is this some statistical anomaly. The disproportionate Olympic success of privately educated contestants has been an enduring pattern in recent years....Equality of outcome is the central theme of the politically correct British state. The concept of a talented elite is despised rather than celebrated.Excellence should not be encouraged for fear of lowering the self-esteem of those who lag behind. the sale of playing fields to make way for lucrative housing developments. Then there is the growing feminisation of the teaching profession, where more than 90 per cent of primary school teachers and 60 per cent of secondary teachers are women - a development that again leaves many sporty boys unchallenged...The Commons Select Committee on Culture recently demanded that our national sporting body, UK Sports, should collect more information on 'the backgrounds' of top athletes. Such data, the committee said, would 'help increase the socio-demographic spread' of funding. In other words, the committee wants more social engineering, more drivel about equality, more intervention in the name of access. This is the sort of nonsense that has ruined state education and it would only undermine our sporting competitive spirit."The new elites loathe male authority and attack masculinity as patriarchy. They see the main enemy as white racism and this justifies disadvantaging white pupils. No other ethnic group can be racist because they are sentimentally categorised as victims of our oppression and require "special needs". While we are blamed as oppressors we are being oppressed at school by telling children their clothes or views could be offensive. What this really means is what you are doing is not acceptable to the upholders of the totalitarian orthodoxy.
A notorious example was reported by The Times of 7th march 2006: "Traditional nursery rhymes are being rewritten at nursery schools to avoid causing offence to children. Instead of singing "Baa baa, black sheep" as generations of children have learnt to do, toddlers in Oxfordshire are being taught to sing "Baa baa, rainbow sheep".A spokesman for Ofsted, the watchdog which inspects Sure Start centres, confirmed that centres are expected to "have regard to anti-discrimination good practice" and that staff should "actively promote equality of opportunity. Christmas is being cancelled. The Daily Mail of 11th December 2006:"It is the time of year when parents and grandparents look forward to seeing their children dressed up as Mary and Joseph or the Three Wise Men. But the traditional Nativity play at Knowland Grove Community First School in Norwich has been axed in favour of a celebration of a range of different faiths."
But the most alarming was in the Telegraph of 8 July 2008. The National Children's Bureau guidance to play leaders and nursery teachers advising them to look racist incidents among youngsters in their care. This could be a child of three who says "yuk" to unfamiliar foreign food. The guidance is designed to highlight potentially-racist attitudes in youngsters from a young age. It alerts playgroup leaders that even babies can not be ignored in the drive to root out prejudice as they can "recognise different people in their lives". The NCB receives £12 million a year, mainly from Government funded organisations and therefore the tax payer is having money taken to pay for their own children to be moulded by brainwashing into what the Cultural Marxist elites want them to be.
The authorities are tightening control of the children. The school leaving age is to be raised to 18. It is not to improve education but there will be more time for state parenting as in school holiday clubs and breakfast clubs. This is to condition them for being monitored 24 hours a day in the E.U.Home educating parents receive income support until their youngest child is 16. But in October 2008 new legislation comes into force and when the youngest child is 12, income support will be replaced with job seeker's allowance and the parents have to seek work. In 2010 the age limit for the youngest child will be reduced to 7 years old. The totalitarians want to keep control of the children which is why we must persevere.This legislation is to force home educating parents to get a job and send their children to school. As it costs the taxpayer about £5,000 per year to keep a child at school there are no economic reasons to force home educating parents into paid employment and children into state schools. It is a political decision. The government should give home schoolers a tax deduction to the same value of sending their child to a state school. A voucher scheme would allow parents to either home school and use the voucher to pay for necessities like books, or, to send their children to state or public school and re-deem the voucher against the cost. Universities are open to Home Schooled children.Home schooling families could get together to form Home school co-ops. These groups could meet weekly and provide a classroom. They are families who link to share their abilities and resources and broaden the children's education. This enables children to do science experiments, art projects, spelling bees, discussions; use museums, community centres, athletic clubs, after-school programs, churches, science preserves, parks, and other community resources. There are sports fields and leisure centres to use.
By forming groups we could get discounts for block bookings. Secondary school level students may take classes at community colleges, which typically have open admission policies. Parents could work as volunteers.

For advice contact Education Otherwise.(1)http://conservativedemocraticalliance.blogspot.com/2008/05/children-of-state-by-david-hamilton.html
An excellent aticle by Troy Southgate
Two recommended books about PC written from a old liberal perspective are:
"The Politics of the Forked Tongue" by Aidan Rankin(New European Publications) and
"Retreat from Reason" by Anthony Browne (Civitas).

Setting up the Targets

American philosopher George Santayana remarked that those who do not learn from history are destined to repeat its mistakes. On October the 26th is the anniversary of a unique event in England –a bomb attack on an mp’s home in 1965. This is a lesson that de-humanising a politician could have fatal consequences as happened to Pym Fortuyn and Theo Van Gogh. Mr.Griffiths had been Member of Parliament for Smethwick (now Warley) for just a year. He had been leader of the Conservative group on the council and won the election of 15th October 1964 against a national swing to Labour, which was led by Harold Wilson. The defeated MP Patrick Gordon Walker was Foreign Secretary designate and a personal friend of Wilson. Mr.Griffith’s turned Walker’s 3,544 majority into 1,774 for the Conservatives.
Alderman Griffiths was local-born and headmaster of nearby primary school, Fir Tree Lane. Mr.Walker lived in Hamstead Garden Suburb. Peter Griffiths lost his seat in March 1966 to Andrew Faulds (Labour) who lived in Stratford –upon-Avon!
Biased and exaggerated reporting created a dangerous climate in which Mr.Griffiths ceased to be seen as human and became a “racialist”, something to be reviled. When people are thus de-humanised they become just figures of hate it does not matter what others do to them.
Paul Foot wrote a book on this election “Immigration and Race in British Politics” and, though an excellent journalist, he could not overcome his prejudice to give Mr. Griffiths a fair examination. However, he did note Walker’s hypocrisy and commented, ”The racial bitterness stirred up…could well last for a generation. For this Patrick Gordon Walker must take his share of the responsibility.” He quoted a Birmingham mp, “look at Patrick. He never left the subject alone.”(1) Walker had issued different election leaflets for each ethnic group. While he was preaching against race discrimination, Smethwick Labour club operated a colour bar! Mr.Griffiths told the Birmingham Evening Mail, on 24/9/1964, “The Socialists are attempting to obtain the coloured vote because they think it will hold Smethwick for them.”Many current attitudes were pre-figured in this election. The recent suggestion by Trevor Philips, head of the Commission for Racial Equality, has suggested young Black boys need schooling separately. This is similar to a suggestion by Peter Griffiths in February 1964, when in response to complaints from white parents he proposed to hold special classes for Indian children who could not speak English for three hours a day. They were to be taught by their own teachers in English, maths and science and then rejoin the others for games and crafts. He was accused of trying to start Apartheid in local schools!
Some think the oppression and social engineering began with Political Correctness or the advent of New Labour under Blair, but in fact it is part of the Multi-Racialists’ mentality. The first act of positive discrimination was in 1950 when Minister of Food John Strachey(L) announced that no Government contracts would go to caterers who did not employ coloured people. In 1955 Smethwick a Conservative candidate for the council Harold had his election addresses printed in Urdu as well as English as did Conservative General election candidate John Wells did too. In 1964 Enid Blyton was being pilloried for her book "The Little Black Doll". Also in 1964 the Campaign Against Racial Discrimination sent out forms for general election candidates to sign pledging not to us race as an issue and in 3 constituencies all the candidates agreed not to mention race! Meanwhile, back at the narrative –
An offensive slogan was being posted on walls before and during the election,” If you want a N***** for a neighbour, vote Labour”. Harold Wilson attributed this to Griffiths on national Television, when asked by Robin Day on Panorama of 9th March 1964 . Mr. Wilson replied, that he understood that this was said by the Conservative candidate in Smethwick. Griffiths denied he or any member of the Conservative party had used this slogan, but did refuse to condemn its use saying it was an expression of frustration felt by local people. He explained that the only person who had heard it was Mr.Walker, who claimed it was in use in the Municipal elections of 1963. A Labour spokesman said that Wilson had said no more than was in the morning’s Times. Mr.Griffiths threatened to sue Mr.Wilson but later declined. After the Election new Prime Minister Wilson broke from his address on the Queens speech to insult Griffiths by calling him a “Parliamentary Leper”, who would be shunned by everyone in the House. This breached the convention that new members be protected until after their Maiden speech! Harold Gurden Birmingham Conservative mp (Selly Oak) told the Times 25/1/1965, “He “had not met Griffiths but would be his friend in the House.” Then on October the 5th 1964 just two weeks before polling Griffiths was denounced for his campaign in the Birmingham Post and the Times Midland correspondent wrote, ”It is abhorrent to all Conservatives candidates and officials of stature to whom I have talked.” The column of October the 12th, “Vile –its all in Black and White.”As the election result was announced on October the 16th Socialists made Nazi salutes. Mr.Walker, the embittered loser griped,” I feel the result tonight will give Smethwick a bad name.” The Bishop of Southwark called the electorate “unchristian” and the Bishop of Chelmsford and Archbishop of Canterbury were critical. Local people supporting a local-born candidate in a democratic election over a local issue is a model of Democracy at work yet, these un-elected Bishops who lived far away, were imposing their a priori ideology on the situation but not drawing inferences from the facts or observation.
The way to understand this piece of history is not through the prejudices of outsiders but through real examples. A supporter of Mr.Griffith’s campaign was Cllr. Alan Vernon, 23-years old, who had fostered a young coloured child. Mr.Vernon, who had supported Griffiths campaign, told the Times of 15th February 1965, June, “I do not think the campaign was conducted on racialist lines. I feel that immigration should be restricted. He had also fostered a young coloured child eighteen months previously. He supported the Marshall Street plan.This plan was an attempt by the Conservative council to buy the remaining houses in Marshall Street to sell to white people as 40% were occupied by coloureds people. Martin Luther King himself had addressed members of Parliament in December 1964 on his way to Oslo to collect his Noble Peace Prize and had warned of the creation of “Little Harlems”.(2) Conservative group leaders had taken the decision after meeting a delegation of worried housewives. Housing Committee chairman E. Gould remarked,” This is not colour prejudice. We understand that over thirty houses in Marshall Street are occupied by coloured people and we think they should not be allowed to occupy more than half the houses in any street.” Griffiths agreed and told the Times of 7th December, 1964 ” coloured people can only be integrated if they live alongside white people.”Later a delegation of housewives visited Richard Crossman Minister of Housing for support, who with his PPS Bob Mellish treated them harshly and upset the ladies. A request for funding was sent but turned down. Crossman a leading left-wing intellectual was proud of having opposed the 1961 Commonwealth Immigration Bill, as a “shameful piece of legislation, but wrote in his Diary,“Ever since the Smethwick election it has been quite clear that immigration can be the greatest potential vote loser for the Labour party if we are seen to be permitting a flood of immigrants to come and blight the central areas of our cities.”(3)Mellish had said “Smethwick’s name stinks and “Smethwick is well regarded in Alabama.” But in May 1976 with an influx of Malawi Asians into his own Bermondsey constituency, Mr. Mellish, then Labours’ chief whip, told the Commons, “With 53 million of us we cannot go on without strict immigration control.”
Ever consistent the BBC took Malcolm X the American Black Power leader to Marshall Street in February 1965 to film for their current affairs programme “Tonight”. He told the world’s media,” I have come here because I am disturbed by reports that coloured people in Smethwick are being badly treated. I have heard they are being treated as the Jews under Hitler. I would not wait for the Fascist element in Smethwick to erect gas ovens.” I wonder who he heard that off! He told the London Times that the BBC had taken him there for a programme on race in their current affairs programe “Tonight”. This was a mere nine days before he was assassinated after his return to the States.The BBC denied having brought him but Smethwick’s eloquent mayor Alderman C.V.Williamse investigated and revealed, that he was appalled at” the BBC bringing algebraic characters to Smethwick and then denying it. I was most amazed at the finesse displayed when I spoke of him being brought in a BBC car. I was told the car was not a BBC car but it was owned by one of the directors.” Griffiths was outraged by the visitations of extremists and wrote to the “Smegs” Telephone, “ The visit of Malcolm X was an affront to decent people and a direct provocation. That he should have been brought to Marshall Street by the BBC, which is supposed to be a responsible public corporation, makes matters worse. I say to all extremists Right and Left, black or white, get out and stay out.”
A blazing wooden cross had been left against a door in Pink Passage, with KKK painted on the pavement. The front room was a store for an Indian shopkeeper. Earlier a Labour Councillor described the council as being like “Peter Griffiths’ Reichstag.”
Mr.Griffiths also called for health checks on immigrants when he responded to a question in the local paper the “Smegs Telephone”, “Immigration should be limited to those of sound health who have jobs and living accommodation arranged before they enter.” This was prescient as there was an outbreak of Typhoid in Smethwick in April 1965. Dr.John Briant the Deputy Medical Officer of Health said ”Smethwick had contained one outbreak but another might occur if people were let into the country without health checks.”
The campaign of vilification which lasted for eighteen months and had been featured in media all across the world, culminated in a time bomb being planted outside Peter Griffith’s home. This is unique in British politics. The bomb was a battery and clock placed on a meter cover, connected by wires through the letterbox to a detonator and an explosive substance. The explosion splintered part of the front door, blew the dining room door off its hinges, broke the hinges on an upstairs door, blew off the loft entrance, smashed some windows and drove splinters into the walls and stair banisters in the hall. The police thought it the work of experts. The media created a climate in which Peter Griffiths was made a legitimate target for political fanatics. This shows that irresponsible journalists and politicians can put people’s lives in danger especially now we have many Muslim extremists in the country, if they use wild and emotive terms of abuse based on lies against an opponent.

1 Foot, Paul 1965. Immigration and Race in British Politics (Penguin)
2 Griffiths, Peter 1966. A Question of Colour (Leslie Frewin)
3 Crossman Richard1975. Diaries of a Cabinet Minister. Vol.1David Hamilton

Maggots feeding on the body of art

An entry for the 2003 Turner Prize was a sculpture depicting bodies being picked at by maggots. Entitled “Sex”, it was by Jake and Dinos Chapman, who duly made the headlines as the most shocking nominees.
Maggots feeding off a body is a fitting out picture of contemporary artists. They are corrupt, degraded, unimaginative and parasitic as they feed off our great artistic traditions and try to destroy them. Their aim is to destroy our values and something that gives meaning to our lives. Is a urinal, say, an artistic subject? No, it is intrinsically unartistic, even though it might have pleasing curves, and to write about it as such does not make it artistic but conceptually separates artistic form from subject
Contemporary art is not really art at all and should be called something else. But it is a financial asset for the global elites who buy and sell it and run the Arts Councils that manage artistic creativity.
Sotheby’s contemporary art auction in July 2008 raised more than $1 billion which shows how the global elites are investing in art regardless of economic predictions. Their evening contemporary art sale raised 95 million pounds ($189 million), the highest total for a summer contemporary auction held in Europe and just below the overall regional record set in February. Francis Bacon’s “Study for Head of George Dyer”, the artist’s lover, fetched $27.4 million, including commission; Jean-Michel Basquiat’s “Untitled”, was sold by rock band U2 for $10.1 million. Competitors Christie’s sold art worth $172 million at its sale. Only the less important Sotheby’s contemporary day sale is left and the two main auctioneers have sold works worth just over $1 billion during the summer season, which includes impressionist, modern, post-war and contemporary art. Christie’s raised around $552 million and Sotheby’s about $449 million so far.
Senior executives are confidant that the art market will sustain soaring values in spite of falling stocks and house prices with rising oil costs. Russian elites have been a big factor in booming art sales, there is worry they may inflate impressionist prices in the same way Japanese money did around 20 years ago then disappeared causing the market to crash.

Contemporary art is the preserve of an elite, a large clique, that finance their interests through grants from the arts council, local authorities and sponsorship from global corporations. It is exhibited by commercial art galleries, private collectors, corporations, publicly funded arts organizations, contemporary art museums or by the artists themselves who are supported by grants, awards and prizes as well as by selling work. These are interlocking and exclusive relationships. Individual members of the elite are highly influential - Charles Saatchi has dominated the market in British contemporary art for twenty years and is a major sponsor and collector.

A major sponsor and collector when the English civilisation was developing was King Athelstan. His attitude and intentions show how different are the motives of sponsors at each end of this arc of culture. He used his collection in service of God and to develop something spiritual, and did so through gift. One was to Chester-le-Street, a tenth-century West Saxon codex containing Bede’s eighth-century prose and verse The Life and Miracles of St. Cuthbert, Bishop of Lindesfarne, a seventh-century monk, solitary and bishop, with a frontispiece illustrating the king presenting the book to St.Cuthbert. Together with the Cuthbert material there were episcopal and royal records in this book, including a list of popes. There is evidence that Athelstan also supported the shrines of St. John of Beverley and St. Wilfrid at Ripon. A ring preserved at Bury St. Edmunds in East Anglia bears as its inscription the names of St. John of Beverley and Athelstan (see Rollason 1989). Traditions of several churches traditions such as Malmesbury attributed their collections to his religious benevolence. The prologue to an Old English relic-list from Exeter (Rollason.), tells how royal agents purchased “with the king’s earthly treasure the most valuable treasures of all - holy relics”. A letter from the prior at St. Samson’s at Dol in Brittany is evidence of Athelstan’s interest in relics outside England.
These qualities give a clue to what creates civilisation - confidence in one’s own people and the sense of the civilisation’s permanence. Traditional masterpieces have such individual detail and are so deep one is enrapt for the entire day after first looking at a work as a whole. We need belief in our inherited values from our ancestors and to transmit them to our descendants. We know that what gives meaning to life is our emotional experience, our relationships, our beliefs and values. Our values come from a sense of continuity. We receive them from our forbears. They tell us that we have long endured and will continue to do so.
The Arts Council privileges some ethnic groups as expressed in their customary
doublespeak:-
Celebrating diversity Race, ethnicity and faith will remain major preoccupations in this country and the arts are fundamental to such debates. The arts help us to develop a sense of our identity and ourselves as individuals, as members of our communities and as a nation. The debate now also needs to encompass a richer and more broad-ranging definition of diversity. By ‘diversity’, we mean that we will respond to issues around race, ethnicity, faith, disability, sexuality, class and economic disadvantage – any social or institutional barriers that prevent people from participating in and enjoying the arts. We have a part to play in turning the diversity debate towards a positive celebration of diversity and the artistic and creative opportunities it offers. Recent progress Recently we have made real progress in this area. In 2004/05, 23% of individuals receiving our grants defined themselves as Black and minority ethnic artists We have a far-reaching race equality scheme, and require all 1,100 regularly funded organisations to have one too Our Council’s disability and Black and minority ethnic profile has improved, but we still have more to do to achieve the same profile at senior executive level We have made major interventions in theatre – demonstrated by Eclipse Theatre and in 2006 the Sustained Theatre consultation on Black performing arts We will continue with our decibel programme, to celebrate and raise the profile how Black and minority ethnic artists contribute to contemporary British culture
In contrast, ventures representative of our culture, like the
English Music Festival
are discriminated against on the grounds that they are not “inclusive.” This ideology is disseminated through the channels of communication the cultural elites control. Ethnic arts are treated with reverence - ours are dismissed.
The current chairman of Arts Council England, is Sir Christopher John Frayling an educationalist and writer known for his study of popular culture. He read history at Churchill College, Cambridge and gained a PhD in the study of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. He taught history at the University of Bath and in 1979 was appointed Professor of Cultural History at London’s post-graduate art and design school, the Royal College of Art. Since 1996 he has been Rector in charge of the College. He is also Chairman of the Design Council, Chairman of the Royal Mint Advisory Committee, and a Trustee of the Victoria and Albert Museum. He was a governor of the British Film Institute in the 1980s. He was knighted in 2001 for “Services to Art and Design Education”.

Chairwoman of the London Arts Board is Lady Sue Woodford Hollick, a businesswoman and consultant with extensive interests in broadcasting and the arts. She is a former producer and director of World in Action for Granada Television and founding Commissioning Editor of multicultural programmes at Channel 4 television. She has been Chairwoman of Arts Council England, London since September 2000 and is currently a member of the Tate Modern Advisory Council. She is founder and Co-Director of Bringing Up Baby, a childcare company and Chair of the UK board of the African Medical & Research Foundation, Africa’s leading health development organization. Her husband, Lord Hollick, is Chair of the South Bank Centre, which is funded by Arts Council England.
The usual chairman of the Turner Prize Committee is Sir Nicholas Serota who grew up in Hampstead. His mother was a Labour Minister for Health in Harold Wilson’s government, who was made a life peer and governor of the BBC. He was educated at Haberdashers’ Aske’s School and then read Economics at Christ’s Cambridge before switching to History of Art. He completed a Masters degree at the Courtauld Institute of Art under the supervision of Anthony Blunt and Anita Brookner.
In the 1990s contemporary art merged with popular culture and artists are promoted as stars. In June 2008 The Evening Standard told of the millions that Damien Hirst is spending on
the mansion
once owned by Lord Sudeley’s family. Hirst is supposedly worth £135 million. Death is a central theme in Hirst’s works like a series in which dead animals like a shark, a sheep and a cow are preserved — sometimes having been dissected — in formaldehyde. The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living is a 14-foot tiger shark immersed in formaldehyde in a vitrine. In June 2007, his Lullaby Spring sold for £9.65 million at Sotheby’s in London then in 2007, For The Love of God sold for £50 million to an anonymous investment group.
Arts Council England is the national development agency for encouraging the maggots. It distributes public money from the Government and the National Lottery to the arts organisations who share their ideology and refuse those that do not. Individuals and organisations can apply to the Arts Council for funding from its own budget or from the Lottery.
Contemporary art is negative and the practitioners use it to destroy the Art they feed off like maggots while they parasitically take what they can. They not only try to destroy art they kill their babies. Lynn Barber wrote of Tracey Emin in The Observer of 22April 2008 :” The first abortion, in 1990, was horrendously bodged because no one realised she was carrying twins: the second abortion, she says, was ‘revenge’ for the first. Contemporary art is a sort of show to shock which is a petty, destructive motive and meant to hurt innocent people. What they really enjoy is shocking elderly people and children. Of Grayson Perry’s “Barbaric Splendour” the Satchi Gallery wrote: “His form and content is always incongruous: classic Grecian-like urns bearing friezes of car-wrecks, cell-phones, supermodels, as well as more dark and literary scenes often incorporating auto-biographical references.” They need traditional art as a background, for if the old standards were truly swept away no one would be able to say, “What a provocative statement, Tracy.”
Tracey Emin was made Royal Academician by the Royal Academy of Arts On 29 March 2007. Emin joined an elite group of artists including David Hockney, Sir Peter Blake, Anthony Caro and Alison Wilding. She is now entitled to exhibit up to six works in the annual summer exhibition. Her sex-themed works on show include a Zebra with an erection - a crankshaft that operates a model of a zebra, which in turn is copulating with a model of woman in Victorian dress, as the hackneyed image of prudery. It is pretentious and has no intrinsic merit - only that bestowed by the elites. It is propaganda for Cultural Marxism. If the Victorian woman was replaced with, say, Cherie Blair or Diane Abbott the pseuds would be filled with shock and hysteria.

At the 2007 Venice Biennale Emin hosted celebrity guests, including Sir Elton John and his husband/wife David Furnish, Viscount Linley and the model Naomi Campbell. Likewise, when Jake Chapman married model Rosemary Ferguson in Christ Church, Spitalfields, among the guests were Kate Moss, Sadie Frost, Noel Gallagher’s ex-wife Meg Matthews and society photographer Sam Taylor-Wood.
A main feature of contemporary art is paedophila. Grayson Perry, the transvestite who won the Turner Prize in 2003, is known for vases depicting child abuse. Popular entertainment has drawn from the art world’s fascination with it. For example, David Bowie’s 1975 concept album “1.Outside” had a tale about the dismemberment of a teenage girl. Bowie also promoted an androgynous image with the concept album on the career of an extraterrestrial rock singer Ziggy Stardust. It was the basis for his 1972 tour, which was sponsored by The Sun newspaper, and the gigs were filmed by BBC television.

Dressed as his alter ego Claire, Grayson Perry told the Tate Exhibition 2003: “Well, it’s about time a transvestite potter won the Turner Prize. I think the art world had more trouble coming to terms with me being a potter than my choice of frocks.” Tate director and award judge, Serota said: “I don’t think the choice is a strategic choice. I think the jury felt strongly that these were the works of a very strong artist who happens to be using ceramics and drawing.”
Institutions like Serota’s manage and regulate what used to be individual inspiration within a traditional culture. So, ordinarily, crafts like textile design are excluded from contemporary art despite having large audiences at exhibitions. But it becomes a different story if they adopt the right values. Elite motives were expressed by Charles Satchi thus, “A ceramic object that is intended as a subversive comment on the nature of beauty is more likely to fit the definition of contemporary art than one that is simply beautiful.”
Perry’s “Golden Ghosts” were described by the Satchi Gallery:” Unhappy expressions on the little girls’ faces in Golden Ghosts contrast sharply with the idyllic country cottages stencilled in the background. Perry often uses found images to create a mood or a tension – the exceptionally sad image of the seated girl is that of a child affected by the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station disaster. This evocative work hints at a familiarity with psychotherapy, made at a time when Perry was coming to terms with his own unhappy past. Perry’s transvestite alter ego, Claire, appears outlined in gold as the ghost in the title, dressed in the elaborate embroidered “Coming Out Dress”, made for a performance in 2000.” As we see with Emin they do not transcend their unhappiness but spread it to others.

The Chapman brothers are conceptual artists who work together. They were part of the Young British Artists movement that was promoted by Charles Saatchi, who also sponsored Damien Hirst and Tracey Emin. Jake Chapman has published a number of catalogue essays and pieces of art criticism in his own right, as well as a book, Meatphysics in 2003. The brothers have also designed a label for Becks beer as part of a series of limited edition labels produced by contemporary artists.
Their Turner Prize exhibit for 2003 featured two new works “Sex” and “Death”. “Sex” referred their previous work “Great Deeds against the Dead”. The original work shows three dismembered corpses hanging from a tree, “Sex” shows the same scene, but in a further state of decay. Clown’s noses have been added to the skulls of the corpses while snakes, rats and insects, similar to ones in joke shops, cover the piece. “Death” is two sex dolls, placed on top of each other, head-to-toe in the soixante-neuf position.

The next step down to total degradation is cruelty to animals and bestiality. In a declining civilisation art becomes corrupted and is a measure of the health - or sickness, actually - of a civilisation. The Romans sank into a debased barbarism by slaughter in the amphitheatre. Our deterioration into barbarism is moving from images to the reality. In popular entertainment like “I’m a Celebrity Get Me out of Here”, simple people, described as Celebrities, are so degraded as to be led into eating live worms and stick insects. There are several levels to this: there is cruelty to lesser animals; encouraging children to eat insects and slugs in the garden ;and the move towards ever more degradation of our people and culture.
This is a world-wide decadence: In 2007, a Costa Rican ‘artist’ Guillermo Vargas Habacuc caught a stray dog on the street and tied it by a short leash to the wall of an art gallery and left it to die of hunger and thirst while cultural elites watched. The Central American Biennial of Art has decided that this was art and has asked Vargas Habacuc to repeat this “installation” at the Biennial of 2008. This was sanctioned by a public body run by the country’s elites. It is not clear that they really did starve the dog and it might be just to shock or get publicity to sell something. But it shows how truly disgusting these people are. The “artist” explained, “I knew the dog died on the following day from lack of food. During the inauguration, I knew that the dog was persecuted in the evening between the houses of aluminum and cardboard in a district of Managua. Five children who helped to capture the dog received 10 bonds of córdobas for their assistance. The name of the dog was Natividad, and I let him die of hunger in the sight of everyone, as if the death of a poor dog was a shameless media show in which nobody does anything but to applaud or to watch disturbed. In the place that the dog was exposed remain a metal cable and a cord. The dog was extremely ill and did not want to eat, so in natural surroundings it would have died anyway; thus they are all poor stray dogs: sooner or later they die or are killed.”

A couple of decades ago an artist castrated himself in an exhibition in London which was presumably funded by the Arts Council! One would wonder how this or the starving of a dog is art. The setting does not make it art. It makes it torture set in an art gallery. It is what the elites want from an artistic subject. It is not what we want. For us, art has to be intrinsically artistic in that it it is something that produces an affect on our emotions ranging from pleasing to spiritual. It triggers something aspirational or transcendent as the subject is transformed by human imagination and skill. Art begins as wholesome and aspiring to the spiritual. But in a declining civilisation it becomes corrupted and corrupting. The debased slaughter in the amphitheatre marked the Roman decline into barbarism. Ours is marked by, among other things, the degeneracy and cruelty of anti-art.
To combat the anti-art movement a young artist would need not only great talent but also independence of mind and an imagination developed through respectful study of tradition and a sense of reverence for God and his creation. He would also need the courage to stand alone against the artists and elites who have a stranglehold on artistic productions and the colleges that pass the fashionable methods on. The brave one would need to study the great masterpieces and find an appropriate tradition to link to, and begin reviving our civilisation.

Nationalist Conservatism

Nationalist Conservatism by David Hamilton

Conservatism was an attempt to preserve traditional ways and differed from Liberalism but became Liberal, Classical then Social Democratic - abstract rights, capitalism, economics, laissez faire and self interest- now Cultural Marxism. Like the other parties they offer the electorate incentives to get into power and at election time pretend they will introduce popular policies like controlling immigration but once in office pursue their own agenda. This should be a criminal offence and the Party name subject to trading standards law. Academic Conservatives have tried to revive Conservatism by turning it into a competing ideology but it has no goal only living life by belonging to a historical community and culture and passing it on to one’s children. It is not a different opinion in a rational debate but an attitude and temperament in life. Rational plans and formulae are for the rationalist-ideologues: which is why these are “intimations” not a blueprint and cannot be stated a priori like utopian ideologies. There is more to human nature than reason. It is not just reaction to current dominant doctrines nor a rejection of future utopias as fantasy in order to re-live a past utopia, not an attempt to turn back the clock to a bygone time but is a traditional way of thinking and feeling for one’s own ethnic community.
The turning point is now as we who feel alienated and dispossessed begin re-developing a tradition for our common good and to revive our collapsing civilisation. We value wisdom over rationalist ideologies.Wisdom is passed down by tradition, especially the family and develops from naivety through learning the lessons of life, how people behave and what they are capable of doing to each other, to practical wisdom which we pass it on to our children to prepare them for life. Received ideology is arrested development.We are born into a family, community and nation with history, culture and a civilisation that pre-exist us and we imbibe it as we grow up: It lives in us, and we in it. This has a conscious and an unconscious effect which makes us what we are. We have piety for our past and reverence for the achievements of our ancestors and a duty to pass it on to our descendants. It is an affective relationship that endures in time not a rationalisation into independent individuals interacting; much less the Cultural Marxist prejudice of slotting selected groups - blacks, homosexuals and women - into abstract categories with legal privileges. We belong to a nation as Edmund Burke explained: “A nation is not an idea only of' local extent, and individual momentary aggregation: but it is an idea of' continuity which extends in time as well as in numbers and in space. And this is a choice not of one day, or one set of people, not a tumultuary and giddy choice; it is a deliberate election of the ages and of generations; it is a constitution made by what is ten thousand times better than choice, it is made by the peculiar circumstances, occasions, tempers, dispositions, and moral and special habitudes of' the people, which disclose themselves only in a long space of time(1)
Enoch Powell defined our belonging succinctly in the debate on the 1981 British Nationality Act “Your nation is who you will fight for.” T.S.Eliot, our ways, ”… the term culture... includes all the characteristic activities and interests of -a people: Derby Day, Henley Regatta, Cowes, the twelfth of August, a cup final, the dog races, the pin table, the dart board, Wensleydale cheese, boiled cabbage cut into sections, beetroot in vinegar, nineteenth century Gothic churches and the music of Elgar.” (2)
Our Christian faith activates our spiritual natures but Ideology is a secular religion which replaces national religion and having no spiritual content gives rise to earthly fanaticism. It has nothing transcendent only a forced move towards utopia on earth instead of heaven. This developed from the French Enlightenment: one of the most significant events in human history that changed the human focus from looking back to the past for wisdom, the Bible, Aristotle and Plato, say, to working towards a vague, future utopia. It requires an idea of the person as abstract and malleable, with substance removed conceptually to fit them into a mental blueprint for utopia - Marxism's classless society, the feminists’ androgynous society, the liberal brotherhood of man and the Nazis' thousand year Reich of pure Aryans. The present Utopia is the coffee coloured, Multi-Racial society. Norman Pannell urged a practical approach to immigration at the 1958 and 1961 Conservative conferences suggesting immigrants have health checks and those who are criminal be deported; Colonial Secretary Iain Macleod countered at a fringe meeting with his utopian belief in the brotherhood of man.
The Ten Commandments are duties which have been more important than rights in our historical and cultural achievement with the greatest art, literature and music inspired by God. A nation based on the duty of men and women is conscientious about responsibilities and obligations: a right-centred society is one in which individuals assert their personal desires. They are encouraged by Human Rights Acts to demand rights, with no consideration for the consequences of those demands on other people, like the right to protest and demonstrate conflicts with the right of pedestrians and motorists to use the public roads. Human Rights are the modern Rights of Man. Conservatives believe in liberty but derived from belonging to a nation and is opposed to the universal, abstract rights of liberals and the group rights of cultural Marxists.Because of the Human Rights Act “travellers” are being given our countryside. They buy farming land and convert it into caravan parks, then claim right of settlement.
In the Spectator of December 17th 2005 philosopher Roger Scruton urged rural residents to save their countryside by clubbing together and buying it. Rural communities should “take power into their own hands” as they had shown that the Hunting Act cannot be enforced we must now rescue our countryside from outsiders who are favoured by the Government. Neighbours (we) should club together to buy small parcels of land from desperate farmers then rent it back at a peppercorn rent.” They have done this in Professor Scruton’s neighbourhood and saved them from both travellers and agribusinesses.The Conservative sense of nation was described by Cambridge don Dr John Casey in an address to the Conservative Philosophy Group. In the nineteenth century,” culture was taken to be the whole life of the people, and not just its highest achievements in, say, the fine arts. This involved an attempt to understand society and the nation through the sum total of its practices, traditions and institutions. This tradition of thought has always had political implications, since the public institutions of the nation - religious and political - are clearly part of the whole life of the people. And the term most frequently invoked to express the whole life of the people, including the sense of itself as a political entity, was nation. The idea of the nation was something that could include the life of local communities, relations between classes, and indeed all those ways in which people impose a sense of themselves upon merely economic arrangements.” (3)
He was persecuted and recanted but it still stands as an example of how we can become homogenous again safe from imported gang murders, muggings and Muslim bomb attacks.Civilisation is created by effort and genius and must be renewed daily but is being undermined by our rulers for a new world order. Through studying history we learn that civilisations decline and fall when they become decadent and the people indulgent, as in Egypt and Rome which is why history is being phased out of state education. People expect the state to solve their problems and spoiling them makes them dependent for not only material needs but their beliefs which are provided by the media and opinion formers so they become decadent and indulgent. Discrimination against us is presented as moral superiority - affirmative action. We who have emotionally bonded with our people and territory and belong here are being dispossessed by our rulers for unrealistic hopes of one world and those they brought here as cheap labour. It takes totalitarianism to make disparate groups unite and our lives are being increasingly regulated. A hospital visit needs a password and our confidential relations with our G.P.s have been destroyed now that our personal medical histories are put on a national database. We are becoming state property.The “Enlightened” ruling and cultural elites try to dismiss our views as prejudice but when examined their views are rationalisations of their prejudice in favour of other ethnic groups.
In fact it is more accurate to define our ruling elites as an “Ideological Caste” because only those who think and act in the correct way are admitted and any who say the wrong thing are forced to publicly apologise or destroyed. London's Science Museum cancelled a talk by Nobel prize-winning geneticist Dr James Watson, winner of a Nobel Prize for his part in discovering the structure of DNA, had been due to speak at the museum, because he suggested black people were less intelligent than white people. Watson, told The Sunday Times he was "inherently gloomy about the prospects of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours -- whereas all the testing says not really." The Science Museum, said "We know that eminent scientists can sometimes say things that cause controversy and the Science Museum does not shy away from debating controversial topics...However we feel that Dr Watson has gone beyond the point of acceptable debate and we are, as a result, cancelling his talk." Where was their reasoned argument? That was naked prejudice on their part. Sir Winston Churchill tried to heal the rupture in our national continuity in 1955 by having a bill to control immigration drawn up which was not ready until June, two months after he stepped down because of his health. He wanted the Conservative party to adopt the slogan “Keep England White.” (4)
The fifth Marquess of Salisbury, grandson of the great Conservative Prime Minister and descendent of Lord Burleigh adviser to Queen Elizabeth1, wrote to Viscount Swinton in 1954, in a letter preserved at the Public Records Office, ”We are faced with a problem which, …With each year that passes, and with the general improvement with methods of transportation, the flow increases. Indeed, if something is not done to check it now, I should not be at all surprised if the problem became quite unmanageable in twenty or thirty years time. We might well be faced with very much the same type of appalling issue that is now causing such great difficulties for the United States. The main cause of this sudden inflow of blacks is of course the Welfare State. So long as the antiquated rule obtains that any British subject can come into this country without any limitation at all, these people will pour in to take advantage of our social services and other amenities and we shall have no protection at all.” That Queen Elizabeth I had “Blackamoors” expelled from her realm in 1601 shows what a Conservative value it is.The Daily Telegraph of 4/10/07 reported, “Foreign criminals are moving out of big cities and infiltrating rural towns and villages. The gangs include Jamaican "Yardies" selling crack in Hereford and Cambridgeshire, Chinese criminals called "Snakeheads" in Lancashire and Norfolk, Albanians running prostitution rings in Hampshire and Colombian cocaine networks in Chelmsford, Essex.A television series, “ Crime Invasion — Britain's New Underworld”, for the Virgin 1 satellite channel, was presented by Rageh Omaar, a journalist who has worked for the BBC. Omaar said: "Crime in the UK is changing and making the series has shown me that it is happening right underneath our noses." The chief constable of Cambridgeshire, Julie Spence, has said that immigrant workers were importing their national feuds and criminal behaviour to rural England.”Democracy is a myth. Few people bother to vote. It attracts inadequate and ignoble people to office because it involves bribing and deceiving people into voting for them; it attracts hypocrites who preach family values and commit adultery or who preach equality but send their own children to public schools. As few voters read the parties manifestoes they have no mandate. The main issues are general movements that political parties conform to, not attached to a political party. In our time it is multi-racialism and all three follow it. Culture is treated as independent of people and anyone can come and adopt it like putting on and taking off clothes. Aristocracy is a form of rule that suggests permanence and continuity as they embody the nation and its traditions. A warrior class based on the land, their duty was to defend the nation was well as rule it. The House of Lords must be re-created as the new chamber will be for rewarding members of the political elite and to stack decisions in the elites favour. Only the gullible think this will be democratic. It is part of the ongoing takeover of our lives by moneyed elites whose loyalty is to themselves and whose vision is the dissolution of our nation for unworkable Globalist aims. They are using people for cheap labour - both outsourced and imported. Re-creating the Lords will be a step back to aristocratic and monarchical rule. Rights were demands of the capitalists that led the French Revolution. Our main historical references are the American and French revolutions and the nationalist revolutions of 1848. It began the destruction of the natural order of sceptre and crown for rule of the Liberal-Capitalist class where membership was not by blood but money. They wanted the disestablishment of religion, the dissolution of nationhood, the denial of race as a social factor, and finally World Government or Utopia. The media elites manipulate the masses into supporting these ideas. The main issues of the day are movements that political parties conform to: they are not attached to particular parties and the major movement of our time is multi-racialism and all three parties conform to it.Traditional prejudice conveys wisdom to new generations but Liberals and cultural Marxists think they have transcended prejudice yet beneath their high-mindedness is the prejudice that immigrants are essentially good but whites are essentially bad and they take sides with immigrants a priori - the rationalisation comes after: “They are going to become English”, “they are bringing diversity”; “Islam the religion of peace”, “they are enriching our culture”, “the hospitals could not run without them”, “we need their doctors”. This justifies them asset stripping the third world of workers and doctors. It is motivated not by guilt but shame: if you feel guilty you are remorseful and seek to make amends which our elites do not do but direct immigrants into our communities so we are used to make amends for them. They live in lovely areas or safely in gated communities while ordinary people get mugged, burgled and raped, and put at risk of Aids and T.B. They do not spoil their own areas but use worthy causes like Campaign for the Preservation of Rural England to preserve them. When centres for asylum seekers are proposed for the countryside, the elites are in uproar to keep them out. Political, intellectual and corporate elites are selfish and think only of themselves. The one gets cheap labour, the others pose as moral beacons to the un-enlightened. They loathe their own people and do not care how much we suffer as long as they feel virtuous. Many illegals work unlawfully long hours for almost nothing and have their liberty restricted by their masters and classic hypocrisy is the elites apologising for historic slavery while importing wage slaves! This is opposite of the Conservative virtue Noblesse Oblige: the obligations of the noble to the lower orders who reciprocate by loyalty and service. Modern Noblesse Oblige would be adopting economic protectionism. This value was preserved in opponents of immigration including working-class Socialists as the British are naturally Conservative.
In the Commons immigration debate on the 5th of December 1958 Labour’s Frank Tomney (Hammersmith), remarked “We have been sent here by the electorate to give expression to issues which concern them.” Conservative Cyril Osborne (Louth) 25th March 1965 spoke up for the working class in an immigration debate in the House of Commons. He said that in 1958 he could see the social evils and could still see them, “…for more than ten years I have begged this house – my own side as well as the party opposite – to face this problem which haunted me, as it still haunts me because I could see the social evils”. If anything goes wrong it cannot be others so they blame their own people and the connative word is “racism”. It is only applied to whites. We are the scapegoats for the setbacks on the road to their utopia. The ideas that we are told rule our lives are but rhetoric.
Equality masks hierarchy. Dr.Frank Ellis left Leeds University after an Inquisition for speaking of, amongst other things, “humane repatriation.” The University stated: “Dr Ellis has acted in breach of our equality and diversity policy, and in a way that is wholly at odds with our values. Second, in publicising his personal views on race, Dr Ellis has recklessly jeopardised the fulfilment of the University’s obligations under the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000. As a public body, the University is required under that Act to promote good relations between people of different racial groups.” Modern society has been built on the foundation of "equality" and therefore statements like this type threaten its roots. The analogy with the 17th century Papacy persecuting Galileo is apposite. Yet the elites are a hierarchy. The law was passed by the rulers then acted on by bureaucrats and academics lower down the hierarchy and finally the students protested obediently. Equality is imposed from the top, down a hierarchical chain of authority. That is the natural state and our recognition of natural hierarchy is only acknowledging what Liberals and Cultural Marxists try to deny!Nationalist Conservatives are protective of civil society which took centuries to grow! If we are split up by introducing masses of aliens, the basis of civility, which is trust, is destroyedbecause they have different ambitions and goals and each group become rivals and neither we nor they, know when historical enmity will surface.A major value is Tradition: ribs that hold communities together. One of the most important is our language and there is a new political vocabulary developing, un-self consciously. Take the word English. During the Empire the home countries were subsumed under the word British and it is PC to say British now but people are describing themselves as English, Scottish, Welsh and Ulster to emphasise their national identity. This happened with flags and the authorities’ rationalisation against is re-claim them from extremists! We need a concrete vocabulary with which to explicate the world around us and describe human nature. The Welsh have it right in their great anthem “Land of my Fathers”. “English” is changing as the English affirm their collective identity, mentally disentangle from the EU and the term British disintegrates. This reflects change in British relationships. Country is vapid but land means something. Anglo Saxon words are folksy and Latin more abstract so our political vocabulary requires old English words. Joseph de Maistre, the Savoyard counter-revolutionary, encapsulated the unreality of abstractions in his famous quote, ”In the course of my life I have seen Frenchmen, Italians, Russians; ... but man I have never met” The ruling bureaucrats of the E.U. and our regional Government are restricting our vocabularies through P.C. so that we speak and think in the way they want us to, and are devising an artificial way of describing Muslims to avoid calling some terrorists. This totalitarian control of thought through language began with the French revolutionaries, was continued by the Bolsheviks, Mao’s cultural revolution and in the west by cultural Marxists with their gradual cultural revolution.
Take our degraded art and literature: it is for talented people to re-link with spiritually uplifting art and re-grow it. For example, in Poetry, re-link with our original Anglo-Saxon forms such as the beautiful internal rhyme of alliteration, whereas end rhyme is dull and monotonous; or, Medieval because of the importance of Ballads as a vehicle to convey our suffering under our elected representatives who are against us. The matter of Robin Hood and the Sheriff of Nottingham is precedent.The family is exemplified in Monarchy. The institution of Monarchy is the embodiment of the nation and the Monarch is on our stamps, our court cases are Regina v X; we walk and drive on the Queen’s highway. The throne goes automatically to her successor. It is not the person but the office. The king is dead long live the king. It is continuity but also has a deep archetypal import that touches our deepest instincts. The natural form of Government is absolute Monarchy. It is the summum bonum of our family system and the family is its reflection. King and Queen are Father and Mother of the nation. Our current royal family are badly advised and reflect the general chaos instead of setting an example. I once read that the Queen Mother liked Ali G! This is propaganda to make them more ordinary in deference to demands by the tabloids and their global-elite owners but has made them contemptible. We must begin working towards absolute monarchy. They have archetypal importance to their people and a relationship with the whole nation not certain classes and factions.
From the fifth Commandment we learn to honour our mothers and fathers. The family is the beginning of civilisation and we have warnings from one-parent families to go by - the misery and trouble they are often in. The bonds that unite us are affective not rational - we feel that we belong and are comfortable. We feel at home. We like our land because we have bonded with it and this bond has been sanctified by time. These affections grow naturally within the family where responsibility for our community begins and is perpetuated in creating and rearing children and renewing our community so what was handed down to us is passed on. Homosexuals do not have this fulfilment as they have no further stage to move onto and remain in adolescence.
Our babies have been devalued as little more than attributes of the woman’s body, her rights are paramount and the father does not count. Abortion is erasing our posterity and 6 million babies have been killed since the 1967 Abortion Act!Fetishism is being popularised by our cultural and intellectual elites. This is deriving thrills from injury and degradation. It is the erotic form of hatred and consent is no excuse because if not countered evil spreads and soon those who do not consent will be abused and bullied by perverts. With outside forces working to destroy our boys and girls parents must regain sovereignty over their families and take responsibility for their children and Home School to rescue them from state corruption which is teaching them to give their land away and to become sexual perverts.
An early progressive William Godwin wrote in Political Justice(1793) that marriage and parental duties are irrational and believed as utopians do that society would become better and that men and women would in the future not behave so narrowly but for the benefit of everyone. The family is not narrow: its influences emanate outwards. Nearly all our traditions and institutions have been destroyed so we are going to have to re-link with many of them and grow others from our roots. The cultural Marxists are planning “Faith Schools” to allow other ethnic groups to instil standards of behaviour and education but try to ruin ours. Jim Knight, the schools minister, was reported in the Daily Telegraph of 8 October 2007 as saying the Government was considering how to simplify the balloting process adopted under 1998 legislation.” Ministers are paved the way for the adoption of fresh powers to abolish academically selective education. They said parents should get the chance to force the closure of grammar schools in their area if the majority of families opposed selection by ability. Jim Knight, the schools minister, said the Government was considering how to simplify the balloting process adopted under 1998 legislation in which schools could be forced to drop the 11-plus.”
The education Guardian on Monday June 25, 2007 told us the other part of the political elite the Conservative party ”announced last month that if it won the next general election there would be no return to grammar schools on the grounds that they do little to benefit children from poorer backgrounds. Instead, the party has promised to continue Tony Blair's flagship education reform and support the expansion of the academy schools programme - independent state schools sponsored by business.”We must counter these attempts to destroy our children by cultural Marxists. Parents must take back responsibility for their sons and daughters from the state. We need to re-introduce grammar Schools or even found new public schools to impart traditional values like honour, duty and service; others must consider Home Schooling networks to give their young the standard of education the state schools are denying them and to instil self-worth and a sense of belonging instead of teaching them to give up their country to outsiders and to become sexual perverts. We must revive local fairs and festivals and develop our Folk music traditions by taking traditional forms but using words and sentiments suitable for our present time to express our sufferings under the elites. These are not rationalist formulae but suggestions for our creative young people to develop in practice. They will forge natural, emotional bonds with their own people, their traditions and civilisation.

1. Reflections on the Revolution in France.
2. Notes Towards a Definition of Culture. T.S.Eliot
3. Peter Hennessy, 'Having It So Good - Britain in the Fifties' (Allen Lane, 2006) p 224. Hennessy's reference is: Peter Catterall (ed.), 'The Macmillan Diaries: The Cabinet Years, 1950-1957' (Macmillan, 2003) p 382.
4. Salisbury Review. Autumn 1982.
See also: pat buchanan.org. November 1998; and "Death of the West” 2002.(St.Martins Press); “"State of Emergency” (2006.St.Martins Press)
Michael Oakeshott.1948.Rationalism in Politics.(Methuen)
James Burnham.1964.Suicide of the West.

The State Persecution of Thought Criminals

The State Persecution of Thought Criminals

Robin Page, former presenter of television’s “One Man and His Dog”, a farmer, columnist for The Daily Telegraph, and the chairman of the Countryside Restoration Trust, won £2,000 compensation for being wrongly arrested on suspicion of stirring up racial hatred. He allegedly made a racist remark at a country fair in 2002 which led to him being held in a police cell and fought a five-year, one-man campaign to clear his name. He used the Data Protection Act and obtained official documents which showed that there had been no grounds for prosecution. "I believe I have scored a significant victory over the ludicrous and sinister politically-correct 'hate crime' culture that is currently doing so much to prevent free speech in this country," he said. His humorous comments at a country fair in September 2002 led to his persecution by the police. To gain the attention of the audience at Frampton-upon-Severn, Gloucestershire, he began in a "light-hearted fashion". "If you are a black, vegetarian, Muslim, asylum-seeking, one-legged lesbian lorry driver, I want the same rights as you." A complaint was later received by police, and another person wrote to say he disagreed with Mr.Page’s remarks. He was arrested the following month, and then five months later was contacted at his farm in Cambridgeshire and asked by two officers from Gloucestershire to attend an interview at a police station. At the station he declined to answer questions without a lawyer and was arrested. He was put in a cell and told that he would have to stay overnight if he wished to wait for his solicitor, but after 40 minutes agreed to be interviewed without legal representation.Mr Page said: "I was told I had committed a 'hate crime', interviewed under caution and given police bail." The BBC claimed that he had been arrested for a "race speech" and he felt the incident was potentially damaging to him professionally and as a district councillor for 30 years. He was neither charged nor given an explanation. Under Freedom of Information disclosures he discovered that the Attorney General had given the opinion "no crime committed". His name was secretly put on a "Homo-phobic Incidents Register". He was due to go to on a journalistic trip to Kenya and requested a change of bail renewal date, and in an internal email from the arresting officer the sergeant wrote: "Let's hope he gets eaten by a crocodile."Mr Page said: "Thank goodness for the Data Protection Act and my advice to anybody who feels that they have been stitched up is to use the Act to get to the real facts. “It is absolutely outrageous. In my view it clearly shows that I was arrested for political reasons simply because my views on the countryside were not appreciated. I was not guilty of any crime."(1)
What has reduced a Liberal Democracy to a police state like Stalin’s Russia or Mao’s China without people objecting? Cultural Marxism or Political Correctness is a totalitarian ideology that intimidates people into thinking the correct thing and extends into every aspect of life because every part of life is deemed political. It replaced Liberalism by using a similar vocabulary but with different intentions: individual rights were replaced by group rights and the multi-racial belief in equal treatment for racial groups was replaced by preferential treatment for all ethnic groups over whites. Cultural Marxism took over with the New Left in the 1960.s to 70.s. It was influenced by the Frankfurt School and European thinkers like Foucault; and facilitated in Britain by academics like E.P.Thompson and Raymond Williams and Home Secretary Roy Jenkins who introduced Race Laws and the Soviet style agency of Inquisition, the Commission For Racial Equality.
A main intention of Trotskyists and The Anti Nazi League in the 60.s and 70.s was to “change attitudes.” Cultural Marxists seek scapegoats to blame when things do not work to their plan. They de-humanise their scapegoats and present a distorted view of what they said to make the persecution seem like justifiable indignation. The thoughts and meanings of the recalcitrant are slotted into a pre-existing ideology which uses them as examples of wrong thinking. The victims are modern outlaws and have no rights and can be spoken of as the guardians of the new morality see fit. This is political persecution because it is only “white” people who express certain views that are targeted for public vilification, though anti-Semitism is coming back amongst the Cultural Marxists who are trying to form an axis with Muslims in the West.The Cultural Marxists are an “Ideological Caste” and membership depends not on blood or birth, nor even class, but holding the right opinions; to succeed in life one has to conform to their ideology, keep your views secret or be expelled from the “Caste” as the Conservative Party did the Monday Club to ensure thy did not impede its transformation into a vehicle of Cultural Marxism like the other two parties. The Personal qualities of the persecuted are ignored and the public shown a one-dimensional aspect - Racist, Hater, Zenophobe etc. This justifies the establishment saying and doing anything and feeling morally superior about it.
There is constant social engineering to mould everyone for utopia. A television programme “Gypsy Wars” contrasted a local woman and tinkers who had invaded her land reversing the roles as we experience them. They think our traditional view of the world is pathological until they correct it for us. They show us or a representative, in the role of what they think are our stereotypes - we are cast as the tinkers - to mould our views and change our attitudes. Of the Gypsies there were no young men shown, because they would be aggressive and they do not want to show them as a threat; village life was not shown because that is appealing and viewers would sympathise with the woman. The woman was selected because she is not typical of rural people but a bit eccentric and could be set up as the aggressor when she was the victim. This is Television re-structuring our thoughts in accordance with their ideology. It is Frankfurt School television. For years vacancies in television were only advertised in the Guardian to filter out the applicants with the wrong attitude. (2)
The “Caste” can not meet the arguments so they discredit people. Dr.James Watson 79-year-old geneticist who, with Francis Crick, had discovered the structure of DNA, who is regarded as one of the great scientists of his time, was persecuted for telling the Sunday Times that he was "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really". He said there was a natural desire that all human beings should be equal but "people who have to deal with black employees find this not true". He claimed genes responsible for creating differences in human intelligence could be found within a decade. The British establishments’ agency of Inquistion the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said it was studying Dr Watson's remarks " in full". Politicians moved in to persecute him: 'It is a shame that a man with a record of scientific distinction should see his work overshadowed by his own irrational prejudices,' said David Lammy, the Skills Minister. London mayor Ken Livingstone: 'Such ignorant comments...are utterly offensive and give succour to the most backward in our society.' The Science Museum cancelled a sell-out meeting it had planned to hold to honour 79-year-old Watson on the grounds that his remarks had gone 'beyond the point of acceptable debate'. Several other centres scheduled to host his talks followed suit. What a scientific argument! His employers, the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Long Island suspended him as chancellor. (3) However, prominent scientist Richard Dawkins saw the real issue: “What is ethically wrong is the hounding, by what can only be described as an illiberal and intolerant "thought police", of one of the most distinguished scientists of our time, out of the Science Museum, and maybe out of the laboratory that he has devoted much of his life to, building up a world-class reputation.”
Celebrity Jade Goody had the wrong attitude to Indian film star, Shilpa Shetty in “Celebrity Big Brother.” The Daily Telegraph showed the three “Racists” looking common while Shilpa was shown at prayer, elegant in a Sari and looking sidelong. The programme is based on getting an assortment of characters into a house and titillating the viewers to keep the viewing figures up. Bullying and personality clashes are the attraction. But Jade, Daniella and Jo had the wrong sort of personality clash with Shilpa and had to be excoriated to cow down other people. Forcing Jade to keep apologising and to confess publicly that she is disgusted with herself is our cultural Marxist rulers version of a Soviet show trial. She had to be broken in public, made to repent and show abject contrition. Jade has some Afro-Caribbean ancestory and an honest person would look for a cause other than racism like class envy or bad manners, but there is an ideology at work which imposes the same explanation on different situations - white racism. (4)
The law introduced persecution in the case against working class lads from Notting Hill after the race battles of August 1958. In the Commons debate a local Labour M.P. Frank Tomney made one of the most honourable and heroic speeches ever in the House of Commons in defence of his young constituents which shows how the police and lawyers had framed them. They had no rights. Here is a precise: “Nine young men were arrested. No one in the constituency takes the view that what they did was not severely wrong, but the sentences of 4 years imprisonment for boys of 17 - even coloured people are going round organizing petitions on their behalf. I wrote to the Home Secretary asking him to see me about this but he declined as it is sub judice. The case was subject to appeal a week ago and the sentences confirmed. I made sure –none of these boys had a previous conviction. “When people read about comparable cases and find variations in the sentences they come to think that our law does not provide justice. In one case of alleged rioting which concerned coloured people, one man was sentenced to prison for a year and others were fined. The man who was sentenced to a year had a former conviction in 1948 for shooting a policeman which is a crime with intent to kill. Yet these boys with no convictions got 4 years. “I have here a letter from the Union of Post Office workers about a boy from Ellingham Road. It tells of his having just returned from serving in Cyprus yet he was taken from his bed at 2.a.m. and charged with rioting. He only pleaded guilty because he was foolishly advised to. Contrary to the bias of police evidence, he was in possession of no weapon, though he admits to being an occupant in the car that toured the district shouting slogans. A petition to me is in responsible language and from people I have known for nine years”
(5)The 1964 election in Smethwick shows where the persecutions can lead. An offensive slogan had been used during the election campaign and posted on walls “If you want a N***** for a neighbour, vote Labour”. Harold Wilson attributed this to Conservative candidate Peter Griffiths, when being interviewed by Robin Day on Panorama of 9th March 1964. After the Election, now Prime Minister, Wilson broke from his address on the Queens speech to insult the victorious Griffiths by calling him a “Parliamentary Leper”, who would be shunned in the House. This breached the convention that new members be protected until after their Maiden speech. On October the 5th just two weeks before polling Griffiths was denounced in the Birmingham Post, and the Times whose Midland correspondent wrote, ”It is abhorrent to all Conservatives and officials of stature to whom I have talked.” But he did not say to whom he had talked. He headed his column of the 12th, “Vile –its all in Black and White.” As the election result was announced on October the 16th Socialists made Nazi salutes and the Marxist Bishop of Southwark, called the electorate “unchristian”, and the Bishop of Chelmsford attacked local voters. This election was a model of democracy. A local man fighting on a local issue was elected in a fair election by local people but these unelected Bishops who lived far away insulted them on a priori ideological grounds. The state broadcaster the BBC took American Black Power leader Malcolm X to Smethwick in February 1965 for current affairs programme “Tonight”. He told the assembled world’s media,” I have come here because I am disturbed by reports that coloured people in Smethwick are being badly treated. I have heard they are being treated as the Jews under Hitler. I would not wait for the Fascist element in Smethwick to erect gas ovens.” That was what the BBC had told him! They denied having taken him there but Mayor C.V.Williamse investigated: “I was most amazed at the finesse shown by the BBC. I was told the car was not a BBC car but it was owned by one of the directors.” Malcolm X told the Times that the BBC had taken him. This led to a time bomb was planted outside Mr.Griffiths’ home on 26th October 1965. The police thought it the work of experts.
(6)The persecution in 1984 of Ray Honeyford a head teacher at Manningham middle school in Bradford shows the depths of intolerance for those who diverge even slightly from the orthodoxy because Mr.Honeyford supported Multi-Racialism but warned of Multi- Culturalism. The local education authority tried to have him removed from his school, and when he wrote about his efforts in the Salisbury Review he was de-humanised by the media, had a “rent a mob” screaming ‘Racist’ outside the school gates, the local education authority sent a psychiatrist to see him, the Department for Education had Helena Kennedy QC subject him to an Inquisition and school inspectors persecuted him. He had to retire at 52! The dangers of multi-culturalism are now widely accepted even by Trevor Phillips of the Human Rights Commission.
(7)In 1991 Cambridge don Dr.John Casey was picked out for an erudite article in the Salisbury Review which concluded that voluntary repatriation could encourage people to try to drive immigrants out so the Government should adopt compulsory repatriation. The argument involved quoting Edmund Burke’s definition society as” a partnership not only between those who are living and those who are dead, but between those who are living and those who are dead, and those who are to be born.” The address appeared in the first issue of the Salisbury Reviewin 1982 but it was only in 1991 when a student found it by accident that the persecution was unleashed. His English Literature lectures were boycotted by students, Trotskyists demonstrated, Marxist Lecturer Terry Eagleton held rival lectures and the Sunday Times of 1/12/1991 printed a picture which made him look like a wizened crow. These actions are always of a mass of people turned onto one person!
(8)In May 2002 a Tory councillor was persecuted by a Government minister. Professor Geoffrey Samspon's website stated, 'There is overwhelming scientific evidence that races differ to some extent in their average intelligence levels - yellow-skinned Orientals tend to be rather brighter than whites, negroes tend to be rather less bright.” Government minister Peter Hain, a founder member of the Anti Nazi League, raved on Breakfast with Frost, “Sampson is proud to be racist”. Prof. Sampson wasgiven right to reply on Radio 4’s Today programme which is heard less than television. He explained Hain’s statement was untrue and “ as far as I am concerned it would be daft to be proud of racism — what is there to be proud of?” But this was ignored in subsequent TV news broadcasts, which kept repeating Hain’s distortion. Prof. Sampson recalls, “many commentators hostile to me seemed to assume that scientists who explain the roots of racial feelings must be sinister Ku Klux Klan types. That is virtually the reverse of the truth.” Special Branch warned him he was a marked man and advised him on safety precautions to reduce the risk of harm to him or his family. He was advised to look under his car before driving to check that nothing was attached - the result of a Labour government minister publicly persecuting him.
(9)In August 2005 Prof. Andrew Fraser was retired by Macquarrie University, Sydney, Australia, where he was Associate Professor in the Department of Public Law. He responded to a newspaper headline that quoted a 3 year-old Sudanese girl, “Now my mum and Dad are Aussies just like me” by letter, ”Experience practically everywhere in the world tells us that an expanding black population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and a wide-range of other social problems. He added that they are expected to acquiesce in the erosion of Australia’s national identity.” He also warned of the “rising Asian ruling class.” He was invited to submit an article to the Deakin University Law Review. Entitled “Rethinking the White Australia Policy” it was reviewed and accepted for publication until journalists and a lawyer acting for the “Sudanese Community” objected, then the Vice-Chancellor of Deakin University directed them not to publish it. Prof. Fraser makes the point that when he taught at Macquarrie in the 70’s there had been attempts to silence visiting professor Hans Eysenk but that was by the students not the authorities. Sydney Morning Herald columnist Michael Duffy pointed out “That generation of students are now the authorities.” They suspended Professor Fraser because they thought his views on race would influence his course, American Constitutional History. Usually retired academics who plan to research obtain an Honorary Associate and can use the university library, but Prof.Fraser was refused this, for his book: “Anglophobia: Its Causes and Cure”. He did not deserve consideration now he was de-humanised and labelled ”racist.” That vindictiveness is another spite in a year-long campaign of discrimination by the University against him.
(10)In April 2006, Leeds university authorities subjected Dr.Frank Ellis to an Inquisition after he had an interview published in “Leeds Student.” Dr.Ellis was sought out for the interview with political bias in mind because of his “peculiar and extreme views.” He and his interviewer ranged over many topics but what ignited prejudice against him were his remarks that the average black has a lower IQ than the average white or Asian; that he believed we need to introduce a policy of humane repatriation. There were the usual demonstrations by Unite Against Fascism, or what legendary Daily Telegraph columnist Michael Wharton aka Peter Simple dubbed “Rent a mob.” The Universities decision was purely to persecute a man for holding the wrong opinion: he treated his students fairly and impartially as the interviewer acknowledged Dr.Ellis’s “excellent rapport with his students and colleagues.” Further, Leeds have a system to prevent unfair marking as the candidates paper is anonymous and each is marked by 3 different tutors. He was investigated by the West Yorkshire police for incitement to racial hatred. So what is the problem? Dr.Ellis was not disciplined for his conduct towards his students, which was exemplary, but persecuted for not expressing the right thoughts on ethnicity. In an interview on Talk Sport Ian Collins screamed at Ellis, ”Your’e mad!”
(11)Robert Henderson was persecuted in July 1995, for an article in Wisden Cricket Monthly. He wrote that a reason for the bad performances of England’s cricket team was the mix of foreign and native players. However talented they lack the commitment to their side on which team success depends. He explains: “The common experience of mixed groups makes it immensely difficult to accept that a changing room comprised of say six Englishmen, two West Indians, two Southern Africans and a New Zealander is going to develop the same camaraderie as eleven unequivocal Englishmen.” This was not racism as his example had two blacks and five people who are not English, three of whom are certainly white. The argument seems to have been accepted by other cricket writers like David Firth, Editor of Wisden and Matthew Engel, editor of the associated Wisden Cricketers' Almanac and columnist for The Guardian. The media held an Inquisition. The journalists and public figures who denounced him did not attack what he had actually written but responded out of ideological correctness against what they thought his views were. Two of the black players, Devon Malcolm and Philip De Freitas, sued Wisden for libel but they did not him which is unusual because the author is usually included in the suit. He had made it clear that he would fight any libel action all the way in the courts. Malcolm and De Freitas had sought the advice of the Professional Cricketer's Association who took counsel's opinion which was that no libel existed. The magazine’s proprietor Paul Getty almost definitely ordered the settlement to avoid social embarrassment. Telegraph newspapers published clues to his home address and refused to print an unedited reply. He was then turned on by Wisden whose following issue had five pages of vitriolic attack on him even though they printed the original article. Editor Mr.Firth would not print a reply.Mr Henderson contacted his M.P. Frank Dobson to complain of the way the media had treated him, and asked for an intervention on his behalf. Mr Dobson gave a vague promise, but did not act even though it was his paid duty as his elected representative to raise this in the House of Commons. Later, in his 1997 General Election leaflets Dobson claimed “over the past 17 years I've tried my best to represent our area in Parliament.” On 3rd August 1995, Mr Henderson received a letter from the black Labour politician Diane Abbott, telling him he had "no appreciation of acceptable terminology. As an ex-journalist, and someone who still dabbles, I believe that we have a duty to write on subjects we know about.” Later Ms Abbott objected to "blue-eyed blonde" nurses from Finland tending coloured patients in her East London constituency!Mr Henderson wrote to Tony Blair about Mr.Dobson and for defence against the media corruption, “You have made a great thing of moral behaviour in politics, Mr Blair. If that means anything you will help me to obtain a fair hearing, both in terms of natural justice and common equity. If you fail to do this, we shall know exactly what a Blair government will be, one based on the primitive idea that justice is for one's political friends and injustice for one's political enemies.”Mr Henderson wrote to Blair at the Commons and at his home, and Mrs Blair a Human Rights lawyer at Gray's Inn, but was ignored. Mr Henderson wrote thirteen letters to the Blairs between March 1996 and February 1997. Finally, Blair summoned the Police to his Westminster office. The Police considered charging Mr.Henderson with Common Assault and offences under the Malicious Communications and Race Relations Acts. They took the letters for examination by the Crown Prosecution Service. It was decided that the correspondence "fell short" of any criminal offence. But Blair was advised that the "sheer volume" of continued letters could justify criminal prosecution in the future. The Crime Report concluded: “In summary, the allegation of Malicious Communication is 'NO CRIME', however the security of the… (name missing )…has been put in the hands of the right people.” “Sheer volume?” there were only 4 letters to Cherie Blair and nine to Blair over a period of a year. The rest were requests for a meaningful answer to the initial letter - he only got non-replies from their offices. The media demonised him but refused him right of reply. An interview he gave to the BBC was edited by splicing together different parts of my interview to produce the opposite of what he had said. The interview was 30 minutes of which only 93 seconds was broadcast.Study this to see how the BBC tries to destroy those who say the wrong things: this is persecution! Mr.Henderson said in the interview: “I take the Mathew Parris line on this. Mathew, says “that part of being an Englishman is being white. Now I think that's reasonable, not just from my own experience, but it seems to me that you don't get someone taking on the whole of a new culture when they come to a country. That doesn't of course mean that they cannot be British and of course if they are representing Britain there may not be the same problem that you've got if they are representing England, but if they are representing England they've got to feel that there isn't anything which spurns them, which thrusts them out from society, which I am absolutely certain that the majority of blacks and Asians do feel. I can sympathise with them because any minority anywhere is going to feel under stress.”This is what the BBC broadcast after editing:“...part of being an Englishman is being white. Now I think that's reasonable, not just from my own experience, but it seems to me you don't get someone taking on the whole of a new culture when they come to a country.”
(12)There has been a widening of focus and now there is religous persecution to stop opposition to the creation of Eurabia, as it is throughout the Anglosphere. One who has written about this is Mark Steyn who, as I write, is being persecuted by the Soviet-styled Canadian Human Rights Commission because of two complaints by the Islamic Congress against Maclean's magazine and its editor-in-chief, Kenneth Whyte for printing a chapter from "America Alone” on Oct 20, 2006. The complainents claim “the article subjects Canadian Muslims to hatred and contempt.” An Islamic Congress press release decries Steyn's article as “flagrantly Islamophobic.” He wrote, “The Muslim world has youth, numbers and global ambitions. The West is growing old and enfeebled, and lacks the will to rebuff those who would supplant it. It's the end of the world as we've known it. Sept. 11, 2001, was not "the day everything changed," but the day that revealed how much had already changed. On Sept. 10, how many journalists had the Council of American-Islamic Relations or the Canadian Islamic Congress or the Muslim Council of Britain in their Rolodexes? If you'd said that whether something does or does not cause offence to Muslims would be the early 21st century's principal political dynamic in Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium, France and the United Kingdom, most folks would have thought you were crazy. Yet on that Tuesday morning the top of the iceberg bobbed up and toppled the Twin Towers. This is about the seven-eighths below the surface -- the larger forces at play in the developed world that have left Europe too enfeebled to resist its remorseless transformation into Eurabia and that call into question the future of much of the rest of the world. The key factors are: demographic decline; the unsustainability of the social democratic state; and civilizational exhaustion.Let's start with demography, because everything does: If your school has 200 guys and you're playing a school with 2,000 pupils, it doesn't mean your baseball team is definitely going to lose but it certainly gives the other fellows a big starting advantage. Likewise, if you want to launch a revolution, it's not very likely if you've only got seven revolutionaries and they're all over 80. But, if you've got two million and seven revolutionaries and they're all under 30 you're in business.For example, I wonder how many pontificators on the "Middle East peace process" ever run this number: The median age in the Gaza Strip is 15.8 years. Once you know that, all the rest is details. If you were a "moderate Palestinian" leader, would you want to try to persuade a nation -- or pseudo-nation -- of unemployed poorly educated teenage boys raised in a UN-supervised European-funded death cult to see sense? Any analysis of the "Palestinian problem" that doesn't take into account the most important determinant on the ground is a waste of time.” (13)I have written about the move to anti-Semitism of the Cultural Marxists to defend the axis they have formed with Muslim terrorists. Well,a Jewish man Ezra Levant, is being persecuted in Canada for “hate speech” about Islam. Mr. Levant is fighting back: "Although the United States has a very robust First Amendment, Canada and Britain have a common tradition going back to the Magna Carta that brought about some of the freest presses in the world," Mr. Levant told The Washington Times, "if Canada and the U.K. can be infected, so can America." Mr. Levant was publisher of the Western Standard, a Conservative weekly. He was noticed by Muslim activists on Feb. 13, 2006, when he published the Danish cartoons of the prophet Muhammad that had caused protests throughout Europe and the Middle East. Canadian law-enforcement officials investigated the publication but did notbring criminal charges. But Syed Soharwardy, head of the Islamic Supreme Council of Canada, made a complaint against Mr. Levant with the Alberta Human Rights Commission. The commission summoned Mr. Levant for a hearing and Mr. Levant republished the cartoons on his blog, Ezra Levant.com. He is also is a lawyer and accused the Commission, a government body, of violating due process to impose state censorship. He told The Times that "unlike real courts, the tribunal members are not judges (and often not even lawyers); in Alberta, there are no rules of court or rules of evidence; precedent is not followed; there is no set burden of proof; the taxpayer funds the complaints, but the defendant must pay his own costs (even if he wins); and, most importantly, the commissions and tribunals issue rulings that are clearly not in compliance with our constitutional and common law freedoms of expression." He video’d the hearing and put excerpts on his blog and YouTube.com. "My lawyer and I insisted that we be permitted to record the interrogation, for use when we appeal the commission's decision to a real court," Mr. Levant wrote on his blog. Marie Riddle, the commission's director, did not return phone calls from The Times and the commission barred journalists, observers and the Western Standard's former editor from the hearing. The persecutions of Mark Steyn and Mr. Levant show the tyranny increasing because "In the past, they've focused on small, powerless bloggers or other loners without any money or legal representation," Mr. Levant told the Times, stating that the commissions are now targeting Canada's mainstream media. Mr. Steyn wrote on his Web, SteynOnline.com, that Mr.Levant’s "magnificent performance ... has raised the bar for the rest of us ensnared by this grotesque system. He's absolutely right not to waste time attempting to mitigate his 'offence,' and he's also correct in rejecting this pseudo-court's jurisdiction over him," he added.
(14)A Catholic priest Father Samuel who fled to Belgium to escape Muslim persecution of Christians in Turkey is now being persecuted for “incitement to racist hatred” by the Belgians: the Government’s Inquisition agency, the Centre for Equal Opportunities and Opposition to Racism (CEOOR). It is for a remark he made in a 2002 television interview: “Every thoroughly Islamized Muslim child that is born in Europe is a time bomb for Western children in the future. The latter will be persecuted when they have become a minority.”The Belgian judiciary decided to try him before the penal court in Charleroi. He repeated his statement and that he would be honoured to go to jail for this. He added that Jesus too had been persecuted! In a sermon he called upon the faithful to accompany him to court. “We will turn this into an excursion, driving there in full buses.” Father Samuel fled to Belgium to escape the persecution of Aramaic Christians in Turkey and is being persecuted by the Belgians! The Aramaics are a Catholic minority in Syria and Turkey and speak an old Semitic language, which Jesus and the apostles used and so are a link with Christ. Mel Gibson used the language in “The Passion of the Christ.” At Montignies-sur-Sambre he conducts the Mass according to the traditional rites of the Catholic Church. Hundreds attend his Sunday Mass. The congregation includes African immigrants, a large number of young people and many young families with small children. On his web and sermons Father Samuel warns of “the islamic invasion” of the West and that Muslims are invading Europe and we face impending civil war. According to Father Samuel “so-called moderate Muslims do not exist.” This was in 2006 and is been kept very quiet as we move towards secret trials for dissenters in the western world. They do not want the mass of Catholics to realise that Christians are now being persecuted in the Europe on behalf of Muslims because a rebellion of Catholics against the Cultural Marxists of the E.U. could end their tyrannous rule. (15)An internet ' blogger' is going to be arrested when he returns to England for incitement to racial hatred. Paul Ray, aka 'Lionheart', left for the Middle East two years ago. He claims he was receiving death threats from Muslims which made it too dangerous to stay in his home town of Luton. He is a born again Christian and reformed drug addict who had reported Muslim drug dealers to the police when, he alleges, the police told the dealers and gave them his address. Paul, a Christian Zionist, went to Israel and met a fellow traveller, who was also looking for a hostel. Together they got a bus to the old city in Jerusalem, and went to the hostel that the other traveller had written down. The International Solidarity Movement were recruiting there. The ISM website mentions Paul by his original name of Paul Cinato, and they deny that he was photographed with them but Paul’s blog has photographs of him and the group brandishing AK47.s! The leader told them to delete the pictures but he kept his. The International Solidarity Group recruit at universities and colleges around the world and are trained to attack Israel by Palestinians. Later, walking around the town he met a member of the security services who advised him to get his stuff, and then drove him to another town.On January 3, he received an email from Bedfordshire Police. It was from Soviet-style “ Hate Crime officer” Ian Holden: “The offence that I need to arrest you for is 'Stirring up Racial Hatred by displaying written material contrary to sections 18(1) and 27(3) of the Public Order Act 1986. You will be arrested on SUSPICION of the offence. You would only be charged following a full investigation based on all the relevant facts and CPS consent. 'Paul I will see you on the 19/02/08 when I will tell you everything that you need to know. 'Due to being out of the office for six weeks I will not have access to my emails as of tomorrow 04/01/08.” Bedfordshire Police said: “We are aware of this particular internet site and we are taking action.” Paul fled the intolerance of the British state to America where he was trying to get asylum but is now planning to return to face the thought police! Since then a West Indian Christian couple in Luton have also exposed the ethnic cleansing of blacks and whites by Pakistanis by bricks through windows, firebombing synagogues etc to the local newspaper. A very local Christian has had a lot of media coverage about some Asian harassment of west-Indian and white households in Luton. It has been on the radio and the main news as some Muslim thugs have been throwing large objects through the windows of elderly black and white people in an Asian neighbourhood to drive them out. The police have been brushing it under the carpet, but the TV covered a residents meeting with the police and Bishop Blake asking the police what they were going to do about it. (16)

David Hamilton

(1) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/01/15/nhate115.xml
(2) http://www.hardcashproductions.com/recent24.html
(3) http://www.amazon.co.uk/Avoid-Boring-People-Lessons-Science/dp/0192802739/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1200949250&sr=1-1http://news.independent.co.uk/sci_tech/article3067222.ece
(4) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6274881.stm
(5) Commons.Hansard The debate was in October 1958.
(6) http://conservativedemocraticalliance.blogspot.com/2007/07/setting-up-targets-by-david-hamilton.htmlA Question of Colour. 1966. Peter Griffiths.(Leslie Frewin).
(7) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/08/27/nmulticul27.xmlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/07/14/nhon14.xml(8) http://www.actioninengland.gb.com/Enoch%20Powell/One%20Nation%20The%20Politics%20of%20Race.htmSunday Times 1st December 1991
(9)(9politics.guardian.co.uk/conservatives/story/0,9061,714247,00.htmlhttp://www.grsampson.net/

(10) http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/counterpoint/stories/s1424337.htm(11) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/4785574.stmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/4785574.stmhttp://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/rachelcrofts/entry/dr_frank_ellis/

(12) http://www.geocities.com/ blairscandal/h.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/08/27/nmulticul27.xmlhttp://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk http://www.libertarian.co.uk/lapubs/polin/polin154.pdf
(13) ) http://www.steynonline.com/content/view/878/128/http://www.amazon.co.uk/America-Alone-End-World-Know/dp/0895260786/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1200948400&sr=1-1http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2005/11/08/do0802.xmlhttp://www.rightwingnews.com/category.php?ent=6805http://conservativedemocraticalliance.blogspot.com/2007/07/realistic-alliance-david-hamilton.html

(14) Washington Times. ” Putting tribunals on trial” January 17, 2008 Ezra Levant.com.http://forlifeandfamily.blogspot.com/2008/01/ezra-levant-vs-orwellian-tribunal.html
(15) http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/936http://www.nonali.com/pere_samuel.php3

(16) See - Bedfordshire on Sunday 13/01/2008Luton on sunday 16/01/2008http://www.lutononsunday.com/lutonon....asp?ID=248085www.lutononsunday.com/lutononsunday/DisplayArticle.asp?id=248100http://www.lutontoday.co.uk/lut-news...mes.3678903.jpBishop Blake is at:http://www.cogichq.co.uk/Text/bishop_a.htm
There is a tradition of free speech in this country and there are organisations to defend it. NO2ID has been set up to fight the introduction of the I.D.Cards and interrogation centres and opposes the Data Base state.020-7793-4005 or office@no2id.netCivitas http://www.civitas.org.uk/The Libertarian Alliance http://www.libertarian.co.uk/lapubs/tactn/tactn001.pdfThe Freedom Association http://www.tfa.net/