Out of the Ashes of Rock
Rock music smashed into public awareness in 1955. The record that started the movement was Rock Around the Clock by Bill Haley and the Comets and used on the soundtrack of the American film “Blackboard Jungle” which was about juvenile delinquents and teenage gangs in a New York school. Where the film was shown or Haley played the cinemas were wrecked and seats slashed with knives. This established the wild, rebellious posture that young people began to imitate and gave them a manufactured identity and rebellion against their families and local traditions.
It was an amalgam of various forms but principally Country and Western and the black form Rhythm and Blues. It came in a package with a style of dress and ways of walking and behaving. Haley was suceeded by Elvis Presley who defined the style and look for the next decade and has a religious devotion 29 years after his death. His home Gracelands attracts worshippers on the scale of Lourdes or Mecca. If any found one of his toenails fans would likely be cured of Scrofula!
The style changed in 1962 with the Beatles. It is an American form that dominated our culture in England. The Beatles appearances produced mass hysteria and in 1964 had an audience of 58, 000 at the Shea stadium in New York, which was unique. Their records sold millions even before release and at one time they had the top 5 hits in the American Billboard chart. John Lennon made his famous remark that “We are more popular than Jesus,” that appalled many but was objectively true.
The talented artists were subsumed into the global enterprise making millions in advertising and book sales and weakened the culture and traditions of independent nations. Rock and its sanitized form pop is mass, universal entertainment.
Most Rock music was produced and listened to through drugs. The type of music went with the type of drug. Some classics are “White Rabbit” by Jefferson Airplane, “I Had Too Much to Dream last night” by The Electric Prunes, and “My Friend Jack eats Sugar Lumps” by the Smoke – all glorified LSD. This caused much psychiatric harm to gullible youngsters and in our own time the varieties of hypnotic dance music require “Ecstasy” which has killed many users.
There was required reading: Timothy Leary, Aldous Huxley, Carlos Casteneda for those who thought they were on a spiritual path; or, for those who wanted political revolution, “The Greening of America” by Charles Reich and the Marxist who inspired the Woodstock festival, and the Hippy movement, Herbert Marcuse. People who did not show full devotion were sneered at as psueds.
Rock stars were promoted as Gurus. The one most feted was John Lennon. But how deep does the thinking go? Lennon was interviewed for Marxist magazine, 'Red Mole' by rich editor Tariq Ali who wrote,” A limo pulled up outside our office, to the astonishment of bystanders. My colleague Robin Blackburn and I piled in and were driven to Tittenhurst, his Surrey mansion. We spoke for most of the day, saw one of Yoko's avant-garde films (which Robin adored) and were driven back to London. The interview had gone extremely well. Both John and Yoko had been disarmingly frank. The very next morning John rang. He had been so inspired by our interview that he had written a new song. Could he sing it down the phone? He could. That was how I first heard "Power to the People".
Tittenhurst Park a massive, white ,200 yr-old Georgian mansion in Ascot, Surrey had an eight-track studio, 7 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, 3 reception rooms and stood in 70 acres of Parkland. Not only did he record "Working Class Hero" and describe it as a song for the revolution. Here he wrote in his best known song, “Imagine” no possessions” but died leaving $275 million. He donated money to the Ira and Black Panthers.
The groups of the first beat boom looked back but for inspiration not to imitate. The Beatles based their early songs on those of Buddy Holly and used his format for a band of 3 guitarists and drummer. The Rolling Stones were part of a white blues movement in London and adopted instruments such as the maracas from black blues singers in the states and the Sitar from India. These influences aided their own productions and helped developed their own song writing. For the young musicians in the early 60’s the influx of American blues records was inspiration.
A fundamental feature of rock is excitement and the power to put people into frenzy. That is all gone, now. The current artists are looking back to previous bands. There has been a shift from copying the 1960’s groups to the 80’s, but it is still looking back to more exciting and creative times but with no development. Although it was once the young, the main buyers of rock music now are in their 40’s and 50’s. The young have no music of their own and look back to eras before they were born. Rock or pop does not grow out of the natural interactions of the community, or as an expression of some deep care or aspect of life. It is parcelled off into types and eras and the quest of the multi-national corporations for a new sounds, a new look, a new star promoted beyond their talent.
The difficulty has always been matching the words to a tune. Pop is manufactured specially for an audience to make money by titillating them with boy or girl bands with the right look. There is no cultural development and the more popular acts sound indistinguishable. Rock and Pop comes in waves and fashions and because it operates on the surface of life, puts down no roots and parcells people into an era. -“When was your era”, as if all of life comes to an end when a new fad begins!
Young people no longer have an original music of their own and look back to a time before they were born. One 23 yr-old woman tells me her favourite band is the Doors and her hero Jim Morrison. Morrison died 12 years before she was born. This would not be pathetic if she had said her heroes were say Wagner or Beethoven, as they were part of a deep tradition of music which can move people everywhere and by their genius transcend their era.
The image of rebellion is used to corrupt the fans while making millions. A young woman told me she likes the Sex Pistols and the Clash, “They are anti-establishment”. What! Most pretend to be, but have made millions and live in mansions with countless bank accounts. Looking at the Charts is like looking at the stock exchange index and buying a CD like shopping for processed food in a supermarket. Everything is packaged, the images on the front are designed to appeal to usually base instincts. There is neither spontaneous talent nor inspiration. Mass produced Rock and Pop is dying, its energy gone, or, as T.S.Eliot put it in “The Hollow Men”, fading away, “Not with a bang, But a wimper. What will fill this gap?
The time is right to begin replacing this artificial music by re- linking to our own traditions and re-developing them for our current time and experiences. We can not go back into the past and must use the instruments that modern musicians have done so much with. Many would prefer a guitar solo from Clapton, Jimmi Hendrix or Gary Moore than an Aria from an opera. It is also futile to pick up the old instruments and try to make authentic music a thousand years late - we would be a choir of caterwaulers screeching on catgut.
I mentioned Blues music. This is a genuine culture and grows out of the real experiences of poor, black singers who tramped the southern states articulating a deep need and a plaint for improvement. This is an immediate expression of the sufferings of a community grown out of experience not manufactured.
Our natural culture is being destroyed and we re-culturalised for the global culture. We should seek to introduce an understanding of our spiritual and social malaise into traditional forms. We are being oppressed by our elected representatives who have hoodwinked us into trusting them as looking after our interests is a subject for community songs. There is precedent in our Ballads of Robin Hood.
The early songs of Bob Dylan give an idea of how to articulate our modern oppressions. He wrote protest songs with a contemporary theme within traditional structures. His anthem for the new era “The Times They are A Changing” was expressed musically by using the tune of “An Irish Rover”.
“Come mothers and fathers
Throughout the land
And don't criticize
What you can't understand
Your sons and your daughters
Are beyond your command
Your old road is Rapidly agein”
This was a hymn to the Adversary culture but it suggests the way. A Hard Rains A-Gonna fall” contains imaginative poetic imagery. With Dylan the whole is greater than the parts and the images are built up until one has the feel of mans’ destructive potential.
It is developed from our traditional Border Ballad, Lord Randall:
"O where ha you been, Lord Randal, my son?
And where ha you been, my handsome young man?"
"I ha been at the greenwood; mother, make my bed soon,
For I'm wearied wi hunting, and fain wad lie down."
In Dylan,
“Oh, were have you been, my blue-eyed son?
Oh, were have you been my darling young one?
I’ve stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains,
I’ve walked and I’ve crawled on six crooked highways,
I’ve stepped in the middle of seven sad forests
I’ve been out in front of a dozen dead oceans,
And it’s a hard, it’s a hard, etc…
In the original Lord Randall has been poisoned by his lover, in Dylan the world has been poisoned by humanity. It was the time of the Cuban missile crisis and Dylan uses traditional forms to carry the contemporary thoughts and emotions felt by people across the world. The Dylan piece is more sophisticated than its model and the language poetic but it suggests a way of re-linking with our musical origins and but being topical for our current time.
TV and radio no longer have such powerful control over what we watch and hear as the internet has opened up new ways of broadcasting music. There are local shows and festivals to begin a renewal of musical culture, like the return of spring after the cold and blasts of winter. There are local and back street pubs that need custom and many who want to escape trendy bars with their excessively loud dance music which destroys customers’ ears.
Development is in the practice, not rationally planned beforehand. Natural music grows out of the community whereas artificial pop and rock are manufactured and “consumers” manipulated into buying it. Development within a tradition gives continuity and acts as a spine to hold communities together. Now that rock is dead, and pop puerile it is time to begin re-linking with our cultural origins.
Saturday, 15 November 2008
Tuesday, 21 October 2008
The Elites are surrending us
Western Elites are Surrending Their People.
The rulers try to build a multi-racial society from mixed motives: some, high-minded ideals, others exploit this to import cheap labour. They invite immigrants and make us share everything with them while the global elites who live here and multi national corporations pay little tax and politicians pay none and claim vast expenses.
If they want immigrants they should put them up at their houses; invite them into their communities. It is not as if the imports are all needy or in danger, though we pretend they are because it makes us feel wanted and righteous for offering aid.
The message conveyed to them is that we are weak and scared and this makes them despise us for not standing up for ourselves. When immigrants arrive they are welcomed by hordes of do-gooders - they can tell any lie and it is accepted.
The elites hope there is no threat from them and pretend they are essentially good and appeal to their good will by being nice to them,. hoping they will reciprocate by being nice back. This mentality was expressed neatly by Jens Orback, Sweden’s Minister of Democracy, “We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.”
The Government are feeble and allow things to happen but also cunning and manipulative. They are not really in control but inadequate for their positions. They should be strengthening our people’s characters but do the opposite - constantly blaming and using us as scapegoats (racists) if anything goes wrong in the Utopian plan. It affects our everyday lives because social relations now have to be regulated and restrictive anti-terrorist laws are imposed on everyone not just the likely suspects, Muslims.
We used to be homogeneous and trusted one another. In general it was peaceful, we queued, were relaxed with each other and tried to get on by using good manners and showing consideration. Is immigration an accident? No, it is importing cheap labour and votes without understanding the consequences.
In November 2006 the Government were advertising for immigrants and doing it by deceit. A Foreign Office pamphlet 'Multicultural Britain - A Land Of Immigrants' encouraged immigrants to come here because of the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs. It was placed in embassies across the world. Cherie Blair, the former Prime Minister’s wife, is a human rights lawyer. No wonder immigration increased so much under Blair!
In June 2004 while Conservative leader Michael Howard was campaigning against immigration to win the General Election, he was an investor in communications firm Incepta. A subsidiary company Citigate Lloyd Northover won two Home Office contracts to develop Websites and communications technology to speed up applications from immigrants to enter the UK.
The company also profited from the Immigration and Nationality Directorate website for the Government which eases the entrance and settling of asylum seekers. The Sunday Mirror of May 1, 2005 revealed that as Home Secretary he gave nearly 15,000 failed asylum seekers the right to stay in Britain for life when he was Home Secretary. He tried to conceal this.
How do ethnics perceive us? “You can chase their women and the men look the other way, even their fathers and brothers don’t mind! There is nothing they can do because their government and media are against them.”
This applies to communities already here who think of our women as only good for one thing, which is at the heart of the widespread grooming of our young girls.
One example was in the Times of August 11th 2007 which reported a 42 year-old Muslim man from Burnley. He gave one 14 year-old white girl the first of five Ecstasy tablets at a motorway service station before having sex with her on the back seat of the car while a group drove back to Lancashire. The court was told that the two men later took the girls to an address in Blackburn where Hussain,from Blackburn aged 42 had sex with the second 14 year-old white girl and gave her ten Ecstasy tablets. Judge Andrew Gilbart, QC, jailed them under new laws to protect young girls being groomed for sex.
Parents complain that white girls as young as 12 are being screwed by older Muslim men but Police and groups with responsibility to protect children pretend it is not happening or that this grooming our youngsters is not racial. Parents know that there are networks to use our young girls while the authorities are frightened to do anything. The issue is not that they are having sex with under-age girls but that they are using our women for gratification when they have their own women.
The elite present white women as only worth one thing. In early August 2007 on a Big Brother programme, within 5 minutes of arriving in the house, the role model for young white women was announcing that she loved to "swallow" and performing a lap dance for two people she'd only just met. Around the same time I accidentally turned on Hollyoaks at 5.15 and was greeted with two blokes snogging, tongues and all.
How is our culture transmitted now? David Beckham: "I definitely want Brooklyn to be Christened but I don't know into which religion yet".
There is a predatory element among the newcomers and they see us differently from the way they look at their own people, so they do not feel guilty about exploiting us. They view us in a similar way to how we viewed them when we went into their countries: as pushovers and a source of advantage.
They are doing what comes naturally while we are being surrendered by our elites. It is encouraged by TV which sells its programmes to foreign countries and this acts as incitement to come here. For years traditional liberals would argue,”We did it to them now they can do it to us.”
It was of course us who had to do their suffering for them. They live in good areas!
The elites are softening us up for immigrants to take over! An editorial in the Birmingham Post of 18th march 2006 asked: ”Is there anything intrinsically wrong with whites becoming a minority in Birmingham?” Well, then, why not look at what is happening in practice? Take the “Pride of Spitalfields” in Heneage Street off Brick Lane. This beautiful, traditional East End pub was fire-bombed by an Asian gang in 2003 and some staff were injured. Two weeks later the landlady was threatened with a replica gun in Brick Lane by Asians and warned: 'You don't belong round here'. She stood her ground and told them to shoot if they were going to. The Bangla gang ran off.
The same courage has enabled her to continue - and it's still a great pub. The Exmouth Estate was a completely white estate but because of Labour's plan to enrich the entire East End with Bangladeshis.
The Hollands was one of the loveliest pubs in London and prized by the Victorian Society, and poet John Betjeman. It was full of Victorian artifacts and sitting in the back bar was like sitting in a small Victorian drawing room.
How did the immigrant feel about this quaint Victorian bit of our culture? They continually tried to burn it down. The 1997 attempt didn't quite succeed but they persevered and finally achieved the desired result. Within the year the Spanish landlady decided she'd had enough. Young's Brewery, who owned the place, decided it had become a liability. Burning a pub down is against the law.
The police are paid to do uphold the law and detect crime but not, where Muslims are concerned - they can do what they like to our society, our country - they are protected because the police are afraid to interfere in issues of 'cultural sensitivity'. Police who do so risk not being promoted - inevitable in a politicised police force. The chiefs of the police are in league with the immigrants against us. Lord Stevens introduced spies in police training colleges to report on and weed out “racist” trainees.
In Tower Hamlets recently it was revealed that police raids on suspected terrorists would have to be cleared with local Muslim religious leaders to prevent civil disturbance. Get permission from the local Imam before raiding a terrorist suspect's flat!
At one level they are constantly pushing for more political power and the local council is now nearly all Muslim and changing our ways to their own. In the council chamber recently a memo was sent round exhorting non-Muslims to observe fasting practices during council meetings.
Two years ago, a traditional Guy Fawkes Night usually subsidised by the council was abandoned for a public enactment of Bangladeshi folk tales which were funded by local council taxes.
There was a proposal to alter the name of Aldgate East underground station near Brick Lane to Banglatown. Last year, because of a shortage of cemetery space for Muslims it was proposed by one Muslim councillor to relocate the graves in Tower Hamlets Cemetery elsewhere in order to construct a ‘multi-faith burial site’ – a Muslim burial site.
Why did the graves need to be dug up? Because dead Muslims cannot be buried alongside Christians and other infidels. There are some relatives of those buried in that cemetery still living. The dead include victims of the famous Bethnal Green tube disaster of 1943.
On the streets, the other part of the pincer move to power operates - the lawlessness of Bangladeshi youths, whose parents appear to have abandoned any attempt to control their behaviour.
The Ousley report published after the Bradford riots in 2001 showed that Muslim fathers, by and large, were only interested in their sons adopting Islam. If they did, the parents turned a blind eye to any anti-social behaviour. All white people, even the elderly, are targets. Tribal gang wars have seen in the last few years - between the Brick Lane Boys, the Shadwell Posse and the Poplar Boys, for example. These gangs also fight gangs from other Asian turfs in London, such as the Drummond Street Boys from Euston.
At other times, Muslim youths have kidnapped animals from one of the local farms on the Isle of Dogs. Small goats and pigs have been driven around for about a mile then taken out of the car and stoned to death – they have also been tortured in other ways.
The Muslim cruelty to animals, particularly dogs, is disgusting. There are educated Muslims who would never behave in this sort of way – attacking white people, gays or torturing animals and I doubt that this behaviour is directly inspired by the Koran, yet there is a wholly unnecessary sense of fear which is felt by those who live there - not only working class people.
There is a parallel in India, but the Indian Government are direct and ours manipulative and deceitful. West Bengal is in the hands of Communists - the ruling party is the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and they have been destroying what was good among the Bengalis.
From 1977 the CPI(M) has been destroying the last traces of Bengali culture - the Viswabharati, the university of Rabindra Nath Tagore, the Asiatic Society of Sir William Jones, the works of 19th Century Bengali writers.
In the 1980's and 1990's, the Communists in West Bengal took control of the properties of the Anglo-Indians, the Bengali Nationalists and Conservatives of British Period. Thousands of Bengalis have been displaced from West Bengal to settle in other countries, UK , USA, and Canada.
In Kolkata on 10th September 2008 Activists of Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) staged a protest against Bangladeshi immigrants. They chanted slogans about their resentment of the large numbers of illegal Bangladeshi immigrants flooding in. They carried placards and banners and marched down the streets demanding deportation. They want Bangladeshi immigrants to be stripped of the benefits that they get in India and repatriated.
There are 30 million Bangladeshi immigrants in India: ” ... we are staging an agitation against them. We demand that these immigrants should be identified and they should be deported from this country. Detect, delete, and deport, these are our three demands”, said Sunil Kumar, an activist.
A warning of what EU elites would do with I.D. cards - These illegal immigrants work in low-paid jobs - maids, servants, labourers etc. They are usually naturalised after being issued with ration cards and identity cards.
On September the 27th 2008 Former Union law minister Subramanian Swamy told the two-day Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) of infiltration by Bangladeshi as a national issue and said that either Bangladesh should hand over one third of its land to India or take back illegal immigrants.
British elites cannot face that immigrants might want to take revenge on us. Our pretense that they are harmless undervalues their humanity and leads our rulers into dangerous absurdities like police chiefs alerting community leaders before they raid for terrorists or explosives!
Implicit in our conduct is we have no fight in us, are easy. The crimes committed by ethnics are not the same as those committed by our people, they are how people invade by demography - raping, stealing and assaulting us – they are here to take. Their body language shows it as they swagger through our streets.
As soon as we wake we put on the TV, or sit at our PC.s, to prevent thinking about what is going on around us. We accept broadcasts from our elites telling us what to think and how to interpret news events without question. We are encouraged to be tolerant which is to be passive and allow others to take everything off us.
The media treated the Muslim bombings as if it were natural disasters and no one was to blame to excuse it which encourages others. There is no questioning of their cultural background but blame the ”preachers of hate,” their visits to the middle east: but these have learned all about us, decided they do not like us and our ways and rejected us. This is a blow to the rulers because they pretend that these middle-class lads of the third generation, behave just like us while at the same time they promote tolerance for different cultures.
It is fearsome to look at where we did it to others like Ireland, Ghana, Sri Lanka, Ceylon. Rubber came from South America not Malaya but we planted it there and because the Singhalese were not cut out for the work imported Tamils with a different language and religion and caused mayhem and misery which is still going on.
The elites think it is normal to mingle but people have deeper loyalties as in Sarajevo where superficially it seemed that everyone was uniting. On independence the divided populations of India collapsed into civil war, as Nigeria, Rwanda, Iraq and Iran, as in Sarajevo, it happens regularly and is happening here. Everyone needs somewhere to belong.
Is it guilt that motivates the elites? Guilt is remorse and you make amends, but the elites are not making amends themselves they use us for that by bringing immigrants into our communities not their own.
They live in lovely areas or safely in gated communities and this shows their real motive - loathing of their own people and fear of offending other ethnic groups. The profession of guilt is egotistical and makes them feel virtuous.
The political, intellectual and corporate elites think only of themselves. One gets cheap labour, the other looks magnanimous and great. They do not care how much we suffer as long as they feel good.
Many illegals work unlawfully long hours for almost nothing and have their liberty restricted by their masters. If anything makes me want to vomit it is the sickening hypocrisy of western elites who publicly apologise for historic slavery while importing wage slaves from the third world and now Eastern Europe!
Although, the elites allow Muslims to what they like to us and our communities they exploit them in their own countries. There have been reports of our elites using sweated labour in Bangladesh.
Recommended Reading
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7184166.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7183465.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2005/11/08/do0802.xml
http://awarforeurabia.blogspot.com/2005/07/mark-steyn-wake-up-folks-its-war.html
The rulers try to build a multi-racial society from mixed motives: some, high-minded ideals, others exploit this to import cheap labour. They invite immigrants and make us share everything with them while the global elites who live here and multi national corporations pay little tax and politicians pay none and claim vast expenses.
If they want immigrants they should put them up at their houses; invite them into their communities. It is not as if the imports are all needy or in danger, though we pretend they are because it makes us feel wanted and righteous for offering aid.
The message conveyed to them is that we are weak and scared and this makes them despise us for not standing up for ourselves. When immigrants arrive they are welcomed by hordes of do-gooders - they can tell any lie and it is accepted.
The elites hope there is no threat from them and pretend they are essentially good and appeal to their good will by being nice to them,. hoping they will reciprocate by being nice back. This mentality was expressed neatly by Jens Orback, Sweden’s Minister of Democracy, “We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.”
The Government are feeble and allow things to happen but also cunning and manipulative. They are not really in control but inadequate for their positions. They should be strengthening our people’s characters but do the opposite - constantly blaming and using us as scapegoats (racists) if anything goes wrong in the Utopian plan. It affects our everyday lives because social relations now have to be regulated and restrictive anti-terrorist laws are imposed on everyone not just the likely suspects, Muslims.
We used to be homogeneous and trusted one another. In general it was peaceful, we queued, were relaxed with each other and tried to get on by using good manners and showing consideration. Is immigration an accident? No, it is importing cheap labour and votes without understanding the consequences.
In November 2006 the Government were advertising for immigrants and doing it by deceit. A Foreign Office pamphlet 'Multicultural Britain - A Land Of Immigrants' encouraged immigrants to come here because of the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs. It was placed in embassies across the world. Cherie Blair, the former Prime Minister’s wife, is a human rights lawyer. No wonder immigration increased so much under Blair!
In June 2004 while Conservative leader Michael Howard was campaigning against immigration to win the General Election, he was an investor in communications firm Incepta. A subsidiary company Citigate Lloyd Northover won two Home Office contracts to develop Websites and communications technology to speed up applications from immigrants to enter the UK.
The company also profited from the Immigration and Nationality Directorate website for the Government which eases the entrance and settling of asylum seekers. The Sunday Mirror of May 1, 2005 revealed that as Home Secretary he gave nearly 15,000 failed asylum seekers the right to stay in Britain for life when he was Home Secretary. He tried to conceal this.
How do ethnics perceive us? “You can chase their women and the men look the other way, even their fathers and brothers don’t mind! There is nothing they can do because their government and media are against them.”
This applies to communities already here who think of our women as only good for one thing, which is at the heart of the widespread grooming of our young girls.
One example was in the Times of August 11th 2007 which reported a 42 year-old Muslim man from Burnley. He gave one 14 year-old white girl the first of five Ecstasy tablets at a motorway service station before having sex with her on the back seat of the car while a group drove back to Lancashire. The court was told that the two men later took the girls to an address in Blackburn where Hussain,from Blackburn aged 42 had sex with the second 14 year-old white girl and gave her ten Ecstasy tablets. Judge Andrew Gilbart, QC, jailed them under new laws to protect young girls being groomed for sex.
Parents complain that white girls as young as 12 are being screwed by older Muslim men but Police and groups with responsibility to protect children pretend it is not happening or that this grooming our youngsters is not racial. Parents know that there are networks to use our young girls while the authorities are frightened to do anything. The issue is not that they are having sex with under-age girls but that they are using our women for gratification when they have their own women.
The elite present white women as only worth one thing. In early August 2007 on a Big Brother programme, within 5 minutes of arriving in the house, the role model for young white women was announcing that she loved to "swallow" and performing a lap dance for two people she'd only just met. Around the same time I accidentally turned on Hollyoaks at 5.15 and was greeted with two blokes snogging, tongues and all.
How is our culture transmitted now? David Beckham: "I definitely want Brooklyn to be Christened but I don't know into which religion yet".
There is a predatory element among the newcomers and they see us differently from the way they look at their own people, so they do not feel guilty about exploiting us. They view us in a similar way to how we viewed them when we went into their countries: as pushovers and a source of advantage.
They are doing what comes naturally while we are being surrendered by our elites. It is encouraged by TV which sells its programmes to foreign countries and this acts as incitement to come here. For years traditional liberals would argue,”We did it to them now they can do it to us.”
It was of course us who had to do their suffering for them. They live in good areas!
The elites are softening us up for immigrants to take over! An editorial in the Birmingham Post of 18th march 2006 asked: ”Is there anything intrinsically wrong with whites becoming a minority in Birmingham?” Well, then, why not look at what is happening in practice? Take the “Pride of Spitalfields” in Heneage Street off Brick Lane. This beautiful, traditional East End pub was fire-bombed by an Asian gang in 2003 and some staff were injured. Two weeks later the landlady was threatened with a replica gun in Brick Lane by Asians and warned: 'You don't belong round here'. She stood her ground and told them to shoot if they were going to. The Bangla gang ran off.
The same courage has enabled her to continue - and it's still a great pub. The Exmouth Estate was a completely white estate but because of Labour's plan to enrich the entire East End with Bangladeshis.
The Hollands was one of the loveliest pubs in London and prized by the Victorian Society, and poet John Betjeman. It was full of Victorian artifacts and sitting in the back bar was like sitting in a small Victorian drawing room.
How did the immigrant feel about this quaint Victorian bit of our culture? They continually tried to burn it down. The 1997 attempt didn't quite succeed but they persevered and finally achieved the desired result. Within the year the Spanish landlady decided she'd had enough. Young's Brewery, who owned the place, decided it had become a liability. Burning a pub down is against the law.
The police are paid to do uphold the law and detect crime but not, where Muslims are concerned - they can do what they like to our society, our country - they are protected because the police are afraid to interfere in issues of 'cultural sensitivity'. Police who do so risk not being promoted - inevitable in a politicised police force. The chiefs of the police are in league with the immigrants against us. Lord Stevens introduced spies in police training colleges to report on and weed out “racist” trainees.
In Tower Hamlets recently it was revealed that police raids on suspected terrorists would have to be cleared with local Muslim religious leaders to prevent civil disturbance. Get permission from the local Imam before raiding a terrorist suspect's flat!
At one level they are constantly pushing for more political power and the local council is now nearly all Muslim and changing our ways to their own. In the council chamber recently a memo was sent round exhorting non-Muslims to observe fasting practices during council meetings.
Two years ago, a traditional Guy Fawkes Night usually subsidised by the council was abandoned for a public enactment of Bangladeshi folk tales which were funded by local council taxes.
There was a proposal to alter the name of Aldgate East underground station near Brick Lane to Banglatown. Last year, because of a shortage of cemetery space for Muslims it was proposed by one Muslim councillor to relocate the graves in Tower Hamlets Cemetery elsewhere in order to construct a ‘multi-faith burial site’ – a Muslim burial site.
Why did the graves need to be dug up? Because dead Muslims cannot be buried alongside Christians and other infidels. There are some relatives of those buried in that cemetery still living. The dead include victims of the famous Bethnal Green tube disaster of 1943.
On the streets, the other part of the pincer move to power operates - the lawlessness of Bangladeshi youths, whose parents appear to have abandoned any attempt to control their behaviour.
The Ousley report published after the Bradford riots in 2001 showed that Muslim fathers, by and large, were only interested in their sons adopting Islam. If they did, the parents turned a blind eye to any anti-social behaviour. All white people, even the elderly, are targets. Tribal gang wars have seen in the last few years - between the Brick Lane Boys, the Shadwell Posse and the Poplar Boys, for example. These gangs also fight gangs from other Asian turfs in London, such as the Drummond Street Boys from Euston.
At other times, Muslim youths have kidnapped animals from one of the local farms on the Isle of Dogs. Small goats and pigs have been driven around for about a mile then taken out of the car and stoned to death – they have also been tortured in other ways.
The Muslim cruelty to animals, particularly dogs, is disgusting. There are educated Muslims who would never behave in this sort of way – attacking white people, gays or torturing animals and I doubt that this behaviour is directly inspired by the Koran, yet there is a wholly unnecessary sense of fear which is felt by those who live there - not only working class people.
There is a parallel in India, but the Indian Government are direct and ours manipulative and deceitful. West Bengal is in the hands of Communists - the ruling party is the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and they have been destroying what was good among the Bengalis.
From 1977 the CPI(M) has been destroying the last traces of Bengali culture - the Viswabharati, the university of Rabindra Nath Tagore, the Asiatic Society of Sir William Jones, the works of 19th Century Bengali writers.
In the 1980's and 1990's, the Communists in West Bengal took control of the properties of the Anglo-Indians, the Bengali Nationalists and Conservatives of British Period. Thousands of Bengalis have been displaced from West Bengal to settle in other countries, UK , USA, and Canada.
In Kolkata on 10th September 2008 Activists of Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) staged a protest against Bangladeshi immigrants. They chanted slogans about their resentment of the large numbers of illegal Bangladeshi immigrants flooding in. They carried placards and banners and marched down the streets demanding deportation. They want Bangladeshi immigrants to be stripped of the benefits that they get in India and repatriated.
There are 30 million Bangladeshi immigrants in India: ” ... we are staging an agitation against them. We demand that these immigrants should be identified and they should be deported from this country. Detect, delete, and deport, these are our three demands”, said Sunil Kumar, an activist.
A warning of what EU elites would do with I.D. cards - These illegal immigrants work in low-paid jobs - maids, servants, labourers etc. They are usually naturalised after being issued with ration cards and identity cards.
On September the 27th 2008 Former Union law minister Subramanian Swamy told the two-day Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) of infiltration by Bangladeshi as a national issue and said that either Bangladesh should hand over one third of its land to India or take back illegal immigrants.
British elites cannot face that immigrants might want to take revenge on us. Our pretense that they are harmless undervalues their humanity and leads our rulers into dangerous absurdities like police chiefs alerting community leaders before they raid for terrorists or explosives!
Implicit in our conduct is we have no fight in us, are easy. The crimes committed by ethnics are not the same as those committed by our people, they are how people invade by demography - raping, stealing and assaulting us – they are here to take. Their body language shows it as they swagger through our streets.
As soon as we wake we put on the TV, or sit at our PC.s, to prevent thinking about what is going on around us. We accept broadcasts from our elites telling us what to think and how to interpret news events without question. We are encouraged to be tolerant which is to be passive and allow others to take everything off us.
The media treated the Muslim bombings as if it were natural disasters and no one was to blame to excuse it which encourages others. There is no questioning of their cultural background but blame the ”preachers of hate,” their visits to the middle east: but these have learned all about us, decided they do not like us and our ways and rejected us. This is a blow to the rulers because they pretend that these middle-class lads of the third generation, behave just like us while at the same time they promote tolerance for different cultures.
It is fearsome to look at where we did it to others like Ireland, Ghana, Sri Lanka, Ceylon. Rubber came from South America not Malaya but we planted it there and because the Singhalese were not cut out for the work imported Tamils with a different language and religion and caused mayhem and misery which is still going on.
The elites think it is normal to mingle but people have deeper loyalties as in Sarajevo where superficially it seemed that everyone was uniting. On independence the divided populations of India collapsed into civil war, as Nigeria, Rwanda, Iraq and Iran, as in Sarajevo, it happens regularly and is happening here. Everyone needs somewhere to belong.
Is it guilt that motivates the elites? Guilt is remorse and you make amends, but the elites are not making amends themselves they use us for that by bringing immigrants into our communities not their own.
They live in lovely areas or safely in gated communities and this shows their real motive - loathing of their own people and fear of offending other ethnic groups. The profession of guilt is egotistical and makes them feel virtuous.
The political, intellectual and corporate elites think only of themselves. One gets cheap labour, the other looks magnanimous and great. They do not care how much we suffer as long as they feel good.
Many illegals work unlawfully long hours for almost nothing and have their liberty restricted by their masters. If anything makes me want to vomit it is the sickening hypocrisy of western elites who publicly apologise for historic slavery while importing wage slaves from the third world and now Eastern Europe!
Although, the elites allow Muslims to what they like to us and our communities they exploit them in their own countries. There have been reports of our elites using sweated labour in Bangladesh.
Recommended Reading
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7184166.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7183465.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2005/11/08/do0802.xml
http://awarforeurabia.blogspot.com/2005/07/mark-steyn-wake-up-folks-its-war.html
Saturday, 20 September 2008
Guerilla Warfare on their People
There is an offence involving a knife every 24 minutes of the day in the UK. The figures from 37 police forces show according to The Mail on Sunday who obtained official evidence under the Freedom of Information Act. Further, there were 5,500 serious crimes involving knives in just three months this year - one every 24 minutes. That is 55 knife-related murders and more than 2,000 stabbings. The newspaper explained:
“London, Manchester and Birmingham are the worst-affected areas, while West Yorkshire, Merseyside and Northumbria police forces were also in the top 10. During just April, May and June this year, the Metropolitan Police recorded 1,580 offences – more than quarter of the national total. A breakdown reveals 17 people are stabbed or robbed at knife point in the every day and by July 2008 Twenty teenagers had been murdered in London. The total for the whole of last year was 26 shooting or stabbing killings among young people”.
Our elites have imported gang warfare while pretending that the immigrants were soft, sentimental like pets and if we were nice to them they would be nice to us!.
To obfuscate the facts a 9 per cent reduction in crime is claimed by the Police, with the violent crime sector being reduced by 8 per cent. As is now well known, in areas with much crime many people do not report burglaries or muggings because experience says that the police will do nothing about it. Less than half of such crimes are reported. It is deceit of the population by a government who can not control crime because they are blinkered by an ideology that tells them that everyone is equal and thus no groups can be more inclined to certain crimes than others. Common sense reveals that these areas are no longer safe for white people to live in.
The elites have varying motives and I mention them inpassing. But what they can not face is that a number of these murders by knifing appear to be racially motivated. But as it is often whites murdered by blacks it is not classed as a racial incident.
This is the case with the Sidcup murder of the young “Harry Potter”actor, two blacks were arrested; and in the murder of Ben Kinsella, brother of “East Enders” actress Brooke Kinsella, four blacks were arrested. The protest march of six hundred in North London against knife crime had a few black girls but no black youths..
The ruling elite - politicians, media, the police and the courts are covering up constant racist violence against indigenous people. The latest spate of murders like the two examples are not comprehended by the average person who has been brainwashed into thinking a victim of racist violence is like Stephen Lawrence.
In around 1979 a Metropolitan police report on black mugging was withdrawn to prevent a clamour for control of immigration or even a white backlash. Even as far back as 1959 two reports from the London Metropolitan Police and the West Midlands Police expressed concern at the growing number of crimes of violence being carried out by some newly arrived West Indians. The rate per head of population was something like four times that committed by indigenous people.
The West Indian family has broken down and now many black boys involved in street crimes, including murder, do not have a father to control them, and some have inherited genes of violence. Crime in Jamaica is similar and holiday makers can not just go our for a stroll from their hotels, as in Africa, Detroit or New Orleans!
An important but unregarded fact is the way the elites who hate their own people, stir up racial hated against them from the other communities: ever since immigration began there has been constant one-sided propaganda about the slave trade to turn blacks against whites. They fill their minds full of hatred for us. Anyone who has lived and worked in an inner city knows that the main reason cited for mugging white people by blacks is slavery. To keep this hidden the police reports stopped taking ethnicity into account.
Why are calls for control of immigration treated with such vehement approbation? Because our elites follow an ideology that is at odds with reality and tells them that immigrants are better than us and enrich us. To the innocent people who think this is an accident, I repeat some words from Dele Oguntimojou an African lawyer working in London: ”(you) do not know how the youth in the poor African village is being seduced by lush advertising to shed his native dress for blue jeans; to retune his ears from the traditional hi-life to the drum and bass of hip-hop and Brit pop. Even now the British Council is busy across Africa training the next generation of immigrants in the language of the destination country.”(1)
In November 2006 it was reported that the Government were advertising for immigrants to come here from terrorist countries. Discovered in the embassy in Pakistan a Foreign Office pamphlet declared: 'Multicultural Britain - A Land of Immigrants'. It encouraged immigrants to come here telling them of the preferential treatment they get under the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs. The Foreign Office put it in embassies across the world.
2 July 2008, The Daily Mail revealed: "British girls as young as 12 are being forced into prostitution by migrants. Children from ordinary families are groomed by older men… before being pimped around the uk to have sex up to 20 times a night. They are raped and often drugged, according to police. Officers have identified syndicates of Iraqi men throughout the uk' behind the exploitation. A government report said 'internal trafficking' was an 'emerging issue' and it should no longer be assumed young victims of sex exploitation were smuggled from abroad.
A UK human trafficking centre intelligence report says girls as young as 12 are taken from town to town and controlled with threats and assault. In one operation, 32 victims were identified in the sheffield area alone. All were aged 12 to 15 and had been raped. In another study, police say girls 'are given to a life of exploitation, waking up in anonymous towns, unable to contact family and with no way out'. Iraqi men? This is a form of guerilla warfare carried out against our children.
Figures released at the end of a six-month crackdown on people traffickers showed 167 victims were rescued across Britain and Ireland and 528 suspected traffickers were arrested…
Latest estimates by police are that there may be as many 18,000 trafficked victims that are forced to work as prostitutes".
These are the people our elites encourage here and if they are illegal give them amnesties. If you have seen the Blair’s houses you will know why. (2) Cherie was a Human Rights lawyer. Home Office minister Vernon Coaker said: "It is difficult for us to determine what the size of that problem is but it's something we are aware of and we have concerns about". That is all they care about our children.
The now normal event of knifings and murders amongst the black population should be no surprise. Practical people have pointed this out to the utopian idealists since mass immigration or what Lord Elton in 1965 called “The Unarmed Invasion”,(3)began.
Those who wanted controls on practical, common-sense grounds were attacked mercilessly by tyrannical political, cultural and intellectual elites who suppressed debate and stifled the genuine worries and fears of innocent people.
It is not left versus right. The first House Of Commons debate was appropriately on the 5th of November, 1954. It was an adjournment debate and called by John Hynd Labour M.P. for Sheffield (Attercliffe). There had been questions asked in the House prior to this. He stated, “One day recently700 embarked from Jamaica without…any prospect of work, housing or anything else.” He also commented on the colour bar in Sheffield dance halls because of knife fights involving blacks.
Throughout the 1950.s honourable M.P.s were worried about the consequences.
Norman Pannell M.P. Liverpool (Kirkdale), addressed the Conservative conferences of 1958 and 1961 on the perils of admitting criminals and the sick.
In 1961 the debate was stage-managed to stop M.P.Cyril Osborne(Louth) speaking. He stood outside in the rain handing out off-prints of his letter from the morning’s Daily Telegraph. In his 1961 address Mr Pannell stated that though in 1958 Home Secretary R.A.Butler had disagreed with restricting entries he had agreed with his suggestion of deporting immigrants who commit crimes but nothing had been done. Government ministers continued to ignore mass immigration throughout this 58 year period regardless of how innocent British people had to suffer. Where is the moral high ground in that?
In the House of Commons in the mid 50.s Marcus Lipton M.P. for Brixton (L) said Jamaica was sending their criminals, and was told by the Government minister, ”They actively discourage it. He asked “How do they and was fobbed-off, with “I must get on.” Sir J.Lucas (C) asked if machinery existed for Jamaica to know how many immigrants had criminal records. Alan Lennox-Boyd (later Lord Boyd) replied, ”There is not”.
In Jan 2002 police were worried about muggers progressing to guns. The Independent and The Telegraph reported that crack cocaine was being imported by the Jamaican connection and a cause of violence. “Ballistics experts warn that firearms are now cheap and easily available. The discharge of guns in non-gangland crimes, such as muggings, is still relatively rare.”
They keep presenting statistics but not believing them or not acting on them. “There were 4,658 muggings in the Met area in November 2001 alone, the largest category involving robberies of mobile phones from school children.
Overall gun crime in Greater London rose by more 30 per cent last year from around 240 firearms-related incidents in April to 317 in November. The total number of gun murders in April to November 2000 was 16 nearly double the previous year to 30 in the same period last year.
Senior Met sources say the age profile of most of the gun criminals arrested in London is between 18 and 30. However, there is deep concern that the level of indiscriminate violence will increase with the next generation. Detectives in Lambeth and Southwark have spoken of "hardened criminals" as young as 12. Commenting on this report The Independent tried to deceive their readers by disputing that it was blacks mugging whites, saying that it was only the victims who said the attackers were black!
They try to pretend we are not victims of a race war in our own country by emphasising “black on black” shootings which is gang fights for territory and customers. But the muggings mentioned are blacks attacking whites especially our elderly who we should be protecting. It is a man’s duty to protect the women and children.
Charles Moore, former editor of the Daily Telegraph, produced Salisbury Paper 9 in 1981,”The Old People of Lambeth”. It was an empirical research into living conditions of “whites”. One elderly man told him, “…its our Queen and our country, why should we be afraid to go out?”
Even Lord Denning, who is regarded as the greatest judge of the twentieth century was pilloried by the totalitarians. His book “What Next In The Law” had 10,000 copies withdrawn because of some errors but he explained: "The English are no longer a homogenous race. They are White and Black, coloured and brown. They no longer share the same standards of conduct. Some of them come from countries where bribery and graft are accepted as an integral part of life: and where stealing is a virtue so long as you are not found out." Various societies of lawyers attacked him as did The Observer, The Times and Daily Mirror.
A comment from a local on The Evening Standard article of 26 August 2008 about the riots at Notting Hill carnival showed what the reality the elites want to keep hidden is: ”I don't know why the media are reporting only 40 bottle throwing rioters, I've just been told by someone who was selling burgers from a burger van in Ladbroke Grove it was over 500 rioters against about 100 police officers until they got back- up. On Monday night I was told people were shooting at the police a few streets up...”
More reality from a police officers forum. Ordinary coppers commenting about the media covering up how many arrests there really had been at carnival. One poster claimed there had been “ Nearly 500 arrested and nothing on the BBC news?
I find that as unbelievable as I do disgusting. Over time, I can't help but feel that we kid ourselves into thinking that we live in a democracy, but really, we're fed what the Government wants us to be fed and wants us to believe.” There is a link to Sky news video and reporter Mark White is praised for being honest. Another poster comments on”
Latest figures re number of Police injuries = 27. Ok not the riot of the century but substantially more than 'a standoff with police' It irritates me greatly that both the MET and the media seem to want to downplay the seriousness of the event.”
(1) Salisbury Review. Spring 2003. Vol 21. No3.
(www.salisbury-review.co.uk)
(2) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....ign-Gordon.html
(3) Lord Elton.1965. The Unarmed Invasion.(Geoffrey Bles)
(4) http://www.policeoracle.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9310&PN=1
“London, Manchester and Birmingham are the worst-affected areas, while West Yorkshire, Merseyside and Northumbria police forces were also in the top 10. During just April, May and June this year, the Metropolitan Police recorded 1,580 offences – more than quarter of the national total. A breakdown reveals 17 people are stabbed or robbed at knife point in the every day and by July 2008 Twenty teenagers had been murdered in London. The total for the whole of last year was 26 shooting or stabbing killings among young people”.
Our elites have imported gang warfare while pretending that the immigrants were soft, sentimental like pets and if we were nice to them they would be nice to us!.
To obfuscate the facts a 9 per cent reduction in crime is claimed by the Police, with the violent crime sector being reduced by 8 per cent. As is now well known, in areas with much crime many people do not report burglaries or muggings because experience says that the police will do nothing about it. Less than half of such crimes are reported. It is deceit of the population by a government who can not control crime because they are blinkered by an ideology that tells them that everyone is equal and thus no groups can be more inclined to certain crimes than others. Common sense reveals that these areas are no longer safe for white people to live in.
The elites have varying motives and I mention them inpassing. But what they can not face is that a number of these murders by knifing appear to be racially motivated. But as it is often whites murdered by blacks it is not classed as a racial incident.
This is the case with the Sidcup murder of the young “Harry Potter”actor, two blacks were arrested; and in the murder of Ben Kinsella, brother of “East Enders” actress Brooke Kinsella, four blacks were arrested. The protest march of six hundred in North London against knife crime had a few black girls but no black youths..
The ruling elite - politicians, media, the police and the courts are covering up constant racist violence against indigenous people. The latest spate of murders like the two examples are not comprehended by the average person who has been brainwashed into thinking a victim of racist violence is like Stephen Lawrence.
In around 1979 a Metropolitan police report on black mugging was withdrawn to prevent a clamour for control of immigration or even a white backlash. Even as far back as 1959 two reports from the London Metropolitan Police and the West Midlands Police expressed concern at the growing number of crimes of violence being carried out by some newly arrived West Indians. The rate per head of population was something like four times that committed by indigenous people.
The West Indian family has broken down and now many black boys involved in street crimes, including murder, do not have a father to control them, and some have inherited genes of violence. Crime in Jamaica is similar and holiday makers can not just go our for a stroll from their hotels, as in Africa, Detroit or New Orleans!
An important but unregarded fact is the way the elites who hate their own people, stir up racial hated against them from the other communities: ever since immigration began there has been constant one-sided propaganda about the slave trade to turn blacks against whites. They fill their minds full of hatred for us. Anyone who has lived and worked in an inner city knows that the main reason cited for mugging white people by blacks is slavery. To keep this hidden the police reports stopped taking ethnicity into account.
Why are calls for control of immigration treated with such vehement approbation? Because our elites follow an ideology that is at odds with reality and tells them that immigrants are better than us and enrich us. To the innocent people who think this is an accident, I repeat some words from Dele Oguntimojou an African lawyer working in London: ”(you) do not know how the youth in the poor African village is being seduced by lush advertising to shed his native dress for blue jeans; to retune his ears from the traditional hi-life to the drum and bass of hip-hop and Brit pop. Even now the British Council is busy across Africa training the next generation of immigrants in the language of the destination country.”(1)
In November 2006 it was reported that the Government were advertising for immigrants to come here from terrorist countries. Discovered in the embassy in Pakistan a Foreign Office pamphlet declared: 'Multicultural Britain - A Land of Immigrants'. It encouraged immigrants to come here telling them of the preferential treatment they get under the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs. The Foreign Office put it in embassies across the world.
2 July 2008, The Daily Mail revealed: "British girls as young as 12 are being forced into prostitution by migrants. Children from ordinary families are groomed by older men… before being pimped around the uk to have sex up to 20 times a night. They are raped and often drugged, according to police. Officers have identified syndicates of Iraqi men throughout the uk' behind the exploitation. A government report said 'internal trafficking' was an 'emerging issue' and it should no longer be assumed young victims of sex exploitation were smuggled from abroad.
A UK human trafficking centre intelligence report says girls as young as 12 are taken from town to town and controlled with threats and assault. In one operation, 32 victims were identified in the sheffield area alone. All were aged 12 to 15 and had been raped. In another study, police say girls 'are given to a life of exploitation, waking up in anonymous towns, unable to contact family and with no way out'. Iraqi men? This is a form of guerilla warfare carried out against our children.
Figures released at the end of a six-month crackdown on people traffickers showed 167 victims were rescued across Britain and Ireland and 528 suspected traffickers were arrested…
Latest estimates by police are that there may be as many 18,000 trafficked victims that are forced to work as prostitutes".
These are the people our elites encourage here and if they are illegal give them amnesties. If you have seen the Blair’s houses you will know why. (2) Cherie was a Human Rights lawyer. Home Office minister Vernon Coaker said: "It is difficult for us to determine what the size of that problem is but it's something we are aware of and we have concerns about". That is all they care about our children.
The now normal event of knifings and murders amongst the black population should be no surprise. Practical people have pointed this out to the utopian idealists since mass immigration or what Lord Elton in 1965 called “The Unarmed Invasion”,(3)began.
Those who wanted controls on practical, common-sense grounds were attacked mercilessly by tyrannical political, cultural and intellectual elites who suppressed debate and stifled the genuine worries and fears of innocent people.
It is not left versus right. The first House Of Commons debate was appropriately on the 5th of November, 1954. It was an adjournment debate and called by John Hynd Labour M.P. for Sheffield (Attercliffe). There had been questions asked in the House prior to this. He stated, “One day recently700 embarked from Jamaica without…any prospect of work, housing or anything else.” He also commented on the colour bar in Sheffield dance halls because of knife fights involving blacks.
Throughout the 1950.s honourable M.P.s were worried about the consequences.
Norman Pannell M.P. Liverpool (Kirkdale), addressed the Conservative conferences of 1958 and 1961 on the perils of admitting criminals and the sick.
In 1961 the debate was stage-managed to stop M.P.Cyril Osborne(Louth) speaking. He stood outside in the rain handing out off-prints of his letter from the morning’s Daily Telegraph. In his 1961 address Mr Pannell stated that though in 1958 Home Secretary R.A.Butler had disagreed with restricting entries he had agreed with his suggestion of deporting immigrants who commit crimes but nothing had been done. Government ministers continued to ignore mass immigration throughout this 58 year period regardless of how innocent British people had to suffer. Where is the moral high ground in that?
In the House of Commons in the mid 50.s Marcus Lipton M.P. for Brixton (L) said Jamaica was sending their criminals, and was told by the Government minister, ”They actively discourage it. He asked “How do they and was fobbed-off, with “I must get on.” Sir J.Lucas (C) asked if machinery existed for Jamaica to know how many immigrants had criminal records. Alan Lennox-Boyd (later Lord Boyd) replied, ”There is not”.
In Jan 2002 police were worried about muggers progressing to guns. The Independent and The Telegraph reported that crack cocaine was being imported by the Jamaican connection and a cause of violence. “Ballistics experts warn that firearms are now cheap and easily available. The discharge of guns in non-gangland crimes, such as muggings, is still relatively rare.”
They keep presenting statistics but not believing them or not acting on them. “There were 4,658 muggings in the Met area in November 2001 alone, the largest category involving robberies of mobile phones from school children.
Overall gun crime in Greater London rose by more 30 per cent last year from around 240 firearms-related incidents in April to 317 in November. The total number of gun murders in April to November 2000 was 16 nearly double the previous year to 30 in the same period last year.
Senior Met sources say the age profile of most of the gun criminals arrested in London is between 18 and 30. However, there is deep concern that the level of indiscriminate violence will increase with the next generation. Detectives in Lambeth and Southwark have spoken of "hardened criminals" as young as 12. Commenting on this report The Independent tried to deceive their readers by disputing that it was blacks mugging whites, saying that it was only the victims who said the attackers were black!
They try to pretend we are not victims of a race war in our own country by emphasising “black on black” shootings which is gang fights for territory and customers. But the muggings mentioned are blacks attacking whites especially our elderly who we should be protecting. It is a man’s duty to protect the women and children.
Charles Moore, former editor of the Daily Telegraph, produced Salisbury Paper 9 in 1981,”The Old People of Lambeth”. It was an empirical research into living conditions of “whites”. One elderly man told him, “…its our Queen and our country, why should we be afraid to go out?”
Even Lord Denning, who is regarded as the greatest judge of the twentieth century was pilloried by the totalitarians. His book “What Next In The Law” had 10,000 copies withdrawn because of some errors but he explained: "The English are no longer a homogenous race. They are White and Black, coloured and brown. They no longer share the same standards of conduct. Some of them come from countries where bribery and graft are accepted as an integral part of life: and where stealing is a virtue so long as you are not found out." Various societies of lawyers attacked him as did The Observer, The Times and Daily Mirror.
A comment from a local on The Evening Standard article of 26 August 2008 about the riots at Notting Hill carnival showed what the reality the elites want to keep hidden is: ”I don't know why the media are reporting only 40 bottle throwing rioters, I've just been told by someone who was selling burgers from a burger van in Ladbroke Grove it was over 500 rioters against about 100 police officers until they got back- up. On Monday night I was told people were shooting at the police a few streets up...”
More reality from a police officers forum. Ordinary coppers commenting about the media covering up how many arrests there really had been at carnival. One poster claimed there had been “ Nearly 500 arrested and nothing on the BBC news?
I find that as unbelievable as I do disgusting. Over time, I can't help but feel that we kid ourselves into thinking that we live in a democracy, but really, we're fed what the Government wants us to be fed and wants us to believe.” There is a link to Sky news video and reporter Mark White is praised for being honest. Another poster comments on”
Latest figures re number of Police injuries = 27. Ok not the riot of the century but substantially more than 'a standoff with police' It irritates me greatly that both the MET and the media seem to want to downplay the seriousness of the event.”
(1) Salisbury Review. Spring 2003. Vol 21. No3.
(www.salisbury-review.co.uk)
(2) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....ign-Gordon.html
(3) Lord Elton.1965. The Unarmed Invasion.(Geoffrey Bles)
(4) http://www.policeoracle.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9310&PN=1
Thursday, 28 August 2008
Save our Children from State Social Engineering
Saving our Children from State Social Engineering
Since the rise to power of the New Left, in the 1960.s - 70.s, education has been to instill the correct attitudes rather than developing the child’s abilities. The authorities brainwash our children and only certain selected topics can be taught in history with the Second World war dominant because Nazism is used to frighten children away from Nationalist sentiments.
I mentioned history being reduced to acceptable propaganda: a Government funded study in April 2007 found that Schools are stopping teaching the Holocaust in history lessons to avoid offending Muslim pupils. It found some teachers are reluctant teach this for fear of upsetting Muslim students whose beliefs include Holocaust denial. There is fear of teaching children about the 11th century Crusades when Christians armies fought Muslim armies for control of Jerusalem because a different version is taught in mosques."
Sexually transmitted diseases are increasing among youngsters and being imported from Africa by immigrants. But rather than face this a group of MPs led by Chris Bryant, parliamentary aide to Harriet Harman, says that the solution is to educate children more about sex education from a much earlier age. They want children to have relationship advice 'in context' if they are to make informed decisions about when to have sex.
Chris Bryant - Captain Underpants It should be remembered that Bryant is openly homosexual as BBC News reported on 2nd December 2003, when he apologised for e-mailing a picture of himself (must read) in his underpants via a gay website. From 1994 to 1996 he was London manager of Common Purpose the controversial charity."Many Muslims will opt out of this as it will be teaching homosexuality as equal to heterosexual relations. Children could be taught sex education from the age of four, under plans by Mps.
They could also be taught a version of the development of slavery, colonisation and how it links to the British empire and the industrial revolution according to BBC News on 27th August 2008The Daily Mail of 27th August revealed. They want the Government to make advice on relationships, contraception and sexually transmitted diseases compulsory in all primary and secondary schools. It is the latest campaign aimed at cutting Britain's teenage pregnancy rate, which remains among the highest in Europe despite repeated attempts by ministers to reduce it.
Even worse the The Daily Mail of 22 August 2008, reported that almost a quarter of all babies in Britain are now born to immigrant mothers. In London the figure is 54 per cent, rising to 75 per cent in some boroughs....A report revealed that one in eight pupils speaks English as a second language...MPs and unions have called for urgent action to prevent schools being overwhelmed by the pressure but we can not trust them and must do this ourselves. Migrant children take longer to understand lessons and divert the teacher's energies from other pupils. In 1965 Peter Griffiths MP for Smethwich, a headmaster, called for special classes to teach immigrants English and was accused of wanting to start apartheid in schools.
It is much worse now so we must do it ourselves. Home education is not an alternative lifestyle choice it is now an imperative. Children used to be withdrawn for, say, bullying, unhappiness, failure to cater for SEN, or problems with teaching style and the curriculum but now we must save our children from Government manipulation.
Cultural Marxism is a total ideological system, imposing or manipulating opinions for all aspects of life - "Everything is Political." It is a subtle but less brutal version of Stalin's Russia. This process begins with children at school and operates on different levels. There is the physical level.
The State has DNA records of nearly a million children, some as young as five, and has been secretly taking their fingerprints since 2001. Each week 20 schools introduce fingerprinting. Ostensibly this helps them develop a love of books and reading. It replaces library cards by the child's fingerprint and placing the print on a scanner opens their computer file with records of the books they have borrowed.Minister for Schools and Learning, Jim Knight, revealed that when working on a crime police have access to the children’s fingerprints but parents are not told. To remove the prints takes professional cleansing. The schools, education authorities and the Government say it is difficult to convert this code back though not impossible and a computer whizz-kid could re- create the original fingerprints for identity theft. To save our children we must set up Home Schooling networks and when the authorities try to impose restrictions, refuse them.
In July 2006 The Observer reported that British children, possibly as young as six, will be subjected to compulsory fingerprinting under European Union rules being drawn up in secret. The prints will be stored on a database which could be shared with countries around the world. Under proposed laws being drawn up secretly by the European Commission’s ‘Article Six’ committee, which is composed of representatives of the European Union’s 25 member states, all children will have to attend a finger-printing centre to obtain an EU passport by June 2009 at the latest. The Home Office wants to include children in its biometric passport scheme in two years' and automatically transfer their details and fingerprints to the new national identity database when they are 16. The Government is underhandedly building a genetic database. Data has been used for genetic research without consent, including attempts to predict "ethnic appearance" from DNA profiles.
Sport too has been jettisoned as the new elites detest competition and advocate co-operation to suppress male aggression. Commenting on our Olympic achievements in the Daily Mail of 20 August 2008, Leo McKinstry wrote: "Over the past weekend, our sailors, cyclists, swimmers and rowers won an unprecedented eight gold medals, by far the greatest haul by Britons in two days in a century of Olympic competition...Of the 14 heroes pictured on the front page of yesterday's Mail, six were educated at independent schools… Nor is this some statistical anomaly. The disproportionate Olympic success of privately educated contestants has been an enduring pattern in recent years....Equality of outcome is the central theme of the politically correct British state. The concept of a talented elite is despised rather than celebrated.Excellence should not be encouraged for fear of lowering the self-esteem of those who lag behind. the sale of playing fields to make way for lucrative housing developments. Then there is the growing feminisation of the teaching profession, where more than 90 per cent of primary school teachers and 60 per cent of secondary teachers are women - a development that again leaves many sporty boys unchallenged...The Commons Select Committee on Culture recently demanded that our national sporting body, UK Sports, should collect more information on 'the backgrounds' of top athletes. Such data, the committee said, would 'help increase the socio-demographic spread' of funding. In other words, the committee wants more social engineering, more drivel about equality, more intervention in the name of access. This is the sort of nonsense that has ruined state education and it would only undermine our sporting competitive spirit."The new elites loathe male authority and attack masculinity as patriarchy. They see the main enemy as white racism and this justifies disadvantaging white pupils. No other ethnic group can be racist because they are sentimentally categorised as victims of our oppression and require "special needs". While we are blamed as oppressors we are being oppressed at school by telling children their clothes or views could be offensive. What this really means is what you are doing is not acceptable to the upholders of the totalitarian orthodoxy.
A notorious example was reported by The Times of 7th march 2006: "Traditional nursery rhymes are being rewritten at nursery schools to avoid causing offence to children. Instead of singing "Baa baa, black sheep" as generations of children have learnt to do, toddlers in Oxfordshire are being taught to sing "Baa baa, rainbow sheep".A spokesman for Ofsted, the watchdog which inspects Sure Start centres, confirmed that centres are expected to "have regard to anti-discrimination good practice" and that staff should "actively promote equality of opportunity. Christmas is being cancelled. The Daily Mail of 11th December 2006:"It is the time of year when parents and grandparents look forward to seeing their children dressed up as Mary and Joseph or the Three Wise Men. But the traditional Nativity play at Knowland Grove Community First School in Norwich has been axed in favour of a celebration of a range of different faiths."
But the most alarming was in the Telegraph of 8 July 2008. The National Children's Bureau guidance to play leaders and nursery teachers advising them to look racist incidents among youngsters in their care. This could be a child of three who says "yuk" to unfamiliar foreign food. The guidance is designed to highlight potentially-racist attitudes in youngsters from a young age. It alerts playgroup leaders that even babies can not be ignored in the drive to root out prejudice as they can "recognise different people in their lives". The NCB receives £12 million a year, mainly from Government funded organisations and therefore the tax payer is having money taken to pay for their own children to be moulded by brainwashing into what the Cultural Marxist elites want them to be.
The authorities are tightening control of the children. The school leaving age is to be raised to 18. It is not to improve education but there will be more time for state parenting as in school holiday clubs and breakfast clubs. This is to condition them for being monitored 24 hours a day in the E.U.Home educating parents receive income support until their youngest child is 16. But in October 2008 new legislation comes into force and when the youngest child is 12, income support will be replaced with job seeker's allowance and the parents have to seek work. In 2010 the age limit for the youngest child will be reduced to 7 years old. The totalitarians want to keep control of the children which is why we must persevere.This legislation is to force home educating parents to get a job and send their children to school. As it costs the taxpayer about £5,000 per year to keep a child at school there are no economic reasons to force home educating parents into paid employment and children into state schools. It is a political decision. The government should give home schoolers a tax deduction to the same value of sending their child to a state school. A voucher scheme would allow parents to either home school and use the voucher to pay for necessities like books, or, to send their children to state or public school and re-deem the voucher against the cost. Universities are open to Home Schooled children.Home schooling families could get together to form Home school co-ops. These groups could meet weekly and provide a classroom. They are families who link to share their abilities and resources and broaden the children's education. This enables children to do science experiments, art projects, spelling bees, discussions; use museums, community centres, athletic clubs, after-school programs, churches, science preserves, parks, and other community resources. There are sports fields and leisure centres to use.
By forming groups we could get discounts for block bookings. Secondary school level students may take classes at community colleges, which typically have open admission policies. Parents could work as volunteers.
For advice contact Education Otherwise.(1)http://conservativedemocraticalliance.blogspot.com/2008/05/children-of-state-by-david-hamilton.html
An excellent aticle by Troy Southgate
Two recommended books about PC written from a old liberal perspective are:
"The Politics of the Forked Tongue" by Aidan Rankin(New European Publications) and
"Retreat from Reason" by Anthony Browne (Civitas).
Since the rise to power of the New Left, in the 1960.s - 70.s, education has been to instill the correct attitudes rather than developing the child’s abilities. The authorities brainwash our children and only certain selected topics can be taught in history with the Second World war dominant because Nazism is used to frighten children away from Nationalist sentiments.
I mentioned history being reduced to acceptable propaganda: a Government funded study in April 2007 found that Schools are stopping teaching the Holocaust in history lessons to avoid offending Muslim pupils. It found some teachers are reluctant teach this for fear of upsetting Muslim students whose beliefs include Holocaust denial. There is fear of teaching children about the 11th century Crusades when Christians armies fought Muslim armies for control of Jerusalem because a different version is taught in mosques."
Sexually transmitted diseases are increasing among youngsters and being imported from Africa by immigrants. But rather than face this a group of MPs led by Chris Bryant, parliamentary aide to Harriet Harman, says that the solution is to educate children more about sex education from a much earlier age. They want children to have relationship advice 'in context' if they are to make informed decisions about when to have sex.
Chris Bryant - Captain Underpants It should be remembered that Bryant is openly homosexual as BBC News reported on 2nd December 2003, when he apologised for e-mailing a picture of himself (must read) in his underpants via a gay website. From 1994 to 1996 he was London manager of Common Purpose the controversial charity."Many Muslims will opt out of this as it will be teaching homosexuality as equal to heterosexual relations. Children could be taught sex education from the age of four, under plans by Mps.
They could also be taught a version of the development of slavery, colonisation and how it links to the British empire and the industrial revolution according to BBC News on 27th August 2008The Daily Mail of 27th August revealed. They want the Government to make advice on relationships, contraception and sexually transmitted diseases compulsory in all primary and secondary schools. It is the latest campaign aimed at cutting Britain's teenage pregnancy rate, which remains among the highest in Europe despite repeated attempts by ministers to reduce it.
Even worse the The Daily Mail of 22 August 2008, reported that almost a quarter of all babies in Britain are now born to immigrant mothers. In London the figure is 54 per cent, rising to 75 per cent in some boroughs....A report revealed that one in eight pupils speaks English as a second language...MPs and unions have called for urgent action to prevent schools being overwhelmed by the pressure but we can not trust them and must do this ourselves. Migrant children take longer to understand lessons and divert the teacher's energies from other pupils. In 1965 Peter Griffiths MP for Smethwich, a headmaster, called for special classes to teach immigrants English and was accused of wanting to start apartheid in schools.
It is much worse now so we must do it ourselves. Home education is not an alternative lifestyle choice it is now an imperative. Children used to be withdrawn for, say, bullying, unhappiness, failure to cater for SEN, or problems with teaching style and the curriculum but now we must save our children from Government manipulation.
Cultural Marxism is a total ideological system, imposing or manipulating opinions for all aspects of life - "Everything is Political." It is a subtle but less brutal version of Stalin's Russia. This process begins with children at school and operates on different levels. There is the physical level.
The State has DNA records of nearly a million children, some as young as five, and has been secretly taking their fingerprints since 2001. Each week 20 schools introduce fingerprinting. Ostensibly this helps them develop a love of books and reading. It replaces library cards by the child's fingerprint and placing the print on a scanner opens their computer file with records of the books they have borrowed.Minister for Schools and Learning, Jim Knight, revealed that when working on a crime police have access to the children’s fingerprints but parents are not told. To remove the prints takes professional cleansing. The schools, education authorities and the Government say it is difficult to convert this code back though not impossible and a computer whizz-kid could re- create the original fingerprints for identity theft. To save our children we must set up Home Schooling networks and when the authorities try to impose restrictions, refuse them.
In July 2006 The Observer reported that British children, possibly as young as six, will be subjected to compulsory fingerprinting under European Union rules being drawn up in secret. The prints will be stored on a database which could be shared with countries around the world. Under proposed laws being drawn up secretly by the European Commission’s ‘Article Six’ committee, which is composed of representatives of the European Union’s 25 member states, all children will have to attend a finger-printing centre to obtain an EU passport by June 2009 at the latest. The Home Office wants to include children in its biometric passport scheme in two years' and automatically transfer their details and fingerprints to the new national identity database when they are 16. The Government is underhandedly building a genetic database. Data has been used for genetic research without consent, including attempts to predict "ethnic appearance" from DNA profiles.
Sport too has been jettisoned as the new elites detest competition and advocate co-operation to suppress male aggression. Commenting on our Olympic achievements in the Daily Mail of 20 August 2008, Leo McKinstry wrote: "Over the past weekend, our sailors, cyclists, swimmers and rowers won an unprecedented eight gold medals, by far the greatest haul by Britons in two days in a century of Olympic competition...Of the 14 heroes pictured on the front page of yesterday's Mail, six were educated at independent schools… Nor is this some statistical anomaly. The disproportionate Olympic success of privately educated contestants has been an enduring pattern in recent years....Equality of outcome is the central theme of the politically correct British state. The concept of a talented elite is despised rather than celebrated.Excellence should not be encouraged for fear of lowering the self-esteem of those who lag behind. the sale of playing fields to make way for lucrative housing developments. Then there is the growing feminisation of the teaching profession, where more than 90 per cent of primary school teachers and 60 per cent of secondary teachers are women - a development that again leaves many sporty boys unchallenged...The Commons Select Committee on Culture recently demanded that our national sporting body, UK Sports, should collect more information on 'the backgrounds' of top athletes. Such data, the committee said, would 'help increase the socio-demographic spread' of funding. In other words, the committee wants more social engineering, more drivel about equality, more intervention in the name of access. This is the sort of nonsense that has ruined state education and it would only undermine our sporting competitive spirit."The new elites loathe male authority and attack masculinity as patriarchy. They see the main enemy as white racism and this justifies disadvantaging white pupils. No other ethnic group can be racist because they are sentimentally categorised as victims of our oppression and require "special needs". While we are blamed as oppressors we are being oppressed at school by telling children their clothes or views could be offensive. What this really means is what you are doing is not acceptable to the upholders of the totalitarian orthodoxy.
A notorious example was reported by The Times of 7th march 2006: "Traditional nursery rhymes are being rewritten at nursery schools to avoid causing offence to children. Instead of singing "Baa baa, black sheep" as generations of children have learnt to do, toddlers in Oxfordshire are being taught to sing "Baa baa, rainbow sheep".A spokesman for Ofsted, the watchdog which inspects Sure Start centres, confirmed that centres are expected to "have regard to anti-discrimination good practice" and that staff should "actively promote equality of opportunity. Christmas is being cancelled. The Daily Mail of 11th December 2006:"It is the time of year when parents and grandparents look forward to seeing their children dressed up as Mary and Joseph or the Three Wise Men. But the traditional Nativity play at Knowland Grove Community First School in Norwich has been axed in favour of a celebration of a range of different faiths."
But the most alarming was in the Telegraph of 8 July 2008. The National Children's Bureau guidance to play leaders and nursery teachers advising them to look racist incidents among youngsters in their care. This could be a child of three who says "yuk" to unfamiliar foreign food. The guidance is designed to highlight potentially-racist attitudes in youngsters from a young age. It alerts playgroup leaders that even babies can not be ignored in the drive to root out prejudice as they can "recognise different people in their lives". The NCB receives £12 million a year, mainly from Government funded organisations and therefore the tax payer is having money taken to pay for their own children to be moulded by brainwashing into what the Cultural Marxist elites want them to be.
The authorities are tightening control of the children. The school leaving age is to be raised to 18. It is not to improve education but there will be more time for state parenting as in school holiday clubs and breakfast clubs. This is to condition them for being monitored 24 hours a day in the E.U.Home educating parents receive income support until their youngest child is 16. But in October 2008 new legislation comes into force and when the youngest child is 12, income support will be replaced with job seeker's allowance and the parents have to seek work. In 2010 the age limit for the youngest child will be reduced to 7 years old. The totalitarians want to keep control of the children which is why we must persevere.This legislation is to force home educating parents to get a job and send their children to school. As it costs the taxpayer about £5,000 per year to keep a child at school there are no economic reasons to force home educating parents into paid employment and children into state schools. It is a political decision. The government should give home schoolers a tax deduction to the same value of sending their child to a state school. A voucher scheme would allow parents to either home school and use the voucher to pay for necessities like books, or, to send their children to state or public school and re-deem the voucher against the cost. Universities are open to Home Schooled children.Home schooling families could get together to form Home school co-ops. These groups could meet weekly and provide a classroom. They are families who link to share their abilities and resources and broaden the children's education. This enables children to do science experiments, art projects, spelling bees, discussions; use museums, community centres, athletic clubs, after-school programs, churches, science preserves, parks, and other community resources. There are sports fields and leisure centres to use.
By forming groups we could get discounts for block bookings. Secondary school level students may take classes at community colleges, which typically have open admission policies. Parents could work as volunteers.
For advice contact Education Otherwise.(1)http://conservativedemocraticalliance.blogspot.com/2008/05/children-of-state-by-david-hamilton.html
An excellent aticle by Troy Southgate
Two recommended books about PC written from a old liberal perspective are:
"The Politics of the Forked Tongue" by Aidan Rankin(New European Publications) and
"Retreat from Reason" by Anthony Browne (Civitas).
Friday, 22 August 2008
Setting up the Targets
American philosopher George Santayana remarked that those who do not learn from history are destined to repeat its mistakes. On October the 26th is the anniversary of a unique event in England –a bomb attack on an mp’s home in 1965. This is a lesson that de-humanising a politician could have fatal consequences as happened to Pym Fortuyn and Theo Van Gogh. Mr.Griffiths had been Member of Parliament for Smethwick (now Warley) for just a year. He had been leader of the Conservative group on the council and won the election of 15th October 1964 against a national swing to Labour, which was led by Harold Wilson. The defeated MP Patrick Gordon Walker was Foreign Secretary designate and a personal friend of Wilson. Mr.Griffith’s turned Walker’s 3,544 majority into 1,774 for the Conservatives.
Alderman Griffiths was local-born and headmaster of nearby primary school, Fir Tree Lane. Mr.Walker lived in Hamstead Garden Suburb. Peter Griffiths lost his seat in March 1966 to Andrew Faulds (Labour) who lived in Stratford –upon-Avon!
Biased and exaggerated reporting created a dangerous climate in which Mr.Griffiths ceased to be seen as human and became a “racialist”, something to be reviled. When people are thus de-humanised they become just figures of hate it does not matter what others do to them.
Paul Foot wrote a book on this election “Immigration and Race in British Politics” and, though an excellent journalist, he could not overcome his prejudice to give Mr. Griffiths a fair examination. However, he did note Walker’s hypocrisy and commented, ”The racial bitterness stirred up…could well last for a generation. For this Patrick Gordon Walker must take his share of the responsibility.” He quoted a Birmingham mp, “look at Patrick. He never left the subject alone.”(1) Walker had issued different election leaflets for each ethnic group. While he was preaching against race discrimination, Smethwick Labour club operated a colour bar! Mr.Griffiths told the Birmingham Evening Mail, on 24/9/1964, “The Socialists are attempting to obtain the coloured vote because they think it will hold Smethwick for them.”Many current attitudes were pre-figured in this election. The recent suggestion by Trevor Philips, head of the Commission for Racial Equality, has suggested young Black boys need schooling separately. This is similar to a suggestion by Peter Griffiths in February 1964, when in response to complaints from white parents he proposed to hold special classes for Indian children who could not speak English for three hours a day. They were to be taught by their own teachers in English, maths and science and then rejoin the others for games and crafts. He was accused of trying to start Apartheid in local schools!
Some think the oppression and social engineering began with Political Correctness or the advent of New Labour under Blair, but in fact it is part of the Multi-Racialists’ mentality. The first act of positive discrimination was in 1950 when Minister of Food John Strachey(L) announced that no Government contracts would go to caterers who did not employ coloured people. In 1955 Smethwick a Conservative candidate for the council Harold had his election addresses printed in Urdu as well as English as did Conservative General election candidate John Wells did too. In 1964 Enid Blyton was being pilloried for her book "The Little Black Doll". Also in 1964 the Campaign Against Racial Discrimination sent out forms for general election candidates to sign pledging not to us race as an issue and in 3 constituencies all the candidates agreed not to mention race! Meanwhile, back at the narrative –
An offensive slogan was being posted on walls before and during the election,” If you want a N***** for a neighbour, vote Labour”. Harold Wilson attributed this to Griffiths on national Television, when asked by Robin Day on Panorama of 9th March 1964 . Mr. Wilson replied, that he understood that this was said by the Conservative candidate in Smethwick. Griffiths denied he or any member of the Conservative party had used this slogan, but did refuse to condemn its use saying it was an expression of frustration felt by local people. He explained that the only person who had heard it was Mr.Walker, who claimed it was in use in the Municipal elections of 1963. A Labour spokesman said that Wilson had said no more than was in the morning’s Times. Mr.Griffiths threatened to sue Mr.Wilson but later declined. After the Election new Prime Minister Wilson broke from his address on the Queens speech to insult Griffiths by calling him a “Parliamentary Leper”, who would be shunned by everyone in the House. This breached the convention that new members be protected until after their Maiden speech! Harold Gurden Birmingham Conservative mp (Selly Oak) told the Times 25/1/1965, “He “had not met Griffiths but would be his friend in the House.” Then on October the 5th 1964 just two weeks before polling Griffiths was denounced for his campaign in the Birmingham Post and the Times Midland correspondent wrote, ”It is abhorrent to all Conservatives candidates and officials of stature to whom I have talked.” The column of October the 12th, “Vile –its all in Black and White.”As the election result was announced on October the 16th Socialists made Nazi salutes. Mr.Walker, the embittered loser griped,” I feel the result tonight will give Smethwick a bad name.” The Bishop of Southwark called the electorate “unchristian” and the Bishop of Chelmsford and Archbishop of Canterbury were critical. Local people supporting a local-born candidate in a democratic election over a local issue is a model of Democracy at work yet, these un-elected Bishops who lived far away, were imposing their a priori ideology on the situation but not drawing inferences from the facts or observation.
The way to understand this piece of history is not through the prejudices of outsiders but through real examples. A supporter of Mr.Griffith’s campaign was Cllr. Alan Vernon, 23-years old, who had fostered a young coloured child. Mr.Vernon, who had supported Griffiths campaign, told the Times of 15th February 1965, June, “I do not think the campaign was conducted on racialist lines. I feel that immigration should be restricted. He had also fostered a young coloured child eighteen months previously. He supported the Marshall Street plan.This plan was an attempt by the Conservative council to buy the remaining houses in Marshall Street to sell to white people as 40% were occupied by coloureds people. Martin Luther King himself had addressed members of Parliament in December 1964 on his way to Oslo to collect his Noble Peace Prize and had warned of the creation of “Little Harlems”.(2) Conservative group leaders had taken the decision after meeting a delegation of worried housewives. Housing Committee chairman E. Gould remarked,” This is not colour prejudice. We understand that over thirty houses in Marshall Street are occupied by coloured people and we think they should not be allowed to occupy more than half the houses in any street.” Griffiths agreed and told the Times of 7th December, 1964 ” coloured people can only be integrated if they live alongside white people.”Later a delegation of housewives visited Richard Crossman Minister of Housing for support, who with his PPS Bob Mellish treated them harshly and upset the ladies. A request for funding was sent but turned down. Crossman a leading left-wing intellectual was proud of having opposed the 1961 Commonwealth Immigration Bill, as a “shameful piece of legislation, but wrote in his Diary,“Ever since the Smethwick election it has been quite clear that immigration can be the greatest potential vote loser for the Labour party if we are seen to be permitting a flood of immigrants to come and blight the central areas of our cities.”(3)Mellish had said “Smethwick’s name stinks and “Smethwick is well regarded in Alabama.” But in May 1976 with an influx of Malawi Asians into his own Bermondsey constituency, Mr. Mellish, then Labours’ chief whip, told the Commons, “With 53 million of us we cannot go on without strict immigration control.”
Ever consistent the BBC took Malcolm X the American Black Power leader to Marshall Street in February 1965 to film for their current affairs programme “Tonight”. He told the world’s media,” I have come here because I am disturbed by reports that coloured people in Smethwick are being badly treated. I have heard they are being treated as the Jews under Hitler. I would not wait for the Fascist element in Smethwick to erect gas ovens.” I wonder who he heard that off! He told the London Times that the BBC had taken him there for a programme on race in their current affairs programe “Tonight”. This was a mere nine days before he was assassinated after his return to the States.The BBC denied having brought him but Smethwick’s eloquent mayor Alderman C.V.Williamse investigated and revealed, that he was appalled at” the BBC bringing algebraic characters to Smethwick and then denying it. I was most amazed at the finesse displayed when I spoke of him being brought in a BBC car. I was told the car was not a BBC car but it was owned by one of the directors.” Griffiths was outraged by the visitations of extremists and wrote to the “Smegs” Telephone, “ The visit of Malcolm X was an affront to decent people and a direct provocation. That he should have been brought to Marshall Street by the BBC, which is supposed to be a responsible public corporation, makes matters worse. I say to all extremists Right and Left, black or white, get out and stay out.”
A blazing wooden cross had been left against a door in Pink Passage, with KKK painted on the pavement. The front room was a store for an Indian shopkeeper. Earlier a Labour Councillor described the council as being like “Peter Griffiths’ Reichstag.”
Mr.Griffiths also called for health checks on immigrants when he responded to a question in the local paper the “Smegs Telephone”, “Immigration should be limited to those of sound health who have jobs and living accommodation arranged before they enter.” This was prescient as there was an outbreak of Typhoid in Smethwick in April 1965. Dr.John Briant the Deputy Medical Officer of Health said ”Smethwick had contained one outbreak but another might occur if people were let into the country without health checks.”
The campaign of vilification which lasted for eighteen months and had been featured in media all across the world, culminated in a time bomb being planted outside Peter Griffith’s home. This is unique in British politics. The bomb was a battery and clock placed on a meter cover, connected by wires through the letterbox to a detonator and an explosive substance. The explosion splintered part of the front door, blew the dining room door off its hinges, broke the hinges on an upstairs door, blew off the loft entrance, smashed some windows and drove splinters into the walls and stair banisters in the hall. The police thought it the work of experts. The media created a climate in which Peter Griffiths was made a legitimate target for political fanatics. This shows that irresponsible journalists and politicians can put people’s lives in danger especially now we have many Muslim extremists in the country, if they use wild and emotive terms of abuse based on lies against an opponent.
1 Foot, Paul 1965. Immigration and Race in British Politics (Penguin)
2 Griffiths, Peter 1966. A Question of Colour (Leslie Frewin)
3 Crossman Richard1975. Diaries of a Cabinet Minister. Vol.1David Hamilton
Saturday, 12 July 2008
Maggots feeding on the body of art
An entry for the 2003 Turner Prize was a sculpture depicting bodies being picked at by maggots. Entitled “Sex”, it was by Jake and Dinos Chapman, who duly made the headlines as the most shocking nominees.
Maggots feeding off a body is a fitting out picture of contemporary artists. They are corrupt, degraded, unimaginative and parasitic as they feed off our great artistic traditions and try to destroy them. Their aim is to destroy our values and something that gives meaning to our lives. Is a urinal, say, an artistic subject? No, it is intrinsically unartistic, even though it might have pleasing curves, and to write about it as such does not make it artistic but conceptually separates artistic form from subject
Contemporary art is not really art at all and should be called something else. But it is a financial asset for the global elites who buy and sell it and run the Arts Councils that manage artistic creativity.
Sotheby’s contemporary art auction in July 2008 raised more than $1 billion which shows how the global elites are investing in art regardless of economic predictions. Their evening contemporary art sale raised 95 million pounds ($189 million), the highest total for a summer contemporary auction held in Europe and just below the overall regional record set in February. Francis Bacon’s “Study for Head of George Dyer”, the artist’s lover, fetched $27.4 million, including commission; Jean-Michel Basquiat’s “Untitled”, was sold by rock band U2 for $10.1 million. Competitors Christie’s sold art worth $172 million at its sale. Only the less important Sotheby’s contemporary day sale is left and the two main auctioneers have sold works worth just over $1 billion during the summer season, which includes impressionist, modern, post-war and contemporary art. Christie’s raised around $552 million and Sotheby’s about $449 million so far.
Senior executives are confidant that the art market will sustain soaring values in spite of falling stocks and house prices with rising oil costs. Russian elites have been a big factor in booming art sales, there is worry they may inflate impressionist prices in the same way Japanese money did around 20 years ago then disappeared causing the market to crash.
Contemporary art is the preserve of an elite, a large clique, that finance their interests through grants from the arts council, local authorities and sponsorship from global corporations. It is exhibited by commercial art galleries, private collectors, corporations, publicly funded arts organizations, contemporary art museums or by the artists themselves who are supported by grants, awards and prizes as well as by selling work. These are interlocking and exclusive relationships. Individual members of the elite are highly influential - Charles Saatchi has dominated the market in British contemporary art for twenty years and is a major sponsor and collector.
A major sponsor and collector when the English civilisation was developing was King Athelstan. His attitude and intentions show how different are the motives of sponsors at each end of this arc of culture. He used his collection in service of God and to develop something spiritual, and did so through gift. One was to Chester-le-Street, a tenth-century West Saxon codex containing Bede’s eighth-century prose and verse The Life and Miracles of St. Cuthbert, Bishop of Lindesfarne, a seventh-century monk, solitary and bishop, with a frontispiece illustrating the king presenting the book to St.Cuthbert. Together with the Cuthbert material there were episcopal and royal records in this book, including a list of popes. There is evidence that Athelstan also supported the shrines of St. John of Beverley and St. Wilfrid at Ripon. A ring preserved at Bury St. Edmunds in East Anglia bears as its inscription the names of St. John of Beverley and Athelstan (see Rollason 1989). Traditions of several churches traditions such as Malmesbury attributed their collections to his religious benevolence. The prologue to an Old English relic-list from Exeter (Rollason.), tells how royal agents purchased “with the king’s earthly treasure the most valuable treasures of all - holy relics”. A letter from the prior at St. Samson’s at Dol in Brittany is evidence of Athelstan’s interest in relics outside England.
These qualities give a clue to what creates civilisation - confidence in one’s own people and the sense of the civilisation’s permanence. Traditional masterpieces have such individual detail and are so deep one is enrapt for the entire day after first looking at a work as a whole. We need belief in our inherited values from our ancestors and to transmit them to our descendants. We know that what gives meaning to life is our emotional experience, our relationships, our beliefs and values. Our values come from a sense of continuity. We receive them from our forbears. They tell us that we have long endured and will continue to do so.
The Arts Council privileges some ethnic groups as expressed in their customary
doublespeak:-
Celebrating diversity Race, ethnicity and faith will remain major preoccupations in this country and the arts are fundamental to such debates. The arts help us to develop a sense of our identity and ourselves as individuals, as members of our communities and as a nation. The debate now also needs to encompass a richer and more broad-ranging definition of diversity. By ‘diversity’, we mean that we will respond to issues around race, ethnicity, faith, disability, sexuality, class and economic disadvantage – any social or institutional barriers that prevent people from participating in and enjoying the arts. We have a part to play in turning the diversity debate towards a positive celebration of diversity and the artistic and creative opportunities it offers. Recent progress Recently we have made real progress in this area. In 2004/05, 23% of individuals receiving our grants defined themselves as Black and minority ethnic artists We have a far-reaching race equality scheme, and require all 1,100 regularly funded organisations to have one too Our Council’s disability and Black and minority ethnic profile has improved, but we still have more to do to achieve the same profile at senior executive level We have made major interventions in theatre – demonstrated by Eclipse Theatre and in 2006 the Sustained Theatre consultation on Black performing arts We will continue with our decibel programme, to celebrate and raise the profile how Black and minority ethnic artists contribute to contemporary British culture
In contrast, ventures representative of our culture, like the
English Music Festival
are discriminated against on the grounds that they are not “inclusive.” This ideology is disseminated through the channels of communication the cultural elites control. Ethnic arts are treated with reverence - ours are dismissed.
The current chairman of Arts Council England, is Sir Christopher John Frayling an educationalist and writer known for his study of popular culture. He read history at Churchill College, Cambridge and gained a PhD in the study of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. He taught history at the University of Bath and in 1979 was appointed Professor of Cultural History at London’s post-graduate art and design school, the Royal College of Art. Since 1996 he has been Rector in charge of the College. He is also Chairman of the Design Council, Chairman of the Royal Mint Advisory Committee, and a Trustee of the Victoria and Albert Museum. He was a governor of the British Film Institute in the 1980s. He was knighted in 2001 for “Services to Art and Design Education”.
Chairwoman of the London Arts Board is Lady Sue Woodford Hollick, a businesswoman and consultant with extensive interests in broadcasting and the arts. She is a former producer and director of World in Action for Granada Television and founding Commissioning Editor of multicultural programmes at Channel 4 television. She has been Chairwoman of Arts Council England, London since September 2000 and is currently a member of the Tate Modern Advisory Council. She is founder and Co-Director of Bringing Up Baby, a childcare company and Chair of the UK board of the African Medical & Research Foundation, Africa’s leading health development organization. Her husband, Lord Hollick, is Chair of the South Bank Centre, which is funded by Arts Council England.
The usual chairman of the Turner Prize Committee is Sir Nicholas Serota who grew up in Hampstead. His mother was a Labour Minister for Health in Harold Wilson’s government, who was made a life peer and governor of the BBC. He was educated at Haberdashers’ Aske’s School and then read Economics at Christ’s Cambridge before switching to History of Art. He completed a Masters degree at the Courtauld Institute of Art under the supervision of Anthony Blunt and Anita Brookner.
In the 1990s contemporary art merged with popular culture and artists are promoted as stars. In June 2008 The Evening Standard told of the millions that Damien Hirst is spending on
the mansion
once owned by Lord Sudeley’s family. Hirst is supposedly worth £135 million. Death is a central theme in Hirst’s works like a series in which dead animals like a shark, a sheep and a cow are preserved — sometimes having been dissected — in formaldehyde. The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living is a 14-foot tiger shark immersed in formaldehyde in a vitrine. In June 2007, his Lullaby Spring sold for £9.65 million at Sotheby’s in London then in 2007, For The Love of God sold for £50 million to an anonymous investment group.
Arts Council England is the national development agency for encouraging the maggots. It distributes public money from the Government and the National Lottery to the arts organisations who share their ideology and refuse those that do not. Individuals and organisations can apply to the Arts Council for funding from its own budget or from the Lottery.
Contemporary art is negative and the practitioners use it to destroy the Art they feed off like maggots while they parasitically take what they can. They not only try to destroy art they kill their babies. Lynn Barber wrote of Tracey Emin in The Observer of 22April 2008 :” The first abortion, in 1990, was horrendously bodged because no one realised she was carrying twins: the second abortion, she says, was ‘revenge’ for the first. Contemporary art is a sort of show to shock which is a petty, destructive motive and meant to hurt innocent people. What they really enjoy is shocking elderly people and children. Of Grayson Perry’s “Barbaric Splendour” the Satchi Gallery wrote: “His form and content is always incongruous: classic Grecian-like urns bearing friezes of car-wrecks, cell-phones, supermodels, as well as more dark and literary scenes often incorporating auto-biographical references.” They need traditional art as a background, for if the old standards were truly swept away no one would be able to say, “What a provocative statement, Tracy.”
Tracey Emin was made Royal Academician by the Royal Academy of Arts On 29 March 2007. Emin joined an elite group of artists including David Hockney, Sir Peter Blake, Anthony Caro and Alison Wilding. She is now entitled to exhibit up to six works in the annual summer exhibition. Her sex-themed works on show include a Zebra with an erection - a crankshaft that operates a model of a zebra, which in turn is copulating with a model of woman in Victorian dress, as the hackneyed image of prudery. It is pretentious and has no intrinsic merit - only that bestowed by the elites. It is propaganda for Cultural Marxism. If the Victorian woman was replaced with, say, Cherie Blair or Diane Abbott the pseuds would be filled with shock and hysteria.
At the 2007 Venice Biennale Emin hosted celebrity guests, including Sir Elton John and his husband/wife David Furnish, Viscount Linley and the model Naomi Campbell. Likewise, when Jake Chapman married model Rosemary Ferguson in Christ Church, Spitalfields, among the guests were Kate Moss, Sadie Frost, Noel Gallagher’s ex-wife Meg Matthews and society photographer Sam Taylor-Wood.
A main feature of contemporary art is paedophila. Grayson Perry, the transvestite who won the Turner Prize in 2003, is known for vases depicting child abuse. Popular entertainment has drawn from the art world’s fascination with it. For example, David Bowie’s 1975 concept album “1.Outside” had a tale about the dismemberment of a teenage girl. Bowie also promoted an androgynous image with the concept album on the career of an extraterrestrial rock singer Ziggy Stardust. It was the basis for his 1972 tour, which was sponsored by The Sun newspaper, and the gigs were filmed by BBC television.
Dressed as his alter ego Claire, Grayson Perry told the Tate Exhibition 2003: “Well, it’s about time a transvestite potter won the Turner Prize. I think the art world had more trouble coming to terms with me being a potter than my choice of frocks.” Tate director and award judge, Serota said: “I don’t think the choice is a strategic choice. I think the jury felt strongly that these were the works of a very strong artist who happens to be using ceramics and drawing.”
Institutions like Serota’s manage and regulate what used to be individual inspiration within a traditional culture. So, ordinarily, crafts like textile design are excluded from contemporary art despite having large audiences at exhibitions. But it becomes a different story if they adopt the right values. Elite motives were expressed by Charles Satchi thus, “A ceramic object that is intended as a subversive comment on the nature of beauty is more likely to fit the definition of contemporary art than one that is simply beautiful.”
Perry’s “Golden Ghosts” were described by the Satchi Gallery:” Unhappy expressions on the little girls’ faces in Golden Ghosts contrast sharply with the idyllic country cottages stencilled in the background. Perry often uses found images to create a mood or a tension – the exceptionally sad image of the seated girl is that of a child affected by the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station disaster. This evocative work hints at a familiarity with psychotherapy, made at a time when Perry was coming to terms with his own unhappy past. Perry’s transvestite alter ego, Claire, appears outlined in gold as the ghost in the title, dressed in the elaborate embroidered “Coming Out Dress”, made for a performance in 2000.” As we see with Emin they do not transcend their unhappiness but spread it to others.
The Chapman brothers are conceptual artists who work together. They were part of the Young British Artists movement that was promoted by Charles Saatchi, who also sponsored Damien Hirst and Tracey Emin. Jake Chapman has published a number of catalogue essays and pieces of art criticism in his own right, as well as a book, Meatphysics in 2003. The brothers have also designed a label for Becks beer as part of a series of limited edition labels produced by contemporary artists.
Their Turner Prize exhibit for 2003 featured two new works “Sex” and “Death”. “Sex” referred their previous work “Great Deeds against the Dead”. The original work shows three dismembered corpses hanging from a tree, “Sex” shows the same scene, but in a further state of decay. Clown’s noses have been added to the skulls of the corpses while snakes, rats and insects, similar to ones in joke shops, cover the piece. “Death” is two sex dolls, placed on top of each other, head-to-toe in the soixante-neuf position.
The next step down to total degradation is cruelty to animals and bestiality. In a declining civilisation art becomes corrupted and is a measure of the health - or sickness, actually - of a civilisation. The Romans sank into a debased barbarism by slaughter in the amphitheatre. Our deterioration into barbarism is moving from images to the reality. In popular entertainment like “I’m a Celebrity Get Me out of Here”, simple people, described as Celebrities, are so degraded as to be led into eating live worms and stick insects. There are several levels to this: there is cruelty to lesser animals; encouraging children to eat insects and slugs in the garden ;and the move towards ever more degradation of our people and culture.
This is a world-wide decadence: In 2007, a Costa Rican ‘artist’ Guillermo Vargas Habacuc caught a stray dog on the street and tied it by a short leash to the wall of an art gallery and left it to die of hunger and thirst while cultural elites watched. The Central American Biennial of Art has decided that this was art and has asked Vargas Habacuc to repeat this “installation” at the Biennial of 2008. This was sanctioned by a public body run by the country’s elites. It is not clear that they really did starve the dog and it might be just to shock or get publicity to sell something. But it shows how truly disgusting these people are. The “artist” explained, “I knew the dog died on the following day from lack of food. During the inauguration, I knew that the dog was persecuted in the evening between the houses of aluminum and cardboard in a district of Managua. Five children who helped to capture the dog received 10 bonds of córdobas for their assistance. The name of the dog was Natividad, and I let him die of hunger in the sight of everyone, as if the death of a poor dog was a shameless media show in which nobody does anything but to applaud or to watch disturbed. In the place that the dog was exposed remain a metal cable and a cord. The dog was extremely ill and did not want to eat, so in natural surroundings it would have died anyway; thus they are all poor stray dogs: sooner or later they die or are killed.”
A couple of decades ago an artist castrated himself in an exhibition in London which was presumably funded by the Arts Council! One would wonder how this or the starving of a dog is art. The setting does not make it art. It makes it torture set in an art gallery. It is what the elites want from an artistic subject. It is not what we want. For us, art has to be intrinsically artistic in that it it is something that produces an affect on our emotions ranging from pleasing to spiritual. It triggers something aspirational or transcendent as the subject is transformed by human imagination and skill. Art begins as wholesome and aspiring to the spiritual. But in a declining civilisation it becomes corrupted and corrupting. The debased slaughter in the amphitheatre marked the Roman decline into barbarism. Ours is marked by, among other things, the degeneracy and cruelty of anti-art.
To combat the anti-art movement a young artist would need not only great talent but also independence of mind and an imagination developed through respectful study of tradition and a sense of reverence for God and his creation. He would also need the courage to stand alone against the artists and elites who have a stranglehold on artistic productions and the colleges that pass the fashionable methods on. The brave one would need to study the great masterpieces and find an appropriate tradition to link to, and begin reviving our civilisation.
Maggots feeding off a body is a fitting out picture of contemporary artists. They are corrupt, degraded, unimaginative and parasitic as they feed off our great artistic traditions and try to destroy them. Their aim is to destroy our values and something that gives meaning to our lives. Is a urinal, say, an artistic subject? No, it is intrinsically unartistic, even though it might have pleasing curves, and to write about it as such does not make it artistic but conceptually separates artistic form from subject
Contemporary art is not really art at all and should be called something else. But it is a financial asset for the global elites who buy and sell it and run the Arts Councils that manage artistic creativity.
Sotheby’s contemporary art auction in July 2008 raised more than $1 billion which shows how the global elites are investing in art regardless of economic predictions. Their evening contemporary art sale raised 95 million pounds ($189 million), the highest total for a summer contemporary auction held in Europe and just below the overall regional record set in February. Francis Bacon’s “Study for Head of George Dyer”, the artist’s lover, fetched $27.4 million, including commission; Jean-Michel Basquiat’s “Untitled”, was sold by rock band U2 for $10.1 million. Competitors Christie’s sold art worth $172 million at its sale. Only the less important Sotheby’s contemporary day sale is left and the two main auctioneers have sold works worth just over $1 billion during the summer season, which includes impressionist, modern, post-war and contemporary art. Christie’s raised around $552 million and Sotheby’s about $449 million so far.
Senior executives are confidant that the art market will sustain soaring values in spite of falling stocks and house prices with rising oil costs. Russian elites have been a big factor in booming art sales, there is worry they may inflate impressionist prices in the same way Japanese money did around 20 years ago then disappeared causing the market to crash.
Contemporary art is the preserve of an elite, a large clique, that finance their interests through grants from the arts council, local authorities and sponsorship from global corporations. It is exhibited by commercial art galleries, private collectors, corporations, publicly funded arts organizations, contemporary art museums or by the artists themselves who are supported by grants, awards and prizes as well as by selling work. These are interlocking and exclusive relationships. Individual members of the elite are highly influential - Charles Saatchi has dominated the market in British contemporary art for twenty years and is a major sponsor and collector.
A major sponsor and collector when the English civilisation was developing was King Athelstan. His attitude and intentions show how different are the motives of sponsors at each end of this arc of culture. He used his collection in service of God and to develop something spiritual, and did so through gift. One was to Chester-le-Street, a tenth-century West Saxon codex containing Bede’s eighth-century prose and verse The Life and Miracles of St. Cuthbert, Bishop of Lindesfarne, a seventh-century monk, solitary and bishop, with a frontispiece illustrating the king presenting the book to St.Cuthbert. Together with the Cuthbert material there were episcopal and royal records in this book, including a list of popes. There is evidence that Athelstan also supported the shrines of St. John of Beverley and St. Wilfrid at Ripon. A ring preserved at Bury St. Edmunds in East Anglia bears as its inscription the names of St. John of Beverley and Athelstan (see Rollason 1989). Traditions of several churches traditions such as Malmesbury attributed their collections to his religious benevolence. The prologue to an Old English relic-list from Exeter (Rollason.), tells how royal agents purchased “with the king’s earthly treasure the most valuable treasures of all - holy relics”. A letter from the prior at St. Samson’s at Dol in Brittany is evidence of Athelstan’s interest in relics outside England.
These qualities give a clue to what creates civilisation - confidence in one’s own people and the sense of the civilisation’s permanence. Traditional masterpieces have such individual detail and are so deep one is enrapt for the entire day after first looking at a work as a whole. We need belief in our inherited values from our ancestors and to transmit them to our descendants. We know that what gives meaning to life is our emotional experience, our relationships, our beliefs and values. Our values come from a sense of continuity. We receive them from our forbears. They tell us that we have long endured and will continue to do so.
The Arts Council privileges some ethnic groups as expressed in their customary
doublespeak:-
Celebrating diversity Race, ethnicity and faith will remain major preoccupations in this country and the arts are fundamental to such debates. The arts help us to develop a sense of our identity and ourselves as individuals, as members of our communities and as a nation. The debate now also needs to encompass a richer and more broad-ranging definition of diversity. By ‘diversity’, we mean that we will respond to issues around race, ethnicity, faith, disability, sexuality, class and economic disadvantage – any social or institutional barriers that prevent people from participating in and enjoying the arts. We have a part to play in turning the diversity debate towards a positive celebration of diversity and the artistic and creative opportunities it offers. Recent progress Recently we have made real progress in this area. In 2004/05, 23% of individuals receiving our grants defined themselves as Black and minority ethnic artists We have a far-reaching race equality scheme, and require all 1,100 regularly funded organisations to have one too Our Council’s disability and Black and minority ethnic profile has improved, but we still have more to do to achieve the same profile at senior executive level We have made major interventions in theatre – demonstrated by Eclipse Theatre and in 2006 the Sustained Theatre consultation on Black performing arts We will continue with our decibel programme, to celebrate and raise the profile how Black and minority ethnic artists contribute to contemporary British culture
In contrast, ventures representative of our culture, like the
English Music Festival
are discriminated against on the grounds that they are not “inclusive.” This ideology is disseminated through the channels of communication the cultural elites control. Ethnic arts are treated with reverence - ours are dismissed.
The current chairman of Arts Council England, is Sir Christopher John Frayling an educationalist and writer known for his study of popular culture. He read history at Churchill College, Cambridge and gained a PhD in the study of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. He taught history at the University of Bath and in 1979 was appointed Professor of Cultural History at London’s post-graduate art and design school, the Royal College of Art. Since 1996 he has been Rector in charge of the College. He is also Chairman of the Design Council, Chairman of the Royal Mint Advisory Committee, and a Trustee of the Victoria and Albert Museum. He was a governor of the British Film Institute in the 1980s. He was knighted in 2001 for “Services to Art and Design Education”.
Chairwoman of the London Arts Board is Lady Sue Woodford Hollick, a businesswoman and consultant with extensive interests in broadcasting and the arts. She is a former producer and director of World in Action for Granada Television and founding Commissioning Editor of multicultural programmes at Channel 4 television. She has been Chairwoman of Arts Council England, London since September 2000 and is currently a member of the Tate Modern Advisory Council. She is founder and Co-Director of Bringing Up Baby, a childcare company and Chair of the UK board of the African Medical & Research Foundation, Africa’s leading health development organization. Her husband, Lord Hollick, is Chair of the South Bank Centre, which is funded by Arts Council England.
The usual chairman of the Turner Prize Committee is Sir Nicholas Serota who grew up in Hampstead. His mother was a Labour Minister for Health in Harold Wilson’s government, who was made a life peer and governor of the BBC. He was educated at Haberdashers’ Aske’s School and then read Economics at Christ’s Cambridge before switching to History of Art. He completed a Masters degree at the Courtauld Institute of Art under the supervision of Anthony Blunt and Anita Brookner.
In the 1990s contemporary art merged with popular culture and artists are promoted as stars. In June 2008 The Evening Standard told of the millions that Damien Hirst is spending on
the mansion
once owned by Lord Sudeley’s family. Hirst is supposedly worth £135 million. Death is a central theme in Hirst’s works like a series in which dead animals like a shark, a sheep and a cow are preserved — sometimes having been dissected — in formaldehyde. The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living is a 14-foot tiger shark immersed in formaldehyde in a vitrine. In June 2007, his Lullaby Spring sold for £9.65 million at Sotheby’s in London then in 2007, For The Love of God sold for £50 million to an anonymous investment group.
Arts Council England is the national development agency for encouraging the maggots. It distributes public money from the Government and the National Lottery to the arts organisations who share their ideology and refuse those that do not. Individuals and organisations can apply to the Arts Council for funding from its own budget or from the Lottery.
Contemporary art is negative and the practitioners use it to destroy the Art they feed off like maggots while they parasitically take what they can. They not only try to destroy art they kill their babies. Lynn Barber wrote of Tracey Emin in The Observer of 22April 2008 :” The first abortion, in 1990, was horrendously bodged because no one realised she was carrying twins: the second abortion, she says, was ‘revenge’ for the first. Contemporary art is a sort of show to shock which is a petty, destructive motive and meant to hurt innocent people. What they really enjoy is shocking elderly people and children. Of Grayson Perry’s “Barbaric Splendour” the Satchi Gallery wrote: “His form and content is always incongruous: classic Grecian-like urns bearing friezes of car-wrecks, cell-phones, supermodels, as well as more dark and literary scenes often incorporating auto-biographical references.” They need traditional art as a background, for if the old standards were truly swept away no one would be able to say, “What a provocative statement, Tracy.”
Tracey Emin was made Royal Academician by the Royal Academy of Arts On 29 March 2007. Emin joined an elite group of artists including David Hockney, Sir Peter Blake, Anthony Caro and Alison Wilding. She is now entitled to exhibit up to six works in the annual summer exhibition. Her sex-themed works on show include a Zebra with an erection - a crankshaft that operates a model of a zebra, which in turn is copulating with a model of woman in Victorian dress, as the hackneyed image of prudery. It is pretentious and has no intrinsic merit - only that bestowed by the elites. It is propaganda for Cultural Marxism. If the Victorian woman was replaced with, say, Cherie Blair or Diane Abbott the pseuds would be filled with shock and hysteria.
At the 2007 Venice Biennale Emin hosted celebrity guests, including Sir Elton John and his husband/wife David Furnish, Viscount Linley and the model Naomi Campbell. Likewise, when Jake Chapman married model Rosemary Ferguson in Christ Church, Spitalfields, among the guests were Kate Moss, Sadie Frost, Noel Gallagher’s ex-wife Meg Matthews and society photographer Sam Taylor-Wood.
A main feature of contemporary art is paedophila. Grayson Perry, the transvestite who won the Turner Prize in 2003, is known for vases depicting child abuse. Popular entertainment has drawn from the art world’s fascination with it. For example, David Bowie’s 1975 concept album “1.Outside” had a tale about the dismemberment of a teenage girl. Bowie also promoted an androgynous image with the concept album on the career of an extraterrestrial rock singer Ziggy Stardust. It was the basis for his 1972 tour, which was sponsored by The Sun newspaper, and the gigs were filmed by BBC television.
Dressed as his alter ego Claire, Grayson Perry told the Tate Exhibition 2003: “Well, it’s about time a transvestite potter won the Turner Prize. I think the art world had more trouble coming to terms with me being a potter than my choice of frocks.” Tate director and award judge, Serota said: “I don’t think the choice is a strategic choice. I think the jury felt strongly that these were the works of a very strong artist who happens to be using ceramics and drawing.”
Institutions like Serota’s manage and regulate what used to be individual inspiration within a traditional culture. So, ordinarily, crafts like textile design are excluded from contemporary art despite having large audiences at exhibitions. But it becomes a different story if they adopt the right values. Elite motives were expressed by Charles Satchi thus, “A ceramic object that is intended as a subversive comment on the nature of beauty is more likely to fit the definition of contemporary art than one that is simply beautiful.”
Perry’s “Golden Ghosts” were described by the Satchi Gallery:” Unhappy expressions on the little girls’ faces in Golden Ghosts contrast sharply with the idyllic country cottages stencilled in the background. Perry often uses found images to create a mood or a tension – the exceptionally sad image of the seated girl is that of a child affected by the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station disaster. This evocative work hints at a familiarity with psychotherapy, made at a time when Perry was coming to terms with his own unhappy past. Perry’s transvestite alter ego, Claire, appears outlined in gold as the ghost in the title, dressed in the elaborate embroidered “Coming Out Dress”, made for a performance in 2000.” As we see with Emin they do not transcend their unhappiness but spread it to others.
The Chapman brothers are conceptual artists who work together. They were part of the Young British Artists movement that was promoted by Charles Saatchi, who also sponsored Damien Hirst and Tracey Emin. Jake Chapman has published a number of catalogue essays and pieces of art criticism in his own right, as well as a book, Meatphysics in 2003. The brothers have also designed a label for Becks beer as part of a series of limited edition labels produced by contemporary artists.
Their Turner Prize exhibit for 2003 featured two new works “Sex” and “Death”. “Sex” referred their previous work “Great Deeds against the Dead”. The original work shows three dismembered corpses hanging from a tree, “Sex” shows the same scene, but in a further state of decay. Clown’s noses have been added to the skulls of the corpses while snakes, rats and insects, similar to ones in joke shops, cover the piece. “Death” is two sex dolls, placed on top of each other, head-to-toe in the soixante-neuf position.
The next step down to total degradation is cruelty to animals and bestiality. In a declining civilisation art becomes corrupted and is a measure of the health - or sickness, actually - of a civilisation. The Romans sank into a debased barbarism by slaughter in the amphitheatre. Our deterioration into barbarism is moving from images to the reality. In popular entertainment like “I’m a Celebrity Get Me out of Here”, simple people, described as Celebrities, are so degraded as to be led into eating live worms and stick insects. There are several levels to this: there is cruelty to lesser animals; encouraging children to eat insects and slugs in the garden ;and the move towards ever more degradation of our people and culture.
This is a world-wide decadence: In 2007, a Costa Rican ‘artist’ Guillermo Vargas Habacuc caught a stray dog on the street and tied it by a short leash to the wall of an art gallery and left it to die of hunger and thirst while cultural elites watched. The Central American Biennial of Art has decided that this was art and has asked Vargas Habacuc to repeat this “installation” at the Biennial of 2008. This was sanctioned by a public body run by the country’s elites. It is not clear that they really did starve the dog and it might be just to shock or get publicity to sell something. But it shows how truly disgusting these people are. The “artist” explained, “I knew the dog died on the following day from lack of food. During the inauguration, I knew that the dog was persecuted in the evening between the houses of aluminum and cardboard in a district of Managua. Five children who helped to capture the dog received 10 bonds of córdobas for their assistance. The name of the dog was Natividad, and I let him die of hunger in the sight of everyone, as if the death of a poor dog was a shameless media show in which nobody does anything but to applaud or to watch disturbed. In the place that the dog was exposed remain a metal cable and a cord. The dog was extremely ill and did not want to eat, so in natural surroundings it would have died anyway; thus they are all poor stray dogs: sooner or later they die or are killed.”
A couple of decades ago an artist castrated himself in an exhibition in London which was presumably funded by the Arts Council! One would wonder how this or the starving of a dog is art. The setting does not make it art. It makes it torture set in an art gallery. It is what the elites want from an artistic subject. It is not what we want. For us, art has to be intrinsically artistic in that it it is something that produces an affect on our emotions ranging from pleasing to spiritual. It triggers something aspirational or transcendent as the subject is transformed by human imagination and skill. Art begins as wholesome and aspiring to the spiritual. But in a declining civilisation it becomes corrupted and corrupting. The debased slaughter in the amphitheatre marked the Roman decline into barbarism. Ours is marked by, among other things, the degeneracy and cruelty of anti-art.
To combat the anti-art movement a young artist would need not only great talent but also independence of mind and an imagination developed through respectful study of tradition and a sense of reverence for God and his creation. He would also need the courage to stand alone against the artists and elites who have a stranglehold on artistic productions and the colleges that pass the fashionable methods on. The brave one would need to study the great masterpieces and find an appropriate tradition to link to, and begin reviving our civilisation.
Monday, 30 June 2008
Nationalist Conservatism
Nationalist Conservatism by David Hamilton
Conservatism was an attempt to preserve traditional ways and differed from Liberalism but became Liberal, Classical then Social Democratic - abstract rights, capitalism, economics, laissez faire and self interest- now Cultural Marxism. Like the other parties they offer the electorate incentives to get into power and at election time pretend they will introduce popular policies like controlling immigration but once in office pursue their own agenda. This should be a criminal offence and the Party name subject to trading standards law. Academic Conservatives have tried to revive Conservatism by turning it into a competing ideology but it has no goal only living life by belonging to a historical community and culture and passing it on to one’s children. It is not a different opinion in a rational debate but an attitude and temperament in life. Rational plans and formulae are for the rationalist-ideologues: which is why these are “intimations” not a blueprint and cannot be stated a priori like utopian ideologies. There is more to human nature than reason. It is not just reaction to current dominant doctrines nor a rejection of future utopias as fantasy in order to re-live a past utopia, not an attempt to turn back the clock to a bygone time but is a traditional way of thinking and feeling for one’s own ethnic community.
The turning point is now as we who feel alienated and dispossessed begin re-developing a tradition for our common good and to revive our collapsing civilisation. We value wisdom over rationalist ideologies.Wisdom is passed down by tradition, especially the family and develops from naivety through learning the lessons of life, how people behave and what they are capable of doing to each other, to practical wisdom which we pass it on to our children to prepare them for life. Received ideology is arrested development.We are born into a family, community and nation with history, culture and a civilisation that pre-exist us and we imbibe it as we grow up: It lives in us, and we in it. This has a conscious and an unconscious effect which makes us what we are. We have piety for our past and reverence for the achievements of our ancestors and a duty to pass it on to our descendants. It is an affective relationship that endures in time not a rationalisation into independent individuals interacting; much less the Cultural Marxist prejudice of slotting selected groups - blacks, homosexuals and women - into abstract categories with legal privileges. We belong to a nation as Edmund Burke explained: “A nation is not an idea only of' local extent, and individual momentary aggregation: but it is an idea of' continuity which extends in time as well as in numbers and in space. And this is a choice not of one day, or one set of people, not a tumultuary and giddy choice; it is a deliberate election of the ages and of generations; it is a constitution made by what is ten thousand times better than choice, it is made by the peculiar circumstances, occasions, tempers, dispositions, and moral and special habitudes of' the people, which disclose themselves only in a long space of time(1)
Enoch Powell defined our belonging succinctly in the debate on the 1981 British Nationality Act “Your nation is who you will fight for.” T.S.Eliot, our ways, ”… the term culture... includes all the characteristic activities and interests of -a people: Derby Day, Henley Regatta, Cowes, the twelfth of August, a cup final, the dog races, the pin table, the dart board, Wensleydale cheese, boiled cabbage cut into sections, beetroot in vinegar, nineteenth century Gothic churches and the music of Elgar.” (2)
Our Christian faith activates our spiritual natures but Ideology is a secular religion which replaces national religion and having no spiritual content gives rise to earthly fanaticism. It has nothing transcendent only a forced move towards utopia on earth instead of heaven. This developed from the French Enlightenment: one of the most significant events in human history that changed the human focus from looking back to the past for wisdom, the Bible, Aristotle and Plato, say, to working towards a vague, future utopia. It requires an idea of the person as abstract and malleable, with substance removed conceptually to fit them into a mental blueprint for utopia - Marxism's classless society, the feminists’ androgynous society, the liberal brotherhood of man and the Nazis' thousand year Reich of pure Aryans. The present Utopia is the coffee coloured, Multi-Racial society. Norman Pannell urged a practical approach to immigration at the 1958 and 1961 Conservative conferences suggesting immigrants have health checks and those who are criminal be deported; Colonial Secretary Iain Macleod countered at a fringe meeting with his utopian belief in the brotherhood of man.
The Ten Commandments are duties which have been more important than rights in our historical and cultural achievement with the greatest art, literature and music inspired by God. A nation based on the duty of men and women is conscientious about responsibilities and obligations: a right-centred society is one in which individuals assert their personal desires. They are encouraged by Human Rights Acts to demand rights, with no consideration for the consequences of those demands on other people, like the right to protest and demonstrate conflicts with the right of pedestrians and motorists to use the public roads. Human Rights are the modern Rights of Man. Conservatives believe in liberty but derived from belonging to a nation and is opposed to the universal, abstract rights of liberals and the group rights of cultural Marxists.Because of the Human Rights Act “travellers” are being given our countryside. They buy farming land and convert it into caravan parks, then claim right of settlement.
In the Spectator of December 17th 2005 philosopher Roger Scruton urged rural residents to save their countryside by clubbing together and buying it. Rural communities should “take power into their own hands” as they had shown that the Hunting Act cannot be enforced we must now rescue our countryside from outsiders who are favoured by the Government. Neighbours (we) should club together to buy small parcels of land from desperate farmers then rent it back at a peppercorn rent.” They have done this in Professor Scruton’s neighbourhood and saved them from both travellers and agribusinesses.The Conservative sense of nation was described by Cambridge don Dr John Casey in an address to the Conservative Philosophy Group. In the nineteenth century,” culture was taken to be the whole life of the people, and not just its highest achievements in, say, the fine arts. This involved an attempt to understand society and the nation through the sum total of its practices, traditions and institutions. This tradition of thought has always had political implications, since the public institutions of the nation - religious and political - are clearly part of the whole life of the people. And the term most frequently invoked to express the whole life of the people, including the sense of itself as a political entity, was nation. The idea of the nation was something that could include the life of local communities, relations between classes, and indeed all those ways in which people impose a sense of themselves upon merely economic arrangements.” (3)
He was persecuted and recanted but it still stands as an example of how we can become homogenous again safe from imported gang murders, muggings and Muslim bomb attacks.Civilisation is created by effort and genius and must be renewed daily but is being undermined by our rulers for a new world order. Through studying history we learn that civilisations decline and fall when they become decadent and the people indulgent, as in Egypt and Rome which is why history is being phased out of state education. People expect the state to solve their problems and spoiling them makes them dependent for not only material needs but their beliefs which are provided by the media and opinion formers so they become decadent and indulgent. Discrimination against us is presented as moral superiority - affirmative action. We who have emotionally bonded with our people and territory and belong here are being dispossessed by our rulers for unrealistic hopes of one world and those they brought here as cheap labour. It takes totalitarianism to make disparate groups unite and our lives are being increasingly regulated. A hospital visit needs a password and our confidential relations with our G.P.s have been destroyed now that our personal medical histories are put on a national database. We are becoming state property.The “Enlightened” ruling and cultural elites try to dismiss our views as prejudice but when examined their views are rationalisations of their prejudice in favour of other ethnic groups.
In fact it is more accurate to define our ruling elites as an “Ideological Caste” because only those who think and act in the correct way are admitted and any who say the wrong thing are forced to publicly apologise or destroyed. London's Science Museum cancelled a talk by Nobel prize-winning geneticist Dr James Watson, winner of a Nobel Prize for his part in discovering the structure of DNA, had been due to speak at the museum, because he suggested black people were less intelligent than white people. Watson, told The Sunday Times he was "inherently gloomy about the prospects of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours -- whereas all the testing says not really." The Science Museum, said "We know that eminent scientists can sometimes say things that cause controversy and the Science Museum does not shy away from debating controversial topics...However we feel that Dr Watson has gone beyond the point of acceptable debate and we are, as a result, cancelling his talk." Where was their reasoned argument? That was naked prejudice on their part. Sir Winston Churchill tried to heal the rupture in our national continuity in 1955 by having a bill to control immigration drawn up which was not ready until June, two months after he stepped down because of his health. He wanted the Conservative party to adopt the slogan “Keep England White.” (4)
The fifth Marquess of Salisbury, grandson of the great Conservative Prime Minister and descendent of Lord Burleigh adviser to Queen Elizabeth1, wrote to Viscount Swinton in 1954, in a letter preserved at the Public Records Office, ”We are faced with a problem which, …With each year that passes, and with the general improvement with methods of transportation, the flow increases. Indeed, if something is not done to check it now, I should not be at all surprised if the problem became quite unmanageable in twenty or thirty years time. We might well be faced with very much the same type of appalling issue that is now causing such great difficulties for the United States. The main cause of this sudden inflow of blacks is of course the Welfare State. So long as the antiquated rule obtains that any British subject can come into this country without any limitation at all, these people will pour in to take advantage of our social services and other amenities and we shall have no protection at all.” That Queen Elizabeth I had “Blackamoors” expelled from her realm in 1601 shows what a Conservative value it is.The Daily Telegraph of 4/10/07 reported, “Foreign criminals are moving out of big cities and infiltrating rural towns and villages. The gangs include Jamaican "Yardies" selling crack in Hereford and Cambridgeshire, Chinese criminals called "Snakeheads" in Lancashire and Norfolk, Albanians running prostitution rings in Hampshire and Colombian cocaine networks in Chelmsford, Essex.A television series, “ Crime Invasion — Britain's New Underworld”, for the Virgin 1 satellite channel, was presented by Rageh Omaar, a journalist who has worked for the BBC. Omaar said: "Crime in the UK is changing and making the series has shown me that it is happening right underneath our noses." The chief constable of Cambridgeshire, Julie Spence, has said that immigrant workers were importing their national feuds and criminal behaviour to rural England.”Democracy is a myth. Few people bother to vote. It attracts inadequate and ignoble people to office because it involves bribing and deceiving people into voting for them; it attracts hypocrites who preach family values and commit adultery or who preach equality but send their own children to public schools. As few voters read the parties manifestoes they have no mandate. The main issues are general movements that political parties conform to, not attached to a political party. In our time it is multi-racialism and all three follow it. Culture is treated as independent of people and anyone can come and adopt it like putting on and taking off clothes. Aristocracy is a form of rule that suggests permanence and continuity as they embody the nation and its traditions. A warrior class based on the land, their duty was to defend the nation was well as rule it. The House of Lords must be re-created as the new chamber will be for rewarding members of the political elite and to stack decisions in the elites favour. Only the gullible think this will be democratic. It is part of the ongoing takeover of our lives by moneyed elites whose loyalty is to themselves and whose vision is the dissolution of our nation for unworkable Globalist aims. They are using people for cheap labour - both outsourced and imported. Re-creating the Lords will be a step back to aristocratic and monarchical rule. Rights were demands of the capitalists that led the French Revolution. Our main historical references are the American and French revolutions and the nationalist revolutions of 1848. It began the destruction of the natural order of sceptre and crown for rule of the Liberal-Capitalist class where membership was not by blood but money. They wanted the disestablishment of religion, the dissolution of nationhood, the denial of race as a social factor, and finally World Government or Utopia. The media elites manipulate the masses into supporting these ideas. The main issues of the day are movements that political parties conform to: they are not attached to particular parties and the major movement of our time is multi-racialism and all three parties conform to it.Traditional prejudice conveys wisdom to new generations but Liberals and cultural Marxists think they have transcended prejudice yet beneath their high-mindedness is the prejudice that immigrants are essentially good but whites are essentially bad and they take sides with immigrants a priori - the rationalisation comes after: “They are going to become English”, “they are bringing diversity”; “Islam the religion of peace”, “they are enriching our culture”, “the hospitals could not run without them”, “we need their doctors”. This justifies them asset stripping the third world of workers and doctors. It is motivated not by guilt but shame: if you feel guilty you are remorseful and seek to make amends which our elites do not do but direct immigrants into our communities so we are used to make amends for them. They live in lovely areas or safely in gated communities while ordinary people get mugged, burgled and raped, and put at risk of Aids and T.B. They do not spoil their own areas but use worthy causes like Campaign for the Preservation of Rural England to preserve them. When centres for asylum seekers are proposed for the countryside, the elites are in uproar to keep them out. Political, intellectual and corporate elites are selfish and think only of themselves. The one gets cheap labour, the others pose as moral beacons to the un-enlightened. They loathe their own people and do not care how much we suffer as long as they feel virtuous. Many illegals work unlawfully long hours for almost nothing and have their liberty restricted by their masters and classic hypocrisy is the elites apologising for historic slavery while importing wage slaves! This is opposite of the Conservative virtue Noblesse Oblige: the obligations of the noble to the lower orders who reciprocate by loyalty and service. Modern Noblesse Oblige would be adopting economic protectionism. This value was preserved in opponents of immigration including working-class Socialists as the British are naturally Conservative.
In the Commons immigration debate on the 5th of December 1958 Labour’s Frank Tomney (Hammersmith), remarked “We have been sent here by the electorate to give expression to issues which concern them.” Conservative Cyril Osborne (Louth) 25th March 1965 spoke up for the working class in an immigration debate in the House of Commons. He said that in 1958 he could see the social evils and could still see them, “…for more than ten years I have begged this house – my own side as well as the party opposite – to face this problem which haunted me, as it still haunts me because I could see the social evils”. If anything goes wrong it cannot be others so they blame their own people and the connative word is “racism”. It is only applied to whites. We are the scapegoats for the setbacks on the road to their utopia. The ideas that we are told rule our lives are but rhetoric.
Equality masks hierarchy. Dr.Frank Ellis left Leeds University after an Inquisition for speaking of, amongst other things, “humane repatriation.” The University stated: “Dr Ellis has acted in breach of our equality and diversity policy, and in a way that is wholly at odds with our values. Second, in publicising his personal views on race, Dr Ellis has recklessly jeopardised the fulfilment of the University’s obligations under the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000. As a public body, the University is required under that Act to promote good relations between people of different racial groups.” Modern society has been built on the foundation of "equality" and therefore statements like this type threaten its roots. The analogy with the 17th century Papacy persecuting Galileo is apposite. Yet the elites are a hierarchy. The law was passed by the rulers then acted on by bureaucrats and academics lower down the hierarchy and finally the students protested obediently. Equality is imposed from the top, down a hierarchical chain of authority. That is the natural state and our recognition of natural hierarchy is only acknowledging what Liberals and Cultural Marxists try to deny!Nationalist Conservatives are protective of civil society which took centuries to grow! If we are split up by introducing masses of aliens, the basis of civility, which is trust, is destroyedbecause they have different ambitions and goals and each group become rivals and neither we nor they, know when historical enmity will surface.A major value is Tradition: ribs that hold communities together. One of the most important is our language and there is a new political vocabulary developing, un-self consciously. Take the word English. During the Empire the home countries were subsumed under the word British and it is PC to say British now but people are describing themselves as English, Scottish, Welsh and Ulster to emphasise their national identity. This happened with flags and the authorities’ rationalisation against is re-claim them from extremists! We need a concrete vocabulary with which to explicate the world around us and describe human nature. The Welsh have it right in their great anthem “Land of my Fathers”. “English” is changing as the English affirm their collective identity, mentally disentangle from the EU and the term British disintegrates. This reflects change in British relationships. Country is vapid but land means something. Anglo Saxon words are folksy and Latin more abstract so our political vocabulary requires old English words. Joseph de Maistre, the Savoyard counter-revolutionary, encapsulated the unreality of abstractions in his famous quote, ”In the course of my life I have seen Frenchmen, Italians, Russians; ... but man I have never met” The ruling bureaucrats of the E.U. and our regional Government are restricting our vocabularies through P.C. so that we speak and think in the way they want us to, and are devising an artificial way of describing Muslims to avoid calling some terrorists. This totalitarian control of thought through language began with the French revolutionaries, was continued by the Bolsheviks, Mao’s cultural revolution and in the west by cultural Marxists with their gradual cultural revolution.
Take our degraded art and literature: it is for talented people to re-link with spiritually uplifting art and re-grow it. For example, in Poetry, re-link with our original Anglo-Saxon forms such as the beautiful internal rhyme of alliteration, whereas end rhyme is dull and monotonous; or, Medieval because of the importance of Ballads as a vehicle to convey our suffering under our elected representatives who are against us. The matter of Robin Hood and the Sheriff of Nottingham is precedent.The family is exemplified in Monarchy. The institution of Monarchy is the embodiment of the nation and the Monarch is on our stamps, our court cases are Regina v X; we walk and drive on the Queen’s highway. The throne goes automatically to her successor. It is not the person but the office. The king is dead long live the king. It is continuity but also has a deep archetypal import that touches our deepest instincts. The natural form of Government is absolute Monarchy. It is the summum bonum of our family system and the family is its reflection. King and Queen are Father and Mother of the nation. Our current royal family are badly advised and reflect the general chaos instead of setting an example. I once read that the Queen Mother liked Ali G! This is propaganda to make them more ordinary in deference to demands by the tabloids and their global-elite owners but has made them contemptible. We must begin working towards absolute monarchy. They have archetypal importance to their people and a relationship with the whole nation not certain classes and factions.
From the fifth Commandment we learn to honour our mothers and fathers. The family is the beginning of civilisation and we have warnings from one-parent families to go by - the misery and trouble they are often in. The bonds that unite us are affective not rational - we feel that we belong and are comfortable. We feel at home. We like our land because we have bonded with it and this bond has been sanctified by time. These affections grow naturally within the family where responsibility for our community begins and is perpetuated in creating and rearing children and renewing our community so what was handed down to us is passed on. Homosexuals do not have this fulfilment as they have no further stage to move onto and remain in adolescence.
Our babies have been devalued as little more than attributes of the woman’s body, her rights are paramount and the father does not count. Abortion is erasing our posterity and 6 million babies have been killed since the 1967 Abortion Act!Fetishism is being popularised by our cultural and intellectual elites. This is deriving thrills from injury and degradation. It is the erotic form of hatred and consent is no excuse because if not countered evil spreads and soon those who do not consent will be abused and bullied by perverts. With outside forces working to destroy our boys and girls parents must regain sovereignty over their families and take responsibility for their children and Home School to rescue them from state corruption which is teaching them to give their land away and to become sexual perverts.
An early progressive William Godwin wrote in Political Justice(1793) that marriage and parental duties are irrational and believed as utopians do that society would become better and that men and women would in the future not behave so narrowly but for the benefit of everyone. The family is not narrow: its influences emanate outwards. Nearly all our traditions and institutions have been destroyed so we are going to have to re-link with many of them and grow others from our roots. The cultural Marxists are planning “Faith Schools” to allow other ethnic groups to instil standards of behaviour and education but try to ruin ours. Jim Knight, the schools minister, was reported in the Daily Telegraph of 8 October 2007 as saying the Government was considering how to simplify the balloting process adopted under 1998 legislation.” Ministers are paved the way for the adoption of fresh powers to abolish academically selective education. They said parents should get the chance to force the closure of grammar schools in their area if the majority of families opposed selection by ability. Jim Knight, the schools minister, said the Government was considering how to simplify the balloting process adopted under 1998 legislation in which schools could be forced to drop the 11-plus.”
The education Guardian on Monday June 25, 2007 told us the other part of the political elite the Conservative party ”announced last month that if it won the next general election there would be no return to grammar schools on the grounds that they do little to benefit children from poorer backgrounds. Instead, the party has promised to continue Tony Blair's flagship education reform and support the expansion of the academy schools programme - independent state schools sponsored by business.”We must counter these attempts to destroy our children by cultural Marxists. Parents must take back responsibility for their sons and daughters from the state. We need to re-introduce grammar Schools or even found new public schools to impart traditional values like honour, duty and service; others must consider Home Schooling networks to give their young the standard of education the state schools are denying them and to instil self-worth and a sense of belonging instead of teaching them to give up their country to outsiders and to become sexual perverts. We must revive local fairs and festivals and develop our Folk music traditions by taking traditional forms but using words and sentiments suitable for our present time to express our sufferings under the elites. These are not rationalist formulae but suggestions for our creative young people to develop in practice. They will forge natural, emotional bonds with their own people, their traditions and civilisation.
1. Reflections on the Revolution in France.
2. Notes Towards a Definition of Culture. T.S.Eliot
3. Peter Hennessy, 'Having It So Good - Britain in the Fifties' (Allen Lane, 2006) p 224. Hennessy's reference is: Peter Catterall (ed.), 'The Macmillan Diaries: The Cabinet Years, 1950-1957' (Macmillan, 2003) p 382.
4. Salisbury Review. Autumn 1982.
See also: pat buchanan.org. November 1998; and "Death of the West” 2002.(St.Martins Press); “"State of Emergency” (2006.St.Martins Press)
Michael Oakeshott.1948.Rationalism in Politics.(Methuen)
James Burnham.1964.Suicide of the West.
Conservatism was an attempt to preserve traditional ways and differed from Liberalism but became Liberal, Classical then Social Democratic - abstract rights, capitalism, economics, laissez faire and self interest- now Cultural Marxism. Like the other parties they offer the electorate incentives to get into power and at election time pretend they will introduce popular policies like controlling immigration but once in office pursue their own agenda. This should be a criminal offence and the Party name subject to trading standards law. Academic Conservatives have tried to revive Conservatism by turning it into a competing ideology but it has no goal only living life by belonging to a historical community and culture and passing it on to one’s children. It is not a different opinion in a rational debate but an attitude and temperament in life. Rational plans and formulae are for the rationalist-ideologues: which is why these are “intimations” not a blueprint and cannot be stated a priori like utopian ideologies. There is more to human nature than reason. It is not just reaction to current dominant doctrines nor a rejection of future utopias as fantasy in order to re-live a past utopia, not an attempt to turn back the clock to a bygone time but is a traditional way of thinking and feeling for one’s own ethnic community.
The turning point is now as we who feel alienated and dispossessed begin re-developing a tradition for our common good and to revive our collapsing civilisation. We value wisdom over rationalist ideologies.Wisdom is passed down by tradition, especially the family and develops from naivety through learning the lessons of life, how people behave and what they are capable of doing to each other, to practical wisdom which we pass it on to our children to prepare them for life. Received ideology is arrested development.We are born into a family, community and nation with history, culture and a civilisation that pre-exist us and we imbibe it as we grow up: It lives in us, and we in it. This has a conscious and an unconscious effect which makes us what we are. We have piety for our past and reverence for the achievements of our ancestors and a duty to pass it on to our descendants. It is an affective relationship that endures in time not a rationalisation into independent individuals interacting; much less the Cultural Marxist prejudice of slotting selected groups - blacks, homosexuals and women - into abstract categories with legal privileges. We belong to a nation as Edmund Burke explained: “A nation is not an idea only of' local extent, and individual momentary aggregation: but it is an idea of' continuity which extends in time as well as in numbers and in space. And this is a choice not of one day, or one set of people, not a tumultuary and giddy choice; it is a deliberate election of the ages and of generations; it is a constitution made by what is ten thousand times better than choice, it is made by the peculiar circumstances, occasions, tempers, dispositions, and moral and special habitudes of' the people, which disclose themselves only in a long space of time(1)
Enoch Powell defined our belonging succinctly in the debate on the 1981 British Nationality Act “Your nation is who you will fight for.” T.S.Eliot, our ways, ”… the term culture... includes all the characteristic activities and interests of -a people: Derby Day, Henley Regatta, Cowes, the twelfth of August, a cup final, the dog races, the pin table, the dart board, Wensleydale cheese, boiled cabbage cut into sections, beetroot in vinegar, nineteenth century Gothic churches and the music of Elgar.” (2)
Our Christian faith activates our spiritual natures but Ideology is a secular religion which replaces national religion and having no spiritual content gives rise to earthly fanaticism. It has nothing transcendent only a forced move towards utopia on earth instead of heaven. This developed from the French Enlightenment: one of the most significant events in human history that changed the human focus from looking back to the past for wisdom, the Bible, Aristotle and Plato, say, to working towards a vague, future utopia. It requires an idea of the person as abstract and malleable, with substance removed conceptually to fit them into a mental blueprint for utopia - Marxism's classless society, the feminists’ androgynous society, the liberal brotherhood of man and the Nazis' thousand year Reich of pure Aryans. The present Utopia is the coffee coloured, Multi-Racial society. Norman Pannell urged a practical approach to immigration at the 1958 and 1961 Conservative conferences suggesting immigrants have health checks and those who are criminal be deported; Colonial Secretary Iain Macleod countered at a fringe meeting with his utopian belief in the brotherhood of man.
The Ten Commandments are duties which have been more important than rights in our historical and cultural achievement with the greatest art, literature and music inspired by God. A nation based on the duty of men and women is conscientious about responsibilities and obligations: a right-centred society is one in which individuals assert their personal desires. They are encouraged by Human Rights Acts to demand rights, with no consideration for the consequences of those demands on other people, like the right to protest and demonstrate conflicts with the right of pedestrians and motorists to use the public roads. Human Rights are the modern Rights of Man. Conservatives believe in liberty but derived from belonging to a nation and is opposed to the universal, abstract rights of liberals and the group rights of cultural Marxists.Because of the Human Rights Act “travellers” are being given our countryside. They buy farming land and convert it into caravan parks, then claim right of settlement.
In the Spectator of December 17th 2005 philosopher Roger Scruton urged rural residents to save their countryside by clubbing together and buying it. Rural communities should “take power into their own hands” as they had shown that the Hunting Act cannot be enforced we must now rescue our countryside from outsiders who are favoured by the Government. Neighbours (we) should club together to buy small parcels of land from desperate farmers then rent it back at a peppercorn rent.” They have done this in Professor Scruton’s neighbourhood and saved them from both travellers and agribusinesses.The Conservative sense of nation was described by Cambridge don Dr John Casey in an address to the Conservative Philosophy Group. In the nineteenth century,” culture was taken to be the whole life of the people, and not just its highest achievements in, say, the fine arts. This involved an attempt to understand society and the nation through the sum total of its practices, traditions and institutions. This tradition of thought has always had political implications, since the public institutions of the nation - religious and political - are clearly part of the whole life of the people. And the term most frequently invoked to express the whole life of the people, including the sense of itself as a political entity, was nation. The idea of the nation was something that could include the life of local communities, relations between classes, and indeed all those ways in which people impose a sense of themselves upon merely economic arrangements.” (3)
He was persecuted and recanted but it still stands as an example of how we can become homogenous again safe from imported gang murders, muggings and Muslim bomb attacks.Civilisation is created by effort and genius and must be renewed daily but is being undermined by our rulers for a new world order. Through studying history we learn that civilisations decline and fall when they become decadent and the people indulgent, as in Egypt and Rome which is why history is being phased out of state education. People expect the state to solve their problems and spoiling them makes them dependent for not only material needs but their beliefs which are provided by the media and opinion formers so they become decadent and indulgent. Discrimination against us is presented as moral superiority - affirmative action. We who have emotionally bonded with our people and territory and belong here are being dispossessed by our rulers for unrealistic hopes of one world and those they brought here as cheap labour. It takes totalitarianism to make disparate groups unite and our lives are being increasingly regulated. A hospital visit needs a password and our confidential relations with our G.P.s have been destroyed now that our personal medical histories are put on a national database. We are becoming state property.The “Enlightened” ruling and cultural elites try to dismiss our views as prejudice but when examined their views are rationalisations of their prejudice in favour of other ethnic groups.
In fact it is more accurate to define our ruling elites as an “Ideological Caste” because only those who think and act in the correct way are admitted and any who say the wrong thing are forced to publicly apologise or destroyed. London's Science Museum cancelled a talk by Nobel prize-winning geneticist Dr James Watson, winner of a Nobel Prize for his part in discovering the structure of DNA, had been due to speak at the museum, because he suggested black people were less intelligent than white people. Watson, told The Sunday Times he was "inherently gloomy about the prospects of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours -- whereas all the testing says not really." The Science Museum, said "We know that eminent scientists can sometimes say things that cause controversy and the Science Museum does not shy away from debating controversial topics...However we feel that Dr Watson has gone beyond the point of acceptable debate and we are, as a result, cancelling his talk." Where was their reasoned argument? That was naked prejudice on their part. Sir Winston Churchill tried to heal the rupture in our national continuity in 1955 by having a bill to control immigration drawn up which was not ready until June, two months after he stepped down because of his health. He wanted the Conservative party to adopt the slogan “Keep England White.” (4)
The fifth Marquess of Salisbury, grandson of the great Conservative Prime Minister and descendent of Lord Burleigh adviser to Queen Elizabeth1, wrote to Viscount Swinton in 1954, in a letter preserved at the Public Records Office, ”We are faced with a problem which, …With each year that passes, and with the general improvement with methods of transportation, the flow increases. Indeed, if something is not done to check it now, I should not be at all surprised if the problem became quite unmanageable in twenty or thirty years time. We might well be faced with very much the same type of appalling issue that is now causing such great difficulties for the United States. The main cause of this sudden inflow of blacks is of course the Welfare State. So long as the antiquated rule obtains that any British subject can come into this country without any limitation at all, these people will pour in to take advantage of our social services and other amenities and we shall have no protection at all.” That Queen Elizabeth I had “Blackamoors” expelled from her realm in 1601 shows what a Conservative value it is.The Daily Telegraph of 4/10/07 reported, “Foreign criminals are moving out of big cities and infiltrating rural towns and villages. The gangs include Jamaican "Yardies" selling crack in Hereford and Cambridgeshire, Chinese criminals called "Snakeheads" in Lancashire and Norfolk, Albanians running prostitution rings in Hampshire and Colombian cocaine networks in Chelmsford, Essex.A television series, “ Crime Invasion — Britain's New Underworld”, for the Virgin 1 satellite channel, was presented by Rageh Omaar, a journalist who has worked for the BBC. Omaar said: "Crime in the UK is changing and making the series has shown me that it is happening right underneath our noses." The chief constable of Cambridgeshire, Julie Spence, has said that immigrant workers were importing their national feuds and criminal behaviour to rural England.”Democracy is a myth. Few people bother to vote. It attracts inadequate and ignoble people to office because it involves bribing and deceiving people into voting for them; it attracts hypocrites who preach family values and commit adultery or who preach equality but send their own children to public schools. As few voters read the parties manifestoes they have no mandate. The main issues are general movements that political parties conform to, not attached to a political party. In our time it is multi-racialism and all three follow it. Culture is treated as independent of people and anyone can come and adopt it like putting on and taking off clothes. Aristocracy is a form of rule that suggests permanence and continuity as they embody the nation and its traditions. A warrior class based on the land, their duty was to defend the nation was well as rule it. The House of Lords must be re-created as the new chamber will be for rewarding members of the political elite and to stack decisions in the elites favour. Only the gullible think this will be democratic. It is part of the ongoing takeover of our lives by moneyed elites whose loyalty is to themselves and whose vision is the dissolution of our nation for unworkable Globalist aims. They are using people for cheap labour - both outsourced and imported. Re-creating the Lords will be a step back to aristocratic and monarchical rule. Rights were demands of the capitalists that led the French Revolution. Our main historical references are the American and French revolutions and the nationalist revolutions of 1848. It began the destruction of the natural order of sceptre and crown for rule of the Liberal-Capitalist class where membership was not by blood but money. They wanted the disestablishment of religion, the dissolution of nationhood, the denial of race as a social factor, and finally World Government or Utopia. The media elites manipulate the masses into supporting these ideas. The main issues of the day are movements that political parties conform to: they are not attached to particular parties and the major movement of our time is multi-racialism and all three parties conform to it.Traditional prejudice conveys wisdom to new generations but Liberals and cultural Marxists think they have transcended prejudice yet beneath their high-mindedness is the prejudice that immigrants are essentially good but whites are essentially bad and they take sides with immigrants a priori - the rationalisation comes after: “They are going to become English”, “they are bringing diversity”; “Islam the religion of peace”, “they are enriching our culture”, “the hospitals could not run without them”, “we need their doctors”. This justifies them asset stripping the third world of workers and doctors. It is motivated not by guilt but shame: if you feel guilty you are remorseful and seek to make amends which our elites do not do but direct immigrants into our communities so we are used to make amends for them. They live in lovely areas or safely in gated communities while ordinary people get mugged, burgled and raped, and put at risk of Aids and T.B. They do not spoil their own areas but use worthy causes like Campaign for the Preservation of Rural England to preserve them. When centres for asylum seekers are proposed for the countryside, the elites are in uproar to keep them out. Political, intellectual and corporate elites are selfish and think only of themselves. The one gets cheap labour, the others pose as moral beacons to the un-enlightened. They loathe their own people and do not care how much we suffer as long as they feel virtuous. Many illegals work unlawfully long hours for almost nothing and have their liberty restricted by their masters and classic hypocrisy is the elites apologising for historic slavery while importing wage slaves! This is opposite of the Conservative virtue Noblesse Oblige: the obligations of the noble to the lower orders who reciprocate by loyalty and service. Modern Noblesse Oblige would be adopting economic protectionism. This value was preserved in opponents of immigration including working-class Socialists as the British are naturally Conservative.
In the Commons immigration debate on the 5th of December 1958 Labour’s Frank Tomney (Hammersmith), remarked “We have been sent here by the electorate to give expression to issues which concern them.” Conservative Cyril Osborne (Louth) 25th March 1965 spoke up for the working class in an immigration debate in the House of Commons. He said that in 1958 he could see the social evils and could still see them, “…for more than ten years I have begged this house – my own side as well as the party opposite – to face this problem which haunted me, as it still haunts me because I could see the social evils”. If anything goes wrong it cannot be others so they blame their own people and the connative word is “racism”. It is only applied to whites. We are the scapegoats for the setbacks on the road to their utopia. The ideas that we are told rule our lives are but rhetoric.
Equality masks hierarchy. Dr.Frank Ellis left Leeds University after an Inquisition for speaking of, amongst other things, “humane repatriation.” The University stated: “Dr Ellis has acted in breach of our equality and diversity policy, and in a way that is wholly at odds with our values. Second, in publicising his personal views on race, Dr Ellis has recklessly jeopardised the fulfilment of the University’s obligations under the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000. As a public body, the University is required under that Act to promote good relations between people of different racial groups.” Modern society has been built on the foundation of "equality" and therefore statements like this type threaten its roots. The analogy with the 17th century Papacy persecuting Galileo is apposite. Yet the elites are a hierarchy. The law was passed by the rulers then acted on by bureaucrats and academics lower down the hierarchy and finally the students protested obediently. Equality is imposed from the top, down a hierarchical chain of authority. That is the natural state and our recognition of natural hierarchy is only acknowledging what Liberals and Cultural Marxists try to deny!Nationalist Conservatives are protective of civil society which took centuries to grow! If we are split up by introducing masses of aliens, the basis of civility, which is trust, is destroyedbecause they have different ambitions and goals and each group become rivals and neither we nor they, know when historical enmity will surface.A major value is Tradition: ribs that hold communities together. One of the most important is our language and there is a new political vocabulary developing, un-self consciously. Take the word English. During the Empire the home countries were subsumed under the word British and it is PC to say British now but people are describing themselves as English, Scottish, Welsh and Ulster to emphasise their national identity. This happened with flags and the authorities’ rationalisation against is re-claim them from extremists! We need a concrete vocabulary with which to explicate the world around us and describe human nature. The Welsh have it right in their great anthem “Land of my Fathers”. “English” is changing as the English affirm their collective identity, mentally disentangle from the EU and the term British disintegrates. This reflects change in British relationships. Country is vapid but land means something. Anglo Saxon words are folksy and Latin more abstract so our political vocabulary requires old English words. Joseph de Maistre, the Savoyard counter-revolutionary, encapsulated the unreality of abstractions in his famous quote, ”In the course of my life I have seen Frenchmen, Italians, Russians; ... but man I have never met” The ruling bureaucrats of the E.U. and our regional Government are restricting our vocabularies through P.C. so that we speak and think in the way they want us to, and are devising an artificial way of describing Muslims to avoid calling some terrorists. This totalitarian control of thought through language began with the French revolutionaries, was continued by the Bolsheviks, Mao’s cultural revolution and in the west by cultural Marxists with their gradual cultural revolution.
Take our degraded art and literature: it is for talented people to re-link with spiritually uplifting art and re-grow it. For example, in Poetry, re-link with our original Anglo-Saxon forms such as the beautiful internal rhyme of alliteration, whereas end rhyme is dull and monotonous; or, Medieval because of the importance of Ballads as a vehicle to convey our suffering under our elected representatives who are against us. The matter of Robin Hood and the Sheriff of Nottingham is precedent.The family is exemplified in Monarchy. The institution of Monarchy is the embodiment of the nation and the Monarch is on our stamps, our court cases are Regina v X; we walk and drive on the Queen’s highway. The throne goes automatically to her successor. It is not the person but the office. The king is dead long live the king. It is continuity but also has a deep archetypal import that touches our deepest instincts. The natural form of Government is absolute Monarchy. It is the summum bonum of our family system and the family is its reflection. King and Queen are Father and Mother of the nation. Our current royal family are badly advised and reflect the general chaos instead of setting an example. I once read that the Queen Mother liked Ali G! This is propaganda to make them more ordinary in deference to demands by the tabloids and their global-elite owners but has made them contemptible. We must begin working towards absolute monarchy. They have archetypal importance to their people and a relationship with the whole nation not certain classes and factions.
From the fifth Commandment we learn to honour our mothers and fathers. The family is the beginning of civilisation and we have warnings from one-parent families to go by - the misery and trouble they are often in. The bonds that unite us are affective not rational - we feel that we belong and are comfortable. We feel at home. We like our land because we have bonded with it and this bond has been sanctified by time. These affections grow naturally within the family where responsibility for our community begins and is perpetuated in creating and rearing children and renewing our community so what was handed down to us is passed on. Homosexuals do not have this fulfilment as they have no further stage to move onto and remain in adolescence.
Our babies have been devalued as little more than attributes of the woman’s body, her rights are paramount and the father does not count. Abortion is erasing our posterity and 6 million babies have been killed since the 1967 Abortion Act!Fetishism is being popularised by our cultural and intellectual elites. This is deriving thrills from injury and degradation. It is the erotic form of hatred and consent is no excuse because if not countered evil spreads and soon those who do not consent will be abused and bullied by perverts. With outside forces working to destroy our boys and girls parents must regain sovereignty over their families and take responsibility for their children and Home School to rescue them from state corruption which is teaching them to give their land away and to become sexual perverts.
An early progressive William Godwin wrote in Political Justice(1793) that marriage and parental duties are irrational and believed as utopians do that society would become better and that men and women would in the future not behave so narrowly but for the benefit of everyone. The family is not narrow: its influences emanate outwards. Nearly all our traditions and institutions have been destroyed so we are going to have to re-link with many of them and grow others from our roots. The cultural Marxists are planning “Faith Schools” to allow other ethnic groups to instil standards of behaviour and education but try to ruin ours. Jim Knight, the schools minister, was reported in the Daily Telegraph of 8 October 2007 as saying the Government was considering how to simplify the balloting process adopted under 1998 legislation.” Ministers are paved the way for the adoption of fresh powers to abolish academically selective education. They said parents should get the chance to force the closure of grammar schools in their area if the majority of families opposed selection by ability. Jim Knight, the schools minister, said the Government was considering how to simplify the balloting process adopted under 1998 legislation in which schools could be forced to drop the 11-plus.”
The education Guardian on Monday June 25, 2007 told us the other part of the political elite the Conservative party ”announced last month that if it won the next general election there would be no return to grammar schools on the grounds that they do little to benefit children from poorer backgrounds. Instead, the party has promised to continue Tony Blair's flagship education reform and support the expansion of the academy schools programme - independent state schools sponsored by business.”We must counter these attempts to destroy our children by cultural Marxists. Parents must take back responsibility for their sons and daughters from the state. We need to re-introduce grammar Schools or even found new public schools to impart traditional values like honour, duty and service; others must consider Home Schooling networks to give their young the standard of education the state schools are denying them and to instil self-worth and a sense of belonging instead of teaching them to give up their country to outsiders and to become sexual perverts. We must revive local fairs and festivals and develop our Folk music traditions by taking traditional forms but using words and sentiments suitable for our present time to express our sufferings under the elites. These are not rationalist formulae but suggestions for our creative young people to develop in practice. They will forge natural, emotional bonds with their own people, their traditions and civilisation.
1. Reflections on the Revolution in France.
2. Notes Towards a Definition of Culture. T.S.Eliot
3. Peter Hennessy, 'Having It So Good - Britain in the Fifties' (Allen Lane, 2006) p 224. Hennessy's reference is: Peter Catterall (ed.), 'The Macmillan Diaries: The Cabinet Years, 1950-1957' (Macmillan, 2003) p 382.
4. Salisbury Review. Autumn 1982.
See also: pat buchanan.org. November 1998; and "Death of the West” 2002.(St.Martins Press); “"State of Emergency” (2006.St.Martins Press)
Michael Oakeshott.1948.Rationalism in Politics.(Methuen)
James Burnham.1964.Suicide of the West.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
