American commentator Brenda Walker wrote: "If there is anything that should make Americans' blood run cold about immigration, it is the sight of Europe—and Britain, the home of Western civilization—being buried by millions of Muslim colonists. Europe is just hoping against hope that Islam isn't going to explode into massive rioting (or worse), or impose total cultural Islamification. Major Jihadist terror occurred in London July 7, 2005, killing 52 and injuring 700 and in Madrid March 11, 2004, killing 191 and injuring 1841. Yet cowardly politicians continue policies of appeasement, which hostile Muslims correctly apprise as the fatal weakness of a culture too pacified to defend itself. " (1)
What she does not know is that there is a change of consciousness spreading through Britain as we realise that we are being discriminated against by our elected representatives. People can find no work, and one reason they have now understood is that foreigners are brought in as cheap labour to undercut wages. (2)
People are realising that the main parties, the media, academics and corporations are promoting an agenda which is destroying them. Politicians are effectively at war with them, and slowly the realisation is dawning. People hear them degrading white children as “chavs” and “yobs” while praising ethnics. They see their communities turned from safe areas into places of fear and uncertainty. They see politician’s children sent to the best schools while theirs have to risk knife gangs from imported ethnic communities.
With a change of consciousness comes a revival of spirit which the elites have been trying to stifle in Brits. But the Three Lions roared in Luton against the Muslims who insulted our brave soldiers!
They roared against our land being taken in the Cambridge village of Cottenham. An an unlikely place for an old-fashioned revolt against authority. But earlier this year, some 1,000 residents declared they would withhold their council tax until something was done about the travellers on the outskirts.
For decades there have been Gypsy communities living legally on two sites for 30 or so families near the village. Then, at Easter 2003, the site grew as a number of Irish Traveller families arrived in the area.
Local tensions rose, as villagers believed their way of life under threat. Angry residents demanded answers and established a campaigning website, Middle England in Revolt." (3)
But now politicians are beginning to lose confidence:
Hazel Blears panicked: "The British National Party has made advances because mainstream political parties, including Labour, have abandoned sections of the white working class, ignoring people’s needs while taking their votes for granted." Blears argues “Shouting ‘Nazi’ is not the answer.” (4)
The media, who are still shouting Nazi, are part of the same “ideological caste”. They give a false view of reality, employing words that become part of habitual thinking. The term “odious” is so often applied to the BNP that people probably think its part of their name!
They, and those who still believe them, affect moral superiority, confident that they are following the Orthodoxy, while we are lectured on our wickedness.
Aggressive TV interviewers like Jeremy Paxman hold media Inquisitions of dissenters in what are effectively show trials as they cross-examine in a bid to make them submit. Those who err are publicly persecuted and subject to public humiliation.
It works whether or not the persecuted are definitively native Britons. It’s about opinions which can be presented as axiomatic examples of “white racism”. So, Jade Goody, who was one-quarter black, was clamorously persecuted by the media for her on-screen faux-pas, and so was the half-Iranian from “The Apprentice” TV program. This sort of thing serves to keep the rest of us obedient. After all, multi-racial society is fragile. It is always ready to explode. It only seems to work through oppression, persecution, totalitarian laws, a politicised police and the media covering up race-crimes against whites.
All this the people are beginning to see.
Education is being “dumbed down”, and this, too, is becoming too obvious to hide. It isn’t done just so everyone passes. In certain subjects only some aspects are taught, as with the concentration upon Hitler and the Holocaust in the teaching of World War II.
The main thing, apparently, is to develop the correct attitudes. White children are indoctrinated to reject their identity, to be ashamed of their history and, if at all possible, to slander themselves and internalise racial guilt. Meanwhile, the children of immigrants imported for cheap labour and to replace us learn how “racist” and “evil” our ancestors were. They learn to silence protest with a word only applied to us - racist. That demonstrates perfectly where the discrimination really lies. It prevents us objecting to the cheap labour that is destroying children’s futures. The entrance figures for law and medical schools show that Asian are pushing indigenous students out.
The rulers don’t know where they are going and are confused. All that saves them from public obloquy is that the media are part of the same “Ideological caste” and, as long as they don’t say the wrong thing, cover up for them. The government have the means to protect our borders because they police Iraq and Afghanistan. But they don’t want to. The media covers by telling us that the politicians have lost control of the orders. No, they have not. They want immigrants to flood in, which is why they advertise for them to come here in our overseas embassies. It is why the British Council trains young Africans in our ways and uproots them from their own villages and communities.
Our politicians are effeminate and rule by deceit. They even deceive themselves because they are not manly enough to face things. This is why they become hysterical when the BNP expose what is really going on. They are still fighting the last war. The pejoratives they use to cow people paint a nightmare vision of what will happen if we cease to follow them. It is as out of date as they are - “Nazism”, “white supremacy”, “fascism”.
All this is, though, is becoming obvious to people.
Politicians and TV are constantly being nice to ethnics because they have lost power and know they will not be obeyed. If any ethnic is involved in a cultural activity or a sport there is always an adjective of praise in front of the name. They start from that point. Wishful thinking overrides analysis.
They don’t have to face the consequences of their inadequacy if they build up a bogey world of what will ensue if we try to deal with their bias against us and also think our culture is so wonderful the whole world will be swayed by it but at the same time want to bring everyone here through advertising in our embassies abroad and through the British Council.
Those granted asylum seekers get priority over British people. When they arrive they are homeless. So Brits on the waiting list may live in overcrowded conditions or in squalor, or may have a health priority such as spores from black mould in the house getting on their childrens’ lungs. But they will be classed as having a home and so are abandoned.
Asylum getters have their houses fitted out with every thing they need: brand new and with a guarantee. There is a free car because its cheaper than paying for taxis for them. Indigenous people are advised to use public transport, but not asylum seekers.
A young women I know was given a temporary, emergency house, called a “dispersal property” and reserved for asylum seekers. She was told that not to use one of the rooms, because there was damaged furniture in it - she checked. The room was full of things that are used to entice asylum seekers to come, including, phone, large flat screen television, pots and pans, blankets, recordable DVD player, X box, play station and a Wi, a box full of various game and music DVD’s in various languages.
Think what you would have to buy for your self and children if you were moving into a empty house to make a home? They also get free phone calls from land-line and mobile to anywhere around the world. They even have to have to be provided with an empty room as a childrens’ play room. Don’t believe me? Go to any council estate and talk to a local. When the asylum van rolls up, locals say, “ It’s Christmas come early - as long as your not British!"
Two telling examples of the new spirit presented themselves when Daily Mail columnists Melannie Phillips and Peter Hitchins respectively attacked the BNP. Each had over two hundred comments, of which the great majority criticised them. Even at the Guardian, it is interesting to see how articles attacking the BNP are themselves attacked by some CiF commenters, and even more interesting that the reader “commend clicks” for these commenters far outnumber those for the anti-BNP misery bags.
Our view of reality is largely created for an ulterior purpose by the media. We are trained to think that defending our communities is “white supremacy.” I don’t think I was born when that was in any sense real! They are thinking of the Ku Klux Klan, of course. But what have unemployed Brits to do with the KKK?
Its’ simply one more cruel, spiteful insult for the victims of multi-racialism. For years the evil elites stopped criticism of importing cheap labour by labelling those who had fought in WWII or lost family in that fight as Nazis. What vile, evil people our rulers are to do that to people who only want to preserve their jobs and communities! But this is not going unseen.
Decades of toxic social, economic and educational policy have made white people less able to compete against migrant groups with strong ideologies like Islam. A moral relativist culture of tolerance could never stand up against people who are organised, protected by family values, with a coherent and radicalising religion. But the desire to redeem our declining civilisation exists. No matter that the elites makes so much effort to destroy our organic culture and re-culture us for globalism. No matter that historicists hold our collapse to be inevitable, the will to survive is reviving from the bottom.
The role of a healthy art now, would be to introduce an understanding of our spiritual and social oppression into traditional forms. Our culture, our civilisation grows from us and we grown in it in reciprocal relation. One thing that is essential in a community is musical performances. I am not a Soviet Marxist-Leninist offering blueprints that lead to people being forced to conform to politicheskaya pravil’nost, but here are some suggestions to consider.(5)
We should form local folk groups and book rooms in local pubs, put on local festivals and feasts. Since the totalitarian ban on smoking in pubs many have been forced to close and those remaining need trade.
That we are being oppressed by our rulers is a subject for community songs. There is precedent in our Ballads of Robin Hood, and even in some of the early and, obviously, commercial work by Bob Dylan. For example, his “A Hard Rains A-Gonna fall” is developed from the traditional Border Ballad, “Lord Randall”, and gives an idea of how to express contemporary evils at the hands of the authorities:-
“O where ha you been, Lord Randal, my son?
And where ha you been, my handsome young man?”
“I ha been at the greenwood; mother, make my bed soon,
For I’m wearied wi hunting, and fain wad lie down.”
In Dylan:-
“Oh, were have you been, my blue-eyed son?
Oh, were have you been my darling young one?
I’ve stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains,
I’ve walked and I’ve crawled on six crooked highways,
I’ve stepped in the middle of seven sad forests
I’ve been out in front of a dozen dead oceans,
And it’s a hard, it’s a hard, etc …
Dylan used traditional forms to carry the contemporary thoughts and emotions felt by people across the world. The Dylan piece suggests how we can re-link with our musical origins and they express contemporary evils visited upon us by the corrupt politicians who hoodwink us into voting for them by pretending they are looking after our interests.
When we were homogenous we had a mutual trust that allowed us to be civil to one another but now civic society is quashed by state controls. This civility took centuries to grow but the progressives have destroyed that and it takes a totalitarian structure and political police to keep things together and we are reverting to a more primitive type.
The new spirit is hopeful not moaning - people do not want to associate with people they perceive as losers who cannot compete and cope.
The relationship of the populace to political representatives is one of trust. Politicians are not educated to it like professional people nor is it inherited as with monarchs and aristocrats but they offer us something and ask us to trust them but now know they have broken it.
The country we have inherited is being taken off us bit by bit and by subterfuge of the rulers. The ethnics are not passive objects but flesh and blood people like us. The con-trick is that the rulers have entered a compact with ethics but lie to us by saying what we know is happening is not happening and those who are coming to take our children’s inheritance are merely improving our lives. Our elected representatives are traitors to rank beside any in British history. We have to take responsibility for ourselves and break our child-like dependence on them. What can we do for ourselves?
A young couple I know bought a lump of ground to create a vegetable garden to help free them from the tyranny of supermarkets, others take on allotments. These things could be organised by local branches but require proper legal arrangements to avoid conflict over people trying to take things for themselves.
Gypsies are taking charge of their own destinies and buying our land. They buy it from farmers cash down, then they pile in. but the authorities are faced with a fait accompli. They stand up for themselves and are self-reliant. We must develop a variant on these and take proper advice. here is an idea:
In The Spectator of 17th December 2005, Conservative philosopher, Roger Scruton told of how he and his community were buying land and letting to local farmers:-
“Rural residents must therefore take power into their own hands, and it is encouraging that they have already done this in the matter of the Hunting Act, holding this law to ridicule by showing that it cannot be enforced. It is now time for them to exercise their power in other and more demanding ways… Neighbours should club together to buy small parcels of land from any desperate farming neighbour, thereafter renting it back to him at a peppercorn rent. This we have done in our neighbourhood, so saving ourselves both from travellers and agribusiness, by injecting needed capital into a family farm.”
(1) Dead Culture Walking: Muslim Colonization Of Europe Should Frighten America, Brenda Walker 26/03/09 - vdare.com,
(2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZnH4wihoKo
(3) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3635872.stm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpDrgrxrR3c
The next March Bank Holiday Sunday the 24th May 5pm St Georges Square, Luton. The whole country witnessed the hate hurled at the soldiers’ homecoming! Two of their regiment died in Iraq and they were met with what the other side in both that war and the war on our streets think of them.
(4) http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/nov/22/bnp-far-right-hazel-blears
http://www.lgcplus.com/News/2009/03/hodge_urges_rethink_on_bnp.html
(5) http://www.reversespins.com/pcmarx.html
Friday, 8 May 2009
Thursday, 7 May 2009
Child Rape - The Spoils of War
In his greatest speech made in response to calls for him to be prosecuted under the 1976 Race Relations Act, “The Uniform of Colour”, Enoch Powell gave an insight into how human nature operates:
“In understanding this matter, the beginning of wisdom is to grasp the law that in human societies power is never left unclaimed and unused. It does not blow about, like wastepaper on the streets, ownerless and inert. Men’s nature is not only, as Thucydides long ago asserted, to exert power where they have it; men cannot help themselves from exerting power where they have it, whether they want to or not. The coloured population of over two million in England, a population which grows at the rate of nearly 100,000 a year while the remainder diminishes, a population which is predominantly concentrated in the central areas of the metropolis and other key urban and industrial centers of England, does possess—simply by reason of segregation and differentiation—a power which would not accrue to a mere random sample of two million persons similarly located but not perceived or perceiving themselves as distinct from the rest”.
The Sun of 10 November 2006 quoted Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller quoted as predicting waves of terrorist bombings, with possibly chemical and biological devices.
“At this moment, at least 30 attacks are being actively planned and 1,600 suicidal young terrorists are under surveillance. Round-the-clock vigilance by security services has thwarted five major conspiracies and saved countless lives. There are plenty more outrages being planned.”
There have been warnings from the Home Secretary and her predecessor John Reid. The US classes London as a centre of terrorism! There are so many Muslims militantly opposed to us that it is attempting to live in a fantasy of multi-racial harmony to pretend that we are in anything but an early stage of undeclared war.
But there is another aspect of the war being waged against us in our own country by people the elites who are bringing here which is not admitted by our complicit authorities.
In an expose` of public interest the Daily Mail of 6 April 2009 reported: “Migrant workers and illegal immigrants (asylum seekers) were responsible for up to a third of all sex attacks in some areas". Greater London was worst affected, with foreigners charged in connection with a third of rapes. To get the figures the Express had to make a Freedom of Information request.
Most sex attacks were committed by foreigners in areas with large immigrant communities, like Cambridgeshire, Merseyside, Hertfordshire, Avon and Somerset. Police say it is difficult to bring foreign rapists to justice due to the large number of migrant workers and illegal immigrants in the country and there is no record of them entering the country.
On March 27, 2009 six Muslim men were arrested for the sexual exploitation and rape of young English girls: "A police spokesman said that it was important to maintain a low profile in order to keep the impact and disturbance caused to surrounding communities to a minimum. He added: "Uniformed officers from the Safer Neighbourhood Teams will be issuing leaflets to residents following the raid to reassure them and explain some details of the operation."
Why don’t the police just beg Muslims to stop raping young white children, to save the police having a race war on our streets?
Our children that they raped were as young as 11 years old. The Rotherham Advertiser reported it but left out the ethnic identities to fool locals into thinking anyone might be doing it when it is Muslim communities. The Advertiser also minimised the seriousness of the attacks by describing them as “exploitation and rape” when it is child molesting and child rape - our children, who are being raped by invaders plundering booty; during invasions, the conquerors rape the women of the conquered, but these are with the complicity of the political police and government.
The rapes in the Rwanda War are notorious. In 1998, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda held that "sexual assault formed an integral part of the process of destroying the Tutsi ethnic group and that the rape was systematic and had been perpetrated against Tutsi women only, manifesting the specific intent required for those acts to constitute genocide." Presiding judge Navanethem Pillay said in a statement after the verdict: "From time immemorial, rape has been regarded as spoils of war. Now it will be considered a war crime. We want to send out a strong message that rape is no longer a trophy of war."
But the rapes on our children are “spoils of war.” Although on a smaller scale than the above examples, the rapes of British children have the same basic motives; the hatred of one ethnic group for another. They are perpetrated on one people (our children) by a different group of people(older Muslim men).
The orthodox assumption is that Muslims rapists are like British rapists - acting as individuals (or a couple), but this is a whole community based on extended families raping the children of a different community. This is where treating each case an as individual case breaks down. It is guerilla warfare: fighting by unconventional means within areas occupied by the enemy(us).
The brave Grandfather of a 12 year old who was child-raped, and passed around to other's to rape, reported it to Rotherham Police but they told him there was nothing they could do about it so he went to Marlene Guest, a Rotherham BNP councillor, and explained that the police had refused to uphold the law against the rapists. Councillor Guest drove straight to the Rotherham Main Street police station and warned them, that if they continued to shield child-rapists the BNP would publicise it as they had in Huddersfield. That is the only reason Rotherham police acted.
In Huddersfield, Muslim men were telephoning young girls and threatening to burn down their homes if they did not meet them. The Mother of one of the raped children, said that she there many case's of child rape by Muslims in Huddersfield and took reporters to meet some of the Mothers, all had the same experiences - multiple offences, and the police allowing Muslims to get away with it. These child- rapes by Muslim communities are only exposed after heroic relations fight the police who fear a race-war starting so they cover it up.(2)
We have evidence of the community nature of the child-rapes in these reports but the establishment pretend it is something else. It is being waged against us by extended families.
British National Party Councillor Sharon Wilkinson listened to the story of a lady living in the war zone in a Northern Mill Town. Hundreds of white girls, many as young as 12, are being lured into group sex and prostitution by gangs of British born Pakistani men from West and South Yorkshire. The girls are introduced to their ‘pimps’ by classmates, often brothers and cousins of the older Muslim rapists. It is their community against ours.(3)
The Daily Mail of 27 March 2008 prompted by that evening’s Panorama expose reported some case studies which show that it is the Muslim community as a whole attacking our people. “Jane: "It happened every night. There were loads of men involved.. You couldn't keep count. It was like a conveyor belt.” she relates. “A conveyor belt of men all expecting sex. She was only 14. Jane clearly remembers the sheer, terrifying numbers of men who would be brought to her bed at night ... As she puts it: "I was just this innocent little girl who went from playing with her dolls to having sex with lots of different men."
And unpalatable though it may be to confront, there are, even now, many other innocent little girls at risk of being forced into the same sickening transition. (4)
She relates the pattern: Victims are wooed by gangs of older men and made dependent by expensive gifts and constant compliments. A sexual relationship ensues before the abusers begin to exert control through threats, brutality and drugs before selling the girls to other men for sex. ... The numbers involved in setting the girls up and raping them from the Muslim community and the fact that it is relations acting together, demonstrates the community nature of this attack on our community.
"The grooming starts where you meet them and they're nice to you and take you to McDonald's and buy you cigarettes," she tells Panorama. "I was flattered that older boys were interested in me, which at 13 is nice. "And then you start to meet the cousins and the brothers, and then you realise that you've been passed on because suddenly you're hanging around with older people." It was not long either, before the "hanging around" took on a more sinister tone. "They start to touch you and say sexual things to you," she told Panorama. "And then the abuse starts. I was pinned down by two men while a third man raped me. "And there were other men watching." There are threats of violence: "They'd say things like they'd bomb my house and gang-rape my mum," she says. "I had to perform sexual acts on different men. One would come in, do whatever he wanted, go out and another would come in," she recalls.
"One day I was picked up by an older man who took me to a park. He pulled a gun out from under the car seat and put it to my head and told me that I was going to die in three seconds," she remembers. "Then he counted down and pulled the trigger, but it wasn't loaded. He found that amusing." These vile abuses of our young girls by the Muslim community is an Act of War.
“Eventually, terrified for her life, Jane confided the truth to her parents, who reported it to the police. What ensued is subject to dispute: while the force concerned say they couldn't find enough evidence for a prosecution, Jane insists she felt forced to withdraw her allegations because officers couldn't guarantee her safety.
Lindsay and Fiona had similar Stories. They were both troubled youngsters who had problems at home, they were manipulated by predatory older Muslims. "We met Zulfi and Qais in a take-away in Blackburn," Lindsay, now 16, recalls today. "We were just mates. They'd give us cans of lager, bottles of Jack Daniels and sometimes ecstasy, cocaine and cannabis. We knew at some point they'd expect sex with us. But we didn't think there was really anything wrong with that."... “
Persistent complaints to the authorities, Megan says, were ignored until local MP, Jack Straw, intervened. Within weeks, both girls were taken into care in a bid to remove them from the source of the abuse. But Naveed and Hussain abducted them from care and took them back to prostitution. This time the violence was too much and they gatherd courage to report the child rapists to the police. They relate the evil being done to our girls by whole communities of Muslims: “The time Zulfi attacked Fiona was the worst," Lindsay says. "I remember hearing her screaming because he was whacking her across the back with a metal bar when she refused to have sex with him. "I guess she had sex with him in the end just to keep him quiet."
The Panorama programme involved eight months of investigation and found that about 5,000 young English girls are being prostituted by Muslims and black gangs. We are victims of racial guerilla war and the police are protecting the pimps and rapists.
Muslims call us “infidels” which dehumanises us, making us less than human in their eyes so they think they can do what they like because we are beneath compassion, yet our evil rulers continue to import them.
Sara Swann, a former government adviser on child protection: "Many girls are terrified and with reason. We had a case in the West Midlands where a girl had her tongue nailed to the table when she threatened to tell.” Another had her head pulled back, and a kettle of boiling water held over her open mouth." These are our people Muslims are attacking. British men have a duty to protect them.
In 2004, Channel 4 pulled a programme about Muslim pimps operating in Bradford at the request of the Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, who felt the timing of the programme could contribute to community unrest. In other words we are on the verge of a race war with Muslims and the police are trying to cover it up.
The documentary, examined the work of Bradford social services, and claims that "charismatic, wealthier" Asian men are targeting white girls as young as 11 for sex and drug abuse. The use of “Asian” is a slur on Hindus because it is Muslims who are doing this to or young girls. The programme was after attempts by two mothers to trace the men who took control of their daughters through drugs and intimidation.
West Yorkshire police asked Channel 4 to withdraw the programme after seeing a preview. Colin Cramphorn, the chief constable, feared race riots which erupted in Bradford three years earlier. In a letter to Mark Thompson, Channel 4's chief executive, he said the documentary could lead to "community disorder". (5)
Mr.Cramphorn knew what Muslims are up to. They use the threat of street war to manipulate the authorities. His obituary in the Guardian of 4 December 2006 told: “ Cramphorn's wider role came in the aftermath of the London bombings of July 7 2005, when it was revealed that the suicide team came from Leeds and Dewsbury, part of his patch. He rose to the challenge both operationally and, perhaps more significantly, in the way he led the reassurance of frightened and potentially angry communities, both ethnic minority and white, which avoided any serious backlash. In this, he built on the work of many other agencies, particularly in Leeds and Bradford, where many channels of communication between different groups swung into action at once.
But the chief constable reached out to others beyond this partly because he had given earlier, clear and outspoken warnings about what he called "Jihadists", and had met initial mockery when he revealed that extremist cells had organised training camps in national parks, such as the Yorkshire Dales. But he knew what he was talking about.”
It's like the American frontier when the Native Americans were being pushed off their land: everything is a negotiation between two hostile communities through Pow Wows and peace offerings.
The Times of August 11 2007 reported on “growing concern" at the attitudes of some Muslim men towards white girls which campaigners claim few will address.
“Parents have complained that in parts of the country with large Asian communities white girls as young as 12 are being targeted for sex by older Asian men yet the authorities are unwilling to act because of fears of being labeled racist.”
The police unbelievably, have a legal duty of care to the public!!! Has anyone ever known them follow this? They have members of al-Queda serving in the police and torture a BNP political activist in Liverpool; they kill an innocent white man going about his lawful business while anarchists protested against the G20 conference on 1st April in London; they ignore Muslims known as the Luton Taliban insulting our troops on their return from Iraq in Luton but arrest a young Englishman who was upset by this.
We are on the verge of an ethnic war with Muslims and the police are trying to cover it up. Even worse the ideological rulers of our country try to stop BNP getting into senior positions positions on police authorities because they will force the police to protect our young girls Muslim rapists instead of covering it up!
The government is even picking serving soldiers who are prepared to shoot their own people. Our rulers are at war with us and in alliance with Muslims. For years we have had it drummed into us that we are governed by high morals and venerable principles - equality, tolerance, fair-play, but as things start to come out we see that in reality we are ruled by some of the vilest, most evil people ever to have power and influence in any country. (7)
(1) http://www.actioninengland.gb.com/Enoch%20Powell%27s%20Speech.htm
(2) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl....ex- slaves.html
http://www.rotherhamadvertiser.com/News.aspx?id=8694
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/article-....hite-girls.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/02/2007_34_thu.shtml
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article2237940.ece
http://www.red-alerts.com/islamic-expans....olest-children/
(3) http://youtube.com/watch?v=F9ngzY4SSH8
http://youtube.com/watch?v=w5dHhzSDOcY
(4) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7935679.stm
(5) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....-testimony.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....e-preacher.html
(6) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1....x-grooming.html
(7) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1462628.stm
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/police-code-consultation
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....ters-warn.htm l
http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog/_archives
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/....el-788559.html.
“In understanding this matter, the beginning of wisdom is to grasp the law that in human societies power is never left unclaimed and unused. It does not blow about, like wastepaper on the streets, ownerless and inert. Men’s nature is not only, as Thucydides long ago asserted, to exert power where they have it; men cannot help themselves from exerting power where they have it, whether they want to or not. The coloured population of over two million in England, a population which grows at the rate of nearly 100,000 a year while the remainder diminishes, a population which is predominantly concentrated in the central areas of the metropolis and other key urban and industrial centers of England, does possess—simply by reason of segregation and differentiation—a power which would not accrue to a mere random sample of two million persons similarly located but not perceived or perceiving themselves as distinct from the rest”.
The Sun of 10 November 2006 quoted Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller quoted as predicting waves of terrorist bombings, with possibly chemical and biological devices.
“At this moment, at least 30 attacks are being actively planned and 1,600 suicidal young terrorists are under surveillance. Round-the-clock vigilance by security services has thwarted five major conspiracies and saved countless lives. There are plenty more outrages being planned.”
There have been warnings from the Home Secretary and her predecessor John Reid. The US classes London as a centre of terrorism! There are so many Muslims militantly opposed to us that it is attempting to live in a fantasy of multi-racial harmony to pretend that we are in anything but an early stage of undeclared war.
But there is another aspect of the war being waged against us in our own country by people the elites who are bringing here which is not admitted by our complicit authorities.
In an expose` of public interest the Daily Mail of 6 April 2009 reported: “Migrant workers and illegal immigrants (asylum seekers) were responsible for up to a third of all sex attacks in some areas". Greater London was worst affected, with foreigners charged in connection with a third of rapes. To get the figures the Express had to make a Freedom of Information request.
Most sex attacks were committed by foreigners in areas with large immigrant communities, like Cambridgeshire, Merseyside, Hertfordshire, Avon and Somerset. Police say it is difficult to bring foreign rapists to justice due to the large number of migrant workers and illegal immigrants in the country and there is no record of them entering the country.
On March 27, 2009 six Muslim men were arrested for the sexual exploitation and rape of young English girls: "A police spokesman said that it was important to maintain a low profile in order to keep the impact and disturbance caused to surrounding communities to a minimum. He added: "Uniformed officers from the Safer Neighbourhood Teams will be issuing leaflets to residents following the raid to reassure them and explain some details of the operation."
Why don’t the police just beg Muslims to stop raping young white children, to save the police having a race war on our streets?
Our children that they raped were as young as 11 years old. The Rotherham Advertiser reported it but left out the ethnic identities to fool locals into thinking anyone might be doing it when it is Muslim communities. The Advertiser also minimised the seriousness of the attacks by describing them as “exploitation and rape” when it is child molesting and child rape - our children, who are being raped by invaders plundering booty; during invasions, the conquerors rape the women of the conquered, but these are with the complicity of the political police and government.
The rapes in the Rwanda War are notorious. In 1998, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda held that "sexual assault formed an integral part of the process of destroying the Tutsi ethnic group and that the rape was systematic and had been perpetrated against Tutsi women only, manifesting the specific intent required for those acts to constitute genocide." Presiding judge Navanethem Pillay said in a statement after the verdict: "From time immemorial, rape has been regarded as spoils of war. Now it will be considered a war crime. We want to send out a strong message that rape is no longer a trophy of war."
But the rapes on our children are “spoils of war.” Although on a smaller scale than the above examples, the rapes of British children have the same basic motives; the hatred of one ethnic group for another. They are perpetrated on one people (our children) by a different group of people(older Muslim men).
The orthodox assumption is that Muslims rapists are like British rapists - acting as individuals (or a couple), but this is a whole community based on extended families raping the children of a different community. This is where treating each case an as individual case breaks down. It is guerilla warfare: fighting by unconventional means within areas occupied by the enemy(us).
The brave Grandfather of a 12 year old who was child-raped, and passed around to other's to rape, reported it to Rotherham Police but they told him there was nothing they could do about it so he went to Marlene Guest, a Rotherham BNP councillor, and explained that the police had refused to uphold the law against the rapists. Councillor Guest drove straight to the Rotherham Main Street police station and warned them, that if they continued to shield child-rapists the BNP would publicise it as they had in Huddersfield. That is the only reason Rotherham police acted.
In Huddersfield, Muslim men were telephoning young girls and threatening to burn down their homes if they did not meet them. The Mother of one of the raped children, said that she there many case's of child rape by Muslims in Huddersfield and took reporters to meet some of the Mothers, all had the same experiences - multiple offences, and the police allowing Muslims to get away with it. These child- rapes by Muslim communities are only exposed after heroic relations fight the police who fear a race-war starting so they cover it up.(2)
We have evidence of the community nature of the child-rapes in these reports but the establishment pretend it is something else. It is being waged against us by extended families.
British National Party Councillor Sharon Wilkinson listened to the story of a lady living in the war zone in a Northern Mill Town. Hundreds of white girls, many as young as 12, are being lured into group sex and prostitution by gangs of British born Pakistani men from West and South Yorkshire. The girls are introduced to their ‘pimps’ by classmates, often brothers and cousins of the older Muslim rapists. It is their community against ours.(3)
The Daily Mail of 27 March 2008 prompted by that evening’s Panorama expose reported some case studies which show that it is the Muslim community as a whole attacking our people. “Jane: "It happened every night. There were loads of men involved.. You couldn't keep count. It was like a conveyor belt.” she relates. “A conveyor belt of men all expecting sex. She was only 14. Jane clearly remembers the sheer, terrifying numbers of men who would be brought to her bed at night ... As she puts it: "I was just this innocent little girl who went from playing with her dolls to having sex with lots of different men."
And unpalatable though it may be to confront, there are, even now, many other innocent little girls at risk of being forced into the same sickening transition. (4)
She relates the pattern: Victims are wooed by gangs of older men and made dependent by expensive gifts and constant compliments. A sexual relationship ensues before the abusers begin to exert control through threats, brutality and drugs before selling the girls to other men for sex. ... The numbers involved in setting the girls up and raping them from the Muslim community and the fact that it is relations acting together, demonstrates the community nature of this attack on our community.
"The grooming starts where you meet them and they're nice to you and take you to McDonald's and buy you cigarettes," she tells Panorama. "I was flattered that older boys were interested in me, which at 13 is nice. "And then you start to meet the cousins and the brothers, and then you realise that you've been passed on because suddenly you're hanging around with older people." It was not long either, before the "hanging around" took on a more sinister tone. "They start to touch you and say sexual things to you," she told Panorama. "And then the abuse starts. I was pinned down by two men while a third man raped me. "And there were other men watching." There are threats of violence: "They'd say things like they'd bomb my house and gang-rape my mum," she says. "I had to perform sexual acts on different men. One would come in, do whatever he wanted, go out and another would come in," she recalls.
"One day I was picked up by an older man who took me to a park. He pulled a gun out from under the car seat and put it to my head and told me that I was going to die in three seconds," she remembers. "Then he counted down and pulled the trigger, but it wasn't loaded. He found that amusing." These vile abuses of our young girls by the Muslim community is an Act of War.
“Eventually, terrified for her life, Jane confided the truth to her parents, who reported it to the police. What ensued is subject to dispute: while the force concerned say they couldn't find enough evidence for a prosecution, Jane insists she felt forced to withdraw her allegations because officers couldn't guarantee her safety.
Lindsay and Fiona had similar Stories. They were both troubled youngsters who had problems at home, they were manipulated by predatory older Muslims. "We met Zulfi and Qais in a take-away in Blackburn," Lindsay, now 16, recalls today. "We were just mates. They'd give us cans of lager, bottles of Jack Daniels and sometimes ecstasy, cocaine and cannabis. We knew at some point they'd expect sex with us. But we didn't think there was really anything wrong with that."... “
Persistent complaints to the authorities, Megan says, were ignored until local MP, Jack Straw, intervened. Within weeks, both girls were taken into care in a bid to remove them from the source of the abuse. But Naveed and Hussain abducted them from care and took them back to prostitution. This time the violence was too much and they gatherd courage to report the child rapists to the police. They relate the evil being done to our girls by whole communities of Muslims: “The time Zulfi attacked Fiona was the worst," Lindsay says. "I remember hearing her screaming because he was whacking her across the back with a metal bar when she refused to have sex with him. "I guess she had sex with him in the end just to keep him quiet."
The Panorama programme involved eight months of investigation and found that about 5,000 young English girls are being prostituted by Muslims and black gangs. We are victims of racial guerilla war and the police are protecting the pimps and rapists.
Muslims call us “infidels” which dehumanises us, making us less than human in their eyes so they think they can do what they like because we are beneath compassion, yet our evil rulers continue to import them.
Sara Swann, a former government adviser on child protection: "Many girls are terrified and with reason. We had a case in the West Midlands where a girl had her tongue nailed to the table when she threatened to tell.” Another had her head pulled back, and a kettle of boiling water held over her open mouth." These are our people Muslims are attacking. British men have a duty to protect them.
In 2004, Channel 4 pulled a programme about Muslim pimps operating in Bradford at the request of the Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, who felt the timing of the programme could contribute to community unrest. In other words we are on the verge of a race war with Muslims and the police are trying to cover it up.
The documentary, examined the work of Bradford social services, and claims that "charismatic, wealthier" Asian men are targeting white girls as young as 11 for sex and drug abuse. The use of “Asian” is a slur on Hindus because it is Muslims who are doing this to or young girls. The programme was after attempts by two mothers to trace the men who took control of their daughters through drugs and intimidation.
West Yorkshire police asked Channel 4 to withdraw the programme after seeing a preview. Colin Cramphorn, the chief constable, feared race riots which erupted in Bradford three years earlier. In a letter to Mark Thompson, Channel 4's chief executive, he said the documentary could lead to "community disorder". (5)
Mr.Cramphorn knew what Muslims are up to. They use the threat of street war to manipulate the authorities. His obituary in the Guardian of 4 December 2006 told: “ Cramphorn's wider role came in the aftermath of the London bombings of July 7 2005, when it was revealed that the suicide team came from Leeds and Dewsbury, part of his patch. He rose to the challenge both operationally and, perhaps more significantly, in the way he led the reassurance of frightened and potentially angry communities, both ethnic minority and white, which avoided any serious backlash. In this, he built on the work of many other agencies, particularly in Leeds and Bradford, where many channels of communication between different groups swung into action at once.
But the chief constable reached out to others beyond this partly because he had given earlier, clear and outspoken warnings about what he called "Jihadists", and had met initial mockery when he revealed that extremist cells had organised training camps in national parks, such as the Yorkshire Dales. But he knew what he was talking about.”
It's like the American frontier when the Native Americans were being pushed off their land: everything is a negotiation between two hostile communities through Pow Wows and peace offerings.
The Times of August 11 2007 reported on “growing concern" at the attitudes of some Muslim men towards white girls which campaigners claim few will address.
“Parents have complained that in parts of the country with large Asian communities white girls as young as 12 are being targeted for sex by older Asian men yet the authorities are unwilling to act because of fears of being labeled racist.”
The police unbelievably, have a legal duty of care to the public!!! Has anyone ever known them follow this? They have members of al-Queda serving in the police and torture a BNP political activist in Liverpool; they kill an innocent white man going about his lawful business while anarchists protested against the G20 conference on 1st April in London; they ignore Muslims known as the Luton Taliban insulting our troops on their return from Iraq in Luton but arrest a young Englishman who was upset by this.
We are on the verge of an ethnic war with Muslims and the police are trying to cover it up. Even worse the ideological rulers of our country try to stop BNP getting into senior positions positions on police authorities because they will force the police to protect our young girls Muslim rapists instead of covering it up!
The government is even picking serving soldiers who are prepared to shoot their own people. Our rulers are at war with us and in alliance with Muslims. For years we have had it drummed into us that we are governed by high morals and venerable principles - equality, tolerance, fair-play, but as things start to come out we see that in reality we are ruled by some of the vilest, most evil people ever to have power and influence in any country. (7)
(1) http://www.actioninengland.gb.com/Enoch%20Powell%27s%20Speech.htm
(2) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl....ex- slaves.html
http://www.rotherhamadvertiser.com/News.aspx?id=8694
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/article-....hite-girls.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/02/2007_34_thu.shtml
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article2237940.ece
http://www.red-alerts.com/islamic-expans....olest-children/
(3) http://youtube.com/watch?v=F9ngzY4SSH8
http://youtube.com/watch?v=w5dHhzSDOcY
(4) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7935679.stm
(5) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....-testimony.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....e-preacher.html
(6) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1....x-grooming.html
(7) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1462628.stm
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/police-code-consultation
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....ters-warn.htm l
http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog/_archives
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/....el-788559.html.
Monday, 27 April 2009
Destroying our youth through popular Culture
One of the weapons used to destroy our young people is what is known as the “Culture Wars.” Modern, popular music transmits raw uninhibited energy, emotion and excitement often with catchy tunes but is negative and corruptive. Those who doubt this should listen to, say, “Heavy Metal” or “Rap” then perhaps some Tudor church music and compare the feelings and images that are aroused. The first produce the desire to hurt or mistreat others, the second, an uplifting spiritual sense and a good feeling towards God and others.
The state of a civilisation can be assessed by its art. There are deep similarities between our collapsing civilisation and the collapse of Greece and Rome and we need to use their historical example as guides to correcting our own folly. The modern manipulators are leading us into degeneracy through popular culture.
In a recent TV series "I'm a Celebrity Get Me out of Here", simple people, described as Celebrities, were so degraded as to eat live worms and stick insects.
Rebecca Loos masturbates pig for your "entertainment"
There are several levels to this: there is cruelty to lesser animals; encouraging children to eat insects and slugs in the garden and the decline into more degradation of our people and culture. On a “reality” programme one masturbated a pig and on another one fried and ate Kangaroos testicles. This is to degrade our people and culture.
Many think that the presentation of certain “lifestyles” in T.V. programmes is innocent, but they are arranged and presented to be sympathetic and thus to change people’s attitudes which is social engineering. The Soaps are used to promote “gay” lifestyles.
This does not happen by serendipity. It is planned in meetings. The “Goodies” are shown sympathetically and glamorously, every character they want us to imitate is attractive and cool; the “Baddies”, those they want us to hate, are thick and unlovable. It does not occur in a vacuum but in tandem with other developments and helps to manipulate acceptance for the Government plans to equalise the sexual marriage laws.
Contemporary art is used to degrade us by destroying any notion of the Sacred needs of people. Every year these time-warped artists stage a ritual by setting up an ordinary member of the public. The script is this: an elderly person takes a youngster, say grandchild or niece, to an exhibition and is shocked by something on display, like an unmade bed or something that requires little imagination, and complains to the press. Then the curator is quoted as saying, “Art is to make people think, and to provoke feelings”. This hackneyed response has been used on each occasion for the last 30 years.
I once went to the Ikon gallery in Birmingham, which is financed by taxpayers’ money confiscated by the Government as well as funding by companies. The young gulls there soon refused to speak to me when I explained they are mass produced artists all doing similar stuff. They have to do what the Art Council wants to get a grant. The liberal middle classes follow the tastes and standards set by elites such as Saatchi.
At the beginning of the twentieth century the modernist movement set about destroying the form and grammar of traditional art and thus the content, and made it both unintelligible and uninteresting. In the 60’s cultural Marxists of the new left became the "elites". They hate our culture and traditions and are destroying our young people.
Aristocrat rulers had sense of “noblesse oblige" towards the working classes and a sense of responsibility but the elites, who grew out of the new left, corrupt them out of hatred and personal gain.
The Discrimination Act of 1975 advises people not to use degrading language of certain selected groups. But our elites continually degrade working-class people and our young. They mock them as “Chavs.”
Our people rarely see themselves affirmed in adverts or on TV, only dark people without English features unless they are advertising our women to the world as whores. We are not supposed to identify with ourselves. The elites need have no conscience about bringing immigrants here to take our jobs by undercutting wages and pushing us out of our communities if they convince themselves we are worthless.
The television programme makers are on the lookout for something to laugh at but we are now the targets and this is done to us before the rest of the world. It is conveyed by images as well as words which are read as body language and semi-conscious messages.
Whites are presented as fat, over weight, while ethics are bright and clean. A television programme “How clean is Your House” has two women visit inadequate parents to tell them how to bring their children up. They select lower class inadequates but never tell an inadequate Muslim couple how to bring their children up.
One of these programmes is shown in 47 countries! This sends the message to potential asylum seekers that we are inadequate and weak and they can come here and everything off us including our women.
What are the effects of this constant debilitation of our people by the elites on everyday life? Ordinary people lose contact with our civilization and become disorientated, lost, suffer from bereavement and become depressed.
Our culture is still amenable to the elites but our manipulated young and those from a de-culturalised background give up and do not bother. They cannot take refuge in a smaller cultural world like the elites who live in large houses in posh areas of London, or beautiful English villages as country gentlefolk. They lose heart and, having nowhere to go descend into vices and viciousness; they are no longer civilized and do not know how to behave. They become prey to amoral meritocrats who use and exploit them.
Amy Winehouse. Role model for our young women
The papers devote pages to the drugged and drunken antics of “celebs” and footballers while the celeb magazines and radio stations promote those who have degraded themselves on Reality TV shows. They show them leaving night clubs drunk and question whether they are wearing knickers or not. The people who make these programmes and write the magazines are educated and intelligent people so they know what they are doing to our young people.
It is to redress the balance with the behaviour of ethnic communities. I looked at the covers of two celeb magazines: one stated, “Posh is looking tired and stressed. Is it too much partying?” The other, “Britney and Paris’ wild night out.”
We are being deprived of self worth and seeking it in drink and drugs. There is a trend in drinking amongst people as young as 10 -15. We see them all over the country in subways, on recreation grounds, schoolchildren drinking cans that they have been sold by shopkeepers.
Our young people do not understand their loss of identity, the loss of the sense of who they are and loss of self-worth. What are the consequences? The degradation shows in their social lives when they try to escape from themselves.
"Yes Mum. We had a lovely night."
A 20 year-old young woman told me how she and her cousin go on. “We were so drunk,” she said beaming, “we were “so drunk we couldn’t stand.” They could not remember how they got home. I asked if they like getting drunk. “It’s social” one replied; the other ”It’s good fun.” “It is acceptable now like sex and dress.”
Some politicians claim stopping “Happy Hours” would stop drunkenness but there are ways of getting drunk quickly and cheaply like “drinking glasses of water while drinking alcohol because it reacts in your blood and you get drunk quicker.” There is also a trick of gulping air down while you drink. I asked who originates these tricks. “Probably, the breweries”, she replied.
Though they have been educated to see themselves as equal to men but in practice women’s vital organs are not as strong as men’s and they have a greater chance of liver and kidney damage as well as permanent brain damage.
Children are selfish, but become civilized as they grow older and take responsibility for the world around them. This is becoming adult. However, the new culture prevents them from growing up and keeps them immature which is causing so much uncivilised behaviour. Bar owners and the drinks companies play on the weaker part of people’s nature rather like a sales scam would play on, say, someone’s greed. It is preying on the young’s need for fun and adventure with unhealthy adventures.
Young people drink drinks that have pretty colours and fruity flavours like soft drinks but are about 6% alcohol, or pretty, pleasant tasting cocktails. At the same time the hypnotic music pounds away disorientating them. There are often TV screens all around showing sport, pop acts or models on catwalks. This bar had a couple of bouncy castles upon which customers bounced gleefully, mindless that outside their bubbles of pleasure there is a dangerous, hostile world. Recent bomb attacks were outside London nightclubs. A cool bar is unreal and like being in a dream. There is also the use of the hallucinatory effects of drugs in adverts. I saw an advert for vodka shots, which was a square of undulating shades of blue light. You do not see these colours by drinking vodka, gulps of air or not. You see this by taking ecstasy.
On a normal evening in every town and city you see young women collapsed on the pavements usually being attended by paramedics and stretchered away comatose or with cracked heads. Is that all our young women are worth? They walk up to cars waiting at traffic lights and ask for lifts and often just open the door and get in. You see them staggering around the streets at 2 to 4 am lobbing their boobs out to stop passing cars for lifts. They are perfect victims for ethnics and asylum seekers who drive up and down the entertainment streets imitating private hire cars.
No wonder others have no respect for our women
when they have none for themselves
People from other countries and ethnic groups have no respect for our corrupted women who they see as only good for one thing. Many are raped every weekend and not know it or who by, as they usually cannot remember how they got home. Later, they might want an abortion or find they are HIV-Positive!
This preying on our degraded women came out recently when The Sun of 14 Nov 2008 reported than an illegal immigrant with HIV is feared to have infected hundreds of women in a massive health scandal, it emerged yesterday. The Jamaican man used hospital patients unmonitored for nearly a year preying on vulnerable patients for sex. The health authorities have now written to 420 women warning they may have been infected with the killer virus! The man is not being named but kept secret. He came here in 2002 on a visitor’s visa. He has slept with dozens of girls after searching nightclubs in Leicester.
The Times of August 11 2007 reported on “growing concern" at the attitudes of some Asian men towards white girls which campaigners for women claim few people wish to address. Parents have complained that in parts of the country with large Asian communities white girls as young as 12 are being targeted for sex by older Asian men yet the authorities are unwilling to act because of fears of being labelled racist.
Ann Cryer, a Labour member of the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee, has been at the forefront of attempting to tackle the problem after receiving complaints from mothers in her constituency about young Asian men targeting their under-age daughters.
Although campaigners claim that hundreds of young girls are already being passed around men within the Asian community for sex, she said that attempts to raise the problem with community leaders had met with little success, with most of them being in a state of denial about it.
Pop stars are arbiters of taste and behaviour and must take personal responsibility for the harm they have done to young people by creating degenerate images to make themselves millions. Young people identify with them and are beguiled by their rebellious and exciting images while in reality they live in mansions, employ gardeners, maids, cooks and butlers and send their children to the best schools.
The man who destroyed old America, and undermined the western world Elvis Presley has a religious devotion 30 years after his death and his home Gracelands attracts worshippers on the scale of Lourdes or Mecca.
These pop idols have replaced religious and national icons for millions of people. They are hypocrites who pose to corrupt and make money. Madonna in real life tried to live as an English country lady while in public she pretends to be a rebel effing and blinding and snogging Britney at award ceremonies. This degraded old thing is no longer influential but did a lot of harm especially by promoting S&M.
On internet “Social Networking” sites for young people to meet others our young women present themselves as tarts and most say they “like getting drunk.” Their clothes and poses show them as anybody’s meat. They are imitating people on TV. talent shows and think they will be spotted, and slappers who have made fortunes showing their silicon boobs.
Our elites promote these as role models for our young people, but only promote honourable and worthy people as role models for ethnic minorities. If you walk around an inner city school or community centre the walls are festooned with heroes from the histories of ethnic groups like Gandhi, Marcus Garvey or Harriet Tubman.
On an entertainment street some bars are used for pills and others for cocaine and most door staff are pumped up on steroids. The drug goes with the music. The coke-heads are hyper and constantly making a sort of chewing motion. The staff of these bars put Vaseline on lavatory cisterns to try to stop customers doing lines of coke on them but the owners are usually on it themselves and door staff are often dealers.
Another mode of destruction is Clubbing on Ecstasy. It is a special occasion like going to church on Sundays.
There is an unfinished part of us that is reaching out to become satisfied or whole and this gives a temporary and artificial substitute. A common feature of ecstasy clubbers is a need to escape from themselves which in a healthier age would have led to a mystic journey in solitude as eremites counting their beads and communing with God. In our degraded times they are prey for the hard-headed business people who use any fashion to make money out of their own people.
A young woman explained to me: “It heightens the music, makes it more epic.” In common with others it helps them to dance longer, but the important effect is that “It fills you full of love towards those around you, if a girl is being sick in the toilets you pull her hair back for her. I have only seen two fights in eight years of clubbing.” She compared this with aggressive pubs when people are drunk and violent fights ensue. It is a response to the betrayal of the needs of our young people by our Christian leaders and has fuelled artificial communities and the illusion of transcendence through drugs.
The importation of cheap labour is justified by blaming us: “Eastern European Workers Shame Lazy Brits” scream the tabloids. It is incredible but the Labour Government and Trades Unions have virtually re-introduced Slavery as those encouraged here but classified as illegal immigrants work for almost nothing.
On top of asylum seekers and families and spouses coming here, eastern European immigration makes a total of 1,000,000 per annum. Nurse graduates for example cannot find jobs.
The elites see only good in ethics but find fault in us. They pretend they are “essentially good,” while we are essentially bad. Unfortunately many immigrants keep letting them down by shooting and knifing people, grooming our young girls and planting bombs.
The one who brought totalitarianism and oppression into our legal system with the Campaign for Racial Equality, in the 1976 Community Relations Act, was Roy Jenkins. Biographer, John Campbell (Weidenfield & Nicolson.1983) tells us, that he believed, “That immigration was good for Britain and if people resisted they should be socially engineered into accepting it." Commonwealth immigrants like previous waves of immigrants from the Norman Conquest, to the refugees of the 30’s, could help overcome “our natural Island lethargy”.
The practice has been our degradation. We need to re-introduce grammar Schools or even found new public schools to impart traditional values like honour, duty and service; others must consider Home Schooling networks to give our young the standard of education the state schools are denying them and to instill self-worth and a sense of belonging instead of teaching them to give up their country to outsiders and to become sexual perverts.
We must revive local fairs and festivals and develop our Folk music traditions by taking traditional forms but using modern words and situations for the present time to express our sufferings under the elites. These are not rationalist formulae but suggestions for our creative young people to develop in practice. They will be able to forge natural, emotional bonds with their own people, their traditions and civilisation.
The state of a civilisation can be assessed by its art. There are deep similarities between our collapsing civilisation and the collapse of Greece and Rome and we need to use their historical example as guides to correcting our own folly. The modern manipulators are leading us into degeneracy through popular culture.
In a recent TV series "I'm a Celebrity Get Me out of Here", simple people, described as Celebrities, were so degraded as to eat live worms and stick insects.
Rebecca Loos masturbates pig for your "entertainment"
There are several levels to this: there is cruelty to lesser animals; encouraging children to eat insects and slugs in the garden and the decline into more degradation of our people and culture. On a “reality” programme one masturbated a pig and on another one fried and ate Kangaroos testicles. This is to degrade our people and culture.
Many think that the presentation of certain “lifestyles” in T.V. programmes is innocent, but they are arranged and presented to be sympathetic and thus to change people’s attitudes which is social engineering. The Soaps are used to promote “gay” lifestyles.
This does not happen by serendipity. It is planned in meetings. The “Goodies” are shown sympathetically and glamorously, every character they want us to imitate is attractive and cool; the “Baddies”, those they want us to hate, are thick and unlovable. It does not occur in a vacuum but in tandem with other developments and helps to manipulate acceptance for the Government plans to equalise the sexual marriage laws.
Contemporary art is used to degrade us by destroying any notion of the Sacred needs of people. Every year these time-warped artists stage a ritual by setting up an ordinary member of the public. The script is this: an elderly person takes a youngster, say grandchild or niece, to an exhibition and is shocked by something on display, like an unmade bed or something that requires little imagination, and complains to the press. Then the curator is quoted as saying, “Art is to make people think, and to provoke feelings”. This hackneyed response has been used on each occasion for the last 30 years.
I once went to the Ikon gallery in Birmingham, which is financed by taxpayers’ money confiscated by the Government as well as funding by companies. The young gulls there soon refused to speak to me when I explained they are mass produced artists all doing similar stuff. They have to do what the Art Council wants to get a grant. The liberal middle classes follow the tastes and standards set by elites such as Saatchi.
At the beginning of the twentieth century the modernist movement set about destroying the form and grammar of traditional art and thus the content, and made it both unintelligible and uninteresting. In the 60’s cultural Marxists of the new left became the "elites". They hate our culture and traditions and are destroying our young people.
Aristocrat rulers had sense of “noblesse oblige" towards the working classes and a sense of responsibility but the elites, who grew out of the new left, corrupt them out of hatred and personal gain.
The Discrimination Act of 1975 advises people not to use degrading language of certain selected groups. But our elites continually degrade working-class people and our young. They mock them as “Chavs.”
Our people rarely see themselves affirmed in adverts or on TV, only dark people without English features unless they are advertising our women to the world as whores. We are not supposed to identify with ourselves. The elites need have no conscience about bringing immigrants here to take our jobs by undercutting wages and pushing us out of our communities if they convince themselves we are worthless.
The television programme makers are on the lookout for something to laugh at but we are now the targets and this is done to us before the rest of the world. It is conveyed by images as well as words which are read as body language and semi-conscious messages.
Whites are presented as fat, over weight, while ethics are bright and clean. A television programme “How clean is Your House” has two women visit inadequate parents to tell them how to bring their children up. They select lower class inadequates but never tell an inadequate Muslim couple how to bring their children up.
One of these programmes is shown in 47 countries! This sends the message to potential asylum seekers that we are inadequate and weak and they can come here and everything off us including our women.
What are the effects of this constant debilitation of our people by the elites on everyday life? Ordinary people lose contact with our civilization and become disorientated, lost, suffer from bereavement and become depressed.
Our culture is still amenable to the elites but our manipulated young and those from a de-culturalised background give up and do not bother. They cannot take refuge in a smaller cultural world like the elites who live in large houses in posh areas of London, or beautiful English villages as country gentlefolk. They lose heart and, having nowhere to go descend into vices and viciousness; they are no longer civilized and do not know how to behave. They become prey to amoral meritocrats who use and exploit them.
Amy Winehouse. Role model for our young women
The papers devote pages to the drugged and drunken antics of “celebs” and footballers while the celeb magazines and radio stations promote those who have degraded themselves on Reality TV shows. They show them leaving night clubs drunk and question whether they are wearing knickers or not. The people who make these programmes and write the magazines are educated and intelligent people so they know what they are doing to our young people.
It is to redress the balance with the behaviour of ethnic communities. I looked at the covers of two celeb magazines: one stated, “Posh is looking tired and stressed. Is it too much partying?” The other, “Britney and Paris’ wild night out.”
We are being deprived of self worth and seeking it in drink and drugs. There is a trend in drinking amongst people as young as 10 -15. We see them all over the country in subways, on recreation grounds, schoolchildren drinking cans that they have been sold by shopkeepers.
Our young people do not understand their loss of identity, the loss of the sense of who they are and loss of self-worth. What are the consequences? The degradation shows in their social lives when they try to escape from themselves.
"Yes Mum. We had a lovely night."
A 20 year-old young woman told me how she and her cousin go on. “We were so drunk,” she said beaming, “we were “so drunk we couldn’t stand.” They could not remember how they got home. I asked if they like getting drunk. “It’s social” one replied; the other ”It’s good fun.” “It is acceptable now like sex and dress.”
Some politicians claim stopping “Happy Hours” would stop drunkenness but there are ways of getting drunk quickly and cheaply like “drinking glasses of water while drinking alcohol because it reacts in your blood and you get drunk quicker.” There is also a trick of gulping air down while you drink. I asked who originates these tricks. “Probably, the breweries”, she replied.
Though they have been educated to see themselves as equal to men but in practice women’s vital organs are not as strong as men’s and they have a greater chance of liver and kidney damage as well as permanent brain damage.
Children are selfish, but become civilized as they grow older and take responsibility for the world around them. This is becoming adult. However, the new culture prevents them from growing up and keeps them immature which is causing so much uncivilised behaviour. Bar owners and the drinks companies play on the weaker part of people’s nature rather like a sales scam would play on, say, someone’s greed. It is preying on the young’s need for fun and adventure with unhealthy adventures.
Young people drink drinks that have pretty colours and fruity flavours like soft drinks but are about 6% alcohol, or pretty, pleasant tasting cocktails. At the same time the hypnotic music pounds away disorientating them. There are often TV screens all around showing sport, pop acts or models on catwalks. This bar had a couple of bouncy castles upon which customers bounced gleefully, mindless that outside their bubbles of pleasure there is a dangerous, hostile world. Recent bomb attacks were outside London nightclubs. A cool bar is unreal and like being in a dream. There is also the use of the hallucinatory effects of drugs in adverts. I saw an advert for vodka shots, which was a square of undulating shades of blue light. You do not see these colours by drinking vodka, gulps of air or not. You see this by taking ecstasy.
On a normal evening in every town and city you see young women collapsed on the pavements usually being attended by paramedics and stretchered away comatose or with cracked heads. Is that all our young women are worth? They walk up to cars waiting at traffic lights and ask for lifts and often just open the door and get in. You see them staggering around the streets at 2 to 4 am lobbing their boobs out to stop passing cars for lifts. They are perfect victims for ethnics and asylum seekers who drive up and down the entertainment streets imitating private hire cars.
No wonder others have no respect for our women
when they have none for themselves
People from other countries and ethnic groups have no respect for our corrupted women who they see as only good for one thing. Many are raped every weekend and not know it or who by, as they usually cannot remember how they got home. Later, they might want an abortion or find they are HIV-Positive!
This preying on our degraded women came out recently when The Sun of 14 Nov 2008 reported than an illegal immigrant with HIV is feared to have infected hundreds of women in a massive health scandal, it emerged yesterday. The Jamaican man used hospital patients unmonitored for nearly a year preying on vulnerable patients for sex. The health authorities have now written to 420 women warning they may have been infected with the killer virus! The man is not being named but kept secret. He came here in 2002 on a visitor’s visa. He has slept with dozens of girls after searching nightclubs in Leicester.
The Times of August 11 2007 reported on “growing concern" at the attitudes of some Asian men towards white girls which campaigners for women claim few people wish to address. Parents have complained that in parts of the country with large Asian communities white girls as young as 12 are being targeted for sex by older Asian men yet the authorities are unwilling to act because of fears of being labelled racist.
Ann Cryer, a Labour member of the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee, has been at the forefront of attempting to tackle the problem after receiving complaints from mothers in her constituency about young Asian men targeting their under-age daughters.
Although campaigners claim that hundreds of young girls are already being passed around men within the Asian community for sex, she said that attempts to raise the problem with community leaders had met with little success, with most of them being in a state of denial about it.
Pop stars are arbiters of taste and behaviour and must take personal responsibility for the harm they have done to young people by creating degenerate images to make themselves millions. Young people identify with them and are beguiled by their rebellious and exciting images while in reality they live in mansions, employ gardeners, maids, cooks and butlers and send their children to the best schools.
The man who destroyed old America, and undermined the western world Elvis Presley has a religious devotion 30 years after his death and his home Gracelands attracts worshippers on the scale of Lourdes or Mecca.
These pop idols have replaced religious and national icons for millions of people. They are hypocrites who pose to corrupt and make money. Madonna in real life tried to live as an English country lady while in public she pretends to be a rebel effing and blinding and snogging Britney at award ceremonies. This degraded old thing is no longer influential but did a lot of harm especially by promoting S&M.
On internet “Social Networking” sites for young people to meet others our young women present themselves as tarts and most say they “like getting drunk.” Their clothes and poses show them as anybody’s meat. They are imitating people on TV. talent shows and think they will be spotted, and slappers who have made fortunes showing their silicon boobs.
Our elites promote these as role models for our young people, but only promote honourable and worthy people as role models for ethnic minorities. If you walk around an inner city school or community centre the walls are festooned with heroes from the histories of ethnic groups like Gandhi, Marcus Garvey or Harriet Tubman.
On an entertainment street some bars are used for pills and others for cocaine and most door staff are pumped up on steroids. The drug goes with the music. The coke-heads are hyper and constantly making a sort of chewing motion. The staff of these bars put Vaseline on lavatory cisterns to try to stop customers doing lines of coke on them but the owners are usually on it themselves and door staff are often dealers.
Another mode of destruction is Clubbing on Ecstasy. It is a special occasion like going to church on Sundays.
There is an unfinished part of us that is reaching out to become satisfied or whole and this gives a temporary and artificial substitute. A common feature of ecstasy clubbers is a need to escape from themselves which in a healthier age would have led to a mystic journey in solitude as eremites counting their beads and communing with God. In our degraded times they are prey for the hard-headed business people who use any fashion to make money out of their own people.
A young woman explained to me: “It heightens the music, makes it more epic.” In common with others it helps them to dance longer, but the important effect is that “It fills you full of love towards those around you, if a girl is being sick in the toilets you pull her hair back for her. I have only seen two fights in eight years of clubbing.” She compared this with aggressive pubs when people are drunk and violent fights ensue. It is a response to the betrayal of the needs of our young people by our Christian leaders and has fuelled artificial communities and the illusion of transcendence through drugs.
The importation of cheap labour is justified by blaming us: “Eastern European Workers Shame Lazy Brits” scream the tabloids. It is incredible but the Labour Government and Trades Unions have virtually re-introduced Slavery as those encouraged here but classified as illegal immigrants work for almost nothing.
On top of asylum seekers and families and spouses coming here, eastern European immigration makes a total of 1,000,000 per annum. Nurse graduates for example cannot find jobs.
The elites see only good in ethics but find fault in us. They pretend they are “essentially good,” while we are essentially bad. Unfortunately many immigrants keep letting them down by shooting and knifing people, grooming our young girls and planting bombs.
The one who brought totalitarianism and oppression into our legal system with the Campaign for Racial Equality, in the 1976 Community Relations Act, was Roy Jenkins. Biographer, John Campbell (Weidenfield & Nicolson.1983) tells us, that he believed, “That immigration was good for Britain and if people resisted they should be socially engineered into accepting it." Commonwealth immigrants like previous waves of immigrants from the Norman Conquest, to the refugees of the 30’s, could help overcome “our natural Island lethargy”.
The practice has been our degradation. We need to re-introduce grammar Schools or even found new public schools to impart traditional values like honour, duty and service; others must consider Home Schooling networks to give our young the standard of education the state schools are denying them and to instill self-worth and a sense of belonging instead of teaching them to give up their country to outsiders and to become sexual perverts.
We must revive local fairs and festivals and develop our Folk music traditions by taking traditional forms but using modern words and situations for the present time to express our sufferings under the elites. These are not rationalist formulae but suggestions for our creative young people to develop in practice. They will be able to forge natural, emotional bonds with their own people, their traditions and civilisation.
Wednesday, 15 April 2009
Secret Genocide of White South African Farmers(Boers).
15th April 2009
An ideology always benefits some elite groups and the one-world ideology benefits multi-national corporations that get the mineral rights. The process is very corrupt: Western governments appropriate tax money paid by their citizens and transfer it to elites in the third world for the mineral rights to go to multi-national corporations; they also free populations to be brought to the west as cheap labour and our work to be relocated where people live on subsistence wages. Having encouraged wage slaves from the Third World Western elites often publicly apologise for historical slavery!
In the new South Africa racial genocide of South African Boers, who are Afrikaner farmers, is taking place as I write but the Western media who know all about it because they have agents and reporters in the country will not report it. (1)
It follows the treatment of French Algerians,(2) the Belgians of Congo, (3) the Portuguese of Angola and Mozambique, (4)Zimbabwe and was predictable. (5) All these peoples were violently forced off lands which their ancestors had occupied for centuries, with the encouragement of the US and British governments and made possible by finance taken from their own taxpayers for the purpose. What is behind this? It is what is now called Globalisation or the attempt to create a New World Order. (6) It is brought about in practice by evil people like Peter Hain.
African-ruled countries are a variation on a theme of total corruption and it is a matter of time before South Africa collapses. The 3.5 million Whites remaining might slow that process but the end result is inevitable and Western elites and journalists must take responsibility. The chaos on the railways is an indicator with locos not turning up at coal mines to collect fully loaded trains and the power stations desperate for coal. The electricity generating plants are fast deteriorating and break down regularly and the country has been plagued with power cuts for the last few years. The ANC is still dominated by members of the South African Communist Party, are anti-white racists, and have a vigorous land confiscation programme on the statute books. Farmers and their families are regularly murdered.
These things are hardly reported in the west because the liberal-left media fully support the ANC as they fully supported Mugabe in 1980 and thereafter and for the real consequences of their actions to be broadcast by our media would destroy the unrealistic ideology of racial equality.
The dream was Nelson Mandela accepting the Nobel Peace Prize for all who have opposed racism. It was awarded to him, the ANC and all South Africa’ s people. The new SA was to be freedom and democracy in an open society which respected the rights of all individuals.
That is the fantasy. What is the reality? Mass genocide of Boer farmers.
The genocide is happening on the farms and Indian farmers are also targeted; the targets are usually defenseless, especially elderly people.(7)
The government does nothing to prevent attacks, so the farmers have begun to co-operate in mutual defence. That the Black government wants Boers harmed and driven from their land as indicated by their programmes to force white farmers to sell their property to blacks. These programmes are to remove a huge percentage of white farmers and give the farms to blacks.
At the beginning of the decade there were 40,000 White farmers in South Africa of which 3,037 were murdered and more than 20,000 victims of armed attacks perpetrated by groups of militant, young Blacks, since the ANC came to power in 1994. The real total is certainly higher as the South African government and police with the help of the world's press keep it covered up. Boers are often tortured or raped first, by boiling water forced down their throats, tendons cut, burnings, personal humiliations - the attackers are usually protected by Blacks within government and the police and not tried. Ask yourselves, gentle readers, when did you see this on television news or read about it in your quality newspaper?
The idealism that accompanied the birth of new South Africa has been destroyed by black rule yet the rainbow nation is still a fantasy to Western elites. They need to believe in it or face the reality that racial equality does not exist. The dream of truth and reconciliation and the deification of Nelson Mandela make it hard to accept that after whites gave way to Blacks the Boer minority would be subjected to racial genocide. Boers have not been sentimentalised as victims, are not figures of sympathy, but dehumanised as “racists” so their murder is not seen as important.
The SA government forbids the publishing of South African police crime statistics without their permission and media crime reports are vetted by the police. The world’s media want to pretend the new government is responsible or face the fact that races are not equal on one hand; on the other, to keep the overseas aid for mineral rights deals quiet, so the genocide is covered upand goes on secretly and with impunity.
Interpol’s global murder figures for South Africa are about double the number of “recorded murders,” the farm murder rate is four times the official South African murder average.
The world’s leading authority on genocide, Dr Gregory Stanton of “Genocide Watch”, stated how serious the Boer genocide is in his 2002 report. (8)
SA Blacks, especially ANC youth, still sing the old ANC resistance song “Kill The Boer”. This shows their purpose. The Boer is only a farmer but the grudge goes on. They work hard, use few words and have no mother country to return to. The “Kill The Boer” slogan has been ruled hate speech by the SA Human Rights Commission because it incites people to kill Afrikaners. But the ANC sing “shaya ma buru” at public meetings all over South Africa. The UN Genocide convention declared that ruling regimes killing ethnic minorities is legally genocide and could be pursued in the International Criminal Court. (7)
The new rulers have imposed racial quotas that deny work to most young Afrikaners, whether or not they have the right qualifications. This programme of Black Economic Empowerment is called “rectifying action” - Affirmative Action. Thousands of ANC civil servants give preferential treatment to blacks over whites and even browns. “Progress” plans are implemented, fines and other sanctions imposed. In most cases it’s an unqualified or illiterate black who gets the job. Whites are left with begging or emigration.
If the farmers are wiped-out the rest of South Africa and parts of southern Africa will be plunged into famine: as in Zimbabwe the Boer genocide may lead to the death of millions by starvation and outbreaks of Cholera.
Does anyone protest?
Archbishop Desmond Tutu criticised Black Economic Empowerment, but because it enriches such a small minority of already powerful blacks not because it impoverishes the white minority. His world-famous moral indignation does not stretch that far. People put themselves first when community spirit breaks down and Afrikaner intellectuals want to keep their own jobs so conform to the black apartheid system like the Judenräte under the Nazis.
Those who criticise Black Economic Empowerment are de-humanised as racists. Yet, the government replacing 35,000 commercial South African farmers by blacks is more than
imposing job quotas in industry and commerce. The farmers are landowners and have a bond with their territory. The authorities are undermining that and the SAHRC has endorsed the withdrawal of commandos from rural areas to leave the Boers open to murder and banned the term “ farm attacks” from the SA Rural Protection Plan as it links the Boers to their land and makes clear which group of people is being attacked but these are now the more abstract “murders” which is vague and gives the impression that it could happen to anybody.
The Government is made an inventory of South Africa’s farmers by race - “To... monitor the patterns of land ownership as it implements land reform, the deeds registration system would be improved to reflect nationality, race and gender of land owners.” There has been legislation to make it possible for the government to expropriate assets summarily without having to apply in advance to a court. The ANC is rewriting the South African Constitution but not stating what its being replaced with.
In 1991 the White population of South Africa was 5.1 million however, as of 2007 the official White population of South Africa was its lowest of 4.2 million, even though millions of White refugees from other parts of Africa added to South Africa's White population in recent years. Whites are persecuted and dispossessed for being White leaving them unable to afford council tax so they end up living in shanty hunts in Black neighbourhoods which hate them because of their race. An example is the 'Affirmative Action' policy of the national school netball championships committee - teams which do not have enough Black children have points given to the opposing side before the game has started!
This could develop into full scale racial genocide and ethnic cleansing like in Zimbabwe and the Belgian Congo before it which was another of the richest Nations in Africa but is now war torn. The elites know the history but keep doing it to African countries.
The killings show savagery and brutality as most are tortured and die slowly and in agony yet in many of the murders, no property is stolen. This shows a savage, uncivilised hatred for
fellow humans that we can not comprehend but the authorities and international media pass it off as "crime related" when it is racial genocide.
It will continue to deteriorate for Whites, especially poor ones as Jacob Zumma could be next President. He is openly racist, has convictions for rape and embezzlement and believes a shower can cure AIDS! (9)
In 2006 there were 55,000 reported rapes in South Africa but official estimates are that another 450,000 rapes were not reported. Therefore, about 1,300 women can be expected to be raped every day. A study by Interpol revealed that South Africa has the most rapes in the world - a women being raped every 17 seconds and this does not include the number of child rape victims. Interpol estimated that one in every two women in South Africa would be raped. The largest increase in attacks has been against children under seven. There is a widespread superstition that having sex with children cures Aids. More than 67,000 cases of rape and sexual assaults against children were reported last year, compared with 37,500 in 1998. Some of the victims are as young as six- months-old and many die from their injuries, others contract HIV.
The Telegraph (11 Nov 2001) reported that on arape of a nine-month-old baby girl by six men in a remote part of rural South Africa which was part of an 80 per cent rise in child sexual abuse over a year. Police said at least one of the men who raped the nine-month-old girl is HIV-positive. The baby has also been tested for the virus and given anti-retroviral drugs as a precaution. (10)
What can we do? We could make sure our representatives who profess belief in “Democracy” and “Rule of Law” know what is happening. Write to Newspapers letters pages, online Comments and post news on internet Blogs and circulate it round the net. Point out that western elites are ignoring this genocide when they caused it. For example, the BBC rock concert which they made millions which donated to the ANC which was against their own charter!
They could make it clear to the South African government that their genocide is starting to be publicised around the world. Pressure them to condemn ethnic cleansing and racial genocide of whites.
(1) An ideology needs an enemy and since the last war the enemy has been “whites.” The ideological aspect of this was dilineated by the American Conservative James Burnham in
Suicide of the West(1964) but the discrete machinations of powerful people in Caroll Quigley’s
tome “Tragedy of the West.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6474617.stm
Western leaders apologise for slavery
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/5647,opini....ing-for-slavery
They also have picked up on where the South African communists donations came from and have some question.
http://www.westwalespatriot.blogspot.com/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7181613.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7206812.stm
http://africare.org/supportus/index.php?gclid=CPDx4-TylJkCFQaA3godnBXtZw
http://www.sagoodnews.co.za/africa/econo....e_in_africa_wor
ld_bank.html
(2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algerian_War
(3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congo_Crisis
(4) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_Colonial_War
(5) http://www.peterhain.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hain
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment....icle3685421.ece
http://www.parliament.the-stationery-off....xt/00411-04.htm
http://www.dkrenton.co.uk/anl/1970s.html
(6) http://www.bgs.ac.uk/mineralsuk/links/mining/home.html
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob....4228f14a9ed27e1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining_in_South_Africa
http://www.riotinto.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_Tinto_Group
http://www.minesandcommunities.org/article.php?a=978
(7)
http://afrikaner-genocide-achives.blogsp....generation.html
http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.co....e-genocide.html
http://www.rainbownation.com/uk/index.asp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrikaner
http://www.stopboergenocide.com/index2.html
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=28421
Type Boer farm murders into a search engine.
Official View:
http://www.gov.za/
(8) http://www.edwebproject.org/sideshow/genocide/convention.html
http://www.preventgenocide.org/law/convention/text.htm
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/267463
(9) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Zuma
(10) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew....e-for-Aids.html
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/STRATEGIES/CDF/0,,contentMDK:20919987~menuPK:2540090~pagePK:139301~piPK:139306~theSitePK:140576,00.html
http://allafrica.com/stories/200809190077.html
http://www.dfid.gov.uk/news/files/pressreleases/alexander-safrica.asp
http://www.usaid.gov/locations/sub-saharan_africa/countries/southafrica/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6185176.stm
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EPF/is_n1_v97/ai_19742413
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/zatoc.html
http://www.southafrica.info/pls/cms/cm_show_gallery?p_gid=2363&p_site_id=38
http://www.southafrica.info/travel/cultural/culture.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_Nation
An ideology always benefits some elite groups and the one-world ideology benefits multi-national corporations that get the mineral rights. The process is very corrupt: Western governments appropriate tax money paid by their citizens and transfer it to elites in the third world for the mineral rights to go to multi-national corporations; they also free populations to be brought to the west as cheap labour and our work to be relocated where people live on subsistence wages. Having encouraged wage slaves from the Third World Western elites often publicly apologise for historical slavery!
In the new South Africa racial genocide of South African Boers, who are Afrikaner farmers, is taking place as I write but the Western media who know all about it because they have agents and reporters in the country will not report it. (1)
It follows the treatment of French Algerians,(2) the Belgians of Congo, (3) the Portuguese of Angola and Mozambique, (4)Zimbabwe and was predictable. (5) All these peoples were violently forced off lands which their ancestors had occupied for centuries, with the encouragement of the US and British governments and made possible by finance taken from their own taxpayers for the purpose. What is behind this? It is what is now called Globalisation or the attempt to create a New World Order. (6) It is brought about in practice by evil people like Peter Hain.
African-ruled countries are a variation on a theme of total corruption and it is a matter of time before South Africa collapses. The 3.5 million Whites remaining might slow that process but the end result is inevitable and Western elites and journalists must take responsibility. The chaos on the railways is an indicator with locos not turning up at coal mines to collect fully loaded trains and the power stations desperate for coal. The electricity generating plants are fast deteriorating and break down regularly and the country has been plagued with power cuts for the last few years. The ANC is still dominated by members of the South African Communist Party, are anti-white racists, and have a vigorous land confiscation programme on the statute books. Farmers and their families are regularly murdered.
These things are hardly reported in the west because the liberal-left media fully support the ANC as they fully supported Mugabe in 1980 and thereafter and for the real consequences of their actions to be broadcast by our media would destroy the unrealistic ideology of racial equality.
The dream was Nelson Mandela accepting the Nobel Peace Prize for all who have opposed racism. It was awarded to him, the ANC and all South Africa’ s people. The new SA was to be freedom and democracy in an open society which respected the rights of all individuals.
That is the fantasy. What is the reality? Mass genocide of Boer farmers.
The genocide is happening on the farms and Indian farmers are also targeted; the targets are usually defenseless, especially elderly people.(7)
The government does nothing to prevent attacks, so the farmers have begun to co-operate in mutual defence. That the Black government wants Boers harmed and driven from their land as indicated by their programmes to force white farmers to sell their property to blacks. These programmes are to remove a huge percentage of white farmers and give the farms to blacks.
At the beginning of the decade there were 40,000 White farmers in South Africa of which 3,037 were murdered and more than 20,000 victims of armed attacks perpetrated by groups of militant, young Blacks, since the ANC came to power in 1994. The real total is certainly higher as the South African government and police with the help of the world's press keep it covered up. Boers are often tortured or raped first, by boiling water forced down their throats, tendons cut, burnings, personal humiliations - the attackers are usually protected by Blacks within government and the police and not tried. Ask yourselves, gentle readers, when did you see this on television news or read about it in your quality newspaper?
The idealism that accompanied the birth of new South Africa has been destroyed by black rule yet the rainbow nation is still a fantasy to Western elites. They need to believe in it or face the reality that racial equality does not exist. The dream of truth and reconciliation and the deification of Nelson Mandela make it hard to accept that after whites gave way to Blacks the Boer minority would be subjected to racial genocide. Boers have not been sentimentalised as victims, are not figures of sympathy, but dehumanised as “racists” so their murder is not seen as important.
The SA government forbids the publishing of South African police crime statistics without their permission and media crime reports are vetted by the police. The world’s media want to pretend the new government is responsible or face the fact that races are not equal on one hand; on the other, to keep the overseas aid for mineral rights deals quiet, so the genocide is covered upand goes on secretly and with impunity.
Interpol’s global murder figures for South Africa are about double the number of “recorded murders,” the farm murder rate is four times the official South African murder average.
The world’s leading authority on genocide, Dr Gregory Stanton of “Genocide Watch”, stated how serious the Boer genocide is in his 2002 report. (8)
SA Blacks, especially ANC youth, still sing the old ANC resistance song “Kill The Boer”. This shows their purpose. The Boer is only a farmer but the grudge goes on. They work hard, use few words and have no mother country to return to. The “Kill The Boer” slogan has been ruled hate speech by the SA Human Rights Commission because it incites people to kill Afrikaners. But the ANC sing “shaya ma buru” at public meetings all over South Africa. The UN Genocide convention declared that ruling regimes killing ethnic minorities is legally genocide and could be pursued in the International Criminal Court. (7)
The new rulers have imposed racial quotas that deny work to most young Afrikaners, whether or not they have the right qualifications. This programme of Black Economic Empowerment is called “rectifying action” - Affirmative Action. Thousands of ANC civil servants give preferential treatment to blacks over whites and even browns. “Progress” plans are implemented, fines and other sanctions imposed. In most cases it’s an unqualified or illiterate black who gets the job. Whites are left with begging or emigration.
If the farmers are wiped-out the rest of South Africa and parts of southern Africa will be plunged into famine: as in Zimbabwe the Boer genocide may lead to the death of millions by starvation and outbreaks of Cholera.
Does anyone protest?
Archbishop Desmond Tutu criticised Black Economic Empowerment, but because it enriches such a small minority of already powerful blacks not because it impoverishes the white minority. His world-famous moral indignation does not stretch that far. People put themselves first when community spirit breaks down and Afrikaner intellectuals want to keep their own jobs so conform to the black apartheid system like the Judenräte under the Nazis.
Those who criticise Black Economic Empowerment are de-humanised as racists. Yet, the government replacing 35,000 commercial South African farmers by blacks is more than
imposing job quotas in industry and commerce. The farmers are landowners and have a bond with their territory. The authorities are undermining that and the SAHRC has endorsed the withdrawal of commandos from rural areas to leave the Boers open to murder and banned the term “ farm attacks” from the SA Rural Protection Plan as it links the Boers to their land and makes clear which group of people is being attacked but these are now the more abstract “murders” which is vague and gives the impression that it could happen to anybody.
The Government is made an inventory of South Africa’s farmers by race - “To... monitor the patterns of land ownership as it implements land reform, the deeds registration system would be improved to reflect nationality, race and gender of land owners.” There has been legislation to make it possible for the government to expropriate assets summarily without having to apply in advance to a court. The ANC is rewriting the South African Constitution but not stating what its being replaced with.
In 1991 the White population of South Africa was 5.1 million however, as of 2007 the official White population of South Africa was its lowest of 4.2 million, even though millions of White refugees from other parts of Africa added to South Africa's White population in recent years. Whites are persecuted and dispossessed for being White leaving them unable to afford council tax so they end up living in shanty hunts in Black neighbourhoods which hate them because of their race. An example is the 'Affirmative Action' policy of the national school netball championships committee - teams which do not have enough Black children have points given to the opposing side before the game has started!
This could develop into full scale racial genocide and ethnic cleansing like in Zimbabwe and the Belgian Congo before it which was another of the richest Nations in Africa but is now war torn. The elites know the history but keep doing it to African countries.
The killings show savagery and brutality as most are tortured and die slowly and in agony yet in many of the murders, no property is stolen. This shows a savage, uncivilised hatred for
fellow humans that we can not comprehend but the authorities and international media pass it off as "crime related" when it is racial genocide.
It will continue to deteriorate for Whites, especially poor ones as Jacob Zumma could be next President. He is openly racist, has convictions for rape and embezzlement and believes a shower can cure AIDS! (9)
In 2006 there were 55,000 reported rapes in South Africa but official estimates are that another 450,000 rapes were not reported. Therefore, about 1,300 women can be expected to be raped every day. A study by Interpol revealed that South Africa has the most rapes in the world - a women being raped every 17 seconds and this does not include the number of child rape victims. Interpol estimated that one in every two women in South Africa would be raped. The largest increase in attacks has been against children under seven. There is a widespread superstition that having sex with children cures Aids. More than 67,000 cases of rape and sexual assaults against children were reported last year, compared with 37,500 in 1998. Some of the victims are as young as six- months-old and many die from their injuries, others contract HIV.
The Telegraph (11 Nov 2001) reported that on arape of a nine-month-old baby girl by six men in a remote part of rural South Africa which was part of an 80 per cent rise in child sexual abuse over a year. Police said at least one of the men who raped the nine-month-old girl is HIV-positive. The baby has also been tested for the virus and given anti-retroviral drugs as a precaution. (10)
What can we do? We could make sure our representatives who profess belief in “Democracy” and “Rule of Law” know what is happening. Write to Newspapers letters pages, online Comments and post news on internet Blogs and circulate it round the net. Point out that western elites are ignoring this genocide when they caused it. For example, the BBC rock concert which they made millions which donated to the ANC which was against their own charter!
They could make it clear to the South African government that their genocide is starting to be publicised around the world. Pressure them to condemn ethnic cleansing and racial genocide of whites.
(1) An ideology needs an enemy and since the last war the enemy has been “whites.” The ideological aspect of this was dilineated by the American Conservative James Burnham in
Suicide of the West(1964) but the discrete machinations of powerful people in Caroll Quigley’s
tome “Tragedy of the West.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6474617.stm
Western leaders apologise for slavery
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/5647,opini....ing-for-slavery
They also have picked up on where the South African communists donations came from and have some question.
http://www.westwalespatriot.blogspot.com/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7181613.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7206812.stm
http://africare.org/supportus/index.php?gclid=CPDx4-TylJkCFQaA3godnBXtZw
http://www.sagoodnews.co.za/africa/econo....e_in_africa_wor
ld_bank.html
(2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algerian_War
(3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congo_Crisis
(4) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_Colonial_War
(5) http://www.peterhain.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hain
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment....icle3685421.ece
http://www.parliament.the-stationery-off....xt/00411-04.htm
http://www.dkrenton.co.uk/anl/1970s.html
(6) http://www.bgs.ac.uk/mineralsuk/links/mining/home.html
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob....4228f14a9ed27e1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining_in_South_Africa
http://www.riotinto.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_Tinto_Group
http://www.minesandcommunities.org/article.php?a=978
(7)
http://afrikaner-genocide-achives.blogsp....generation.html
http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.co....e-genocide.html
http://www.rainbownation.com/uk/index.asp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrikaner
http://www.stopboergenocide.com/index2.html
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=28421
Type Boer farm murders into a search engine.
Official View:
http://www.gov.za/
(8) http://www.edwebproject.org/sideshow/genocide/convention.html
http://www.preventgenocide.org/law/convention/text.htm
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/267463
(9) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Zuma
(10) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew....e-for-Aids.html
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/STRATEGIES/CDF/0,,contentMDK:20919987~menuPK:2540090~pagePK:139301~piPK:139306~theSitePK:140576,00.html
http://allafrica.com/stories/200809190077.html
http://www.dfid.gov.uk/news/files/pressreleases/alexander-safrica.asp
http://www.usaid.gov/locations/sub-saharan_africa/countries/southafrica/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6185176.stm
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EPF/is_n1_v97/ai_19742413
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/zatoc.html
http://www.southafrica.info/pls/cms/cm_show_gallery?p_gid=2363&p_site_id=38
http://www.southafrica.info/travel/cultural/culture.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_Nation
Monday, 23 March 2009
Sir Winston Churchill - Keep England White
Those who call for common sense in immigration are following an honourable tradition of conserving our homogeneity going back at least as far as Queen Elizabeth1 who expelled “the Blackamors” in 1602.
In this fine British tradition Sir Winston Churchill attempted to introduce a Bill to control immigration in 1955. He also wanted the Conservative Party to adopt the slogan “Keep England White”. (1)
The multi-racial idealists ignored warning signs of what mass immigration would lead to when there was plenty of evidence. The Race battles of 1919 in Glasgow in January, in South Shields in January and February, in London in April, and in Liverpool, Cardiff, Barry and Newport in June were not the first.
There had been racial battles in 1870s and 1911 in Cardiff with the Chinese community. In 1919 there were five deaths and serious injuries, whole areas cordoned off by the police and hundreds taken into protective custody. The Times reported the Cardiff battle:
“Racial riots of a grave character occurred at Cardiff during the early hours of yesterday morning. The trouble seems to have broken out simultaneously in several adjacent parts of the city about midnight. A young man named Harold Smart walked up to a constable and complained that a coloured man had cut his throat”
The constable took him to hospital but he died on arrival. This culminated in crowds of whites and blacks facing and baiting each one another. Six Arabs were charged including firing a revolver. It appears the riot grew out of white men objecting to coloured men consorting with white women.
One-Worlder Lord Milner wrote a Memorandum of June 23rd “On the Repatriation of Coloured Men.” ”I have every reason to fear, that when we get these men back to their own colonies they might be tempted to revenge themselves on the white minorities there…”
When Empire Windrush brought immigrants here in 1948 there were race battles: Liverpool again, between 31 July and 2 August, in Deptford on the 18th July; and Birmingham between the 6th and 8th of August 1949 involving immigrants from seafaring backgrounds but the idealists ignored them. The Times reported the Liverpool battle as about 50 persons ”mostly coloured appeared in court after. ..”a gang of negros stoned several white men who were walking peacefully. They were armed with bottles, swords, daggers, iron bars, coshes and axes. The white men hopelessly outnumbered ran away. A Negro club appeared to have been the headquarters of the coloured men, and police officers were stoned and had bottles thrown at them from club windows as they tried to disperse the crowd.”(2)
Despite “the risks involved” they continued with the policy of free entry for immigrants. They kept no records of numbers entering, apparently because the immigrants were, as Commonwealth citizens, British subjects, nor did they give practical support, leaving it to local councils and voluntary organizations. Throughout the 50.s many delegations from local councils of areas effected went to 10, Downing Street, to ask for practical help and funds. On the 21st of November 1952 the Town Clerk of Brixton asked for regulation of immigration.
Churchill first discussed immigration in Cabinet on 25th November 1952 when he asked in Cabinet if the Post Office employed large numbers of “coloured workers”. “If so, there was some risk social problems would be created.” They were from India, Nigeria, the Gold Coast, Sierra Leone, Uganda, Mauritius, West Indies, Ceylon, British Guiana and Malaya.
The postmaster General was asked to report on it. He explained: “...the Post Offices main unions raised no objections to their employment at basic grades.” He added,” If it is felt that coloured workers should not be allowed to obtain employment in this country, I should have thought the proper course would be to deny them entry to the country.”
Churchill asked his staff to find out about problems in Lambeth, Brixton and Cardiff. B.G.Smallman, PS, to the Colonial Secretary, producing a paper on “The Coloured Population of the UK". This estimated the numbers to be 40-50,000 which included about 6,000 students. (3)
Historian Andrew Roberts wrote that The Commonwealth Relations Office worried that with restrictions “ there might well be a chance of the governments of India and Pakistan introducing retaliatory restrictions against the entry or residence of members of the British business community.” Commonwealth Secretary Earl Home, worried that they should not give the impression that Commonwealth citizens from India, Pakistan and Ceylon would be less favourably treated than those from the Dominions otherwise there could be retaliation.
In private interviews Roberts shows the decadence of those around Churchill: “A Minister closely involved in the decision-making process, ‘ In fact…we were just stalling and hoping for the best’… One of Mr. Churchill’s private secretaries, ‘at that time it seemed a very good idea to get bus conductors and stuff’ … a junior minister, ‘it was becoming hard to find somebody to carry your bags at the station’.’’(4 )
On the 27th of June 1953 Sir Winston suffered a stroke that left him paralysed down the left side. After that, he told Butler, “I feel like an aeroplane at the end of its flight , in the dusk, with the petrol running out, in search of a safe landing.”(5) Interviewed by Andrew Roberts his Foreign Affairs Personal Secretary Anthony Montague- Brown recalled that he was “simply too tired to deal with the immigration problem. He could concentrate on a few big issues at a time- like the Russians -and the rest of the time he could only give a steer and not see it through.” (6) I
In November 1952 His Private Secretary, Sir John Colville noted, "He is getting tired and visibly ageing. He finds it hard to compose a speech and ideas no longer flow. (7)
Cabinet set up an Inter Departmental Committee to look into preventing an increase in the number. It reported its findings in December 1953. This Inter Departmental Committee comprised Ministry of Labour and National Service, the National Assistance Board, the Colonial Office and Chief Constables from areas where immigrants were settling.
The Home Secretary was to ask the Inter Departmental Committee, which was chaired by the Home Office, to look into preventing an increase in the number coming for employment. There is a note to R.J.Guppy of the Home Office in The Prime Ministers papers notifying him that Churchill had seen the report in that day's Daily Telegraph "about what is termed an influx of West Indians. He is considering bringing the matter before the Cabinet and would like to have a report from the Home Secretary about it." (8)
January 1954 Home Secretary Maxwell Fyfe reported on the findings of the “Working party on the Social and Economic Problems Arising from the Growing Influx into the United Kingdom of Coloured Workers”. He stated “the unskilled workers who form the majority are difficult to place because on the whole they are physically unsuited to heavy manual work…”(9)
For those familiar with the debate over the veracity of Enoch Powell’s claim in his Rivers Of Blood speech that an elderly white lady was being driven from her home, of the several news cuttings in the Prime Ministers papers is one from The News Chronicle of 7th December 1954 where a 62 year-old white woman living alone in a house full of coloured men asked for an injunction to stop her coloured landlord abusing or molesting her. Judge Wilfred Clothier in giving judgement said that she was “hounded by these coloured men. This is another case of black people entering half a house and never resting until they have turned the white people out. I hope there will be a remedy found quickly. One could be to turn back to Jamaica anyone found guilty of this practice. Another would be a prohibition by law to stop any black people buying a house containing white tenants.” Conrad Fairclough wanted Miss.Matilda McLaren out of where she had lived for 40 years yet he only came here in 1948.
“In Paddington hundreds of houses have been rented or bought by coloured people since the war. Statements are being taken from 2,000 residents who protested to the borough council against “the ever-increasing practice of selling to coloured people houses in which there are already white tenants.” Mr.George O’Connell, a member of the council said to me that a committee formed in the borough would sift through evidence provided by the residents. He hoped shortly to discuss the problem with Sir David Maxwell Fyfe, Home Secretary.”...We are not so much concerned about the effect on values of neighbouring properties as on the white tenants who are forced out by them.”
Churchill’s Private Secretary Montague-Brown to Civil Servant Johnston 2/11/1954 on an article in the Telegraph of 19 Oct in which the Jamaican Minister of Labour said he would not attempt to stop mass immigration. The P.M. thinks this should be brought up in Cabinet.
It is important to note that Commonwealth citizens had the right of entry to the UK and the same rights as British citizens when here. The difference is few came until after the Second war. The British Nationality Act of 1948 did not give them that right but codified it.
This point is made in the following example from the Cabinet Secretaries Notebooks released to the public in August 2007. These are the handwritten notes of Cabinet Meetings. They record that on 3 February 1954 under the item 'Coloured Workers', Sir Winston stated ‘Problems which will arise if many coloured people settle here. Are we to saddle ourselves with colour problems in the UK? Attracted by Welfare State. Public opinion in UK won't tolerate it once it gets beyond certain limits.'
Florence Horsbrugh, Minister of Education and MP for Manchester( Moss Side), added: 'Already becoming serious in Manchester.' David Maxwell Fyfe, the Home Secretary, gave a figure of 40,000 compared to 7,000 before the Second World War and raised the possibility of control. He said: 'There is a case on merits for exclude. riff-raff. But politically it wd. be represented & discussed on basis of colour limitation. That wd. offend the floating vote viz., the old Liberals. We shd. be reversing age-long tradition that. British Subjects have right of entry to mother-country of Empire. We should. offend Liberals, also sentimentalists.' He added: 'The colonial. populations are resented in Liverpool, Paddington & other areas by those who come into contact with them. But those who don't are apt to take a more Liberal view.'
Churchill intervened: 'Question . is whether it is politically wise to allow public feeling to develop a little more before taking action.' Adding that it would be 'fatal' to let the situation develop too far Mr.Churchill conclud: 'Would like also to study possibility of "quota" - no. not to be exceeded.'
Another referred to an "increasing evil" and principles "laid down 200 yrs. ago are not applicable to-day. See dangers of colour discriminn. But other [Dominions] control entry of B. subjects. Cd. we present action as coming into line...& securing uniformity?"
Mr.Churchill said the question was whether it might be wise "to allow public feeling to develop a little more - before takg. action...May be wise to wait...But it wd. be fatal to let it develop too far." (11)
In March 1954 Maxwell Fyfe told Cabinet, “that large numbers of coloured people are living on National Assistance” and that “coloured landlords by their conduct are making life difficult for white people living in the same building or area…the result is that white people leave and the accommodation is then converted to furnished lettings for coloured people, with serious overcrowding and exploitation”.
In a Cabinet memorandum of 8 March Maxwell Fyfe feared “serious difficulties involved in contemplating action which would undoubtedly land the Government in some political controversy.”
In cabinet in October 1954 Mr. Churchill warned Maxwell Fyfe, “that the problems arising from the immigration of coloured people required urgent and serious consideration.” Maxwell-Fyfe emphasised that there is no power to prevent these people entering no matter how much the number may increase. (12)
The discussion that Harold Macmillan referred to in his diary entry for January 20th 1955: "More discussion about the West Indian immigrants. A Bill is being drafted - but it's not an easy problem. P.M. thinks 'Keep England White' a good slogan! Can be substantiated by the Cabinet notebooks for 20th January 1955. This is a transcript:
Coloured Immigrants.
P.M. Need for decision before long.
Anthony Eden. Before Commonwealth P.M. mtg.
Henry Hopkinson. Osborne M.P. is thinking of introducg. Bill under 10 min. rule.
Lloyd George . Depn. y’day from B’ham. No objn. to them as workers. But qua housing. Figures are impressive.
Viscount Swinton. Might consider Cttee. on social aspects, alone.
A.E. Might be useful – to re-inforce action we decide to take.
P.M. Not in favour. Better to introduce Bill. May find we cd. get it thro’. At least we shd. have shown our view.
Marquess of Salisbury. Urgent.
H.H. Movement is starting now in favour of immign. from Barbados.
[Exit H.H. (11)
Just before he gave up the Premiership in 1955 Mr. Churchill told Spectator owner and editor Ian Gilmour that immigration "is the most important subject facing this country, but I cannot get any of my ministers to take any notice". (12)
If Sir Winston had been well we would not know be suffering the gun killings and knivings or Muslim bombings of our people.
Cabinet Secretaries Notebooks covering this period CAB 195/13 was released at the beginning of February 2008. The papers of British Prime Ministers are classified under PREM. PREM 11/824 covers Churchill’s premiership. It has Information requested by the Prime Minister on immigration of coloured workers to the UK and their employment in the Civil Service; deportation of British subjects; powers of Colonial Governments; employment of Jamaicans in the UK 1952-1955
1 Peter Hennessy, 'Having It So Good - Britain in the Fifties' (Allen Lane, 2006) p 224. Hennessy's reference is: Peter Catterall (ed.), 'The Macmillan Diaries: The Cabinet Years, 1950-1957' (Macmillan, 2003) p 382.
2 …” ( Panikos Paranyi (ed) “Racial Violence in Britain in the Nineteenth Century.” (Leicester University.1996). The discussions on immigration are classified as our “racism” and usually by Marxist academics who blame us”whites” for any difficulties. See also
British Immigration Policy Since 1939: The Making of Multi-Racial Britain, By Ian R. G. Spencer. (Routledge. 1997)
3 Thee are held at the National Archive. CC100(52)8(cabinet Conclusions on 25/11/1952, CAB 128/25; The Post Master General’s report and the Chancellor being asked to restrict entry to the Civil Service is in CC106(52), 8/12/1952, CAB 128
4 Eminent Churchillians, Andrew Roberts. (London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson) 1994,
5 R.A.Butler,”The Art of the Possible, (London. Hamish Hamilton),1971, p173.
6 ibid Eminent Churchillians.
7 Sir John Colville.(London. Stoughton Ltd )1985.The Fringes of Power. P654
8 Daily Telegraph 29/1/54 "Cities Concerned at Influx of West Indians."
9 CAB124/1191 Report of the Working Party on Coloured People Seeking Employment in the United Kingdom. 17th December 1953.
10 Cabinet Secretaries Notebooks. The eleventh Notebook (CAB 195/11) (released August 2007) covers the period 3.12.52 - 26.2.54.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/aug/05/race.past
11 Cabinet Secretaries Notebooks. The Notebook covering 20th January 1955 CAB 195/13 was released at the beginning of February 2008.
ibid Peter Hennessy, 'Having It So Good - Britain in the Fifties' (Allen Lane.2006) p 224. Hennessy's reference is: Peter Catterall (ed.), 'The Macmillan Diaries: The Cabinet Years, 1950-1957' (Macmillan, 2003) p 382.
12 Inside Right. Sir Ian Gilmour (Quartet.1977)
In this fine British tradition Sir Winston Churchill attempted to introduce a Bill to control immigration in 1955. He also wanted the Conservative Party to adopt the slogan “Keep England White”. (1)
The multi-racial idealists ignored warning signs of what mass immigration would lead to when there was plenty of evidence. The Race battles of 1919 in Glasgow in January, in South Shields in January and February, in London in April, and in Liverpool, Cardiff, Barry and Newport in June were not the first.
There had been racial battles in 1870s and 1911 in Cardiff with the Chinese community. In 1919 there were five deaths and serious injuries, whole areas cordoned off by the police and hundreds taken into protective custody. The Times reported the Cardiff battle:
“Racial riots of a grave character occurred at Cardiff during the early hours of yesterday morning. The trouble seems to have broken out simultaneously in several adjacent parts of the city about midnight. A young man named Harold Smart walked up to a constable and complained that a coloured man had cut his throat”
The constable took him to hospital but he died on arrival. This culminated in crowds of whites and blacks facing and baiting each one another. Six Arabs were charged including firing a revolver. It appears the riot grew out of white men objecting to coloured men consorting with white women.
One-Worlder Lord Milner wrote a Memorandum of June 23rd “On the Repatriation of Coloured Men.” ”I have every reason to fear, that when we get these men back to their own colonies they might be tempted to revenge themselves on the white minorities there…”
When Empire Windrush brought immigrants here in 1948 there were race battles: Liverpool again, between 31 July and 2 August, in Deptford on the 18th July; and Birmingham between the 6th and 8th of August 1949 involving immigrants from seafaring backgrounds but the idealists ignored them. The Times reported the Liverpool battle as about 50 persons ”mostly coloured appeared in court after. ..”a gang of negros stoned several white men who were walking peacefully. They were armed with bottles, swords, daggers, iron bars, coshes and axes. The white men hopelessly outnumbered ran away. A Negro club appeared to have been the headquarters of the coloured men, and police officers were stoned and had bottles thrown at them from club windows as they tried to disperse the crowd.”(2)
Despite “the risks involved” they continued with the policy of free entry for immigrants. They kept no records of numbers entering, apparently because the immigrants were, as Commonwealth citizens, British subjects, nor did they give practical support, leaving it to local councils and voluntary organizations. Throughout the 50.s many delegations from local councils of areas effected went to 10, Downing Street, to ask for practical help and funds. On the 21st of November 1952 the Town Clerk of Brixton asked for regulation of immigration.
Churchill first discussed immigration in Cabinet on 25th November 1952 when he asked in Cabinet if the Post Office employed large numbers of “coloured workers”. “If so, there was some risk social problems would be created.” They were from India, Nigeria, the Gold Coast, Sierra Leone, Uganda, Mauritius, West Indies, Ceylon, British Guiana and Malaya.
The postmaster General was asked to report on it. He explained: “...the Post Offices main unions raised no objections to their employment at basic grades.” He added,” If it is felt that coloured workers should not be allowed to obtain employment in this country, I should have thought the proper course would be to deny them entry to the country.”
Churchill asked his staff to find out about problems in Lambeth, Brixton and Cardiff. B.G.Smallman, PS, to the Colonial Secretary, producing a paper on “The Coloured Population of the UK". This estimated the numbers to be 40-50,000 which included about 6,000 students. (3)
Historian Andrew Roberts wrote that The Commonwealth Relations Office worried that with restrictions “ there might well be a chance of the governments of India and Pakistan introducing retaliatory restrictions against the entry or residence of members of the British business community.” Commonwealth Secretary Earl Home, worried that they should not give the impression that Commonwealth citizens from India, Pakistan and Ceylon would be less favourably treated than those from the Dominions otherwise there could be retaliation.
In private interviews Roberts shows the decadence of those around Churchill: “A Minister closely involved in the decision-making process, ‘ In fact…we were just stalling and hoping for the best’… One of Mr. Churchill’s private secretaries, ‘at that time it seemed a very good idea to get bus conductors and stuff’ … a junior minister, ‘it was becoming hard to find somebody to carry your bags at the station’.’’(4 )
On the 27th of June 1953 Sir Winston suffered a stroke that left him paralysed down the left side. After that, he told Butler, “I feel like an aeroplane at the end of its flight , in the dusk, with the petrol running out, in search of a safe landing.”(5) Interviewed by Andrew Roberts his Foreign Affairs Personal Secretary Anthony Montague- Brown recalled that he was “simply too tired to deal with the immigration problem. He could concentrate on a few big issues at a time- like the Russians -and the rest of the time he could only give a steer and not see it through.” (6) I
In November 1952 His Private Secretary, Sir John Colville noted, "He is getting tired and visibly ageing. He finds it hard to compose a speech and ideas no longer flow. (7)
Cabinet set up an Inter Departmental Committee to look into preventing an increase in the number. It reported its findings in December 1953. This Inter Departmental Committee comprised Ministry of Labour and National Service, the National Assistance Board, the Colonial Office and Chief Constables from areas where immigrants were settling.
The Home Secretary was to ask the Inter Departmental Committee, which was chaired by the Home Office, to look into preventing an increase in the number coming for employment. There is a note to R.J.Guppy of the Home Office in The Prime Ministers papers notifying him that Churchill had seen the report in that day's Daily Telegraph "about what is termed an influx of West Indians. He is considering bringing the matter before the Cabinet and would like to have a report from the Home Secretary about it." (8)
January 1954 Home Secretary Maxwell Fyfe reported on the findings of the “Working party on the Social and Economic Problems Arising from the Growing Influx into the United Kingdom of Coloured Workers”. He stated “the unskilled workers who form the majority are difficult to place because on the whole they are physically unsuited to heavy manual work…”(9)
For those familiar with the debate over the veracity of Enoch Powell’s claim in his Rivers Of Blood speech that an elderly white lady was being driven from her home, of the several news cuttings in the Prime Ministers papers is one from The News Chronicle of 7th December 1954 where a 62 year-old white woman living alone in a house full of coloured men asked for an injunction to stop her coloured landlord abusing or molesting her. Judge Wilfred Clothier in giving judgement said that she was “hounded by these coloured men. This is another case of black people entering half a house and never resting until they have turned the white people out. I hope there will be a remedy found quickly. One could be to turn back to Jamaica anyone found guilty of this practice. Another would be a prohibition by law to stop any black people buying a house containing white tenants.” Conrad Fairclough wanted Miss.Matilda McLaren out of where she had lived for 40 years yet he only came here in 1948.
“In Paddington hundreds of houses have been rented or bought by coloured people since the war. Statements are being taken from 2,000 residents who protested to the borough council against “the ever-increasing practice of selling to coloured people houses in which there are already white tenants.” Mr.George O’Connell, a member of the council said to me that a committee formed in the borough would sift through evidence provided by the residents. He hoped shortly to discuss the problem with Sir David Maxwell Fyfe, Home Secretary.”...We are not so much concerned about the effect on values of neighbouring properties as on the white tenants who are forced out by them.”
Churchill’s Private Secretary Montague-Brown to Civil Servant Johnston 2/11/1954 on an article in the Telegraph of 19 Oct in which the Jamaican Minister of Labour said he would not attempt to stop mass immigration. The P.M. thinks this should be brought up in Cabinet.
It is important to note that Commonwealth citizens had the right of entry to the UK and the same rights as British citizens when here. The difference is few came until after the Second war. The British Nationality Act of 1948 did not give them that right but codified it.
This point is made in the following example from the Cabinet Secretaries Notebooks released to the public in August 2007. These are the handwritten notes of Cabinet Meetings. They record that on 3 February 1954 under the item 'Coloured Workers', Sir Winston stated ‘Problems which will arise if many coloured people settle here. Are we to saddle ourselves with colour problems in the UK? Attracted by Welfare State. Public opinion in UK won't tolerate it once it gets beyond certain limits.'
Florence Horsbrugh, Minister of Education and MP for Manchester( Moss Side), added: 'Already becoming serious in Manchester.' David Maxwell Fyfe, the Home Secretary, gave a figure of 40,000 compared to 7,000 before the Second World War and raised the possibility of control. He said: 'There is a case on merits for exclude. riff-raff. But politically it wd. be represented & discussed on basis of colour limitation. That wd. offend the floating vote viz., the old Liberals. We shd. be reversing age-long tradition that. British Subjects have right of entry to mother-country of Empire. We should. offend Liberals, also sentimentalists.' He added: 'The colonial. populations are resented in Liverpool, Paddington & other areas by those who come into contact with them. But those who don't are apt to take a more Liberal view.'
Churchill intervened: 'Question . is whether it is politically wise to allow public feeling to develop a little more before taking action.' Adding that it would be 'fatal' to let the situation develop too far Mr.Churchill conclud: 'Would like also to study possibility of "quota" - no. not to be exceeded.'
Another referred to an "increasing evil" and principles "laid down 200 yrs. ago are not applicable to-day. See dangers of colour discriminn. But other [Dominions] control entry of B. subjects. Cd. we present action as coming into line...& securing uniformity?"
Mr.Churchill said the question was whether it might be wise "to allow public feeling to develop a little more - before takg. action...May be wise to wait...But it wd. be fatal to let it develop too far." (11)
In March 1954 Maxwell Fyfe told Cabinet, “that large numbers of coloured people are living on National Assistance” and that “coloured landlords by their conduct are making life difficult for white people living in the same building or area…the result is that white people leave and the accommodation is then converted to furnished lettings for coloured people, with serious overcrowding and exploitation”.
In a Cabinet memorandum of 8 March Maxwell Fyfe feared “serious difficulties involved in contemplating action which would undoubtedly land the Government in some political controversy.”
In cabinet in October 1954 Mr. Churchill warned Maxwell Fyfe, “that the problems arising from the immigration of coloured people required urgent and serious consideration.” Maxwell-Fyfe emphasised that there is no power to prevent these people entering no matter how much the number may increase. (12)
The discussion that Harold Macmillan referred to in his diary entry for January 20th 1955: "More discussion about the West Indian immigrants. A Bill is being drafted - but it's not an easy problem. P.M. thinks 'Keep England White' a good slogan! Can be substantiated by the Cabinet notebooks for 20th January 1955. This is a transcript:
Coloured Immigrants.
P.M. Need for decision before long.
Anthony Eden. Before Commonwealth P.M. mtg.
Henry Hopkinson. Osborne M.P. is thinking of introducg. Bill under 10 min. rule.
Lloyd George . Depn. y’day from B’ham. No objn. to them as workers. But qua housing. Figures are impressive.
Viscount Swinton. Might consider Cttee. on social aspects, alone.
A.E. Might be useful – to re-inforce action we decide to take.
P.M. Not in favour. Better to introduce Bill. May find we cd. get it thro’. At least we shd. have shown our view.
Marquess of Salisbury. Urgent.
H.H. Movement is starting now in favour of immign. from Barbados.
[Exit H.H. (11)
Just before he gave up the Premiership in 1955 Mr. Churchill told Spectator owner and editor Ian Gilmour that immigration "is the most important subject facing this country, but I cannot get any of my ministers to take any notice". (12)
If Sir Winston had been well we would not know be suffering the gun killings and knivings or Muslim bombings of our people.
Cabinet Secretaries Notebooks covering this period CAB 195/13 was released at the beginning of February 2008. The papers of British Prime Ministers are classified under PREM. PREM 11/824 covers Churchill’s premiership. It has Information requested by the Prime Minister on immigration of coloured workers to the UK and their employment in the Civil Service; deportation of British subjects; powers of Colonial Governments; employment of Jamaicans in the UK 1952-1955
1 Peter Hennessy, 'Having It So Good - Britain in the Fifties' (Allen Lane, 2006) p 224. Hennessy's reference is: Peter Catterall (ed.), 'The Macmillan Diaries: The Cabinet Years, 1950-1957' (Macmillan, 2003) p 382.
2 …” ( Panikos Paranyi (ed) “Racial Violence in Britain in the Nineteenth Century.” (Leicester University.1996). The discussions on immigration are classified as our “racism” and usually by Marxist academics who blame us”whites” for any difficulties. See also
British Immigration Policy Since 1939: The Making of Multi-Racial Britain, By Ian R. G. Spencer. (Routledge. 1997)
3 Thee are held at the National Archive. CC100(52)8(cabinet Conclusions on 25/11/1952, CAB 128/25; The Post Master General’s report and the Chancellor being asked to restrict entry to the Civil Service is in CC106(52), 8/12/1952, CAB 128
4 Eminent Churchillians, Andrew Roberts. (London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson) 1994,
5 R.A.Butler,”The Art of the Possible, (London. Hamish Hamilton),1971, p173.
6 ibid Eminent Churchillians.
7 Sir John Colville.(London. Stoughton Ltd )1985.The Fringes of Power. P654
8 Daily Telegraph 29/1/54 "Cities Concerned at Influx of West Indians."
9 CAB124/1191 Report of the Working Party on Coloured People Seeking Employment in the United Kingdom. 17th December 1953.
10 Cabinet Secretaries Notebooks. The eleventh Notebook (CAB 195/11) (released August 2007) covers the period 3.12.52 - 26.2.54.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/aug/05/race.past
11 Cabinet Secretaries Notebooks. The Notebook covering 20th January 1955 CAB 195/13 was released at the beginning of February 2008.
ibid Peter Hennessy, 'Having It So Good - Britain in the Fifties' (Allen Lane.2006) p 224. Hennessy's reference is: Peter Catterall (ed.), 'The Macmillan Diaries: The Cabinet Years, 1950-1957' (Macmillan, 2003) p 382.
12 Inside Right. Sir Ian Gilmour (Quartet.1977)
Wednesday, 11 March 2009
David Cameron and The United Front Against Whites
David Cameron and The United Front Against Whites
On the Tommy Boyd's talk Radio show of 17 February Weyman Bennett described David Cameron as a supporter of the Marxist UAF! Are the Conservatives still the patriotic party or a Con that pretends to support the nation but when in power carry on with the work of the Labour Party? Bennet accused the BNP of violence but at 2008 Red White Blue, 33 arrests were recorded - including left wing thugs throwing rocks at children and elderly people. Yet no members or supporters of the BNP were arrested. What is Cameron doing with people like that if he is a Tory?
The Daily Mail of 22 January reported his speaking to think tank Demos which is The Progressive Conservatism Project developing policies and ideas that are radical. Conservatives are now pursuing progressive goals which were once left-wing like social justice, social mobility and an end to poverty. How, they ask, can these be achieved through ‘conservative’ means? They are turning the Conservative party into a neo-Marxist outfit like Nulab!
cameron said his party wants to abolish child poverty and increase social mobility. The four aims of 'progressive Conservatism' are - a fair society, a green environment, safety for citizens and equal opportunity... 'Yes, they are ends that we share with people in the Labour Party, the Liberal Democrat Party and right across the mainstream political spectrum. But no, we do not agree about how best to achieve those ends.”(1)
What people fail to understand is that the Conservative Party is no longer conservative. They should be done under Advertising Standards laws or change their name. They are another aspect of PC ideology Party. You cannot "change" the fundamental tenets of Conservatism but you can become something else behind the name. In 1991 the party got rid of the remaining traditionalists when it purged the Monday Club to make it another vehicle of neo-Marxism, PC and to serve the Globalists agenda.
What do traditional Conservatives believe? American Conservative Robert Nisbet (1966): "The ethos of Conservatism is tradition…...defence of social tradition and emphasis on the values of community, kinship, hierarchy, authority, and religion; add also Conservatism’s premonition of social chaos surmounted by absolute power once individuals have become wrenched from the context of these values by the forces of liberalism and radicalism. The Conservatives began with the reality of the institutional order as they found it, the order bequeathed by history".
The sense of belonging to a people and a putting their interests first was shown by Indian PM, Mrs Gandhi’s, 'Indianisation' policies commenced about 1962 in which Europeans were asked to leave their posts on the basis of race; the the Africanisation policies of Robert Mugabe, are cruel and brutal and, even though they can not run their society, they see it as theirs and want to do it for themselves; the Africanisation policies of the ANC are racist but multi-racialists and anti-racists support racist policies if they are against “white people”! There was the expulsion of over 10 million Europeans between 1945 and 1948 on the basis of their race and nationality.
Indigenous Indians are given preference in India - in fact we wouldn't be allowed in and if we did wouldn't be eligible for anything. Every country puts the interests of its own first, but our establishment want to see the indigenous British dispossessed in their own country. Why don't the elites just admit they hate us and want to destroy us?
In September(2008) , in a speech to the Israeli parliament, Gordon Brown called on the nations of the world to ensure that our era becomes the century of the global community.
He swore to a “make a reality of the vision of a global society in which we create global civic institutions that turn words of friendship into bonds of human solidarity.
David Cameron is also a servant of the global elites pushing for globalism. During his visit to Rwanda last summer, while there was severe flooding in his Whitney, Oxfordshire constituency, he showed which people he supported: ˜There is no domestic or foreign any more. In this world today, we are all in it together.”
There is no difference, one word that has been driving me nuts has been the word ‘Global’, every time Gordon Brown opens his mouth the word ‘Global’ comes out over and over again, Cameron is no different, here is a quote from Cameron in 2007 taken from an article ‘Cameron sets out vision for EU’
In his speech, Mr Cameron said the priorities should be the "three Gs" of globalisation, global warming and global poverty.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6421215.stm
They all use the same language and concepts and most of his main ideological concerns are the same as the other elites and as Brown has shown a main part of the globalist vision is the creation of a new corporate and political network which would operate beyond nations. The Utopians believed that harmony could be made on earth not heaven by world government. H. G. Wells, the science fiction writer and socialist philosopher, was an advocate of a “permanent world congress” and specialised international agencies which would end the nation state. Patriotism, he believed, was “mere flag-waving with no constructive duties”. Now the dreamers are in power and doing it through deceit and manipulation.
Cameron visited Bolton on Monday 5th January 2009 and addressed a more than 1,000 leading members of the Asian community, at the Reebok Stadium. Cameron ignored the indigenous populatiion. He announced: “We have hitherto been able to rise to the challenge and sustain our coherence and unity. We have done so through a combination of a steadfast faith in our institutions and values, such as freedom under the rule of law, pluralism and tolerance….and because society – not only the majority community but the minority community too – were prepared to stand together as one. There is no reason to think we cannot do the same today.” But he knows that under the EU “Rule of Law” and the other values he cited like “our institutions” are being scrapped. Very hypocritical!
The one-sided view of racism which ignores the horrendous crimes our people are subjected to including the routine raping of our little girls by older Muslim gangs is typical of the caste: “ First, a concerted attack on racism and soft bigotry. You can't even start to talk about a truly integrated society while people are suffering racist insults and abuse, as many still are in our country on a daily basis. We must also be careful about the language we use. No Muslim I've ever met is offended by Christmas, or supports its replacement with 'Winterval'. But many Muslims I've talked to about these issues are deeply offended by the use of the word 'Islamic' or 'Islamist' to describe the terrorist threat we face today”(2) like Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith’s call to describe Muslim terrorism as “anti-Islamic activity.”
British politics are run by utopians, optimists and Romantic Idealists since WWII - look at the practical consequences. Utopians brought millions of immigrants to make our lives better and, still say it – Cameron is one of them. There is also cheap labour for commerce.
In his 2007 conference speech Cameron spoke without notes, to suggest they were deeply felt beliefs yet he was clearly reciting a script, which said nothing. He asked the audience, “What do I believe?” and answered, “I am by nature an optimist.” We assume his answer meant, “ Everything will turn out well in the end.”
Like other “Caste” elites he has no sense of duty or honour - his political career comes first. Small differences aside the Libs, Labs, and Cons, have the same ideology and Cameron in the speech signalled that he belongs: “I think our diverse and multi-racial society is a huge benefit for Britain.” Anything less and his career is over.
He joined in the Persecution of Prince Harry demonstrating that the non-Conservatives will not defend our people's norms nor the monarchy as traditionally, but are the same as the other mainstream parties, the intellectual and cultural elites, commerce and the media - attacking our traditions and ways to prepare us for utopia. Like all Utopians Cameron is an optimist about the ultimate conclusion of British society in a multi-racial, one-world. Prime Ministers don’t question dominant state- ideology - they slot into it.
Like the others he says what he has to to get elected not what is needed to save the country. The common features of this ilk are Political correctness, ambition and cowardice which prevents them addressing the real problems affecting us. They try to convince us that if we also fantasise that things will turn out well, they will. But things only work out well when done well.
Optimists can’t solve problems that optimists have created. They thought the multiracial society would work because they thought it would. Even though their utopia is a nightmare, they will not face it but make us scapegoats when anything goes wrong by using the all-purpose pejorative “racism” which only whites can be.
The media puff him up as they did with Gordon Brown and the Archbishop of Canterbury. Politicians are always pictured in mid-flow, with a finger raised as authority figures when really they are weak and inadequate. The Daily Telegraph said the speech: “…explained in detail his vision of how to change Britain.” It did no such thing.
It was the same script we get from all establishment politicians - changing this and changing that, but they never make a real point like what they are going to change - what into what, why and how? Our inadequate leaders haven’t got it and hope something will turn up.
What they call change is more of the same in a different guise. They mean repackaging. They’ve set us on this course and they’re determined to see it through, and there will be no change until establishment liars, cowards, and parasites have been replaced by people for whom self interest is not the prime motivating factor.
Like Obama’s inaugural speech Cameron’s vision to the conference had no substance: “We need change for the long term, hope for our country and optimism for the next generation…”. Merely buzz-words - “…change …long term …hope …our country …optimism …next generation,” but no ‘detailed’ explanation of the vision that the Telegraph praised. The only thing he stated with certainty was that he supports mass immigration: “I think this country has benefited immeasurably from immigration”. If immigration isn’t the problem, what is? He enlightened us: “I want to tell you what's wrong with our country and I want to explain what I am going to do to put it right “ …if we really want to tackle crime, if we really want to make our society stronger then you have got to make families stronger and society more responsible …we must make our country safer and greener and give people more freedom and control of their lives…” …families …stronger …responsible …our country …safer …greener …freedom” - more buzz-words without meaning. The population does not see society through the same ideology and have to be browbeaten by moral lectures and coralled by totalitarian laws and a politicised police. Few indeed share his view that immigration has benefitted Britain ‘immeasurably’ and most people were they not frightened of being persecuted by the state and “free” would say so.
What he really means is that he wants people to be free to say what the “caste” want them to say, and to have control over their lives so that the “caste” can manage them in the way they want to. His knee jerk response to faux pas of Patrick Mercer and Nigel Hastilow show what this “freedom” means - persecution of dissidents.
A new kind of Tory? In his 68 minute long conference speech ostensibly about British society he didn’t refer to our Christian traditions or the threat that Islam poses to them. He is on the other side. He interpreted the worries over immigration as concern about the effect it has on services, education, health, housing, and ignored the more important effect it is having on British culture and the dispossession of ethnic Britons.
Then he enthused about what he thinks important – persuading ethnic groups to become Tories. He told the audience they must, “…get out amongst Britain's ethnic minority communities and find the brightest, the best and the most talented and get them in.”
One of “...the brightest, the best and the most talented” members of “…the ethnics ” is Baroness Warsi. He was so impressed by Warsi that he wanted her on board at any price. And when she failed to make it and lost to Labour’s Shahid Malik in the 2005 general election he had her made a Baroness to encourage other Asians. She became minister responsible for ‘cohesion’.
We’re in safe hands. He told the conference, “I am proud that I can stand here with the first Muslim woman of a Shadow Cabinet or Cabinet in Sayeeda Warsi who will be a great talent for our party and our country.” Baroness Warsi is a former immigration lawyer. She was involved with Operation Black Vote and the left wing pro-immigration Joseph Rowntree Trust. Last year she was co-author of a report that made the case for allowing refused asylum seekers to enter the economy.
She is his Lord Ahmed who Blair appointed to the House of Lords, swearing his oath of allegiance to Queen and Country on the Koran. Ahmed was both the first Muslim to be appointed to the Lords, and the first Lord to lead delegations on behalf of the British government to Saudi Arabia for the Haj, or Muslim pilgrimage.
In February 2005 he hosted a book launch for the infamous anti-Semite Jöran Jermas at the House of Lords, where Jermas launched into a fundamentalist Muslims tirade against Zionists. This fawning on immigrants presents us as weak and afraid of them which is what emboldened Ahmed to threaten to mobilise 10,000 Muslims to stop Geert Wilders entering The Palace of Westminster!(3) Jacqui smityh, Home secretary banned Wilders!
In May 2007 Cameron stayed with a Muslim family in Birmingham and wrote in the Observer of 13th may 2007: “Last week, I spent two days staying with Abdullah and Shahida Rehman and their family in Birmingham. The experience has strengthened my conviction about the right way to build a more cohesive Britain... by using the word 'Islamist' to describe the threat, we actually help do the terrorist ideologues' work for them, confirming to many impressionable young Muslim men that to be a 'good Muslim', you have to support their evil campaign.” Cameron’s argument that otherwise peaceful Muslims can be persuaded to embrace terrorism by the mere association of the words ‘Islamist’ and ‘threat’ is either absurd or the ultimate in unintentional truths.
He uses us whites as scapegoats: “Many British Asians see a society that hardly inspires them to integrate. Indeed, they see aspects of modern Britain which are a threat to the values they hold dear - values which we should all hold dear.” It’s our fault, again. I should have guessed.
He revealed the establishment agenda to deculture as well as dispossess us: “Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.” (4)To help shift society in this direction Cameron set up the Conservative Muslim Forum, a sort of Tory equivalent of the National Black Police Association, which ‘advises’ the Conservative Party on how best to assimulate us to Muslims. The CMF wants the compulsory history curriculum in schools changed to give full recognition to the “…massive contribution (sic) that Islam has made to the development of Western civilisation".and the “caste” is introducing the same agenda into our schools and teaching our children to see 7/7 through the eyes of the bombers! This is teaching our children to submit to Islam and to cover the terrorists in glory. (5)
Recently, Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari head of the Muslim Council of Britain was calling for Britain to adopt Islamic customs and labelling us a Nazis for daring to question the infinite benefits of Islam. Good old Tory values! Conservative Cameron concludes that British society is collapsing because it’s not sufficiently Asian: “We have a responsibility to change to accommodate immigrants so they fit in”. He’s made this perfectly clear which is why the Conservative Muslim Forum and the Muslim Council of Britain are emboldened to demand that Britain change to take account of their ways and laud their achievements.
Cameron's false Conservatives like Labour are increasing the influence of Islam on this country. Lets end by reminding ourselves what a traditional Tory is: On May 24 1929, Stanley Baldwin, three times Prime Minister, said :“Let us keep this thought ever in our mind: “that each one of us, so far as in him lies, will strive to keep these islands a fit nursery for Our Race”.
(1) http://www.divinity.cam.ac.uk/cip/documents/DavidCameronSpeech2.pdf
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/may/13/comment.communities
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6421215.stm
(2) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....o-Muslim s.html
(3)http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/3344161/britain-capitulates-to-terror.thtml
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/....liberty-central
(4) http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2007/may/13/race.immigrationpolicy
(5) http://www.independent.co.uk/news/educat....t-1627062.ht ml
://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/apr/07/race.world
On the Tommy Boyd's talk Radio show of 17 February Weyman Bennett described David Cameron as a supporter of the Marxist UAF! Are the Conservatives still the patriotic party or a Con that pretends to support the nation but when in power carry on with the work of the Labour Party? Bennet accused the BNP of violence but at 2008 Red White Blue, 33 arrests were recorded - including left wing thugs throwing rocks at children and elderly people. Yet no members or supporters of the BNP were arrested. What is Cameron doing with people like that if he is a Tory?
The Daily Mail of 22 January reported his speaking to think tank Demos which is The Progressive Conservatism Project developing policies and ideas that are radical. Conservatives are now pursuing progressive goals which were once left-wing like social justice, social mobility and an end to poverty. How, they ask, can these be achieved through ‘conservative’ means? They are turning the Conservative party into a neo-Marxist outfit like Nulab!
cameron said his party wants to abolish child poverty and increase social mobility. The four aims of 'progressive Conservatism' are - a fair society, a green environment, safety for citizens and equal opportunity... 'Yes, they are ends that we share with people in the Labour Party, the Liberal Democrat Party and right across the mainstream political spectrum. But no, we do not agree about how best to achieve those ends.”(1)
What people fail to understand is that the Conservative Party is no longer conservative. They should be done under Advertising Standards laws or change their name. They are another aspect of PC ideology Party. You cannot "change" the fundamental tenets of Conservatism but you can become something else behind the name. In 1991 the party got rid of the remaining traditionalists when it purged the Monday Club to make it another vehicle of neo-Marxism, PC and to serve the Globalists agenda.
What do traditional Conservatives believe? American Conservative Robert Nisbet (1966): "The ethos of Conservatism is tradition…...defence of social tradition and emphasis on the values of community, kinship, hierarchy, authority, and religion; add also Conservatism’s premonition of social chaos surmounted by absolute power once individuals have become wrenched from the context of these values by the forces of liberalism and radicalism. The Conservatives began with the reality of the institutional order as they found it, the order bequeathed by history".
The sense of belonging to a people and a putting their interests first was shown by Indian PM, Mrs Gandhi’s, 'Indianisation' policies commenced about 1962 in which Europeans were asked to leave their posts on the basis of race; the the Africanisation policies of Robert Mugabe, are cruel and brutal and, even though they can not run their society, they see it as theirs and want to do it for themselves; the Africanisation policies of the ANC are racist but multi-racialists and anti-racists support racist policies if they are against “white people”! There was the expulsion of over 10 million Europeans between 1945 and 1948 on the basis of their race and nationality.
Indigenous Indians are given preference in India - in fact we wouldn't be allowed in and if we did wouldn't be eligible for anything. Every country puts the interests of its own first, but our establishment want to see the indigenous British dispossessed in their own country. Why don't the elites just admit they hate us and want to destroy us?
In September(2008) , in a speech to the Israeli parliament, Gordon Brown called on the nations of the world to ensure that our era becomes the century of the global community.
He swore to a “make a reality of the vision of a global society in which we create global civic institutions that turn words of friendship into bonds of human solidarity.
David Cameron is also a servant of the global elites pushing for globalism. During his visit to Rwanda last summer, while there was severe flooding in his Whitney, Oxfordshire constituency, he showed which people he supported: ˜There is no domestic or foreign any more. In this world today, we are all in it together.”
There is no difference, one word that has been driving me nuts has been the word ‘Global’, every time Gordon Brown opens his mouth the word ‘Global’ comes out over and over again, Cameron is no different, here is a quote from Cameron in 2007 taken from an article ‘Cameron sets out vision for EU’
In his speech, Mr Cameron said the priorities should be the "three Gs" of globalisation, global warming and global poverty.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6421215.stm
They all use the same language and concepts and most of his main ideological concerns are the same as the other elites and as Brown has shown a main part of the globalist vision is the creation of a new corporate and political network which would operate beyond nations. The Utopians believed that harmony could be made on earth not heaven by world government. H. G. Wells, the science fiction writer and socialist philosopher, was an advocate of a “permanent world congress” and specialised international agencies which would end the nation state. Patriotism, he believed, was “mere flag-waving with no constructive duties”. Now the dreamers are in power and doing it through deceit and manipulation.
Cameron visited Bolton on Monday 5th January 2009 and addressed a more than 1,000 leading members of the Asian community, at the Reebok Stadium. Cameron ignored the indigenous populatiion. He announced: “We have hitherto been able to rise to the challenge and sustain our coherence and unity. We have done so through a combination of a steadfast faith in our institutions and values, such as freedom under the rule of law, pluralism and tolerance….and because society – not only the majority community but the minority community too – were prepared to stand together as one. There is no reason to think we cannot do the same today.” But he knows that under the EU “Rule of Law” and the other values he cited like “our institutions” are being scrapped. Very hypocritical!
The one-sided view of racism which ignores the horrendous crimes our people are subjected to including the routine raping of our little girls by older Muslim gangs is typical of the caste: “ First, a concerted attack on racism and soft bigotry. You can't even start to talk about a truly integrated society while people are suffering racist insults and abuse, as many still are in our country on a daily basis. We must also be careful about the language we use. No Muslim I've ever met is offended by Christmas, or supports its replacement with 'Winterval'. But many Muslims I've talked to about these issues are deeply offended by the use of the word 'Islamic' or 'Islamist' to describe the terrorist threat we face today”(2) like Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith’s call to describe Muslim terrorism as “anti-Islamic activity.”
British politics are run by utopians, optimists and Romantic Idealists since WWII - look at the practical consequences. Utopians brought millions of immigrants to make our lives better and, still say it – Cameron is one of them. There is also cheap labour for commerce.
In his 2007 conference speech Cameron spoke without notes, to suggest they were deeply felt beliefs yet he was clearly reciting a script, which said nothing. He asked the audience, “What do I believe?” and answered, “I am by nature an optimist.” We assume his answer meant, “ Everything will turn out well in the end.”
Like other “Caste” elites he has no sense of duty or honour - his political career comes first. Small differences aside the Libs, Labs, and Cons, have the same ideology and Cameron in the speech signalled that he belongs: “I think our diverse and multi-racial society is a huge benefit for Britain.” Anything less and his career is over.
He joined in the Persecution of Prince Harry demonstrating that the non-Conservatives will not defend our people's norms nor the monarchy as traditionally, but are the same as the other mainstream parties, the intellectual and cultural elites, commerce and the media - attacking our traditions and ways to prepare us for utopia. Like all Utopians Cameron is an optimist about the ultimate conclusion of British society in a multi-racial, one-world. Prime Ministers don’t question dominant state- ideology - they slot into it.
Like the others he says what he has to to get elected not what is needed to save the country. The common features of this ilk are Political correctness, ambition and cowardice which prevents them addressing the real problems affecting us. They try to convince us that if we also fantasise that things will turn out well, they will. But things only work out well when done well.
Optimists can’t solve problems that optimists have created. They thought the multiracial society would work because they thought it would. Even though their utopia is a nightmare, they will not face it but make us scapegoats when anything goes wrong by using the all-purpose pejorative “racism” which only whites can be.
The media puff him up as they did with Gordon Brown and the Archbishop of Canterbury. Politicians are always pictured in mid-flow, with a finger raised as authority figures when really they are weak and inadequate. The Daily Telegraph said the speech: “…explained in detail his vision of how to change Britain.” It did no such thing.
It was the same script we get from all establishment politicians - changing this and changing that, but they never make a real point like what they are going to change - what into what, why and how? Our inadequate leaders haven’t got it and hope something will turn up.
What they call change is more of the same in a different guise. They mean repackaging. They’ve set us on this course and they’re determined to see it through, and there will be no change until establishment liars, cowards, and parasites have been replaced by people for whom self interest is not the prime motivating factor.
Like Obama’s inaugural speech Cameron’s vision to the conference had no substance: “We need change for the long term, hope for our country and optimism for the next generation…”. Merely buzz-words - “…change …long term …hope …our country …optimism …next generation,” but no ‘detailed’ explanation of the vision that the Telegraph praised. The only thing he stated with certainty was that he supports mass immigration: “I think this country has benefited immeasurably from immigration”. If immigration isn’t the problem, what is? He enlightened us: “I want to tell you what's wrong with our country and I want to explain what I am going to do to put it right “ …if we really want to tackle crime, if we really want to make our society stronger then you have got to make families stronger and society more responsible …we must make our country safer and greener and give people more freedom and control of their lives…” …families …stronger …responsible …our country …safer …greener …freedom” - more buzz-words without meaning. The population does not see society through the same ideology and have to be browbeaten by moral lectures and coralled by totalitarian laws and a politicised police. Few indeed share his view that immigration has benefitted Britain ‘immeasurably’ and most people were they not frightened of being persecuted by the state and “free” would say so.
What he really means is that he wants people to be free to say what the “caste” want them to say, and to have control over their lives so that the “caste” can manage them in the way they want to. His knee jerk response to faux pas of Patrick Mercer and Nigel Hastilow show what this “freedom” means - persecution of dissidents.
A new kind of Tory? In his 68 minute long conference speech ostensibly about British society he didn’t refer to our Christian traditions or the threat that Islam poses to them. He is on the other side. He interpreted the worries over immigration as concern about the effect it has on services, education, health, housing, and ignored the more important effect it is having on British culture and the dispossession of ethnic Britons.
Then he enthused about what he thinks important – persuading ethnic groups to become Tories. He told the audience they must, “…get out amongst Britain's ethnic minority communities and find the brightest, the best and the most talented and get them in.”
One of “...the brightest, the best and the most talented” members of “…the ethnics ” is Baroness Warsi. He was so impressed by Warsi that he wanted her on board at any price. And when she failed to make it and lost to Labour’s Shahid Malik in the 2005 general election he had her made a Baroness to encourage other Asians. She became minister responsible for ‘cohesion’.
We’re in safe hands. He told the conference, “I am proud that I can stand here with the first Muslim woman of a Shadow Cabinet or Cabinet in Sayeeda Warsi who will be a great talent for our party and our country.” Baroness Warsi is a former immigration lawyer. She was involved with Operation Black Vote and the left wing pro-immigration Joseph Rowntree Trust. Last year she was co-author of a report that made the case for allowing refused asylum seekers to enter the economy.
She is his Lord Ahmed who Blair appointed to the House of Lords, swearing his oath of allegiance to Queen and Country on the Koran. Ahmed was both the first Muslim to be appointed to the Lords, and the first Lord to lead delegations on behalf of the British government to Saudi Arabia for the Haj, or Muslim pilgrimage.
In February 2005 he hosted a book launch for the infamous anti-Semite Jöran Jermas at the House of Lords, where Jermas launched into a fundamentalist Muslims tirade against Zionists. This fawning on immigrants presents us as weak and afraid of them which is what emboldened Ahmed to threaten to mobilise 10,000 Muslims to stop Geert Wilders entering The Palace of Westminster!(3) Jacqui smityh, Home secretary banned Wilders!
In May 2007 Cameron stayed with a Muslim family in Birmingham and wrote in the Observer of 13th may 2007: “Last week, I spent two days staying with Abdullah and Shahida Rehman and their family in Birmingham. The experience has strengthened my conviction about the right way to build a more cohesive Britain... by using the word 'Islamist' to describe the threat, we actually help do the terrorist ideologues' work for them, confirming to many impressionable young Muslim men that to be a 'good Muslim', you have to support their evil campaign.” Cameron’s argument that otherwise peaceful Muslims can be persuaded to embrace terrorism by the mere association of the words ‘Islamist’ and ‘threat’ is either absurd or the ultimate in unintentional truths.
He uses us whites as scapegoats: “Many British Asians see a society that hardly inspires them to integrate. Indeed, they see aspects of modern Britain which are a threat to the values they hold dear - values which we should all hold dear.” It’s our fault, again. I should have guessed.
He revealed the establishment agenda to deculture as well as dispossess us: “Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.” (4)To help shift society in this direction Cameron set up the Conservative Muslim Forum, a sort of Tory equivalent of the National Black Police Association, which ‘advises’ the Conservative Party on how best to assimulate us to Muslims. The CMF wants the compulsory history curriculum in schools changed to give full recognition to the “…massive contribution (sic) that Islam has made to the development of Western civilisation".and the “caste” is introducing the same agenda into our schools and teaching our children to see 7/7 through the eyes of the bombers! This is teaching our children to submit to Islam and to cover the terrorists in glory. (5)
Recently, Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari head of the Muslim Council of Britain was calling for Britain to adopt Islamic customs and labelling us a Nazis for daring to question the infinite benefits of Islam. Good old Tory values! Conservative Cameron concludes that British society is collapsing because it’s not sufficiently Asian: “We have a responsibility to change to accommodate immigrants so they fit in”. He’s made this perfectly clear which is why the Conservative Muslim Forum and the Muslim Council of Britain are emboldened to demand that Britain change to take account of their ways and laud their achievements.
Cameron's false Conservatives like Labour are increasing the influence of Islam on this country. Lets end by reminding ourselves what a traditional Tory is: On May 24 1929, Stanley Baldwin, three times Prime Minister, said :“Let us keep this thought ever in our mind: “that each one of us, so far as in him lies, will strive to keep these islands a fit nursery for Our Race”.
(1) http://www.divinity.cam.ac.uk/cip/documents/DavidCameronSpeech2.pdf
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/may/13/comment.communities
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6421215.stm
(2) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....o-Muslim s.html
(3)http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/3344161/britain-capitulates-to-terror.thtml
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/....liberty-central
(4) http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2007/may/13/race.immigrationpolicy
(5) http://www.independent.co.uk/news/educat....t-1627062.ht ml
://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/apr/07/race.world
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
