What Alan Clarke, the former Conservative government minister and famous diarist praised as “the British military spirit” is scorned as yobbery by The Establishment when it should be a matter of honour and pride. (1)
The people who were the backbone of our traditional military prowess are slandered and misused. They are misused because they are not wanted in the armed forces where they should be cherished as heroes ready to defend our country and control our borders to repel the current invasion. Our troops are held in contempt and not even provided with adequate equipment to save their lives.
The people who naturally belong in the forces are barred because of youthful misadventures. At one time young men who were at risk of being sent to young offenders institutions were given the opportunity of joining the military. To the traditional aristocratic ruling, warrior class, these would have been ideal recruits possessed of noble virtues which are now criminalized.
A classic example of how these virtues are presented as wrong or even low class was in the Daily Mail of 5th July. In this deceitful piece of fiction scribbler Neil Firth linked several disconnected phenomena. Typical of his old-fashioned kind he used the usual faded cliches to trigger negative responses in his readers. “Far-right” was trotted out as usual to deter others from feeling their natural instincts to defend their communities and protect our young girls from being child - raped by the rival Muslims communities. (2)
The actual quotes from Commander Shawn Sawyer show how the police work in league with Muslims against their own people. Sawyer, is from the Met's specialist operations wing told a meeting of British Muslims last night: 'I fear that they will have a spectacular ...'They will carry out an attack that will lead to a loss of life or injury to a community somewhere. They're not choosy about which community.' (3)
These are the corrupt police who stop “whites” under terrorist laws to avoid upsetting Muslims and who tell community leaders before they stage a raid looking for bombs and weapons. If the police continue to act in concert with Muslim extremists against the indigenous people we will have to consider with holding the portion of council tax that pays their wages.
They use class distinction to distance their targets from the rest of polite and enlightened society by characterisation like “Banner-waving drunks”. This is to discredit them and put them outside what is respectable. These are attempts to stifle their own populations to prevent a “White backlash” but their prospects are bleak as people are feeling threatened and realising what the corrupt caste has been doing behind their backs. They try to shift the focus of blame when they make things up. In this Firth uses “There were reports of...” I checked with people who had really been there unlike story-teller, Firth. (4)
One farrago of lies and made up examples was the Birmingham posts so-called report of the St.Georges’ Day parade in West Bromwich. This inventor hide behind “allegedly” but turned out something so different from the truth that I am thinking of recommending him for “The Booker Prize”!
These imaginative concoctions do not just appear out of nowhere, they are part of an ideology that is in the minds of “The ideological Caste” and binds them together in a common political aim of destroying us and installing Islam as the dominant European belief and legal system and the elites slot each event into that.
This why news items seem old: the new event is interpreted through the old ideology. The ideology that sees us as he enemy and scapegoats us every time the multi-racial dream falters. The recent hysterical reports blaming Ulster people for disputes with Roma gypsies is a classic example. The media never told us what caused the dispute but just accused local people of “racist attacks.” Well, I don’t believe them, and think these people were defending their communities.
They take the public's mind off what their allies in the Muslim communities are doing by focusing public attention on a bogey figure which they set up for the purpose - allowing Muslim extremists to recruit and build up ethnic war against us. (4)
But, around the world, EthnoNationlism is being re-asserted while Western rulers go into orbit on fantasies of Globalisation. China is instructive. They claim there are 158 dead, 1,080 injured and a thousand arrested in ethnic violence between Han Chinese and the Muslim, Turkic-speaking Uighurs of Xinjiang - the large oil-rich province on the border with Pakistan, Afghanistan and several Central Asian countries that seceded from the Soviet Union.
The Communist Party chief has promised to execute those responsible for the killings. The Chinese are not decadent and putting troops into Xinjiang and they have fought to ensure possession of Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang and Tibet by moving in millions of Han Chinese, swamping the indigenous peoples, as they did in Manchuria.
Where Beijing floods its borderlands with Han to reduce indigenous populations to minorities, and stifles religious, ethnic and linguistic diversity, Western decadent rulers dispossess their own people for the benefit of immigrants and rationalise it as “Global migration” when it is actually encouraged. Even the coded language sends out the message that they can come here and take everything off us boasting across the world that we need them to look after our elderly, for example.
What despicable decadents these people are to try and destroy their own innocent, people.
As I mentioned previously, their comments on us are not independent, assessments of something bad but parts of their ideology. When deceitful Simon Hughes stated on television that it is not true that asylum seekers get more state benefits than indigenous people he deliberately misled the public by playing with words because he knows it is the illegal immigrants that are granted asylum that get more benefits than our own people.
But Hughes comment was not only deliberately, deceitful, he left out the context they occupy in his mind. That of surrendering us to Muslim by allowing them to take over in what is one of the most evil crimes against innocent people in human history, while being dressed up as progress, we are scape- goated as evil for trying to defend our children and communities. (5)
The Soviet Union imploded very quickly yet the Chinese are cute and believe in EthnoNationalism. Western rulers have tried transcend it by dreaming about a New World Order and ignore their much-vaunted democratic principles? What value are principles when even their proponents don’t really live by them? We still are a blood and soil people but the rulers are trying to break down our natural need for belonging to a people in a traditional homeland to allow Muslims to take over.
They retrospectively alter history and fib that we were never blood-and-soil people, but a propositional nation, a nation of ideas. Our belief in democracy, diversity, and equality define us and make us different from all other nations they lie.
They enthusiastically look forward to when we become a minority in our own country. This is beyond democracy and takes no account of the Will of the People as they convert our natural, organic nation into a rationalist construct that requires social engineering, a political police and other totalitarian structures; from a Christian country into a multiracial, Tower of Babel that is imploding as did the late Roman Empire. Even in those dark days the rulers did not deliberately wage war on their own people and try to have them pushed out of their local areas. What the caste is doing to us is uniquely evil. (6)
Underlying these apparently, disparate examples is EthnoNationalism - the will of ethnic minorities to have their own countries, where their faith, culture and language are dominant. The difference in Western countries is that the corrupt and decadent elites are acting against their own people in the interests of the invaders they are encouraging.
EthnoNationalism caused the Balkan wars of 1912 and 1913, triggered World War I in Sarajevo, and rent asunder the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires. EthnoNationalism spawned Turkey and Israel.
EthnoNationalism was the spur for the dissolution of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, and splintered Czechoslovakia into two-dozen nations from three. Last August, EthnoNationalism took Abkhazia and South Ossetia out of Georgia.
Russia has its own ethnic worries in Chechnya, Dagestan and Ingushetia, whose Moscow-installed president was nearly blown up a couple of weeks ago and where a Chechen convoy was ambushed with 10 soldiers killed.
EthnoNationalism split the Asian subcontinent up into Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. Iran, Iraq and Pakistan are on the brink. Persians are against the Azeris, Kurds, Arabs and Baluch. Each of those minorities has kinfolk across the national border —in Azerbaijan, Kurdistan, Iraq and Pakistan. Turkey has struggled for decades with Kurd EthnoNationalism. Pashtun in Pakistan outnumber Pashtun in Afghanistan, though in the latter they are the majority.
Africa is riven throughout its artificial countries and the vicious attacks by the Luo on the Kikiyu show renewed tribalism, as did the horrors of Rwanda, where Hutu massacred thousands of Tutsi. Morales in Bolivia, Ollanta Humala in Peru and Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez are inciting their Indian peoples to re- take what the white man took from them 500 years ago.
As well as allowing Choudry free reign to recruit our evil rulers allow senior people to advocate war against our soldiers. Make no mistake, dear readers, the rulers share the aims of Choudry in bringing about Sharia Law in an Islamic Europe.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....il-servant.html
It is likely that the Establishment goes even farther than that to silence opponents.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....llys-death.html
The ideology percolates down from the top and lesser people like teachers go along with it because they think they are supposed to and don’t want jeopardise their careers. (7)
The default position is anti-British and what was normal, healthy patriotism is now slandered as “far-right” and patriots are subject to slander and discrimination. What Alan Clarke praised as “the British military spirit” is forced into street thuggery when it should be controlled by encouraging voluntary boxing and martial arts in schools and clubs.
Then the military reject these young men for military because they have been prosecuted and this forces them to form their own makeshift armies around football clubs with ranks like generals etc. it is a natural instinct for young men to be aggressive and to seek comradeship and to want to defend their countries and communities. Young men need to prove themselves to move forward in life but they should not have to do it in the streets because the elites reject them!
However, we must be guarded because civil disobedience could be used in propaganda by the Neil Firth's and the Birmingham Post scribbler just as the BNP is getting somewhere politically.
This is the sort of situation the security agencies use and have experience of doing so. When one of these protests does 'kick off' the MSM will reveal that these protests are “far-right” BNP.
The violence would be shown on prime time TV with smug BBC talking head’s announcing it as typical "far-right" while they cover up Muslim protests and twist their reports of Muslim bombings to fool the population. To put things in perspective, there are something like 200 investigations into Muslim terror plots being conducted by security services and the courts as I write.
Former Conservative MP K.Harvey Proctor constantly warned of was a White backlash. To prevent this the caste has devised various underhand and undemocratic methods. The idea was to manage the population into a sort of utopian state but ideologies need an enemy and that was “Whites” who were all held responsible for the slave trade which meant only a heavily-censored version of slavery with the main dealers the Arabs left out of account. We are only supposed to think the “correct” thoughts.
The “white backlash” comes in unexpected ways and this is where the establishment media is now inventing stories and presenting them as outside polite society. There are other dangers.
The football firms were infiltrated by police and they would use agent provocateurs to incite violence and then used to discredit the BNP and nationalism in general.
This view of the world is diametrically is opposed to the Establishment plan to have us dispossessed and to cover up the child-rape of young girls and they will use any lie, any dirty tactic to stop it. There is also the EU paramilitary police force created to oppress the indigenous European peoples that can be used in Britain.
(1) http://www.independent.co.uk/news/clark-....ns-1165721.html
(2) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....lice -warn.html
http://www.truthtube.tv/play.php?vid=1745
(3) http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jul/06/far-right-terrorism-threat-police
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....e-stations.html
http://www.wikio.com/themes/Shaun+Sawyer
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/1131....sts-police-told
(4)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....sh-courts.html
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/0....tml#readfurther
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?p....d=1231167268618
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/06/world/europe/06iht-06europe.19125259.html
(5) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHZYXOm898Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFzlR-Mug-M
(6) http://buchanan.org/blog/pjb-globalism-vs-ethnonationalism-1381
See also his great books: Death of the West” and “State of Emergency.”
(7) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....il-servant.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....llys-death.html
http://www.hounslowchronicle.co.uk/west-....09642-24116836/
http://www.lampton.hounslow.sch.uk/
(8) http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2009/07/truths-about-slave-trade.html
(9)
K. Harvey Proctor addressed the 1983 Conservative party conference ,but no senior party member sat on the platform apart from a glum looking John Biffen who only clapped sparely.
Mrs Thatcher was not present.
In 1981 Proctor had announced a plan by the Monday club Immigration and Repatriation Committee to repatriate 50,000 immigrants a year. The forward to the document was by Sir Ronald Bell.
At a Monday Club dinner in early 1984 guest of honour Enoch Powell revealed that the Conservative party had threatened to not speak to Proctor for his belief in repatriation which would have been the first time in their history they had sent one of their MP’s to Coventry!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Tebbit
See also:
http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.com/
Geert Wilders Islamification Speech in LA - Geert Wilders Islamification Speech in LA -
http://www.youtube.com/user/LutonLionheart
Thursday, 30 July 2009
Prejudice, self-help and civil disobedience
Prejudice, self-help and civil disobedience
The Ideological Caste in the broad sense - the corporate, banking and political classes, intellectuals and academics, media personnel, and so forth - are in league with people who are engaged in taking our country off us and taking our children’s futures from them. They are prejudiced against us and in favour of Muslims!
Enoch once stated that immigrants are swaggering around our cities like conquerors. More people every day are starting to see it as it becomes clearer what is really going on. I have written before that our elites are surrendering us to Islam by allowing them to take over. At the highest levels, bankers and politicians make deals to get money from people like the Saudis, who finance Wahhabism, to conquer the West through a pincer movement of violence and cultural infiltration. The Prime Minister and Lord Mandelson asked the Saudis to put money into the IMF and offered them and other Gulf states more influence in global institutions in return. Barclays Bank, has had nearly £6 billion invested from Abu Dhabi and Qatar.
This has consequences in everyday life.
1. Islamist ideas are spread through our country by Islamic study centres attached to universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed eight universities - including Oxford and Cambridge - have had more than £233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995. The Saudi monarchy are building The Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), founded in 1985. Prince Charles is its honorary patron.
Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, was quoted in the Daily Mail of 5th July 2008 as saying Christian doctrine is offensive to Muslims, and criticising Christianity’s history for its violence, its use of harsh punishments and its betrayal of its peaceful principles. His sent a conciliatory letter to Islamic leaders calling for an alliance between the two faiths for ‘the common good’. Does he intend to destroy his own church?
2. The elites submitted to Saudi threats when they abandoned the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems because the Saudi authorities threatened: ‘British lives on British streets’ would be at risk, as explained by Britain’s former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles. These are the controllers of terror groups in the West that Brown and other elites are colluding with against their own people!
3. Brown is to make London the global centre of Islamic banking. Sharia finance was founded in mid-20th century by Islamist ideologues to further global Islamic rule by creating separate administrative systems. Muslims have to donate some of their income to charity, and that goes through the Sharia banking system. The clerics who distribute the money are advocates of terror like Sheik Yusuf Qaradawi, who supports suicide bombing in Iraq and Israel, and Sheik Muhammed Taqi Usmani, who ran a madrassa that supported the Taliban, yet sits on the Sharia supervisory board of the Dow Jones Islamic Index Fund.
4. With encouragement from our rulers, Muslims are creating a rival legal system. The Sunday Times September 14th 2008 reported that Islamic law has been officially adopted in Britain. The government secretly sanctioned the powers for Sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence. Rulings issued by a network of five Sharia courts are enforceable by the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court. Before this, rulings of Sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced and required voluntary compliance among Muslims. There are now , with twenty-two in the Midlands alone, which shows how quickly Muslims are taking over our country with the encouragement of the decadent authorities. (1)
5. I understand that former Chief Constable of West Yorkshire the late Colin Cramphorn told a meeting that child abuse is part of our future so “get used to it”! In 2004 he also managed to get a Channel 4 investigation into Muslim child-grooming spiked on the grounds that it would “increase community tensions”. (2)
When the Caste betrays us in such a fashion, sinking so low as to look the other way when Muslim men groom and rape our children, we are plainly on our own. We have to form self-help groups, and we have to contemplate civil disobedience.
The catalyst for civil disobedience was when Muslims in Luton insulted the local regiment, The Royal Anglians, on their homecoming march through the town. This rioting in Luton was covered up. (3)
Anjem Choudary is the voice of Al Qaeda and the British front of the global Jihad to convert our nation from the Dar al-Harb, into the Dar al-Islam. He has been holding road shows throughout Britain with the blessing of the authorities to promote Sharia law for our country in a power struggle between our communities, which last week included the insult to us of the conversion to Islam of an eleven year old English boy in Birmingham. This is the sort of thing the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams is working for. (4)
Choudrey stated that Southall should be the centre of power “when Islam takes over the UK”. His followers cheered as he called for Muslims to “rise up” and seize power in Britain". (5)
He has allies in the British Establishment who are encouraging the introduction of Sharia Law and, out of hatred for their own people, are encouraging Muslims to push them out by massive immigration to augment their high birth levels. Several prominent lawyers have called for Sharia Law: Anne Elizabeth Oldfield Butler-Sloss, Baroness Butler-Sloss (née Havers) GBE PC; Nicholas Addison Phillips, Baron Phillips of Worth Matravers PC, (born 21 January 1938) is the Senior Lord of Appeal in Ordinary. He was Master of the Rolls from 2000 to 2005 and Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales from 2005 until 1 October 2008; and Stephen Hockman QC, an influential figure among barristers.
These evil people are the causes of the problems on our streets as they are encouraging Anjem Choudrey’s Muslim revolution.
To defend our communities and our daughters, British people are having to form self-help groups. They are utterly disillusioned with the rich, cosy-living Caste that is having them pushed out of their communities and keeps the child-rape of young white girls of eleven and twelve by Muslims quiet.
The state deals with by media blackouts under DA-notices and oppression by the political police. A member of The English Defence League who opposed Choudry’s roadshow to spread Sharia Law on July 4th in North London explained:
During the time waiting for Choudary a small group of young Moslems who were stirring us up by passing comments, and making threats. Several times they walked past us, goading us to react which eventually we did.
Suddenly, about eight police wagons and cars arrived, police scrambled out surrounding the protesters in a heavy handed way. The group of young Moslems had phoned the police alleging that the protesters had been racially abusive to them. Two young protesters were manhandled, then arrested and then taken away in a police wagon. The rest of the protesters were searched, filmed, had personal details taken and verified, and threatened with arrest if we walked into the centre of Haringay. A Section 60 order was in force in the borough for the day. (6)
Choudary had spotters out in the borough pinpointing where the EDL were. Then some young Muslim arrived to stir the group up, those Moslem kids then phoned the police crying ‘racism’, the police came and arrested people for racism. The arrests justify the police action? It is a group of young Moslems’ word against the EDL members who were arrested, and those members who were present who heard and saw what went on but the British legal system is biased against their own people. Will this be used as a show trial for the State to show solidarity with Muslims against us?
The group who had stayed in Wood Green learned that Choudary had set up his road show in a neighbouring borough to avoid Section 60. The group were joined by some United British Alliance members who carried out the protest without notifying anyone. They disrupted Choudary’s roadshow - he called in about twenty of his men of whom around six badly beat one of the group who was then run over by a bus and had to be taken to hospital unconscious in an ambulance. The Muslim thugs then besieged the pub where the protesters had met and smashed it up and threw objects through the windows at those inside. Remarkably the police didn’t notice this!
It took this protest for the police to authorise the Section 60 powers and move Choudry on? But shouldn’t they be using these powers wherever he sets up a roadshow that is promoting the takeover of our country, and is recruiting for that purpose? Muslims in Europe mobilize many street soldiers within a matter of minutes, consonant with Lord Ahmed’s threat to mobilise ten thousand outside parliament to prevent Dutch MP Geert Wilders showing his film “Fitna” to members of the House of Lords.
The defenders of our communities will respond by improving communications to warn others of attacks in a particular area. Muslims will increase attacking people in force and picking off those in small groups and blaming those they attack knowing the law is on their side. There seem to be many Muslims who want a fight. It would be best to be prepared as the authorities are allowing them to do it. The defenders will certainly need a digital camcorder to record these events for evidence to counter the fabrications of the State.
There was also a protest in Birmingham where the conversion of the young English boy took place. It is the city where the terrorists tried to capture and behead a Muslim soldier in the British Army. It is where, in an editorial in The Birmingham Post a couple of years ago, some drip asked, “Is there anything intrinsically wrong with Muslims becoming a majority?”
A protester in Birmingham related:
“When I arrived at the rendezvous point a police officer asked us if we were here for the meeting and directed us to the Pavilions shopping area, and from the direction of Moor Street station about fifty protesters appeared singing. The police quickly pushed them in our direction forming a line but this enabled all of us scattered in the crowds to join our band of brothers.
The police pushed everyone in a tight circle and formed a tight human chain around us. There was probably about 100 in the circle but outside there was probably more, as at one point I was outside and then went into the circle. There was constant singing from our crowd, all light-hearted which kept the stopping shoppers entertained, and the police forming the shield seem quite good natured.
After about half an hour just in front of the main Bull Ring entrance a gang of Muslims started to form and the police made a line in front of them. They were singing Abu Akhbar, I think, but it was hard to tell and the area became more crowded with supporting shoppers, and it began to get quite hot.
Then everyone started looking in the direction of New Street at the sound of sirens and it seemed that the police were reversing a number of large police wagons across New Street and High Street right in front of us? Was this to block the whole area off or were they intending to arrest the demonstrators ? We don’t know.
Suddenly, the back of the crowd made a break through the police lines to dash down High Street, the police circle quickly fell apart as many of us just blended in with the watching shoppers as there then seemed to be a police chase down High Street.
The only incident I saw was outside Marks and Spencers on the High Street, where a white pro-Palestinian was on his soap-box shouting, “They’re all BNP”. On going over and telling him “No, you’re wrong and check out some of the black lads in the group", he called the police over and told the usual lies about our conversation. The police were not fooled and told him to get off his soap-box and go home. They were OK with us. And that was it. We then went on our way.
My summary : At no one point did I witness any racism. At no point did I see the police draw a baton, nor did I see them being aggressive with the demonstrators. All I saw was a peaceful demonstration which seemed welcome by the shoppers in Birmingham city centre."
However, there was total news blackout of these two simultaneous protests. A correspondent told me she had emailed the editor of Birmingham Evening Mail on Thursday, two days in advance but he ignored her! It looks as the government are allowing democratic protest but containing it by the use of the police and keeping it quiet by the use of DA-notices to gag the media! (7)
(1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRnP-XzB_U0
(2) http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2004/may/26/broadcasting.elections2004
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1535641/Colin-Cramphorn.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvkldPJZZC0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5rzkngqztU
http://podblanc.com/5-live-report-pakistani-men-grooming-young-white-girls
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8Shznb4_eQ
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1203434/Girl-15-forced-marry-illegal-immigrant-raped-assaulted-little-sister.html#ixzz0MrAh7PJV
(3) http://muslimvillage.com/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t50512.html
(4) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anjem_Choudary
(5) http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/64532/Make-Southall-the-UK-capital/
(6) http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights/....o-prote st.html
(7) http://www.dnotice.org.uk
The Ideological Caste in the broad sense - the corporate, banking and political classes, intellectuals and academics, media personnel, and so forth - are in league with people who are engaged in taking our country off us and taking our children’s futures from them. They are prejudiced against us and in favour of Muslims!
Enoch once stated that immigrants are swaggering around our cities like conquerors. More people every day are starting to see it as it becomes clearer what is really going on. I have written before that our elites are surrendering us to Islam by allowing them to take over. At the highest levels, bankers and politicians make deals to get money from people like the Saudis, who finance Wahhabism, to conquer the West through a pincer movement of violence and cultural infiltration. The Prime Minister and Lord Mandelson asked the Saudis to put money into the IMF and offered them and other Gulf states more influence in global institutions in return. Barclays Bank, has had nearly £6 billion invested from Abu Dhabi and Qatar.
This has consequences in everyday life.
1. Islamist ideas are spread through our country by Islamic study centres attached to universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed eight universities - including Oxford and Cambridge - have had more than £233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995. The Saudi monarchy are building The Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), founded in 1985. Prince Charles is its honorary patron.
Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, was quoted in the Daily Mail of 5th July 2008 as saying Christian doctrine is offensive to Muslims, and criticising Christianity’s history for its violence, its use of harsh punishments and its betrayal of its peaceful principles. His sent a conciliatory letter to Islamic leaders calling for an alliance between the two faiths for ‘the common good’. Does he intend to destroy his own church?
2. The elites submitted to Saudi threats when they abandoned the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems because the Saudi authorities threatened: ‘British lives on British streets’ would be at risk, as explained by Britain’s former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles. These are the controllers of terror groups in the West that Brown and other elites are colluding with against their own people!
3. Brown is to make London the global centre of Islamic banking. Sharia finance was founded in mid-20th century by Islamist ideologues to further global Islamic rule by creating separate administrative systems. Muslims have to donate some of their income to charity, and that goes through the Sharia banking system. The clerics who distribute the money are advocates of terror like Sheik Yusuf Qaradawi, who supports suicide bombing in Iraq and Israel, and Sheik Muhammed Taqi Usmani, who ran a madrassa that supported the Taliban, yet sits on the Sharia supervisory board of the Dow Jones Islamic Index Fund.
4. With encouragement from our rulers, Muslims are creating a rival legal system. The Sunday Times September 14th 2008 reported that Islamic law has been officially adopted in Britain. The government secretly sanctioned the powers for Sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence. Rulings issued by a network of five Sharia courts are enforceable by the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court. Before this, rulings of Sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced and required voluntary compliance among Muslims. There are now , with twenty-two in the Midlands alone, which shows how quickly Muslims are taking over our country with the encouragement of the decadent authorities. (1)
5. I understand that former Chief Constable of West Yorkshire the late Colin Cramphorn told a meeting that child abuse is part of our future so “get used to it”! In 2004 he also managed to get a Channel 4 investigation into Muslim child-grooming spiked on the grounds that it would “increase community tensions”. (2)
When the Caste betrays us in such a fashion, sinking so low as to look the other way when Muslim men groom and rape our children, we are plainly on our own. We have to form self-help groups, and we have to contemplate civil disobedience.
The catalyst for civil disobedience was when Muslims in Luton insulted the local regiment, The Royal Anglians, on their homecoming march through the town. This rioting in Luton was covered up. (3)
Anjem Choudary is the voice of Al Qaeda and the British front of the global Jihad to convert our nation from the Dar al-Harb, into the Dar al-Islam. He has been holding road shows throughout Britain with the blessing of the authorities to promote Sharia law for our country in a power struggle between our communities, which last week included the insult to us of the conversion to Islam of an eleven year old English boy in Birmingham. This is the sort of thing the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams is working for. (4)
Choudrey stated that Southall should be the centre of power “when Islam takes over the UK”. His followers cheered as he called for Muslims to “rise up” and seize power in Britain". (5)
He has allies in the British Establishment who are encouraging the introduction of Sharia Law and, out of hatred for their own people, are encouraging Muslims to push them out by massive immigration to augment their high birth levels. Several prominent lawyers have called for Sharia Law: Anne Elizabeth Oldfield Butler-Sloss, Baroness Butler-Sloss (née Havers) GBE PC; Nicholas Addison Phillips, Baron Phillips of Worth Matravers PC, (born 21 January 1938) is the Senior Lord of Appeal in Ordinary. He was Master of the Rolls from 2000 to 2005 and Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales from 2005 until 1 October 2008; and Stephen Hockman QC, an influential figure among barristers.
These evil people are the causes of the problems on our streets as they are encouraging Anjem Choudrey’s Muslim revolution.
To defend our communities and our daughters, British people are having to form self-help groups. They are utterly disillusioned with the rich, cosy-living Caste that is having them pushed out of their communities and keeps the child-rape of young white girls of eleven and twelve by Muslims quiet.
The state deals with by media blackouts under DA-notices and oppression by the political police. A member of The English Defence League who opposed Choudry’s roadshow to spread Sharia Law on July 4th in North London explained:
During the time waiting for Choudary a small group of young Moslems who were stirring us up by passing comments, and making threats. Several times they walked past us, goading us to react which eventually we did.
Suddenly, about eight police wagons and cars arrived, police scrambled out surrounding the protesters in a heavy handed way. The group of young Moslems had phoned the police alleging that the protesters had been racially abusive to them. Two young protesters were manhandled, then arrested and then taken away in a police wagon. The rest of the protesters were searched, filmed, had personal details taken and verified, and threatened with arrest if we walked into the centre of Haringay. A Section 60 order was in force in the borough for the day. (6)
Choudary had spotters out in the borough pinpointing where the EDL were. Then some young Muslim arrived to stir the group up, those Moslem kids then phoned the police crying ‘racism’, the police came and arrested people for racism. The arrests justify the police action? It is a group of young Moslems’ word against the EDL members who were arrested, and those members who were present who heard and saw what went on but the British legal system is biased against their own people. Will this be used as a show trial for the State to show solidarity with Muslims against us?
The group who had stayed in Wood Green learned that Choudary had set up his road show in a neighbouring borough to avoid Section 60. The group were joined by some United British Alliance members who carried out the protest without notifying anyone. They disrupted Choudary’s roadshow - he called in about twenty of his men of whom around six badly beat one of the group who was then run over by a bus and had to be taken to hospital unconscious in an ambulance. The Muslim thugs then besieged the pub where the protesters had met and smashed it up and threw objects through the windows at those inside. Remarkably the police didn’t notice this!
It took this protest for the police to authorise the Section 60 powers and move Choudry on? But shouldn’t they be using these powers wherever he sets up a roadshow that is promoting the takeover of our country, and is recruiting for that purpose? Muslims in Europe mobilize many street soldiers within a matter of minutes, consonant with Lord Ahmed’s threat to mobilise ten thousand outside parliament to prevent Dutch MP Geert Wilders showing his film “Fitna” to members of the House of Lords.
The defenders of our communities will respond by improving communications to warn others of attacks in a particular area. Muslims will increase attacking people in force and picking off those in small groups and blaming those they attack knowing the law is on their side. There seem to be many Muslims who want a fight. It would be best to be prepared as the authorities are allowing them to do it. The defenders will certainly need a digital camcorder to record these events for evidence to counter the fabrications of the State.
There was also a protest in Birmingham where the conversion of the young English boy took place. It is the city where the terrorists tried to capture and behead a Muslim soldier in the British Army. It is where, in an editorial in The Birmingham Post a couple of years ago, some drip asked, “Is there anything intrinsically wrong with Muslims becoming a majority?”
A protester in Birmingham related:
“When I arrived at the rendezvous point a police officer asked us if we were here for the meeting and directed us to the Pavilions shopping area, and from the direction of Moor Street station about fifty protesters appeared singing. The police quickly pushed them in our direction forming a line but this enabled all of us scattered in the crowds to join our band of brothers.
The police pushed everyone in a tight circle and formed a tight human chain around us. There was probably about 100 in the circle but outside there was probably more, as at one point I was outside and then went into the circle. There was constant singing from our crowd, all light-hearted which kept the stopping shoppers entertained, and the police forming the shield seem quite good natured.
After about half an hour just in front of the main Bull Ring entrance a gang of Muslims started to form and the police made a line in front of them. They were singing Abu Akhbar, I think, but it was hard to tell and the area became more crowded with supporting shoppers, and it began to get quite hot.
Then everyone started looking in the direction of New Street at the sound of sirens and it seemed that the police were reversing a number of large police wagons across New Street and High Street right in front of us? Was this to block the whole area off or were they intending to arrest the demonstrators ? We don’t know.
Suddenly, the back of the crowd made a break through the police lines to dash down High Street, the police circle quickly fell apart as many of us just blended in with the watching shoppers as there then seemed to be a police chase down High Street.
The only incident I saw was outside Marks and Spencers on the High Street, where a white pro-Palestinian was on his soap-box shouting, “They’re all BNP”. On going over and telling him “No, you’re wrong and check out some of the black lads in the group", he called the police over and told the usual lies about our conversation. The police were not fooled and told him to get off his soap-box and go home. They were OK with us. And that was it. We then went on our way.
My summary : At no one point did I witness any racism. At no point did I see the police draw a baton, nor did I see them being aggressive with the demonstrators. All I saw was a peaceful demonstration which seemed welcome by the shoppers in Birmingham city centre."
However, there was total news blackout of these two simultaneous protests. A correspondent told me she had emailed the editor of Birmingham Evening Mail on Thursday, two days in advance but he ignored her! It looks as the government are allowing democratic protest but containing it by the use of the police and keeping it quiet by the use of DA-notices to gag the media! (7)
(1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRnP-XzB_U0
(2) http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2004/may/26/broadcasting.elections2004
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1535641/Colin-Cramphorn.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvkldPJZZC0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5rzkngqztU
http://podblanc.com/5-live-report-pakistani-men-grooming-young-white-girls
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8Shznb4_eQ
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1203434/Girl-15-forced-marry-illegal-immigrant-raped-assaulted-little-sister.html#ixzz0MrAh7PJV
(3) http://muslimvillage.com/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t50512.html
(4) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anjem_Choudary
(5) http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/64532/Make-Southall-the-UK-capital/
(6) http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights/....o-prote st.html
(7) http://www.dnotice.org.uk
Who Occupies the Moral High Ground?
Conservative philosopher Roger Scruton has written that “ an ideology needs an enemy”. In the West that is us - “whites”. The chosen method is to dehumanise the enemy so that it can be persecuted or even assassinated without conscience. They think it will fool the public when they try to outlaw the BNP’s racial admission rules, despite leaving the various black and Asian groups to operate their own racial membership policies.
These comments show the Ideological Caste’s dehumanisation of its enemies in language they would otherwise eagerly attribute to Nazis:
Trevor Phillips: “The BNP should be treated as less than human”.
Nick Bourne - Welsh Tory MP: “The BNP are subhuman”
The voice of whites in Britain is the BNP and the whole establishment is conspiring to de-humanise them with a level of incitement that is unprecedented. If this type of hate campaign was against another ethnic group they would be facing a seven year jail sentence. The whole Establishment has shown itself to be the same type of hate-filled ideologues that dehumanised Jews in Nazi Germany. It is an ideology of hate like those in Soviet Russia, Mao’s China and Cambodia against a particular group.
I am very grateful to Stuart, a NHS employee for this illuastration of how de-humanisation works.
“It reminds me of anti-aggression training in the NHS. Things to watch for before you get thumped: You nurses are all the same! All you nurses are *******s, you go from being an individual person (which it is not okay to hurt), to a group of people, to a non-human that it is okay to hurt. Once you are not human watch for the thump. It’s coming very soon." Change nurses to BNP and the swear words to thug, knuckle-dragger, Nazi and racist.”
If a BNPer does something wrong the Caste generalise to dehumanise them, and the whole party is dehumainised But the Caste present themselves as individuals when they are exposed for breaking the rules and thieving from the public and so the whole party is still thought respectable when really the mainstream parties are brimful of deceivers and crooks.
It has been reported that the Met will question some MP’s and Peers about their expenses. But the newspapers, the Met and the government and most of the public all know it will be whitewashed. Even so, public opinion will be manipulated to deceive people into thinking our ruling elite are subject to the law.
The Establishment smear campaigns contain some ‘facts’ but are mainly half-truths and downright lies because, as have I said, they can not counter the new arguments. What they use to dehumanise their targets they ignore in their favoured groups.
The Sunday Times of 14th June showed that underneath the veneer of respectability and intellectual gravity the Times’ journalists tell the same lies as The Sun and Mirror - Nick Griffin MEP does not have dogs called Anne and Frank; he did not loose an eye during paramilitary manoeuvres, but when a discarded shotgun cartridge hidden in household waste exploded in a fire; MEP Robert Fiore, a friend of Griffin’s, was not implicated in a terrorist bombing in Italy. That is another lie and Fiore has sued several papers for reprinting that lie started by a Communist front organisation. Both the Sunday Times and Searchlight share a political outlook.
They foster the same ideology of hatered for the indigenous British as semi-literate gutter press: The Sun and Daily Mail lied that the BNP put out leaflets during the EU elections calling for the Gurkhas to be sent home. That was done by an anti-Fascist group who illegally put the BNP’s name to it. (1)
But these journalists don’t let honesty stand in the way of good propaganda. They expose Griffin’s past sins against convention but cover up the much more serious sins of the politicians on their own side. The Caste accuse Griffin and his party of hating, but their hatred for their own people is perverse and unnatural. Deep in their psyches, one suspects, these liars fear and envy Griffin’s honesty and courage.
We are taken us on countless TV documentary journeys into tribes and tribal cultures around the developing world and shown stomach-churning sights of animal sacrifice and initiation rites, and never do they tell us that to preserve these people is Nazi or racist or thuggish.
Try and say that Europe has ethnic people and traditions that must be preserved too and you will run into a wall of hostility. Marxists have managed to bully people of the north European cultures into accepting that they have no racial identification and, therefore, do not really exist, and they have no right to even murmur about self-preservation. To do this would be evil and selfish, and re-connect to all those too awful symbols of European supremacy: slavery and Adolf Hitler.
BBC Wales aired a programme just after the EU elections to expose Arthur Kemp, and it was an excellent example of the genre. It started with a pre-judgement(prejudice) against not just Kemp but those sinfull people they call “white”. (2)
By selecting evidence on them that ignores all other ethnic groups it proceeds to discriminate against them. It also left out what is really happening in South Africa like the genocide of white African farmers by blacks to create the impression that Black rule is a success.
BBC programme-makers typically wait for months until they get something on their prey, then they present it purely according to their ideology (which, of course, enables them to pose as tolerant and so very morally superior to their “Nazi” prey). The hypocritical immorality is never allowed to intrude. When the BBC acted in concert with the legal system to prosecute Griffin what was over looked was that he did not make the speech to the public. It was the BBC who broadcast it to the public.
All this takes place within an extreme ideological world view that uses modern multiracial myths like “They seek to divide communities”. That one depends on the false notion that multiracial communities are melding together.
One of the subtler tricks is to describe their activists as “anti-racists”, thus sanitising them and by implication demonising the other. It also hides the fact that these anti-fascist groups are the ones involved in street thuggery. For the elites are in league with the street thugs and use deceitful photographs like the Searchlight agents flying to Italy to be photographed making Nazi salutes to BNP deputy chairman Simon Darby so that the media could publicise it to put people off voting for them. Or worse! (3)
The Ideological Caste cover up for each right up to the point where someone oversteps the rules of public acceptability. Even then, a programme described the BNP’s attacks on the expenses scandal as a “toxic cocktail”. Everything is manipulated. The public is provided with no material that has not been ideologically filtered.
Even before this month’s EU Parliament elections the gutter-press Guardian was working overtime to stop the public voting for the BNP. When that failed they carried straight on with the attack:
Andrew Brons said of his victory: "I regard this as the first step towards the UK, the British people, getting freedom from the European Union dictatorship."
Divorced with two grown-up daughters and four grand children, Mr Brons was 17 when, in 1964, he started his political activism, signing up for the neo-Nazi National Socialist Movement, an organisation that was deliberately founded on Hitler's birthday. NSM members were responsible for an arson campaign against Jewish property and synagogues in the 1960s. It is not that these sentiments should go unchallenged, they should, but the media play them up to harm someone for what he said 23 years-ago to focus attention away from their Muslim allies chanting “Jews to the gas” throughout Europe last January. (4)
The Establishment are trying to destroy rivals who are openly challenging them and exposing their corruption as the BNP exposed the police cover-up of the widespread child-rape of young white girls by older Muslim men. Take no notice of this obsession with holocaust denial they use that to weaken us while nearly every Muslim in the country denies the holocaust and believes Mossad did the Twin Towers but the media keep that quiet!
There are many racial attacks on Jewish people by Muslims. There are Muslim shops all over the UK selling ”The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”. Many of our elites encourage terrorism not only Peter Hain and George Galloway. Ken Livingstone's is a history of invective against Jews and Israel. A couple of months ago Cherie Blair’s sister Lauren was filmed by intrepid BNP photographers inciting Muslims against Jews in a Blackburn park but the media ignored it.(5}
Here she is interviewing Bob Bailey a candidate in the EU elections for Iranian owned Press TV. Why did the police allow her to get away with it? For the same reason they cover up Muslims child-raping young white girls all across he country. They are in league with Muslims against their own people and the Jewish community.
Witness: The profile told us: ”At the time he (Brons) was the chairman of the National Front and was marching through the streets with his colleagues chanting slogans including "white power" and "death to Jews". Brons’ supposed statements were 24 years ago whereas Muslims attacking Jewish restaurants in Golders Green was only in January during the Gazza demonstarations. Like their Muslim allies chanting “Jews to the gas” throughout Europe. Why play up the one but keep the other quiet?
At Globalist Rupert Murdoch’s Sun Graeme Wilson devalued an elected British politician:”Bad egg hit by good egg.” Then the common language again: ” Griffin- his fascist party’s first MEP.”
A less measured variation on the theme from Weyman Bennett:” We came here to stand up for the people who have faced the intimidation of violence of racist thugs.” UAF supporter David Cameron used the same language when he called the BNP “Nazis and thugs.” (6)
http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.co....isation-of.html
What else do the media keep from the public? Labour MP Shahid Malik predicting the total Islamification of Britain and a Muslim prime minister, “Allah willing”, within the next thirty years at the October 2008 “Global Peace and Unity.”
Over the past four years, Malik claimed more than £60,000 from the Commons authorities towards his “second home” in London and number of luxury items including a £2,600 home cinema system yet he was brought back into government!
On the 10th of June 2009, The Metro and The Sun set up a target for violence or violence. (7)
John Higginson chief political correspondent of The Metro showed his intellectual grasp of political ideas by writing in mindless cliches:
“Far-right leader Griffen is splattered as anti-fascists protest over poll victory.”
What really happened – an organised and fascistic, physical assault on Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons at a press conference they had called - is distorted by the code-words. Thus, the morally undeserving “far right” Griffin is justly humiliated by (merely) protesting “anti-fascists”.
The Daily Star went further and incited its readers to throw chapattis at Griffin. This is simply hate-speech and can only serve to inflame the racial situation as chapattis are ethnic food.
Over at arch-Globalist Rupert Murdoch’s The Sun, Graeme Wilson devalued an elected British politician thus:
“Bad egg hit by good egg.”
Then the common language again:
“Griffin- his fascist party’s first MEP.”
The semi-literate papers have for years told their readers how to vote but now they are inciting violence against a legal political party. The owners of these papers are foreigners, and this is outside intervention in our internal politics. Never again must foreigners be allowed to own our newspapers.
Both Establishment and apparatchiks use a common language. The “anti-fascists” commonly describe the BNP as fascists and the apparently respectable opinion-formers have adopted this. In his interview with Griffin, David Dimbleby used the word fascist. Dimbleby would not invite SWP leaders like Martin Smith and Weyman Bennett to dinner, unless he wanted to show what a fine fellow he is, because they are the wrong class. But when it comes to defending the elites’ way of life they share the same prejudices.
The caste usually incite violence indirectly so they can keep up the appearance of respectability. But Peter Hain, who did so much to bring about the genocide of whites in South Africa and has never apologised for it, has now called for violent confrontation with the BNP. He is trying to do the same thing here - while he makes himself rich by corruptly trousering £103 grand. The language is the same as with the others:
It is vital that everyone now isolates and confronts the BNP and works with United Against Fascism to defeat them. The gang of UAF thugs attack Nick Griffin everyone can see ...
The Sun are now encouraging more attacks, and this in a country with hundreds of Muslim extremists and terrorists. They are actually encouraging assassination. If anything happens again remember that and get the evidence from the newspaper reports of how they lead people on.
An openly illegal incitement to violence against a democratically elected politician was published by London media:
I’m so disappointed with the people that threw eggs at BNP leader Nick Griffin yesterday when he attempted to hold a victory press conference...come on people...we live in a multi cultural democracy...so next time please FOR THE SAKE OF THIS DEMOCRACY can you chuck BRICKS at the racist instead???...much more effective, n’est pas?
Ali Sichilongo, London
So why are such untrue and hateful words employed in the media? Possibly because of something Griffin has in mind for the elites. He told the BNP conference in Blackpool:
“We all know that they have announced that there will now be another inquiry into the Iraq War. Of course there should not be an inquiry, but rather a war crimes trial, based on the principles established during the Nuremburg Trial.
“The accused must include the politicians and the propagandists who generated the background to the war. This will include the newspaper editors and media owners who are just as responsible for the lies which led to that war.
“However, we have enough evidence right now to make a case against Geoff Hoon and Tony Blair for an incident during the Balkans War when a Serbian TV station was bombed. I will be laying a charge with a central London police station very soon over this matter.”
This is why the corrupt thieves and liars of the caste have to try and silence those who threaten them. Presumably it’s also why Griffin does not have state security like Geert Wilders in the Netherlands and Salman Rushdie did here. His protection rests largely in us informing the public that State forces are dehumanising him for attack..
(1) http://www.cesc.net/radicalweb/scholars/rankin/ar2.html
(2) http://www.arthurkemp.com/
http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.co....an-farmers.html
(3) http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/multimed....1204_34745a.jpg
(4) http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1055554.html
(5) http://keeptonyblairforpm.wordpress.com/....lic- order-act/
http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2....you-to-see.html
(6) Drag to 6 minutes.
#####//####youtube.com/watch?v=Knk_jpq7Vx8&feature=PlayList&p=2802385E9FC1CED7&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=11
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopi....two-houses.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopi....-agreement.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jun/08/european-elections-bnp
(7)
http://extras.thesun.co.uk/flash/nick_griffin/shoot.html
These comments show the Ideological Caste’s dehumanisation of its enemies in language they would otherwise eagerly attribute to Nazis:
Trevor Phillips: “The BNP should be treated as less than human”.
Nick Bourne - Welsh Tory MP: “The BNP are subhuman”
The voice of whites in Britain is the BNP and the whole establishment is conspiring to de-humanise them with a level of incitement that is unprecedented. If this type of hate campaign was against another ethnic group they would be facing a seven year jail sentence. The whole Establishment has shown itself to be the same type of hate-filled ideologues that dehumanised Jews in Nazi Germany. It is an ideology of hate like those in Soviet Russia, Mao’s China and Cambodia against a particular group.
I am very grateful to Stuart, a NHS employee for this illuastration of how de-humanisation works.
“It reminds me of anti-aggression training in the NHS. Things to watch for before you get thumped: You nurses are all the same! All you nurses are *******s, you go from being an individual person (which it is not okay to hurt), to a group of people, to a non-human that it is okay to hurt. Once you are not human watch for the thump. It’s coming very soon." Change nurses to BNP and the swear words to thug, knuckle-dragger, Nazi and racist.”
If a BNPer does something wrong the Caste generalise to dehumanise them, and the whole party is dehumainised But the Caste present themselves as individuals when they are exposed for breaking the rules and thieving from the public and so the whole party is still thought respectable when really the mainstream parties are brimful of deceivers and crooks.
It has been reported that the Met will question some MP’s and Peers about their expenses. But the newspapers, the Met and the government and most of the public all know it will be whitewashed. Even so, public opinion will be manipulated to deceive people into thinking our ruling elite are subject to the law.
The Establishment smear campaigns contain some ‘facts’ but are mainly half-truths and downright lies because, as have I said, they can not counter the new arguments. What they use to dehumanise their targets they ignore in their favoured groups.
The Sunday Times of 14th June showed that underneath the veneer of respectability and intellectual gravity the Times’ journalists tell the same lies as The Sun and Mirror - Nick Griffin MEP does not have dogs called Anne and Frank; he did not loose an eye during paramilitary manoeuvres, but when a discarded shotgun cartridge hidden in household waste exploded in a fire; MEP Robert Fiore, a friend of Griffin’s, was not implicated in a terrorist bombing in Italy. That is another lie and Fiore has sued several papers for reprinting that lie started by a Communist front organisation. Both the Sunday Times and Searchlight share a political outlook.
They foster the same ideology of hatered for the indigenous British as semi-literate gutter press: The Sun and Daily Mail lied that the BNP put out leaflets during the EU elections calling for the Gurkhas to be sent home. That was done by an anti-Fascist group who illegally put the BNP’s name to it. (1)
But these journalists don’t let honesty stand in the way of good propaganda. They expose Griffin’s past sins against convention but cover up the much more serious sins of the politicians on their own side. The Caste accuse Griffin and his party of hating, but their hatred for their own people is perverse and unnatural. Deep in their psyches, one suspects, these liars fear and envy Griffin’s honesty and courage.
We are taken us on countless TV documentary journeys into tribes and tribal cultures around the developing world and shown stomach-churning sights of animal sacrifice and initiation rites, and never do they tell us that to preserve these people is Nazi or racist or thuggish.
Try and say that Europe has ethnic people and traditions that must be preserved too and you will run into a wall of hostility. Marxists have managed to bully people of the north European cultures into accepting that they have no racial identification and, therefore, do not really exist, and they have no right to even murmur about self-preservation. To do this would be evil and selfish, and re-connect to all those too awful symbols of European supremacy: slavery and Adolf Hitler.
BBC Wales aired a programme just after the EU elections to expose Arthur Kemp, and it was an excellent example of the genre. It started with a pre-judgement(prejudice) against not just Kemp but those sinfull people they call “white”. (2)
By selecting evidence on them that ignores all other ethnic groups it proceeds to discriminate against them. It also left out what is really happening in South Africa like the genocide of white African farmers by blacks to create the impression that Black rule is a success.
BBC programme-makers typically wait for months until they get something on their prey, then they present it purely according to their ideology (which, of course, enables them to pose as tolerant and so very morally superior to their “Nazi” prey). The hypocritical immorality is never allowed to intrude. When the BBC acted in concert with the legal system to prosecute Griffin what was over looked was that he did not make the speech to the public. It was the BBC who broadcast it to the public.
All this takes place within an extreme ideological world view that uses modern multiracial myths like “They seek to divide communities”. That one depends on the false notion that multiracial communities are melding together.
One of the subtler tricks is to describe their activists as “anti-racists”, thus sanitising them and by implication demonising the other. It also hides the fact that these anti-fascist groups are the ones involved in street thuggery. For the elites are in league with the street thugs and use deceitful photographs like the Searchlight agents flying to Italy to be photographed making Nazi salutes to BNP deputy chairman Simon Darby so that the media could publicise it to put people off voting for them. Or worse! (3)
The Ideological Caste cover up for each right up to the point where someone oversteps the rules of public acceptability. Even then, a programme described the BNP’s attacks on the expenses scandal as a “toxic cocktail”. Everything is manipulated. The public is provided with no material that has not been ideologically filtered.
Even before this month’s EU Parliament elections the gutter-press Guardian was working overtime to stop the public voting for the BNP. When that failed they carried straight on with the attack:
Andrew Brons said of his victory: "I regard this as the first step towards the UK, the British people, getting freedom from the European Union dictatorship."
Divorced with two grown-up daughters and four grand children, Mr Brons was 17 when, in 1964, he started his political activism, signing up for the neo-Nazi National Socialist Movement, an organisation that was deliberately founded on Hitler's birthday. NSM members were responsible for an arson campaign against Jewish property and synagogues in the 1960s. It is not that these sentiments should go unchallenged, they should, but the media play them up to harm someone for what he said 23 years-ago to focus attention away from their Muslim allies chanting “Jews to the gas” throughout Europe last January. (4)
The Establishment are trying to destroy rivals who are openly challenging them and exposing their corruption as the BNP exposed the police cover-up of the widespread child-rape of young white girls by older Muslim men. Take no notice of this obsession with holocaust denial they use that to weaken us while nearly every Muslim in the country denies the holocaust and believes Mossad did the Twin Towers but the media keep that quiet!
There are many racial attacks on Jewish people by Muslims. There are Muslim shops all over the UK selling ”The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”. Many of our elites encourage terrorism not only Peter Hain and George Galloway. Ken Livingstone's is a history of invective against Jews and Israel. A couple of months ago Cherie Blair’s sister Lauren was filmed by intrepid BNP photographers inciting Muslims against Jews in a Blackburn park but the media ignored it.(5}
Here she is interviewing Bob Bailey a candidate in the EU elections for Iranian owned Press TV. Why did the police allow her to get away with it? For the same reason they cover up Muslims child-raping young white girls all across he country. They are in league with Muslims against their own people and the Jewish community.
Witness: The profile told us: ”At the time he (Brons) was the chairman of the National Front and was marching through the streets with his colleagues chanting slogans including "white power" and "death to Jews". Brons’ supposed statements were 24 years ago whereas Muslims attacking Jewish restaurants in Golders Green was only in January during the Gazza demonstarations. Like their Muslim allies chanting “Jews to the gas” throughout Europe. Why play up the one but keep the other quiet?
At Globalist Rupert Murdoch’s Sun Graeme Wilson devalued an elected British politician:”Bad egg hit by good egg.” Then the common language again: ” Griffin- his fascist party’s first MEP.”
A less measured variation on the theme from Weyman Bennett:” We came here to stand up for the people who have faced the intimidation of violence of racist thugs.” UAF supporter David Cameron used the same language when he called the BNP “Nazis and thugs.” (6)
http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.co....isation-of.html
What else do the media keep from the public? Labour MP Shahid Malik predicting the total Islamification of Britain and a Muslim prime minister, “Allah willing”, within the next thirty years at the October 2008 “Global Peace and Unity.”
Over the past four years, Malik claimed more than £60,000 from the Commons authorities towards his “second home” in London and number of luxury items including a £2,600 home cinema system yet he was brought back into government!
On the 10th of June 2009, The Metro and The Sun set up a target for violence or violence. (7)
John Higginson chief political correspondent of The Metro showed his intellectual grasp of political ideas by writing in mindless cliches:
“Far-right leader Griffen is splattered as anti-fascists protest over poll victory.”
What really happened – an organised and fascistic, physical assault on Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons at a press conference they had called - is distorted by the code-words. Thus, the morally undeserving “far right” Griffin is justly humiliated by (merely) protesting “anti-fascists”.
The Daily Star went further and incited its readers to throw chapattis at Griffin. This is simply hate-speech and can only serve to inflame the racial situation as chapattis are ethnic food.
Over at arch-Globalist Rupert Murdoch’s The Sun, Graeme Wilson devalued an elected British politician thus:
“Bad egg hit by good egg.”
Then the common language again:
“Griffin- his fascist party’s first MEP.”
The semi-literate papers have for years told their readers how to vote but now they are inciting violence against a legal political party. The owners of these papers are foreigners, and this is outside intervention in our internal politics. Never again must foreigners be allowed to own our newspapers.
Both Establishment and apparatchiks use a common language. The “anti-fascists” commonly describe the BNP as fascists and the apparently respectable opinion-formers have adopted this. In his interview with Griffin, David Dimbleby used the word fascist. Dimbleby would not invite SWP leaders like Martin Smith and Weyman Bennett to dinner, unless he wanted to show what a fine fellow he is, because they are the wrong class. But when it comes to defending the elites’ way of life they share the same prejudices.
The caste usually incite violence indirectly so they can keep up the appearance of respectability. But Peter Hain, who did so much to bring about the genocide of whites in South Africa and has never apologised for it, has now called for violent confrontation with the BNP. He is trying to do the same thing here - while he makes himself rich by corruptly trousering £103 grand. The language is the same as with the others:
It is vital that everyone now isolates and confronts the BNP and works with United Against Fascism to defeat them. The gang of UAF thugs attack Nick Griffin everyone can see ...
The Sun are now encouraging more attacks, and this in a country with hundreds of Muslim extremists and terrorists. They are actually encouraging assassination. If anything happens again remember that and get the evidence from the newspaper reports of how they lead people on.
An openly illegal incitement to violence against a democratically elected politician was published by London media:
I’m so disappointed with the people that threw eggs at BNP leader Nick Griffin yesterday when he attempted to hold a victory press conference...come on people...we live in a multi cultural democracy...so next time please FOR THE SAKE OF THIS DEMOCRACY can you chuck BRICKS at the racist instead???...much more effective, n’est pas?
Ali Sichilongo, London
So why are such untrue and hateful words employed in the media? Possibly because of something Griffin has in mind for the elites. He told the BNP conference in Blackpool:
“We all know that they have announced that there will now be another inquiry into the Iraq War. Of course there should not be an inquiry, but rather a war crimes trial, based on the principles established during the Nuremburg Trial.
“The accused must include the politicians and the propagandists who generated the background to the war. This will include the newspaper editors and media owners who are just as responsible for the lies which led to that war.
“However, we have enough evidence right now to make a case against Geoff Hoon and Tony Blair for an incident during the Balkans War when a Serbian TV station was bombed. I will be laying a charge with a central London police station very soon over this matter.”
This is why the corrupt thieves and liars of the caste have to try and silence those who threaten them. Presumably it’s also why Griffin does not have state security like Geert Wilders in the Netherlands and Salman Rushdie did here. His protection rests largely in us informing the public that State forces are dehumanising him for attack..
(1) http://www.cesc.net/radicalweb/scholars/rankin/ar2.html
(2) http://www.arthurkemp.com/
http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.co....an-farmers.html
(3) http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/multimed....1204_34745a.jpg
(4) http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1055554.html
(5) http://keeptonyblairforpm.wordpress.com/....lic- order-act/
http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2....you-to-see.html
(6) Drag to 6 minutes.
#####//####youtube.com/watch?v=Knk_jpq7Vx8&feature=PlayList&p=2802385E9FC1CED7&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=11
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopi....two-houses.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopi....-agreement.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jun/08/european-elections-bnp
(7)
http://extras.thesun.co.uk/flash/nick_griffin/shoot.html
Inside the mind of the Ideological Caste(and Kleptocracy)
Often, in researching for an article like this, I find it is almost impossible to believe what I am reading. I am reminded that we are fortunate. We have attained a perceptive grasp and know how to read between the lines. But if you talk to the average punter in the pub, in the shops or on the bus, you will find that they are still not free from propagandists deceit. They believe much of what they have been told by the media.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_P3tAP38GuxI/Sh....h/Scan10074.jpg
The UK is ruled by an ideological caste which is a self-selecting elite that requires total acceptance of the belief-system to advance in life; the practical aspect is a Kleptocracy as they rob the population by deceit and theft from public funds. If you meet that criteria you can fiddle yourself a fortune. Blair’s expenses records have now been accidentally shredded! Opening the door to immigration is a nice, little earner if your wife is a Human Rights lawyer.
They transfer other peoples’ taxes to fellow Kleptocrats in the Third World with whom they are in alliance under the guise of giving to the starving or poor but make little effort to ensure that starving people actually get the aid. These are their two main activities and both utilise a talent for deceit, deception, dissembling and good old-fashioned lying and stealing. They have a common way of thinking and make allowances for themselves.
There is an awakening going on, but the media are still dictating opinion for the mass of people in the soggy centre. Everyone talks of the gutter press, and of their lies and deceit. (1)
(2) http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/maguire/2007/10/bnps-king-harold-claim-is-bonk.html
But people still form their opinions on what the press tells them. The propagandist nature of that is apparent in the dumbing-down that we see in the coverage of politics and areas that the elites want to control, while the analysis on the sports pages of, say, football tactics, or analysis of football managers and their styles, is thoughtful, informative stuff. (2)
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/2....15875-21341228/
It assumes a great deal of both the intelligence and knowledge of the reader. The political coverage, however, treats him as an empty vessel to be filled with filled with foreign thoughts.
How do the establishment and their media deal with people who form their own conclusions from life, and see through the lies told by the media? They ignore our perceptions and argue to the man. They insult the speaker. Why don’t they calmly and reasonably explain why we are wrong? Because our views are natural and traditional and instinctive. They cannot face what they also think deep down, so they project on to us. Those in charge, the “caste”, are the same as us deep down but don’t have to express it because they have good lives in nice areas and exclusive jobs; underneath, they have the same instincts as us and, though cushioned, feel the same shocks. What they do when they feel unease sneaking in is to repress the doubt, and when dark thoughts bubble to the surface they force them to the back of their minds. This tension is barely perceived as it is projected on to us. They see what they cannot face in us, and that is why they never give a reasoned explanation to us. All the press hate the BNP with a passion. When I read their hate I look for sensible points in case there is a real expose, but it is always lies.
The BNP are a genuinely popular movement that recalls Huey Long in the States and Poujade in France, have an opportunity at grassroots level and an enormous opportunity now they have two MEPs.
Griffin has made some inroads into gaining the vote from middle-class voters which should make a lot of difference in the long run. There are a several BNP councillors who own businesses and who, through networking, will probably help to increase the popularity of the party. Maybe that explains part of why the media went to war with them!
What else is it about the BNP that the media hate so much? Is it that its policy is completely different from the norm, thus they attack people who are not like “us”? General dislike of the leaders? Revenge, then? It was the BNP’s Michael Barnbrook who exposed Conservative MP Derek Conway and started the expenses scams ball rolling. Or are the media, like the politicians, scared the BNP will expose them too? The press are, as an institution, liberal-Socialist. Individually they want to keep their jobs so they toe the line. The media put a great deal of money and effort into their Anti-BNP campaign, with every single newspaper and even The Publican, Accountancy Age and Caterer & Housekeeper joining the biased fray!
If not for the internet, the BNP website, blogs etc and the activists on the ground, the party would have been hammered at the ballot box. I can honestly say that I have never seen such a campaign of hatred towards any party, which destroys the media pretence of being fair and unbisased and leads me to suspect that the NUJ is probably still the closed shop that it was back in the 80’s. And I only hope that the claims of vote-rigging aren’t true (though I’m not as naive as to believe that there won’t have been some discussions of vote-rigging going on). It is of profound importance to tackle this bias.
It is built into people like animals to defend our territories, and when they have uncomfortable thoughts or feelings they often project them onto other people, assigning the thoughts or feelings that they cannot face in themselves to an alternative target. Neurotic projection is seeing in others what they find objectionable in themselves and unwanted thoughts, and emotions are ascribed onto another person or people. According to Wade, Tavris (2000) projection occurs when a person’s unacceptable or threatening feelings are repressed and then attributed to someone else.
When the Establishment attacks its rivals it generalises, but even when corruption is widespread amongst the Establishment parties, as with the expenses scandals, it is presented as an individual matter. Although it is clear that the expenses scandal is a matter of the party as a whole, the media, being corrupt, focus on individuals. Party politicians, for their part, try hard not to focus at all. (3)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY3YNW0TFV8
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/articl....in g-No-10.html
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment....icle6445961.ece
http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.co....0-expenses.html
David Cameron acknowledged that many people will be angry at the main parties over the MPs’ expenses, but he urged them not to react by voting for the BNP. Cameron is a civilised and polished man. But he became very angry with a member of the audience at the Bath and West Show in Shepton Mallet, Somerset - and this was an example of when what cannot be faced is projected. The member of the audience argued that the BNP “have a point when it comes to immigration” and Cameron retorted: “If you vote for the BNP you are voting for a bunch of fascists who want to divide this country over the issues of race and the colour of skin.” Cameron told him: “Go and have a look at what the BNP have said. Do not be naive about what these people stand for. “They dress up in a suit and knock on your door in a nice way but they are still Nazi thugs”. Yes, look at what they really stand for and do not trust the media. (4)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....ths- later.html
He told the audience:
“There is a proper national debate that we should have about immigration. I want us to limit the number of people coming to Britain, but do not believe that the way to beat the BNP is to half agree with them.”
He knows full well that debate and honest expression of fears have been suppressed by the Ideological Caste who cannot bear to hear the truth! But what is his hidden agenda?
Cameron revealed the establishment agenda to de-culture as well as dispossess us:
“Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.” (5)
http://www.movinghere.org.uk/galleries/histories/asian/origins/origins.htm
To accelerate the socially-engineering of our society Cameron set up the Conservative Muslim Forum, a sort of Tory equivalent of the National Black Police Association, which ‘advises’ the Conservative Party on how best to assimilate us to Muslims. The CMF wants the compulsory history curriculum in schools changed to give full recognition of the “massive contribution (sic) that Islam has made to the development of Western civilisation”.
His totalitarian response to comments by Patrick Mercer and Nigel Hastilow show what this “freedom” means - persecution of dissidents. But what does he stand for, in his lovely suits?
“There is no domestic or foreign any more. In this world today, we are all in it together.”
He abandoned his constituency in Whitney during severe flooding to visit Rwanda. His view that immigration has benefited Britain “immeasurably”, and we are they “free” and not frightened of being persecuted by the state, would not find an echo in the hearts of the masses. What Cameron really means is that he wants people to be free to say what the Caste wants them to say, and to have control over their lives so that the Caste can manage them in the way they want to.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew....-on-floods.html
Nick Clegg, another member of the Ideological Caste, saw himself staring straight back at him when he looked at the BNP:
“They peddle hate and they don’t actually provide people with hope.”
Hope? If you are hopeful for the future for women in an increasingly Islamicised West, just look at the Despatches programme that was filmed inside Mosques. If you are hopeful for a just life for the native British, just look at how immigrants enter our country without question and officials say nothing. But if we speak we are shut up with the usual insults of “racism”, “xenophobia” and “hate”. In normal, non-Marxised times there are rules of etiquette that govern how we approach others and are approached. The idea that the present vile censorship constitutes hospitality and openness to strangers is utterly false, and just a cover because the Caste are too weak to acknowledge the enormity of what they have done to us.
"Police are investigating money laundering allegations over the Liberal Democrats' acceptance of £2.4m from a donor later convicted of fraud.
Michael Brown's donation hugely boosted the party's 2005 election campaign, the BBC's Newsnight programme said.
Mr Brown was convicted of fraud in 2008 but vanished before being sentenced to seven years in jail last month.
The party said its auditors were "satisfied that we do not need to make provision for repayment".
Mr Brown's victims say the Liberal Democrats were using their stolen money.
Now one of them, Robert Mann, who is already suing the party to get it back, has instructed his lawyers to ask police to investigate whether the party breached the 2002 Proceeds of Crime Act"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8110452.stm
Sir Ian Blair, who as commissioner of the Metropolitan Police was in charge at the time of the London bombings, was paid £580,000 during his final eight months in office, more than double his annual salary, and a pension of £3.5 million. No wonder he was compliant!
Complementary Projection is the act of assuming that others do, think and feel in the same way as you. The Archbishop of Canterbury says the adoption of certain aspects of Sharia law in the UK “seems unavoidable”. He told Radio 4’s World at One on 7th February 2008 that the UK has to “face up to the fact” that some of its citizens do not relate to the British legal system. Dr Williams argues that adopting parts of Islamic Sharia law would help maintain social cohesion. Williams also tried to cover up the exposures of MPs’ expenses. (6)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment....icle6345624.ece
Another who wants to destroy Britain and her people is the Bishop of Hulme, the Rt Rev Stephen Lowe. He said recently that anyone who votes BNP is not a Christian!. (7)
http://www.manchester.anglican.org/news/209/faith-leaders-sign-antibnp-pledge
Lowe also took it upon himself to ban I vow to thee my country from his services for being too nationalistic:
“Honestly, nobody can really, if they read that hymn, sing it in any seriousness anymore.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/3557750.stm
He added that he was raising the issue in the wider context of the “vilification” of foreigners in the media and had noticed it was being sung at “various national occasions”. He was seeing villification of the indigenous population who are vilified in the media IF they stand up for themselves but projecting it.
The Bishops talk as if the BNP operates in a vacuum where no changes and no events ever impel political consequences. They seem to think that their faux-holy response has no foundation in culturally Marxist ideology. But it does: it is all part of their ideology. And what do they really think? Archbishop Murphy-O’Connor tolerated child abuse by priests.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/840594.stm
In reality, hospitality implies that someone needs refuge ... you welcome them ... but after a time they leave. They do not move in or push your own children out. That is not hospitality. That is dispossession.
Certainly the most comic but also the best example of repressed racism was the classic bloomer by famous football manager Ron Atkinson in what is known as a Freudian Slip. On 21 April 2004, he said, “… he (Desailly) is what is known in some schools as a lazy thick nigger”. Transmission in the UK had finished - his comment was broadcast to the Middle East. He also gave up his column for The Guardian “by mutual agreement”. He has no idea why he said it. He believes it was an aberration and that he is not racist, stating that his West Brom side was the first high-profile British club to have a significant number of black players.
Last November, Brown and Mandelson went to Saudi to ask for funding for the IMF and Western economies, and offered them some influence over our affairs. Darling has introduced Sharia banking and the EU have signed “The Barcelona Deal” which gives open immigration into Europe. The consequences are very ugly. Last January thousands of Muslims marched through London and other European cities chanting “Jews to the gas”.
It is important that intelligent young people start looking into what is actually happening - not what we are told is happening. Don’t take my word for it. Look into it.
The quote in that article of Cameron saying we should adapt to Muslims is only different in degree, but not kind, from the submission of Simon Hughes to Muslims. (9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHZYXOm898Q
The traditional elites such as the Archbishop of Canterbury, Judge Butler-Sloss and Stephan Hickman QC are calling for the introduction of Sharia Law. Consider how we are told that Islam is a “Religion of Peace”. Both Tony Blair and Boris Johnson have stated as much. Well, if that’s true, wouldn’t you expect such a force for “goodness” to be evident in culture, and society? But is that the truth of Islamic societies?
Saudi Arabia (Muslim) has a legal system that uses savage penalties. How does a ‘Religion of Peace’ feel about criminals getting their hands chopped off? The protesters who called for death to a cartoonist who drew Mohammed in a way that they saw as offensive. Did Muslims across the world declare that this was in no conceivable way an appropriate response? Were the Muslim “extremists” who in their hundreds called for death to Gillian Gibbons, the teacher working in the Sudan who made the cultural error of permitting a pupil to name a teddy bear “Mohammed”, mere ‘freaks’, totally insane, totally unrepresentative of any version of Islam? In our own country we saw what they really think when they burnt Salman Rushdie’s books.
The Caste behave with studied generosity towards immigrants, and pretend they are harmless. If you cannot face some danger you may well pretend it is harmless, or even not real. If there is a gangster in the area terrorising others you wish it away. Oh, he’s a good bloke ... he doesn’t bother me. It’s a way of putting off catastrophe. And perhaps they will get to like us. Perhaps they will realise that we are nice people. It’s like being so frightened you pretend something is not happening. It is too painful for the elites to acknowledge and would lead to sufficient anguish for them to strike out, blaming us.
The timid rulers have capitulated to everyone from Communists in South Africa and Zimbabwe to Muslims throughout Europe. They can not assert themselves over anyone but their own compliant people. There is a great deal of emasculated masochism bound up with the shame and lack of moral courage of our rulers.
They give overseas aid to countries who don’t need it and pass oppressive laws against their own people. An early example of the state oppressing its own people and privileging foreigners was the the race battles in Notting Hill of 1958. Evil Judge Salmon gave excessive sentences of around 4 years to the young working-class local lad but let the Black youths off.
The 1961 race battles in Dudley were similar. Young men were fearful of losing their jobs to immigrants but even worse, the immigrants were pulling their women while many young locals were away serving their country on national service. The police arrested them and the magistrates punished them just for acting naturally. The state was breaking down the primary instincts of its own menfolk to keep their women and territory!
In his excellent book “The Deculturalisation of the English People”, John Lovejoy told of how, on his return from Australia where he had worked closely with Aborigines, he was horrified to see that his own people were being decultured in the same way (and by the same Globalist forces). The most important factor in a people’s decline is when the men lose their women, and that is what the Caste are doing to us by constantly promoting ethnics. How often in a normal day do we encounter advertisements and other representations of the typical family unit as a Black with a white woman. I urge people to look for themselves and not trust the Caste who are trying to destroy their own people for no better reason than their own underlying fear of other races!
(10)
In the most noble speech ever made in the House of commons Labour MP Frank Tomney explained how his young constituents were persecuted by the elites. Speaking in Cyril Osborne's Immigration (Control) debate HC Deb 05 December 1958 vol 596 cc1552-97
"I do not want to take up too much time, but I have a special consideration to put to the Under-Secretary of State arising out of the race riots in my constituency. Nine young men were arrested. There is no one in the constituency who takes the view that what they did was not wrong, severely wrong, but the sentence they received, boys of 17 years of age, was four years' imprisonment, and there has been considerable feeling in Notting Hill and that neighbourhood against these sentences, and it is still there today, so that even coloured people are going round organising petitions on behalf of those boys.
I wrote a letter on behalf of the parents of those boys to the Home Secretary, asking him to see me about this matter. He replied that it was sub judice and he could not do so. The case was subject to appeal a week ago and the Appeal Bench confirmed the sentences. So far as I know—and I made sure—none of those boys had a previous conviction. Not one of them. It may be that there will be a change of attitude towards this case on the part of the Home Office after time has elapsed. I mention this case only to demonstrate that, despite the fact that there may have been some unsavoury people, some people out looking for trouble, some people out to spread trouble in these areas, there were people who were genuinely concerned about their own position.
I want to refer to an issue which has been put to me. It concerns the Manchester Guardian and some of my constituents. We all know that frequently there is landlord and tenant trouble. We know about the problems that arise between white landlords and coloured tenants, between coloured landlords and white tenants, between coloured landlords and coloured tenants, between English landlords and English tenants, between Irish landlords and English tenants, and between English landlords and tenants from Commonwealth countries.
These are things which are spread by gossip and otherwise through our constituencies. The case I have in mind was a classic one in so far as the Manchester Guardian treated it in a special article. Some of my constituents did not agree with the contents of the article. They sent me a petition on the matter and upon the issue which gave rise to the article. That was all right. I investigated the case personally. I interviewed the coloured family concerned. I interviewed their white tenant, the police, and the neighbours, and I came to the conclusion that the Manchester Guardian article was not right either in fact or in presentation. The tenants in the area wrote to the Manchester Guardian protesting that this was not a true summary of the position and asking the editor to publish their letter. This great Liberal newspaper refused to do it.
These are the things underneath which give rise to feeling. It is not colour, it is not race, it is utter and complete frustration. The Daily Herald first drew attention to this matter when they took up the case and published a leading article headed "Cut it out", which made direct reference to the position in that area. These are responsible people. The tenants have lived in the house for 21 years, but it is understandable that when people from the Commonwealth take a lease they are charged high prices and they must get their money back somehow before the lease runs out.
The result is that we have these cases of crowding more and more people into the available accommodation. Cannot something be done? Surely it is not beyond the guile of a Government Department to frame regulations which provide that where there is a change of tenancy of this character protection can be given to both parties. These are the human things, which have not been mentioned hitherto in this debate, that give rise to these troubles.
To return to the case of the four boys, there are no more loyal people than the Cockneys. They are loyal to our institutions and to the nation, but they are also informed. They read the newspapers and look at television. When they read about comparable cases and find variations in the sentences imposed by the courts they come to think that our law does not provide justice. In one case of alleged rioting which concerned coloured people, one man was sentenced to prison for a year and others were fined. The man who was sentenced to a year's imprisonment had a former conviction in 1948 for shooting a policeman—I will not give his name—and if I know the Public Prosecutor that is a crime with intent to kill. Yet these boys, with no previous convictions, got four years. I do not want to take up too much time, but I have a special consideration to put to the Under-Secretary of State arising out of the race riots in my constituency. Nine young men were arrested. There is no one in the constituency who takes the view that what they did was not wrong, severely wrong, but the sentence they received, boys of 17 years of age, was four years' imprisonment, and there has been considerable feeling in Notting Hill and that neighbourhood against these sentences, and it is still there today, so that even coloured people are going round organising petitions on behalf of those boys.
I wrote a letter on behalf of the parents of those boys to the Home Secretary, asking him to see me about this matter. He replied that it was sub judice and he could not do so. The case was subject to appeal a week ago and the Appeal Bench confirmed the sentences. So far 1594 as I know—and I made sure—none of those boys had a previous conviction. Not one of them. It may be that there will be a change of attitude towards this case on the part of the Home Office after time has elapsed. I mention this case only to demonstrate that, despite the fact that there may have been some unsavoury people, some people out looking for trouble, some people out to spread trouble in these areas, there were people who were genuinely concerned about their own position.
I want to refer to an issue which has been put to me. It concerns the Manchester Guardian and some of my constituents. We all know that frequently there is landlord and tenant trouble. We know about the problems that arise between white landlords and coloured tenants, between coloured landlords and white tenants, between coloured landlords and coloured tenants, between English landlords and English tenants, between Irish landlords and English tenants, and between English landlords and tenants from Commonwealth countries.
These are things which are spread by gossip and otherwise through our constituencies. The case I have in mind was a classic one in so far as the Manchester Guardian treated it in a special article. Some of my constituents did not agree with the contents of the article. They sent me a petition on the matter and upon the issue which gave rise to the article. That was all right. I investigated the case personally. I interviewed the coloured family concerned. I interviewed their white tenant, the police, and the neighbours, and I came to the conclusion that the Manchester Guardian article was not right either in fact or in presentation. The tenants in the area wrote to the Manchester Guardian protesting that this was not a true summary of the position and asking the editor to publish their letter. This great Liberal newspaper refused to do it.
These are the things underneath which give rise to feeling. It is not colour, it is not race, it is utter and complete frustration. The Daily Herald first drew attention to this matter when they took up the case and published a leading article headed "Cut it out", which made direct reference to the position in that area. These are responsible people. The tenants have lived in the house for 21 years, but it is understandable that when people from the Commonwealth take a lease they are charged high prices and they must get their money back somehow before the lease runs out.
The result is that we have these cases of crowding more and more people into the available accommodation. Cannot something be done? Surely it is not beyond the guile of a Government Department to frame regulations which provide that where there is a change of tenancy of this character protection can be given to both parties. These are the human things, which have not been mentioned hitherto in this debate, that give rise to these troubles.
To return to the case of the four boys, there are no more loyal people than the Cockneys. They are loyal to our institutions and to the nation, but they are also informed. They read the newspapers and look at television. When they read about comparable cases and find variations in the sentences imposed by the courts they come to think that our law does not provide justice. In one case of alleged rioting which concerned coloured people, one man was sentenced to prison for a year and others were fined. The man who was sentenced to a year's imprisonment had a former conviction in 1948 for shooting a policeman—I will not give his name—and if I know the Public Prosecutor that is a crime with intent to kill. Yet these boys, with no previous convictions, got four years. I do not want to take up too much time, but I have a special consideration to put to the Under-Secretary of State arising out of the race riots in my constituency. Nine young men were arrested. There is no one in the constituency who takes the view that what they did was not wrong, severely wrong, but the sentence they received, boys of 17 years of age, was four years' imprisonment, and there has been considerable feeling in Notting Hill and that neighbourhood against these sentences, and it is still there today, so that even coloured people are going round organising petitions on behalf of those boys.
I wrote a letter on behalf of the parents of those boys to the Home Secretary, asking him to see me about this matter. He replied that it was sub judice and he could not do so. The case was subject to appeal a week ago and the Appeal Bench confirmed the sentences. So far as I know—and I made sure—none of those boys had a previous conviction. Not one of them. It may be that there will be a change of attitude towards this case on the part of the Home Office after time has elapsed. I mention this case only to demonstrate that, despite the fact that there may have been some unsavoury people, some people out looking for trouble, some people out to spread trouble in these areas, there were people who were genuinely concerned about their own position.
I want to refer to an issue which has been put to me. It concerns the Manchester Guardian and some of my constituents. We all know that frequently there is landlord and tenant trouble. We know about the problems that arise between white landlords and coloured tenants, between coloured landlords and white tenants, between coloured landlords and coloured tenants, between English landlords and English tenants, between Irish landlords and English tenants, and between English landlords and tenants from Commonwealth countries.
These are things which are spread by gossip and otherwise through our constituencies. The case I have in mind was a classic one in so far as the Manchester Guardian treated it in a special article. Some of my constituents did not agree with the contents of the article. They sent me a petition on the matter and upon the issue which gave rise to the article. That was all right. I investigated the case personally. I interviewed the coloured family concerned. I interviewed their white tenant, the police, and the neighbours, and I came to the conclusion that the Manchester Guardian article was not right either in fact or in presentation. The tenants in the area wrote to the Manchester Guardian protesting that this was not a true summary of the position and asking the editor to publish their letter. This great Liberal newspaper refused to do it.
These are the things underneath which give rise to feeling. It is not colour, it is not race, it is utter and complete frustration. The Daily Herald first drew attention to this matter when they took up the case and published a leading article headed "Cut it out", which made direct reference to the position in that area. These are responsible people. The tenants have lived in the house for 21 years, but it is understandable that when people from the Commonwealth take a lease they are charged high prices and they must get their money back somehow before the lease runs out.
The result is that we have these cases of crowding more and more people into the available accommodation. Cannot something be done? Surely it is not beyond the guile of a Government Department to frame regulations which provide that where there is a change of tenancy of this character protection can be given to both parties. These are the human things, which have not been mentioned hitherto in this debate, that give rise to these troubles.
To return to the case of the four boys, there are no more loyal people than the Cockneys. They are loyal to our institutions and to the nation, but they are also informed. They read the newspapers and look at television. When they read about comparable cases and find variations in the sentences imposed by the courts they come to think that our law does not provide justice. In one case of alleged rioting which concerned coloured people, one man was sentenced to prison for a year and others were fined. The man who was sentenced to a year's imprisonment had a former conviction in 1948 for shooting a policeman—I will not give his name—and if I know the Public Prosecutor that is a crime with intent to kill. Yet these boys, with no previous convictions, got four years."
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_P3tAP38GuxI/Sh....h/Scan10074.jpg
The UK is ruled by an ideological caste which is a self-selecting elite that requires total acceptance of the belief-system to advance in life; the practical aspect is a Kleptocracy as they rob the population by deceit and theft from public funds. If you meet that criteria you can fiddle yourself a fortune. Blair’s expenses records have now been accidentally shredded! Opening the door to immigration is a nice, little earner if your wife is a Human Rights lawyer.
They transfer other peoples’ taxes to fellow Kleptocrats in the Third World with whom they are in alliance under the guise of giving to the starving or poor but make little effort to ensure that starving people actually get the aid. These are their two main activities and both utilise a talent for deceit, deception, dissembling and good old-fashioned lying and stealing. They have a common way of thinking and make allowances for themselves.
There is an awakening going on, but the media are still dictating opinion for the mass of people in the soggy centre. Everyone talks of the gutter press, and of their lies and deceit. (1)
(2) http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/maguire/2007/10/bnps-king-harold-claim-is-bonk.html
But people still form their opinions on what the press tells them. The propagandist nature of that is apparent in the dumbing-down that we see in the coverage of politics and areas that the elites want to control, while the analysis on the sports pages of, say, football tactics, or analysis of football managers and their styles, is thoughtful, informative stuff. (2)
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/2....15875-21341228/
It assumes a great deal of both the intelligence and knowledge of the reader. The political coverage, however, treats him as an empty vessel to be filled with filled with foreign thoughts.
How do the establishment and their media deal with people who form their own conclusions from life, and see through the lies told by the media? They ignore our perceptions and argue to the man. They insult the speaker. Why don’t they calmly and reasonably explain why we are wrong? Because our views are natural and traditional and instinctive. They cannot face what they also think deep down, so they project on to us. Those in charge, the “caste”, are the same as us deep down but don’t have to express it because they have good lives in nice areas and exclusive jobs; underneath, they have the same instincts as us and, though cushioned, feel the same shocks. What they do when they feel unease sneaking in is to repress the doubt, and when dark thoughts bubble to the surface they force them to the back of their minds. This tension is barely perceived as it is projected on to us. They see what they cannot face in us, and that is why they never give a reasoned explanation to us. All the press hate the BNP with a passion. When I read their hate I look for sensible points in case there is a real expose, but it is always lies.
The BNP are a genuinely popular movement that recalls Huey Long in the States and Poujade in France, have an opportunity at grassroots level and an enormous opportunity now they have two MEPs.
Griffin has made some inroads into gaining the vote from middle-class voters which should make a lot of difference in the long run. There are a several BNP councillors who own businesses and who, through networking, will probably help to increase the popularity of the party. Maybe that explains part of why the media went to war with them!
What else is it about the BNP that the media hate so much? Is it that its policy is completely different from the norm, thus they attack people who are not like “us”? General dislike of the leaders? Revenge, then? It was the BNP’s Michael Barnbrook who exposed Conservative MP Derek Conway and started the expenses scams ball rolling. Or are the media, like the politicians, scared the BNP will expose them too? The press are, as an institution, liberal-Socialist. Individually they want to keep their jobs so they toe the line. The media put a great deal of money and effort into their Anti-BNP campaign, with every single newspaper and even The Publican, Accountancy Age and Caterer & Housekeeper joining the biased fray!
If not for the internet, the BNP website, blogs etc and the activists on the ground, the party would have been hammered at the ballot box. I can honestly say that I have never seen such a campaign of hatred towards any party, which destroys the media pretence of being fair and unbisased and leads me to suspect that the NUJ is probably still the closed shop that it was back in the 80’s. And I only hope that the claims of vote-rigging aren’t true (though I’m not as naive as to believe that there won’t have been some discussions of vote-rigging going on). It is of profound importance to tackle this bias.
It is built into people like animals to defend our territories, and when they have uncomfortable thoughts or feelings they often project them onto other people, assigning the thoughts or feelings that they cannot face in themselves to an alternative target. Neurotic projection is seeing in others what they find objectionable in themselves and unwanted thoughts, and emotions are ascribed onto another person or people. According to Wade, Tavris (2000) projection occurs when a person’s unacceptable or threatening feelings are repressed and then attributed to someone else.
When the Establishment attacks its rivals it generalises, but even when corruption is widespread amongst the Establishment parties, as with the expenses scandals, it is presented as an individual matter. Although it is clear that the expenses scandal is a matter of the party as a whole, the media, being corrupt, focus on individuals. Party politicians, for their part, try hard not to focus at all. (3)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY3YNW0TFV8
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/articl....in g-No-10.html
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment....icle6445961.ece
http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.co....0-expenses.html
David Cameron acknowledged that many people will be angry at the main parties over the MPs’ expenses, but he urged them not to react by voting for the BNP. Cameron is a civilised and polished man. But he became very angry with a member of the audience at the Bath and West Show in Shepton Mallet, Somerset - and this was an example of when what cannot be faced is projected. The member of the audience argued that the BNP “have a point when it comes to immigration” and Cameron retorted: “If you vote for the BNP you are voting for a bunch of fascists who want to divide this country over the issues of race and the colour of skin.” Cameron told him: “Go and have a look at what the BNP have said. Do not be naive about what these people stand for. “They dress up in a suit and knock on your door in a nice way but they are still Nazi thugs”. Yes, look at what they really stand for and do not trust the media. (4)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....ths- later.html
He told the audience:
“There is a proper national debate that we should have about immigration. I want us to limit the number of people coming to Britain, but do not believe that the way to beat the BNP is to half agree with them.”
He knows full well that debate and honest expression of fears have been suppressed by the Ideological Caste who cannot bear to hear the truth! But what is his hidden agenda?
Cameron revealed the establishment agenda to de-culture as well as dispossess us:
“Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.” (5)
http://www.movinghere.org.uk/galleries/histories/asian/origins/origins.htm
To accelerate the socially-engineering of our society Cameron set up the Conservative Muslim Forum, a sort of Tory equivalent of the National Black Police Association, which ‘advises’ the Conservative Party on how best to assimilate us to Muslims. The CMF wants the compulsory history curriculum in schools changed to give full recognition of the “massive contribution (sic) that Islam has made to the development of Western civilisation”.
His totalitarian response to comments by Patrick Mercer and Nigel Hastilow show what this “freedom” means - persecution of dissidents. But what does he stand for, in his lovely suits?
“There is no domestic or foreign any more. In this world today, we are all in it together.”
He abandoned his constituency in Whitney during severe flooding to visit Rwanda. His view that immigration has benefited Britain “immeasurably”, and we are they “free” and not frightened of being persecuted by the state, would not find an echo in the hearts of the masses. What Cameron really means is that he wants people to be free to say what the Caste wants them to say, and to have control over their lives so that the Caste can manage them in the way they want to.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew....-on-floods.html
Nick Clegg, another member of the Ideological Caste, saw himself staring straight back at him when he looked at the BNP:
“They peddle hate and they don’t actually provide people with hope.”
Hope? If you are hopeful for the future for women in an increasingly Islamicised West, just look at the Despatches programme that was filmed inside Mosques. If you are hopeful for a just life for the native British, just look at how immigrants enter our country without question and officials say nothing. But if we speak we are shut up with the usual insults of “racism”, “xenophobia” and “hate”. In normal, non-Marxised times there are rules of etiquette that govern how we approach others and are approached. The idea that the present vile censorship constitutes hospitality and openness to strangers is utterly false, and just a cover because the Caste are too weak to acknowledge the enormity of what they have done to us.
"Police are investigating money laundering allegations over the Liberal Democrats' acceptance of £2.4m from a donor later convicted of fraud.
Michael Brown's donation hugely boosted the party's 2005 election campaign, the BBC's Newsnight programme said.
Mr Brown was convicted of fraud in 2008 but vanished before being sentenced to seven years in jail last month.
The party said its auditors were "satisfied that we do not need to make provision for repayment".
Mr Brown's victims say the Liberal Democrats were using their stolen money.
Now one of them, Robert Mann, who is already suing the party to get it back, has instructed his lawyers to ask police to investigate whether the party breached the 2002 Proceeds of Crime Act"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8110452.stm
Sir Ian Blair, who as commissioner of the Metropolitan Police was in charge at the time of the London bombings, was paid £580,000 during his final eight months in office, more than double his annual salary, and a pension of £3.5 million. No wonder he was compliant!
Complementary Projection is the act of assuming that others do, think and feel in the same way as you. The Archbishop of Canterbury says the adoption of certain aspects of Sharia law in the UK “seems unavoidable”. He told Radio 4’s World at One on 7th February 2008 that the UK has to “face up to the fact” that some of its citizens do not relate to the British legal system. Dr Williams argues that adopting parts of Islamic Sharia law would help maintain social cohesion. Williams also tried to cover up the exposures of MPs’ expenses. (6)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment....icle6345624.ece
Another who wants to destroy Britain and her people is the Bishop of Hulme, the Rt Rev Stephen Lowe. He said recently that anyone who votes BNP is not a Christian!. (7)
http://www.manchester.anglican.org/news/209/faith-leaders-sign-antibnp-pledge
Lowe also took it upon himself to ban I vow to thee my country from his services for being too nationalistic:
“Honestly, nobody can really, if they read that hymn, sing it in any seriousness anymore.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/3557750.stm
He added that he was raising the issue in the wider context of the “vilification” of foreigners in the media and had noticed it was being sung at “various national occasions”. He was seeing villification of the indigenous population who are vilified in the media IF they stand up for themselves but projecting it.
The Bishops talk as if the BNP operates in a vacuum where no changes and no events ever impel political consequences. They seem to think that their faux-holy response has no foundation in culturally Marxist ideology. But it does: it is all part of their ideology. And what do they really think? Archbishop Murphy-O’Connor tolerated child abuse by priests.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/840594.stm
In reality, hospitality implies that someone needs refuge ... you welcome them ... but after a time they leave. They do not move in or push your own children out. That is not hospitality. That is dispossession.
Certainly the most comic but also the best example of repressed racism was the classic bloomer by famous football manager Ron Atkinson in what is known as a Freudian Slip. On 21 April 2004, he said, “… he (Desailly) is what is known in some schools as a lazy thick nigger”. Transmission in the UK had finished - his comment was broadcast to the Middle East. He also gave up his column for The Guardian “by mutual agreement”. He has no idea why he said it. He believes it was an aberration and that he is not racist, stating that his West Brom side was the first high-profile British club to have a significant number of black players.
Last November, Brown and Mandelson went to Saudi to ask for funding for the IMF and Western economies, and offered them some influence over our affairs. Darling has introduced Sharia banking and the EU have signed “The Barcelona Deal” which gives open immigration into Europe. The consequences are very ugly. Last January thousands of Muslims marched through London and other European cities chanting “Jews to the gas”.
It is important that intelligent young people start looking into what is actually happening - not what we are told is happening. Don’t take my word for it. Look into it.
The quote in that article of Cameron saying we should adapt to Muslims is only different in degree, but not kind, from the submission of Simon Hughes to Muslims. (9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHZYXOm898Q
The traditional elites such as the Archbishop of Canterbury, Judge Butler-Sloss and Stephan Hickman QC are calling for the introduction of Sharia Law. Consider how we are told that Islam is a “Religion of Peace”. Both Tony Blair and Boris Johnson have stated as much. Well, if that’s true, wouldn’t you expect such a force for “goodness” to be evident in culture, and society? But is that the truth of Islamic societies?
Saudi Arabia (Muslim) has a legal system that uses savage penalties. How does a ‘Religion of Peace’ feel about criminals getting their hands chopped off? The protesters who called for death to a cartoonist who drew Mohammed in a way that they saw as offensive. Did Muslims across the world declare that this was in no conceivable way an appropriate response? Were the Muslim “extremists” who in their hundreds called for death to Gillian Gibbons, the teacher working in the Sudan who made the cultural error of permitting a pupil to name a teddy bear “Mohammed”, mere ‘freaks’, totally insane, totally unrepresentative of any version of Islam? In our own country we saw what they really think when they burnt Salman Rushdie’s books.
The Caste behave with studied generosity towards immigrants, and pretend they are harmless. If you cannot face some danger you may well pretend it is harmless, or even not real. If there is a gangster in the area terrorising others you wish it away. Oh, he’s a good bloke ... he doesn’t bother me. It’s a way of putting off catastrophe. And perhaps they will get to like us. Perhaps they will realise that we are nice people. It’s like being so frightened you pretend something is not happening. It is too painful for the elites to acknowledge and would lead to sufficient anguish for them to strike out, blaming us.
The timid rulers have capitulated to everyone from Communists in South Africa and Zimbabwe to Muslims throughout Europe. They can not assert themselves over anyone but their own compliant people. There is a great deal of emasculated masochism bound up with the shame and lack of moral courage of our rulers.
They give overseas aid to countries who don’t need it and pass oppressive laws against their own people. An early example of the state oppressing its own people and privileging foreigners was the the race battles in Notting Hill of 1958. Evil Judge Salmon gave excessive sentences of around 4 years to the young working-class local lad but let the Black youths off.
The 1961 race battles in Dudley were similar. Young men were fearful of losing their jobs to immigrants but even worse, the immigrants were pulling their women while many young locals were away serving their country on national service. The police arrested them and the magistrates punished them just for acting naturally. The state was breaking down the primary instincts of its own menfolk to keep their women and territory!
In his excellent book “The Deculturalisation of the English People”, John Lovejoy told of how, on his return from Australia where he had worked closely with Aborigines, he was horrified to see that his own people were being decultured in the same way (and by the same Globalist forces). The most important factor in a people’s decline is when the men lose their women, and that is what the Caste are doing to us by constantly promoting ethnics. How often in a normal day do we encounter advertisements and other representations of the typical family unit as a Black with a white woman. I urge people to look for themselves and not trust the Caste who are trying to destroy their own people for no better reason than their own underlying fear of other races!
(10)
In the most noble speech ever made in the House of commons Labour MP Frank Tomney explained how his young constituents were persecuted by the elites. Speaking in Cyril Osborne's Immigration (Control) debate HC Deb 05 December 1958 vol 596 cc1552-97
"I do not want to take up too much time, but I have a special consideration to put to the Under-Secretary of State arising out of the race riots in my constituency. Nine young men were arrested. There is no one in the constituency who takes the view that what they did was not wrong, severely wrong, but the sentence they received, boys of 17 years of age, was four years' imprisonment, and there has been considerable feeling in Notting Hill and that neighbourhood against these sentences, and it is still there today, so that even coloured people are going round organising petitions on behalf of those boys.
I wrote a letter on behalf of the parents of those boys to the Home Secretary, asking him to see me about this matter. He replied that it was sub judice and he could not do so. The case was subject to appeal a week ago and the Appeal Bench confirmed the sentences. So far as I know—and I made sure—none of those boys had a previous conviction. Not one of them. It may be that there will be a change of attitude towards this case on the part of the Home Office after time has elapsed. I mention this case only to demonstrate that, despite the fact that there may have been some unsavoury people, some people out looking for trouble, some people out to spread trouble in these areas, there were people who were genuinely concerned about their own position.
I want to refer to an issue which has been put to me. It concerns the Manchester Guardian and some of my constituents. We all know that frequently there is landlord and tenant trouble. We know about the problems that arise between white landlords and coloured tenants, between coloured landlords and white tenants, between coloured landlords and coloured tenants, between English landlords and English tenants, between Irish landlords and English tenants, and between English landlords and tenants from Commonwealth countries.
These are things which are spread by gossip and otherwise through our constituencies. The case I have in mind was a classic one in so far as the Manchester Guardian treated it in a special article. Some of my constituents did not agree with the contents of the article. They sent me a petition on the matter and upon the issue which gave rise to the article. That was all right. I investigated the case personally. I interviewed the coloured family concerned. I interviewed their white tenant, the police, and the neighbours, and I came to the conclusion that the Manchester Guardian article was not right either in fact or in presentation. The tenants in the area wrote to the Manchester Guardian protesting that this was not a true summary of the position and asking the editor to publish their letter. This great Liberal newspaper refused to do it.
These are the things underneath which give rise to feeling. It is not colour, it is not race, it is utter and complete frustration. The Daily Herald first drew attention to this matter when they took up the case and published a leading article headed "Cut it out", which made direct reference to the position in that area. These are responsible people. The tenants have lived in the house for 21 years, but it is understandable that when people from the Commonwealth take a lease they are charged high prices and they must get their money back somehow before the lease runs out.
The result is that we have these cases of crowding more and more people into the available accommodation. Cannot something be done? Surely it is not beyond the guile of a Government Department to frame regulations which provide that where there is a change of tenancy of this character protection can be given to both parties. These are the human things, which have not been mentioned hitherto in this debate, that give rise to these troubles.
To return to the case of the four boys, there are no more loyal people than the Cockneys. They are loyal to our institutions and to the nation, but they are also informed. They read the newspapers and look at television. When they read about comparable cases and find variations in the sentences imposed by the courts they come to think that our law does not provide justice. In one case of alleged rioting which concerned coloured people, one man was sentenced to prison for a year and others were fined. The man who was sentenced to a year's imprisonment had a former conviction in 1948 for shooting a policeman—I will not give his name—and if I know the Public Prosecutor that is a crime with intent to kill. Yet these boys, with no previous convictions, got four years. I do not want to take up too much time, but I have a special consideration to put to the Under-Secretary of State arising out of the race riots in my constituency. Nine young men were arrested. There is no one in the constituency who takes the view that what they did was not wrong, severely wrong, but the sentence they received, boys of 17 years of age, was four years' imprisonment, and there has been considerable feeling in Notting Hill and that neighbourhood against these sentences, and it is still there today, so that even coloured people are going round organising petitions on behalf of those boys.
I wrote a letter on behalf of the parents of those boys to the Home Secretary, asking him to see me about this matter. He replied that it was sub judice and he could not do so. The case was subject to appeal a week ago and the Appeal Bench confirmed the sentences. So far 1594 as I know—and I made sure—none of those boys had a previous conviction. Not one of them. It may be that there will be a change of attitude towards this case on the part of the Home Office after time has elapsed. I mention this case only to demonstrate that, despite the fact that there may have been some unsavoury people, some people out looking for trouble, some people out to spread trouble in these areas, there were people who were genuinely concerned about their own position.
I want to refer to an issue which has been put to me. It concerns the Manchester Guardian and some of my constituents. We all know that frequently there is landlord and tenant trouble. We know about the problems that arise between white landlords and coloured tenants, between coloured landlords and white tenants, between coloured landlords and coloured tenants, between English landlords and English tenants, between Irish landlords and English tenants, and between English landlords and tenants from Commonwealth countries.
These are things which are spread by gossip and otherwise through our constituencies. The case I have in mind was a classic one in so far as the Manchester Guardian treated it in a special article. Some of my constituents did not agree with the contents of the article. They sent me a petition on the matter and upon the issue which gave rise to the article. That was all right. I investigated the case personally. I interviewed the coloured family concerned. I interviewed their white tenant, the police, and the neighbours, and I came to the conclusion that the Manchester Guardian article was not right either in fact or in presentation. The tenants in the area wrote to the Manchester Guardian protesting that this was not a true summary of the position and asking the editor to publish their letter. This great Liberal newspaper refused to do it.
These are the things underneath which give rise to feeling. It is not colour, it is not race, it is utter and complete frustration. The Daily Herald first drew attention to this matter when they took up the case and published a leading article headed "Cut it out", which made direct reference to the position in that area. These are responsible people. The tenants have lived in the house for 21 years, but it is understandable that when people from the Commonwealth take a lease they are charged high prices and they must get their money back somehow before the lease runs out.
The result is that we have these cases of crowding more and more people into the available accommodation. Cannot something be done? Surely it is not beyond the guile of a Government Department to frame regulations which provide that where there is a change of tenancy of this character protection can be given to both parties. These are the human things, which have not been mentioned hitherto in this debate, that give rise to these troubles.
To return to the case of the four boys, there are no more loyal people than the Cockneys. They are loyal to our institutions and to the nation, but they are also informed. They read the newspapers and look at television. When they read about comparable cases and find variations in the sentences imposed by the courts they come to think that our law does not provide justice. In one case of alleged rioting which concerned coloured people, one man was sentenced to prison for a year and others were fined. The man who was sentenced to a year's imprisonment had a former conviction in 1948 for shooting a policeman—I will not give his name—and if I know the Public Prosecutor that is a crime with intent to kill. Yet these boys, with no previous convictions, got four years. I do not want to take up too much time, but I have a special consideration to put to the Under-Secretary of State arising out of the race riots in my constituency. Nine young men were arrested. There is no one in the constituency who takes the view that what they did was not wrong, severely wrong, but the sentence they received, boys of 17 years of age, was four years' imprisonment, and there has been considerable feeling in Notting Hill and that neighbourhood against these sentences, and it is still there today, so that even coloured people are going round organising petitions on behalf of those boys.
I wrote a letter on behalf of the parents of those boys to the Home Secretary, asking him to see me about this matter. He replied that it was sub judice and he could not do so. The case was subject to appeal a week ago and the Appeal Bench confirmed the sentences. So far as I know—and I made sure—none of those boys had a previous conviction. Not one of them. It may be that there will be a change of attitude towards this case on the part of the Home Office after time has elapsed. I mention this case only to demonstrate that, despite the fact that there may have been some unsavoury people, some people out looking for trouble, some people out to spread trouble in these areas, there were people who were genuinely concerned about their own position.
I want to refer to an issue which has been put to me. It concerns the Manchester Guardian and some of my constituents. We all know that frequently there is landlord and tenant trouble. We know about the problems that arise between white landlords and coloured tenants, between coloured landlords and white tenants, between coloured landlords and coloured tenants, between English landlords and English tenants, between Irish landlords and English tenants, and between English landlords and tenants from Commonwealth countries.
These are things which are spread by gossip and otherwise through our constituencies. The case I have in mind was a classic one in so far as the Manchester Guardian treated it in a special article. Some of my constituents did not agree with the contents of the article. They sent me a petition on the matter and upon the issue which gave rise to the article. That was all right. I investigated the case personally. I interviewed the coloured family concerned. I interviewed their white tenant, the police, and the neighbours, and I came to the conclusion that the Manchester Guardian article was not right either in fact or in presentation. The tenants in the area wrote to the Manchester Guardian protesting that this was not a true summary of the position and asking the editor to publish their letter. This great Liberal newspaper refused to do it.
These are the things underneath which give rise to feeling. It is not colour, it is not race, it is utter and complete frustration. The Daily Herald first drew attention to this matter when they took up the case and published a leading article headed "Cut it out", which made direct reference to the position in that area. These are responsible people. The tenants have lived in the house for 21 years, but it is understandable that when people from the Commonwealth take a lease they are charged high prices and they must get their money back somehow before the lease runs out.
The result is that we have these cases of crowding more and more people into the available accommodation. Cannot something be done? Surely it is not beyond the guile of a Government Department to frame regulations which provide that where there is a change of tenancy of this character protection can be given to both parties. These are the human things, which have not been mentioned hitherto in this debate, that give rise to these troubles.
To return to the case of the four boys, there are no more loyal people than the Cockneys. They are loyal to our institutions and to the nation, but they are also informed. They read the newspapers and look at television. When they read about comparable cases and find variations in the sentences imposed by the courts they come to think that our law does not provide justice. In one case of alleged rioting which concerned coloured people, one man was sentenced to prison for a year and others were fined. The man who was sentenced to a year's imprisonment had a former conviction in 1948 for shooting a policeman—I will not give his name—and if I know the Public Prosecutor that is a crime with intent to kill. Yet these boys, with no previous convictions, got four years."
Thursday, 18 June 2009
Conservative Architecture and Planning
Since the end of World War Two, Britain’s towns and cities have been transformed for the benefit of local councils and commerce. Grievous damage was done by Luftwaffe bombs, but the Nazis were outdone in gratuitous destruction by postwar urban planners.
After the war, a sense of shame at our past and achievements became widespread amongst the intelligentsia, and led to an ineluctable weakening of our national identity. Our elites began wittingly and unwittingly to dismantle the very idea of England. Social engineering started to be used in architecture and planning as much as in education and entertainment. Its aim was to change the physical and mental environment, and thereby change people, who were seen as plastic and malleable. The theory was that planned council estates could change people for the better.
Marxism was fashionable and in 1938, Leeds City Council built Quarry Hill Flats to commemorate the Marxist insurrection against the government in Karl Mark Hof, Vienna in 1934. It was the largest housing scheme in the country and used the latest ideas and techniques. The flats had solid fuel ranges, electric lighting, the latest refuse disposal system and communal facilities. (The steel frame and concrete clad construction was faulty, and the flats had to be demolished in 1978.)
Park Hill in Sheffield was another Marxist utopian development. These flats were opened in 1962 and are now listed. They are representative of the “Streets in the Sky” fad. The idea was that of artificial “streets” built outside the front doors of tower block flats. It was envisaged that milk floats would go up in service lifts and on to the ‘streets’, make their deliveries and go back into the service lift and on up to the next floor. (Deliveries were stopped when a child was knocked over and killed by a float.)
In most of these schemes, there was great emphasis on pedestrian movement, as envisaged in Corbusier’s theoretic “Radiant City”or his “Unite” development in Marseilles.
The new town of Skelmersdale was designed to separate vehicles from pedestrians with a system of courtyard layouts and cul-de-sacs emerging off spine streets, which led to disproportionate costs in street cleaning, refuse collection, ground and street furniture maintenance and, particularly, policing. It was built on an old coalfield and around a series of deep clefts in the moor side that go down into the middle of the town, which means that extensive ground remediation and stabilisation was and is required for any construction.
It was built using innovative and experimental techniques – but these were deeply flawed, requiring expensive remedies. Many houses had central heating outlets in the ceiling. The fact that heat rises was ignored, so the bedrooms were heated moderately well but not the downstairs rooms. And it is possible to punch a hand through walls because the houses’ metal frames are corroded and the concrete slabs have collapsed.
Local communities were dispossessed for such gimcrack schemes. The theory was from the Corbusian model of “uniformity in the part, variety in the whole,” which was necessary to produce the “house machine” or “A machine for living in”? This phrase says it all: treating people as machines.
As well as the vague but generic desire to change society, there were more direct motives for such grandiose developments. For example, trade unionists on Sheffield council wanted to create municipal socialism and get back into power (1), by creating a new class of grateful client voters. Businesses also usually preferred to build anew rather than rebuild or restore, as re-development usually offers higher returns than conservation. There were often baser motives. In The History of Halesowen (2004), Julian Hunt relates how in the late 1950s and early ‘60s when the historic town centre was demolished for a concrete shopping centre, three of the local councillors were builders, and a fourth a demolition contractor.
For all these reasons, a plethora of radical new municipal building swept across the country from the 1950s onwards – schools, hospitals, offices, civic centres, entertainment and sports venues, shopping parades, shopping malls, new road schemes and street furniture, apartment tower blocks to house tenants whose ‘slums’ had been bombed or condemned as unfit for habitation. Whole new towns were created, like Stevenage, Corby and Cumbernauld, and historic towns such as Peterborough altered radically by vast, bland and often jerry-built new housing estates for ex-slum-dwellers. These schemes looked exciting in the plans but in practice turned out usually to be ugly, expensive and inefficient. At least some of the ‘slum clearance’ may not have even have necessary. Norman Dennis, told me in private correspondence, that In 1970, “Four out of every ten families living in the 1965-70 clearance areas were very satisfied with their present living conditions, in some areas the proportion was as high as six out of every ten. Two out of three owner-occupiers were not in favour of demolition.” But it went ahead anyway. The ruling mentality was well expressed in 1950 by the Labour minister for Town and Country Planning, Lewis Silkin: “It is necessary to lead the citizen – guide him. The citizen does not always know exactly what is best”.
Hackins Hey, for example, was a quaint by-way in Liverpool with small shops dating from the 18th century. But to planners and councillors it was only history and so it was destroyed overtime for a railway station that was not built. What little remains of Liverpool’s unique character and community spirit is still under threat. In 2005, the government issued a directive to destroy 20,000 habitable homes in Liverpool (and thousands more elsewhere), to be replaced by largely executive-style homes beyond the economic reach of dispossessed locals. Whole Liverpool neighbourhoods are still being flattened and their often unwilling communities compulsorily dispersed.
To see a ruined city, go to Coventry. The bus station is cold, drab, dirty and unwelcoming and just outside there is a piece of modern art to commemorate Frank Mitchell, inventor of the jet engine, that looks like four waste disposal chutes poking up into the air then coming down again. It suffered some of the worst German bombing of the war, as a result of which the word “Coventration” passed into the German language. But after the war, it was still an English medieval town - then the council got to work on it. There are still some outstanding buildings but they are lost in a welter of ugly concrete buildings.
Two plans for redevelopment were submitted: one proposed by the city engineer, E H Ford, would have re-created the old city centre using the existing street lines; the other, the plan of city architect Donald Gibson, was the one adopted. Based on completely new street lines with pedestrian shopping precincts, it was seen as a great opportunity to create an ultra-modern city centre based on entirely new thinking and almost erasing the past. The centre of Coventry had had congestion before the war in its narrow medieval streets and the bombing gave the council an excuse to sweep it all away. The development soon dated and it is now generally regretted that most of the city’s history has been erased, as it is now recognised that history attracts tourists. They could have rebuilt it as it was, as in cities like Budapest.
Exeter was recently voted the most “Cloned” town in England, but before the war it was beautiful, and though wartime bombing hit some excellent buildings they could have been rebuilt on the old plans - but the council had them replaced in the modern style. In 1940 German radio announced, “Exeter was a jewel. We have destroyed it.” They had not. It could easily have been rebuilt.
The City Council commissioned a town-planning consultant, Thomas Sharp, to prepare a redevelopment plan for the reconstruction of the city. The plan was published as “Exeter Phoenix”. Bedford Circus, was damaged, it had been one of the most impressive examples of unified urban 18th century architecture in England but the council destroyed it and Princesshay turned into a pedestrian shopping precinct which was redeveloped again in 2005 into shopping and leisure complex which manages our time. Sharp believed buildings that “will best stand the test of time will be those which show no stylistic tricks at all but which depend for their effect on being clean, well proportioned and honest”. He had it the wrong way round.
Pictures of old Birmingham(England) show a fine Victorian city with buildings like Snow Hill station, which was like a cathedral in its design and detail, The Woodman, a glorious Victorian pub, and the old library to see the wanton destruction so often perpetrated by local authorities. The Bull Ring shopping area was redeveloped in the 1960s, and was so ugly, so unpopular and so badly constructed that it has all just been redeveloped again (not entirely successfully, although it is an improvement). In 1971, Liverpudlian sculptor Arthur Dooley presented a statue of a town planner to Birmingham Council - a little man in pinstriped trousers and a bowler hat with a key in his back. The council no loger have it!
In the 1960s, one Shrewsbury councillor wanted the entire historic town centre dismantled and rebuilt outside the town so a shopping centre could be built in its stead. Thankfully, he was overruled. Yet the council has wasted many fine buildings, such as the beautiful String of Horses pub, which was removed in 1969 to make way for a traffic roundabout. (It was reconstructed at the Avoncroft Museum of Historic Buildings in Bromsgrove.)
In 1968, the 140 year old London Bridge had started to sink into the Thames. Instead of trying to rescue it, the Corporation of London sold it for US$2.5m. American entrepreneur Robert P McCulloch had the bridge dismantled and sent by barge to California, where it was rebuilt at Lake Havasu. Near the bridge is an “English Village” which pays homage to our culture, while here our authorities are destroying it. It has Tudor-style architecture, and the shops and restaurants create the atmosphere of ‘Olde England’, with tree-lined walkways and local breweries for hand-brewed ale.
An example of what our towns and cities could and should be like is Cambridge. It is a human-scale city, where Roman roads and walls can still be seen, along with the Saxon church of St Bene’t’s, the Romanesque Church of the Holy Sepulchre, university buildings from the early 13th century, the awe-inspiring 15/16th century King’s College Chapel and many characterful later houses and cottages, which do not imitate American models or make people feel insignificant. The beautiful, historic buildings give residents not just civic pride, but also a sense of being part of something that transcends themselves, uniting them with something deeper and bigger than the present moment. This respect for architectural tradition, be it noted, runs in parallel with an international reputation not just for academic excellence, but also the cutting-edge technology of Cambridge’s so-called “Silicon Fen”.
In much modern architecture, everything is streamlined - flat surfaces and geometric shapes without the ornamentation that lends character and beauty to so many older buildings. So-called ‘rational’ architecture eschews tradition and local and national vernacular styles and materials, leading to conformity and an artificialism that make people feel out of place. It is impossible to love tower blocks or office buildings built along these lines, or places dominated by such buildings.
This is not just a matter of aesthetics; it is about our very identity, which is the reciprocal relationship between people and the places in which they live. Building on what we have in a similar scale and style maintains continuity and helps to focus culture and identity. National and local governments alike are destroying places that are sanctioned by time and use, where communities have grown up and grown together instinctively.
People’s natural bonding instincts are increasingly thwarted by buildings that separate them from one another and are not physically conducive to developing community spirit - the sense of belonging and of knowing with whom you belong.
Canadian Plains Indians, the Innu, were moved by government into specially built estates. The Innu were effectively forcibly transformed into Canadians, just as Britons are being forcibly transformed into ‘citizens of the world’. Like us, the Innu are having their past erased and are being offered nothing for the future – despair has set in, as it is setting in on Britain’s sink estates. One important difference is that the Innu have been dispossessed by a different ethnic group(Canadian Globalists), whereas we are being dispossessed by our own elected representatives(British Globalists). In many young Innu, their deculturation manifests in drug and alcohol abuse and petty crime. More and more of Britain’s young people are similarly aimless, lacking in self-respect, without tradition or a sense of being part of something. Many of them have likewise started to prey on their own people. There have always been people at the bottom of the pile, but they used to develop within a cultural tradition to which they belonged, albeit peripherally. Most Young people do not misbehave out of endemic wickedness, but because they have been decultured. Thanks to a combination of social, cultural, political and now environmental pressures, many young people in this country have been effectively estranged from Englishness, severed from civilizing structures that their ancestors could take for granted. Buildings need to develop from traditions and renew those traditions with the sense of familiarity to helping civilise young people and minimise the viscious crimes we now have.
Local councillors are only elected by a minority of voters and are not therefore fully representative of the public. We need an office appointed by the Crown like a lord lieutenant with responsibility for protecting communities not factions of it. The Office of the Lord-Lieutenant dates from the 16th Century and has the force of tradition behind it at a time when we are victims of unrestrained change for profit at our communities’ expense.
The Lord Lieutenant is apart from local politics in the County and is interested in all aspects of life - voluntary and business, statutory and social and cultural. This office could be expanded into a Royal representative to appoint local authorities with responsibility for maintaining the continuity of local areas and communities.
DAVID HAMILTON
(2381)
NOTES
1. Farewell to Yorkshire, Roy Hattersley.
See
People and Planning: The Sociology of Housing in Sunderland, Norman Dennis, Faber & Faber, 1970
Planning and Urban Change, S V Ward, Paul Chapman, 1994
After the war, a sense of shame at our past and achievements became widespread amongst the intelligentsia, and led to an ineluctable weakening of our national identity. Our elites began wittingly and unwittingly to dismantle the very idea of England. Social engineering started to be used in architecture and planning as much as in education and entertainment. Its aim was to change the physical and mental environment, and thereby change people, who were seen as plastic and malleable. The theory was that planned council estates could change people for the better.
Marxism was fashionable and in 1938, Leeds City Council built Quarry Hill Flats to commemorate the Marxist insurrection against the government in Karl Mark Hof, Vienna in 1934. It was the largest housing scheme in the country and used the latest ideas and techniques. The flats had solid fuel ranges, electric lighting, the latest refuse disposal system and communal facilities. (The steel frame and concrete clad construction was faulty, and the flats had to be demolished in 1978.)
Park Hill in Sheffield was another Marxist utopian development. These flats were opened in 1962 and are now listed. They are representative of the “Streets in the Sky” fad. The idea was that of artificial “streets” built outside the front doors of tower block flats. It was envisaged that milk floats would go up in service lifts and on to the ‘streets’, make their deliveries and go back into the service lift and on up to the next floor. (Deliveries were stopped when a child was knocked over and killed by a float.)
In most of these schemes, there was great emphasis on pedestrian movement, as envisaged in Corbusier’s theoretic “Radiant City”or his “Unite” development in Marseilles.
The new town of Skelmersdale was designed to separate vehicles from pedestrians with a system of courtyard layouts and cul-de-sacs emerging off spine streets, which led to disproportionate costs in street cleaning, refuse collection, ground and street furniture maintenance and, particularly, policing. It was built on an old coalfield and around a series of deep clefts in the moor side that go down into the middle of the town, which means that extensive ground remediation and stabilisation was and is required for any construction.
It was built using innovative and experimental techniques – but these were deeply flawed, requiring expensive remedies. Many houses had central heating outlets in the ceiling. The fact that heat rises was ignored, so the bedrooms were heated moderately well but not the downstairs rooms. And it is possible to punch a hand through walls because the houses’ metal frames are corroded and the concrete slabs have collapsed.
Local communities were dispossessed for such gimcrack schemes. The theory was from the Corbusian model of “uniformity in the part, variety in the whole,” which was necessary to produce the “house machine” or “A machine for living in”? This phrase says it all: treating people as machines.
As well as the vague but generic desire to change society, there were more direct motives for such grandiose developments. For example, trade unionists on Sheffield council wanted to create municipal socialism and get back into power (1), by creating a new class of grateful client voters. Businesses also usually preferred to build anew rather than rebuild or restore, as re-development usually offers higher returns than conservation. There were often baser motives. In The History of Halesowen (2004), Julian Hunt relates how in the late 1950s and early ‘60s when the historic town centre was demolished for a concrete shopping centre, three of the local councillors were builders, and a fourth a demolition contractor.
For all these reasons, a plethora of radical new municipal building swept across the country from the 1950s onwards – schools, hospitals, offices, civic centres, entertainment and sports venues, shopping parades, shopping malls, new road schemes and street furniture, apartment tower blocks to house tenants whose ‘slums’ had been bombed or condemned as unfit for habitation. Whole new towns were created, like Stevenage, Corby and Cumbernauld, and historic towns such as Peterborough altered radically by vast, bland and often jerry-built new housing estates for ex-slum-dwellers. These schemes looked exciting in the plans but in practice turned out usually to be ugly, expensive and inefficient. At least some of the ‘slum clearance’ may not have even have necessary. Norman Dennis, told me in private correspondence, that In 1970, “Four out of every ten families living in the 1965-70 clearance areas were very satisfied with their present living conditions, in some areas the proportion was as high as six out of every ten. Two out of three owner-occupiers were not in favour of demolition.” But it went ahead anyway. The ruling mentality was well expressed in 1950 by the Labour minister for Town and Country Planning, Lewis Silkin: “It is necessary to lead the citizen – guide him. The citizen does not always know exactly what is best”.
Hackins Hey, for example, was a quaint by-way in Liverpool with small shops dating from the 18th century. But to planners and councillors it was only history and so it was destroyed overtime for a railway station that was not built. What little remains of Liverpool’s unique character and community spirit is still under threat. In 2005, the government issued a directive to destroy 20,000 habitable homes in Liverpool (and thousands more elsewhere), to be replaced by largely executive-style homes beyond the economic reach of dispossessed locals. Whole Liverpool neighbourhoods are still being flattened and their often unwilling communities compulsorily dispersed.
To see a ruined city, go to Coventry. The bus station is cold, drab, dirty and unwelcoming and just outside there is a piece of modern art to commemorate Frank Mitchell, inventor of the jet engine, that looks like four waste disposal chutes poking up into the air then coming down again. It suffered some of the worst German bombing of the war, as a result of which the word “Coventration” passed into the German language. But after the war, it was still an English medieval town - then the council got to work on it. There are still some outstanding buildings but they are lost in a welter of ugly concrete buildings.
Two plans for redevelopment were submitted: one proposed by the city engineer, E H Ford, would have re-created the old city centre using the existing street lines; the other, the plan of city architect Donald Gibson, was the one adopted. Based on completely new street lines with pedestrian shopping precincts, it was seen as a great opportunity to create an ultra-modern city centre based on entirely new thinking and almost erasing the past. The centre of Coventry had had congestion before the war in its narrow medieval streets and the bombing gave the council an excuse to sweep it all away. The development soon dated and it is now generally regretted that most of the city’s history has been erased, as it is now recognised that history attracts tourists. They could have rebuilt it as it was, as in cities like Budapest.
Exeter was recently voted the most “Cloned” town in England, but before the war it was beautiful, and though wartime bombing hit some excellent buildings they could have been rebuilt on the old plans - but the council had them replaced in the modern style. In 1940 German radio announced, “Exeter was a jewel. We have destroyed it.” They had not. It could easily have been rebuilt.
The City Council commissioned a town-planning consultant, Thomas Sharp, to prepare a redevelopment plan for the reconstruction of the city. The plan was published as “Exeter Phoenix”. Bedford Circus, was damaged, it had been one of the most impressive examples of unified urban 18th century architecture in England but the council destroyed it and Princesshay turned into a pedestrian shopping precinct which was redeveloped again in 2005 into shopping and leisure complex which manages our time. Sharp believed buildings that “will best stand the test of time will be those which show no stylistic tricks at all but which depend for their effect on being clean, well proportioned and honest”. He had it the wrong way round.
Pictures of old Birmingham(England) show a fine Victorian city with buildings like Snow Hill station, which was like a cathedral in its design and detail, The Woodman, a glorious Victorian pub, and the old library to see the wanton destruction so often perpetrated by local authorities. The Bull Ring shopping area was redeveloped in the 1960s, and was so ugly, so unpopular and so badly constructed that it has all just been redeveloped again (not entirely successfully, although it is an improvement). In 1971, Liverpudlian sculptor Arthur Dooley presented a statue of a town planner to Birmingham Council - a little man in pinstriped trousers and a bowler hat with a key in his back. The council no loger have it!
In the 1960s, one Shrewsbury councillor wanted the entire historic town centre dismantled and rebuilt outside the town so a shopping centre could be built in its stead. Thankfully, he was overruled. Yet the council has wasted many fine buildings, such as the beautiful String of Horses pub, which was removed in 1969 to make way for a traffic roundabout. (It was reconstructed at the Avoncroft Museum of Historic Buildings in Bromsgrove.)
In 1968, the 140 year old London Bridge had started to sink into the Thames. Instead of trying to rescue it, the Corporation of London sold it for US$2.5m. American entrepreneur Robert P McCulloch had the bridge dismantled and sent by barge to California, where it was rebuilt at Lake Havasu. Near the bridge is an “English Village” which pays homage to our culture, while here our authorities are destroying it. It has Tudor-style architecture, and the shops and restaurants create the atmosphere of ‘Olde England’, with tree-lined walkways and local breweries for hand-brewed ale.
An example of what our towns and cities could and should be like is Cambridge. It is a human-scale city, where Roman roads and walls can still be seen, along with the Saxon church of St Bene’t’s, the Romanesque Church of the Holy Sepulchre, university buildings from the early 13th century, the awe-inspiring 15/16th century King’s College Chapel and many characterful later houses and cottages, which do not imitate American models or make people feel insignificant. The beautiful, historic buildings give residents not just civic pride, but also a sense of being part of something that transcends themselves, uniting them with something deeper and bigger than the present moment. This respect for architectural tradition, be it noted, runs in parallel with an international reputation not just for academic excellence, but also the cutting-edge technology of Cambridge’s so-called “Silicon Fen”.
In much modern architecture, everything is streamlined - flat surfaces and geometric shapes without the ornamentation that lends character and beauty to so many older buildings. So-called ‘rational’ architecture eschews tradition and local and national vernacular styles and materials, leading to conformity and an artificialism that make people feel out of place. It is impossible to love tower blocks or office buildings built along these lines, or places dominated by such buildings.
This is not just a matter of aesthetics; it is about our very identity, which is the reciprocal relationship between people and the places in which they live. Building on what we have in a similar scale and style maintains continuity and helps to focus culture and identity. National and local governments alike are destroying places that are sanctioned by time and use, where communities have grown up and grown together instinctively.
People’s natural bonding instincts are increasingly thwarted by buildings that separate them from one another and are not physically conducive to developing community spirit - the sense of belonging and of knowing with whom you belong.
Canadian Plains Indians, the Innu, were moved by government into specially built estates. The Innu were effectively forcibly transformed into Canadians, just as Britons are being forcibly transformed into ‘citizens of the world’. Like us, the Innu are having their past erased and are being offered nothing for the future – despair has set in, as it is setting in on Britain’s sink estates. One important difference is that the Innu have been dispossessed by a different ethnic group(Canadian Globalists), whereas we are being dispossessed by our own elected representatives(British Globalists). In many young Innu, their deculturation manifests in drug and alcohol abuse and petty crime. More and more of Britain’s young people are similarly aimless, lacking in self-respect, without tradition or a sense of being part of something. Many of them have likewise started to prey on their own people. There have always been people at the bottom of the pile, but they used to develop within a cultural tradition to which they belonged, albeit peripherally. Most Young people do not misbehave out of endemic wickedness, but because they have been decultured. Thanks to a combination of social, cultural, political and now environmental pressures, many young people in this country have been effectively estranged from Englishness, severed from civilizing structures that their ancestors could take for granted. Buildings need to develop from traditions and renew those traditions with the sense of familiarity to helping civilise young people and minimise the viscious crimes we now have.
Local councillors are only elected by a minority of voters and are not therefore fully representative of the public. We need an office appointed by the Crown like a lord lieutenant with responsibility for protecting communities not factions of it. The Office of the Lord-Lieutenant dates from the 16th Century and has the force of tradition behind it at a time when we are victims of unrestrained change for profit at our communities’ expense.
The Lord Lieutenant is apart from local politics in the County and is interested in all aspects of life - voluntary and business, statutory and social and cultural. This office could be expanded into a Royal representative to appoint local authorities with responsibility for maintaining the continuity of local areas and communities.
DAVID HAMILTON
(2381)
NOTES
1. Farewell to Yorkshire, Roy Hattersley.
See
People and Planning: The Sociology of Housing in Sunderland, Norman Dennis, Faber & Faber, 1970
Planning and Urban Change, S V Ward, Paul Chapman, 1994
Tuesday, 2 June 2009
Facing Reality and Making Tough Decisions
The British ruling class changed after the Second World War, becoming obsessed with an ideology of sensitivity towards the Third World and their posture of white man on top was discarded. The humiliation over Suez put the lid on it as the debacle showed us as weak and no longer a top nation. We need to understand how our foolish “Caste” think and to ask ourselves if we are betraying young people.
The events that led to the tragedy facing us now were dictated by - weakness, sentimentality and surrender which were presented as moral superiority, dressed up in high-mindedness. The tougher ones used it as a screen for the exploitation of cheap imported labour to make profits by keeping costs down. At the same time they think that when immigrants take over our culture will continue!
The old British ruling class had introduced minorities into several countries for commercial reasons and if contemporary elites had anything about them thy would see from history that immigration leads to racial war. They introduced Tamils into Ceylon (Sri Lanka) for rubber and saddled the Singalese with a race war. They spoke a different language and had a different religion from the natives. It was similar in Malaya were the ruling class introduced Chinese, then Tamils, while in Guyana they introduced Indians. It happened too in Fiji when the ruling class imported Indians to cut sugar cane.
Around 50 years ago little more than half of the population was Malay and the racial differences showed themselves in the Malays being pushed out as the Chinese were more successful at commerce and gravitated to the cities while the Malays lived in the country. There had to be laws introduced to protect the Malays.
Henry “Chips” Channon, wrote in his diary for 12th May 1948 “... I fear that England is on the decline, and that we shall dwindle for a generation or so. We are a tired race and our genius seems dead.” There was appeasement of the Nazis in the 30s and appeasement of immigrants since the 50s.
The elites became frightened of the world and needed to join larger bodies for protection The League of Nations was seen as a vehicle for morality rather than power and the national -interest. They renounced the Balance of Power for the moral superiority of the League. The began disarming while there was a potential threat from Nazi Germany and we were the most powerful nation. Since the second War its been the Commonwealth, the EU and ultimately World Government and for Socialists, even the Soviet Union.
There was racial conflict from the beginning of mass immigration and the rulers avoided facing it by making scapegoats of the British people. This blaming their own people is part of the multi-racialist outlook and endures still.
In 1948 between 31 July and 2 August in Liverpool, in Deptford on the 18th July; and Birmingham between the 6th and 8th of August 1949 but the idealists ignored them as they had in 1919 when after the racial battles in Liverpool and Cardiff Lord Milner wrote in a Memorandum of June 23rd, On the Repatriation of Coloured Men: ”I have every reason to fear, that when we get these men back to their own colonies they might be tempted to revenge themselves on the white minorities there…” (1) Milner’s high-minded comment on Britain ruling Egypt is telling:” It is a force making for the triumph of the simplest ideas of honesty, humanity, and justice...If Egyptian prosperity is a British interest so is Egyptian independence...”
They failed to keep power by being the centre of the Commonwealth and adopted a fawning attitude to them. It is thought that immigration was caused by the 1948 British Nationality Act. In fact there had never been restrictions because Commonwealth citizens were legally British subjects. However, it was one-sided as we could not just immigrate into their countries.
Oliver Lyttleton (later Lord Chandos), Secretary of State for the Colonies, 1951-53, made a list of the restrictions Commonwealth countries imposed on Britons. They refused “persons who are likely to become a public charge,” “illiterates”, those deemed “undesirable” had “unsuitable standards or habits of life;” many had quota systems and dictation tests. Jamaica prohibited those likely “to become a charge on public funds by reason of infirmity of body or mind or ill-health or who is not in possession of sufficient means to support himself or such of his dependants as he shall bring with him to the island”. Thirty–nine territories had entry permit systems or required prospective residents to first obtain permission.
In Eminent Churchillians Andrew Roberts reports that Commonwealth Secretary Lord Home (later PM), worried that they should not give the impression that Commonwealth citizens from India, Pakistan and Ceylon would be less favourably treated than those from the Dominions otherwise there could be retaliation. Robert’s interviews show the decadence of the rulers in the 1950s: “A Minister closely involved in the decision-making process, ‘ In fact…we were just stalling and hoping for the best’… One of Mr. Churchill’s private secretaries, ‘at that time it seemed a very good idea to get bus conductors and stuff’ … a junior minister, ‘it was becoming hard to find somebody to carry your bags at the station’
In 1955 Conservative MP Cyril Osborne tried to introduce a Bill to control immigration but was not successful. The Spectator of 4th February commented: “This will save the Government the duty of facing the facts.”
The government gave no practical support, leaving it to local councils and voluntary organizations. There were many representations from local councils to the Government; slum clearance was held back; immigration was under constant and secret discussion at Cabinet level but apart from Churchill’s attempt in 1955 to have a Bill for controls drawn up but having to retire because of his health, no other could take decisive action.
In August 1958 senior police officers dismissed the Notting Hill race battle as “...ruffians, both coloured and white, out for hooliganism.” However, the files show that there were mobs of 300-400 shouting “Keep Britain White” who fought large mobs of “youths of colour.” Coincidentally, “Keep England White” is the slogan Churchill wanted the Conservative party to use for the 1955 general election.
People are realising that the main parties, the media, academics and corporations are enemies promoting policies that are destroying them; that, far from representing us, they are against us. They and those who still follow them effect moral superiority, while we are lectured on our wickedness because we object to our communities being destroyed by being used as dumping ground for immigrants when the Ideological Caste themselves have 2 homes in posh areas or beautiful village and the recent revelations of their expenses scams has disgusted the whole nation.
The young are given no sense of cultural legacy, but taught what races we wronged and who to apologise to. As long as the state controls education and the parents abdicate their responsibilities the decline will continue. We have to face up to the fact that we are letting them do this to us. Would asylum seekers take the risks to get here if they were not so privileged?
Rulers are paralysed by fear of immigrants but tell themselves it is virtue - tolerance, absence of prejudice, we are all coming together in the brotherhood of man! They pretend the immigrants are assimilating. Its as if they boarded an airplane and left their ways behind like shedding a skin and arrived here waiting to be moulded into Brits!
Those who express, or are suspected of holding, unauthorized opinions never get a job in an Establishment position because they are "racists" or "haters." The result is an “Ideological caste” purged of independent thought and consisting solely of drones, and followers. They talk like mindless robots - sexism, homophobia, racism, hate speech. The education system filters dissidents, preventing them getting qualified. Malcolm Bradbury made it clear in “The History Man” that those labelled “right-wing” are marked down.
Everyone with a public profile is a hundred percent on message because of the "aspirational" adoption of elite orthodoxy by the middle class. "To be a progressive is to be elite". This is why it is an “Ideological Caste” - you can only belong if you submit, and you have no career if you think for yourself.
Nature abhors a vacuum and others take control: In August 2008 David Cameron had private talks with Murdoch as did Blair before becoming PM. I recall Mathew Paris stating on TV that Murdoch closed the Today newspaper to change The Sun from promoting the Tories to promoting Blair's Labour.
In one of his Talk Sport programmes, historian David Starkey criticised journalists and asked why none had the guts to tell us what Blair and Murdoch discussed at their private meeting. Murdoch should never have been allowed to take over The Times because of the Monopolies Commission but it was got through Parliament by Tory John Biffen. I assume at that time Murdoch supported the Tories!
If ever you wonder why Lord Archer was grassed up years after the event, remember his novel based on the lives of Murdoch and Maxwell. Maxwell was not exposed by intrepid journalists until he had died and stories of corruption were coming out. Journalists know about these things but keep them quiet until they need to control or destroy someone. They will have known about the expenses for ages but are bringing it out now for reasons that are not yet clear,possibly to present Cameron as a moral force to clean up.
The elites are afraid to listen to other opinions and face the harsh reality and this is leading to anti-Semitism as they grovel for oil and finance for Western banking.
Sin is no longer wrong behaviour but wrong thinking - those who err are persecuted and subject to public humiliation. Churchill was pushed into “the wilderness” by the establishment during a national crisis and Enoch was sacked from the Shadow Cabinet. For writing that “Enoch was right” prospective Halesowen Conservative candidate Nigel Hastilow had to stand down and local councillor Ken Turner claimed he was rejected because he is not Black!
Frank Ellis, was persecuted by the University of Leeds, for calling for “Humane repatriation of immigrants”, Talk Sport presenter Ian Collins shouted at him, “Your’e mad!” A couple of years earlier Collins screamed abuse at an elderly lady on his programme but Ofcom would not investigate. Adverts for his programme were later broadcast joking about him insulting elderly ladies! It's now alright to scream abuse at our elderly, but if you say anything about immigrants you must be mad!
Comedians have been dropped to stop them influencing the public - Hughie Greene, Jim Davidson and the massively popular Benny Hill. had his TV series cancelled. While the right sort of people like Ben Elton and Lenny Henry are promoted.
When it comes to different ethnic groups otherwise rational people become sentimental and weak. Its like a woman on seeing a baby or a child talking to its pet. When immigrants are presented they go to pieces in a girly sentimentality that has caused us to pretend invaders are coming to improve our culture and look after the sick and elderly!
It is like a family writ large. Sometimes one is despised and does not get the care that makes one feel worthy. I knew of an elder girl who was not favoured but the young one and son were. Her mother criticised her appearance which made her depressive. With fostering there is a danger that the parents will pay them attention leaving their own out and making them feel less worthy. This is what is causing immoral behaviour and a giving up amongst our working classes who are neglected for immigrants.
I listened to the debate at the Radio Academy of Nick Griffin and Abu Hamza. One particularly pompous journo asked Griffin:”Don’t you think people should be treated equally?". They don’t treat us equally! The positions of the “caste” are assumptions - they never justify their views while we are effectively put on media trial. I suppose they convince themselves they are righting wrongs, and redressing the balance, by showing us in a bad light and the ethnics as always competent and worthy. They habitually describe them as intelligent. We don’t talk about white people like this: “Charles Murray the intelligent social scientist,” but they do of ethnics and people start to wonder why it has to be emphasised.
Meanwhile television is telling us to feel sympathy for immigrants and how ill-used they have been. They boost others up but put us down. The neglect is psychological and subliminal. We are left out of adverts as the typical unit is portrayed as a black with a white woman.
Things come out in bits and we have to put them together as bits are usually in a little report tucked away in a newspaper.
The rulers have thrown in the towel and accepted that they can not stop immigrants taking over our homeland apart from keep us oppressed. It was stated by a former television employee in the Birmingham Post that we must be prepared for when immigrants become a majority.
Former Swedish PM Jens Orback stated Swedes must be nice to Muslims so they will be nice to us when they take over! To see where fawning on immigrants gets, the Muslim terrorists are the grandchildren of people our elites praised. If they slipped up in their restaurants like serving Kit E Kat in the curry it was assumed that they didn’t know any better but we would bring them up and they would become like us but instead they are making constant threats of violence and domination against us. Like a conquered people we are broken down by the elites so that immigrants can take over.
But why assume dominant immigrants would treat our children well? They are human like us and likely to treat us badly as they were treated under the Empire. In fact many quotations from preachers in mosques make it clear what they intend to do to our children. For elites to leave our children to be bullied and persecuted by new Muslim rulers shows what evil people they are.
Paradoxically, the elites think our culture is so powerful that the newcomers will imitate us. The unrecognised implication is that they are inferior. When they apply to open a Mosque the authorities think it is something harmless, like a local church. They hide in the comforting illusion that Islam is “a religion of peace.” But underneath the rulers are capitulating, betraying us to an enemy who will visit vengeance on our next generations for wrongs committed by these same rulers who invaded their homelands in Iraq and Afghanistan in an unjustified invasion and bombed their women and children! They see to imagine that they can make these countries Western and bring everyone here!
There is a pretence that the British Muslims against us are a tiny minority but its not a half-a-dozen chaps who happen to bump into each other fortuitously and think “Oh, lets plant some bombs!” They all share the goal of Muslim domination if not the methods.
The authorities can not face it when they plant a bomb so ask their neighbours leading questions then pretend how much they had integrated and how he loved fish and chips. They gather endless statistics on the widespread support for terrorism but can’t face them.
When the “Ideological Caste” discuss the multi-racial society they never give examples of the results but name someone they know or sports personalities; when we cite examples like Luton, (3) they do not prove us wrong with debate but slander us because they are afraid of facing things and our exposing reality frightens them. There is no attempt to be honest - they have closed minds.
We are given semi-psychiatric labels for our recalcitrance – prejudice, paranoia, living in the past, irrational. We have been labelled and do not need explaining. We are having a false identities imposed on us and internalising the negativity. For example, what is “racist” about wanting our own communities? What is racist about keeping jobs and homes for our own children?
The orthodoxy is dissolving and we face chaos or totalitarian holding measures, in this time of great change. We must ask ourselves some important questions. What future are we leaving for our next generations? In twenty years what will our children and grandchildren have?
We have a duty to our children and their children as they in turn will have to theirs and we owe a debt to our ancestors who bequeath our nation and culture to us and must honour that. The honouring is in maintaining what they left to us and the duty is in passing it on to our descendents. In the wise words of general George S.Patton:” "All men are afraid in battle. The coward is the one who lets his fear overcome his sense of duty. Duty is the essence of manhood.”
The elites have caused a human tragedy. We have terrible choices and must make tough decisions. Most people have friends, colleagues and relations from other ethnic groups but now have to ask ourselves: “can we allow our future generations to whom we owe a duty to be pushed out of jobs, homes, and college places in their own country?” Look at statistics from ONS which don’t take into account the births to mothers born here and then look at your children and ask” am I betraying them? Where will they live and work?” We have tough decisions to make. (4)
(1) For the weakening of the old ruling class see Correlli Barnett's "Collapse of British Power". I can't recommend it enough.
On behind the scenes machinations see Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley, who was praised by Bill Clinton in his inaugural speech.
http://radiobergen.org/powergame/tragedy.html
(2)Panikos Paranyi (ed) “Racial Violence in Britain in the Nineteenth Century.” (Leicester University.1996).
(3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJDs0F1Cn8A
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/mar/10/two-arrested-army-protest-luton
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/mar/11/muslim-group-anti-war-protests
http://keeptonyblairforpm.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/anjem-choudary-on-protest-at-luton-troopsshould-hate-speech-be-banned/
(4)
Mark Steyn on demographic domination - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlkEYoKC-kA
http://www.panos.org.uk/?lid=27193
The events that led to the tragedy facing us now were dictated by - weakness, sentimentality and surrender which were presented as moral superiority, dressed up in high-mindedness. The tougher ones used it as a screen for the exploitation of cheap imported labour to make profits by keeping costs down. At the same time they think that when immigrants take over our culture will continue!
The old British ruling class had introduced minorities into several countries for commercial reasons and if contemporary elites had anything about them thy would see from history that immigration leads to racial war. They introduced Tamils into Ceylon (Sri Lanka) for rubber and saddled the Singalese with a race war. They spoke a different language and had a different religion from the natives. It was similar in Malaya were the ruling class introduced Chinese, then Tamils, while in Guyana they introduced Indians. It happened too in Fiji when the ruling class imported Indians to cut sugar cane.
Around 50 years ago little more than half of the population was Malay and the racial differences showed themselves in the Malays being pushed out as the Chinese were more successful at commerce and gravitated to the cities while the Malays lived in the country. There had to be laws introduced to protect the Malays.
Henry “Chips” Channon, wrote in his diary for 12th May 1948 “... I fear that England is on the decline, and that we shall dwindle for a generation or so. We are a tired race and our genius seems dead.” There was appeasement of the Nazis in the 30s and appeasement of immigrants since the 50s.
The elites became frightened of the world and needed to join larger bodies for protection The League of Nations was seen as a vehicle for morality rather than power and the national -interest. They renounced the Balance of Power for the moral superiority of the League. The began disarming while there was a potential threat from Nazi Germany and we were the most powerful nation. Since the second War its been the Commonwealth, the EU and ultimately World Government and for Socialists, even the Soviet Union.
There was racial conflict from the beginning of mass immigration and the rulers avoided facing it by making scapegoats of the British people. This blaming their own people is part of the multi-racialist outlook and endures still.
In 1948 between 31 July and 2 August in Liverpool, in Deptford on the 18th July; and Birmingham between the 6th and 8th of August 1949 but the idealists ignored them as they had in 1919 when after the racial battles in Liverpool and Cardiff Lord Milner wrote in a Memorandum of June 23rd, On the Repatriation of Coloured Men: ”I have every reason to fear, that when we get these men back to their own colonies they might be tempted to revenge themselves on the white minorities there…” (1) Milner’s high-minded comment on Britain ruling Egypt is telling:” It is a force making for the triumph of the simplest ideas of honesty, humanity, and justice...If Egyptian prosperity is a British interest so is Egyptian independence...”
They failed to keep power by being the centre of the Commonwealth and adopted a fawning attitude to them. It is thought that immigration was caused by the 1948 British Nationality Act. In fact there had never been restrictions because Commonwealth citizens were legally British subjects. However, it was one-sided as we could not just immigrate into their countries.
Oliver Lyttleton (later Lord Chandos), Secretary of State for the Colonies, 1951-53, made a list of the restrictions Commonwealth countries imposed on Britons. They refused “persons who are likely to become a public charge,” “illiterates”, those deemed “undesirable” had “unsuitable standards or habits of life;” many had quota systems and dictation tests. Jamaica prohibited those likely “to become a charge on public funds by reason of infirmity of body or mind or ill-health or who is not in possession of sufficient means to support himself or such of his dependants as he shall bring with him to the island”. Thirty–nine territories had entry permit systems or required prospective residents to first obtain permission.
In Eminent Churchillians Andrew Roberts reports that Commonwealth Secretary Lord Home (later PM), worried that they should not give the impression that Commonwealth citizens from India, Pakistan and Ceylon would be less favourably treated than those from the Dominions otherwise there could be retaliation. Robert’s interviews show the decadence of the rulers in the 1950s: “A Minister closely involved in the decision-making process, ‘ In fact…we were just stalling and hoping for the best’… One of Mr. Churchill’s private secretaries, ‘at that time it seemed a very good idea to get bus conductors and stuff’ … a junior minister, ‘it was becoming hard to find somebody to carry your bags at the station’
In 1955 Conservative MP Cyril Osborne tried to introduce a Bill to control immigration but was not successful. The Spectator of 4th February commented: “This will save the Government the duty of facing the facts.”
The government gave no practical support, leaving it to local councils and voluntary organizations. There were many representations from local councils to the Government; slum clearance was held back; immigration was under constant and secret discussion at Cabinet level but apart from Churchill’s attempt in 1955 to have a Bill for controls drawn up but having to retire because of his health, no other could take decisive action.
In August 1958 senior police officers dismissed the Notting Hill race battle as “...ruffians, both coloured and white, out for hooliganism.” However, the files show that there were mobs of 300-400 shouting “Keep Britain White” who fought large mobs of “youths of colour.” Coincidentally, “Keep England White” is the slogan Churchill wanted the Conservative party to use for the 1955 general election.
People are realising that the main parties, the media, academics and corporations are enemies promoting policies that are destroying them; that, far from representing us, they are against us. They and those who still follow them effect moral superiority, while we are lectured on our wickedness because we object to our communities being destroyed by being used as dumping ground for immigrants when the Ideological Caste themselves have 2 homes in posh areas or beautiful village and the recent revelations of their expenses scams has disgusted the whole nation.
The young are given no sense of cultural legacy, but taught what races we wronged and who to apologise to. As long as the state controls education and the parents abdicate their responsibilities the decline will continue. We have to face up to the fact that we are letting them do this to us. Would asylum seekers take the risks to get here if they were not so privileged?
Rulers are paralysed by fear of immigrants but tell themselves it is virtue - tolerance, absence of prejudice, we are all coming together in the brotherhood of man! They pretend the immigrants are assimilating. Its as if they boarded an airplane and left their ways behind like shedding a skin and arrived here waiting to be moulded into Brits!
Those who express, or are suspected of holding, unauthorized opinions never get a job in an Establishment position because they are "racists" or "haters." The result is an “Ideological caste” purged of independent thought and consisting solely of drones, and followers. They talk like mindless robots - sexism, homophobia, racism, hate speech. The education system filters dissidents, preventing them getting qualified. Malcolm Bradbury made it clear in “The History Man” that those labelled “right-wing” are marked down.
Everyone with a public profile is a hundred percent on message because of the "aspirational" adoption of elite orthodoxy by the middle class. "To be a progressive is to be elite". This is why it is an “Ideological Caste” - you can only belong if you submit, and you have no career if you think for yourself.
Nature abhors a vacuum and others take control: In August 2008 David Cameron had private talks with Murdoch as did Blair before becoming PM. I recall Mathew Paris stating on TV that Murdoch closed the Today newspaper to change The Sun from promoting the Tories to promoting Blair's Labour.
In one of his Talk Sport programmes, historian David Starkey criticised journalists and asked why none had the guts to tell us what Blair and Murdoch discussed at their private meeting. Murdoch should never have been allowed to take over The Times because of the Monopolies Commission but it was got through Parliament by Tory John Biffen. I assume at that time Murdoch supported the Tories!
If ever you wonder why Lord Archer was grassed up years after the event, remember his novel based on the lives of Murdoch and Maxwell. Maxwell was not exposed by intrepid journalists until he had died and stories of corruption were coming out. Journalists know about these things but keep them quiet until they need to control or destroy someone. They will have known about the expenses for ages but are bringing it out now for reasons that are not yet clear,possibly to present Cameron as a moral force to clean up.
The elites are afraid to listen to other opinions and face the harsh reality and this is leading to anti-Semitism as they grovel for oil and finance for Western banking.
Sin is no longer wrong behaviour but wrong thinking - those who err are persecuted and subject to public humiliation. Churchill was pushed into “the wilderness” by the establishment during a national crisis and Enoch was sacked from the Shadow Cabinet. For writing that “Enoch was right” prospective Halesowen Conservative candidate Nigel Hastilow had to stand down and local councillor Ken Turner claimed he was rejected because he is not Black!
Frank Ellis, was persecuted by the University of Leeds, for calling for “Humane repatriation of immigrants”, Talk Sport presenter Ian Collins shouted at him, “Your’e mad!” A couple of years earlier Collins screamed abuse at an elderly lady on his programme but Ofcom would not investigate. Adverts for his programme were later broadcast joking about him insulting elderly ladies! It's now alright to scream abuse at our elderly, but if you say anything about immigrants you must be mad!
Comedians have been dropped to stop them influencing the public - Hughie Greene, Jim Davidson and the massively popular Benny Hill. had his TV series cancelled. While the right sort of people like Ben Elton and Lenny Henry are promoted.
When it comes to different ethnic groups otherwise rational people become sentimental and weak. Its like a woman on seeing a baby or a child talking to its pet. When immigrants are presented they go to pieces in a girly sentimentality that has caused us to pretend invaders are coming to improve our culture and look after the sick and elderly!
It is like a family writ large. Sometimes one is despised and does not get the care that makes one feel worthy. I knew of an elder girl who was not favoured but the young one and son were. Her mother criticised her appearance which made her depressive. With fostering there is a danger that the parents will pay them attention leaving their own out and making them feel less worthy. This is what is causing immoral behaviour and a giving up amongst our working classes who are neglected for immigrants.
I listened to the debate at the Radio Academy of Nick Griffin and Abu Hamza. One particularly pompous journo asked Griffin:”Don’t you think people should be treated equally?". They don’t treat us equally! The positions of the “caste” are assumptions - they never justify their views while we are effectively put on media trial. I suppose they convince themselves they are righting wrongs, and redressing the balance, by showing us in a bad light and the ethnics as always competent and worthy. They habitually describe them as intelligent. We don’t talk about white people like this: “Charles Murray the intelligent social scientist,” but they do of ethnics and people start to wonder why it has to be emphasised.
Meanwhile television is telling us to feel sympathy for immigrants and how ill-used they have been. They boost others up but put us down. The neglect is psychological and subliminal. We are left out of adverts as the typical unit is portrayed as a black with a white woman.
Things come out in bits and we have to put them together as bits are usually in a little report tucked away in a newspaper.
The rulers have thrown in the towel and accepted that they can not stop immigrants taking over our homeland apart from keep us oppressed. It was stated by a former television employee in the Birmingham Post that we must be prepared for when immigrants become a majority.
Former Swedish PM Jens Orback stated Swedes must be nice to Muslims so they will be nice to us when they take over! To see where fawning on immigrants gets, the Muslim terrorists are the grandchildren of people our elites praised. If they slipped up in their restaurants like serving Kit E Kat in the curry it was assumed that they didn’t know any better but we would bring them up and they would become like us but instead they are making constant threats of violence and domination against us. Like a conquered people we are broken down by the elites so that immigrants can take over.
But why assume dominant immigrants would treat our children well? They are human like us and likely to treat us badly as they were treated under the Empire. In fact many quotations from preachers in mosques make it clear what they intend to do to our children. For elites to leave our children to be bullied and persecuted by new Muslim rulers shows what evil people they are.
Paradoxically, the elites think our culture is so powerful that the newcomers will imitate us. The unrecognised implication is that they are inferior. When they apply to open a Mosque the authorities think it is something harmless, like a local church. They hide in the comforting illusion that Islam is “a religion of peace.” But underneath the rulers are capitulating, betraying us to an enemy who will visit vengeance on our next generations for wrongs committed by these same rulers who invaded their homelands in Iraq and Afghanistan in an unjustified invasion and bombed their women and children! They see to imagine that they can make these countries Western and bring everyone here!
There is a pretence that the British Muslims against us are a tiny minority but its not a half-a-dozen chaps who happen to bump into each other fortuitously and think “Oh, lets plant some bombs!” They all share the goal of Muslim domination if not the methods.
The authorities can not face it when they plant a bomb so ask their neighbours leading questions then pretend how much they had integrated and how he loved fish and chips. They gather endless statistics on the widespread support for terrorism but can’t face them.
When the “Ideological Caste” discuss the multi-racial society they never give examples of the results but name someone they know or sports personalities; when we cite examples like Luton, (3) they do not prove us wrong with debate but slander us because they are afraid of facing things and our exposing reality frightens them. There is no attempt to be honest - they have closed minds.
We are given semi-psychiatric labels for our recalcitrance – prejudice, paranoia, living in the past, irrational. We have been labelled and do not need explaining. We are having a false identities imposed on us and internalising the negativity. For example, what is “racist” about wanting our own communities? What is racist about keeping jobs and homes for our own children?
The orthodoxy is dissolving and we face chaos or totalitarian holding measures, in this time of great change. We must ask ourselves some important questions. What future are we leaving for our next generations? In twenty years what will our children and grandchildren have?
We have a duty to our children and their children as they in turn will have to theirs and we owe a debt to our ancestors who bequeath our nation and culture to us and must honour that. The honouring is in maintaining what they left to us and the duty is in passing it on to our descendents. In the wise words of general George S.Patton:” "All men are afraid in battle. The coward is the one who lets his fear overcome his sense of duty. Duty is the essence of manhood.”
The elites have caused a human tragedy. We have terrible choices and must make tough decisions. Most people have friends, colleagues and relations from other ethnic groups but now have to ask ourselves: “can we allow our future generations to whom we owe a duty to be pushed out of jobs, homes, and college places in their own country?” Look at statistics from ONS which don’t take into account the births to mothers born here and then look at your children and ask” am I betraying them? Where will they live and work?” We have tough decisions to make. (4)
(1) For the weakening of the old ruling class see Correlli Barnett's "Collapse of British Power". I can't recommend it enough.
On behind the scenes machinations see Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley, who was praised by Bill Clinton in his inaugural speech.
http://radiobergen.org/powergame/tragedy.html
(2)Panikos Paranyi (ed) “Racial Violence in Britain in the Nineteenth Century.” (Leicester University.1996).
(3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJDs0F1Cn8A
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/mar/10/two-arrested-army-protest-luton
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/mar/11/muslim-group-anti-war-protests
http://keeptonyblairforpm.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/anjem-choudary-on-protest-at-luton-troopsshould-hate-speech-be-banned/
(4)
Mark Steyn on demographic domination - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlkEYoKC-kA
http://www.panos.org.uk/?lid=27193
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
